Skip to main content
Log in

Exhausting Life

  • Published:
The Journal of Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Can we render death harmless to us by perfecting life, as the ancient Epicureans and Stoics seemed to think? It might seem so, for after we perfect life—assuming we can—persisting would not make life any better. Dying earlier rather than later would shorten life, but a longer perfect life is no better than a shorter perfect life, so dying would take nothing of value from us. However, after sketching what perfecting life might entail, I will argue that it is not a desirable approach to invulnerability after all.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Here is Seneca (1966, p. 120): “That which is evil does harm; that which does harm makes a man worse. But pain and poverty do not make a man worse; therefore, they are not evils.”

References

  • Cicero. 1875. De finibus. In The academic questions, treatise De finibus and Tusculan disputations of M. T. Cicero, transl. C.D. Yonge, B.A. London: George Bell and Sons.

  • Cicero. 1988. On goals. In Hellenistic philosophy, ed. B. Inwood, and L.P. Gerson. Indianapolis: Hackett Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epicurus. 1994. The Epicurus reader, eds. and transl. B. Inwood and L.P. Gerson. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.

  • Kamm, F. 1993. Morality, mortality, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luper, S. Retroactive harms and wrongs. In Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Death, ed. B. Bradley, F. Feldman, and J. Johansson. Oxford: Oxford University Press (forthcoming).

  • Luper, S. 2009. The philosophy of death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. 1981. After virtue. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. 1970. Death. Noûs 4.1: 73–80. (Reprinted in Nagel, T. Mortal questions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979, and in The metaphysics of death, ed. J.M. Fischer, 59–70, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1993).

  • Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, S. 1990. Epicurus on pleasure and the complete life. Monist 73(1): 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, B. 2010. Death and mortality in contemporary philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seneca. 1966. In Greek and Roman philosophy after Aristotle, ed. J. Saunders. New York: The Free Press.

  • Slote, M. 1982. Goods and lives. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 63: 311–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, G. 2004. Against narrativity. Ratio (new series) XVII: 428–452.

  • Taylor, C. 1989. Sources of the self: the making of the modern identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velleman, D. 1991. Well-being and time. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 72: 48–77 (Reprinted in The metaphysics of death, ed. J.M. Fischer, 329–357, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1993.).

  • Williams, B. 1981. Moral luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Jens Johansson for constructive comments on a previous draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Luper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luper, S. Exhausting Life. J Ethics 17, 99–119 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-012-9138-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-012-9138-2

Keywords

Navigation