Abstract
UK official statistics on income distribution have incorporated top-income adjustments to household survey data since 1992. This article reviews the work undertaken by the Department for Work and Pensions and the Office for National Statistics, and the academic research that influenced them, and reflects on the lessons to learn from the UK experience.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Data Availability
The data used in Table 1 and Figs. 1 and 2 and how to access them are described in the replication materials for Burkhauser et al. (2018b). The sources of the data used in Figs. 3 and 4 are the publicly available spreadsheets cited in the notes to the figures.
References
Atkinson, A.B., Piketty, T., Saez, E.: Top incomes in the long run of history. J. Econ. Lit. 49(1), 3–71 (2011)
Blanchet, T., Flores, I., and Morgan, M. ‘The weight of the rich: improving surveys using tax data’, WID.world Working Paper 2018/12 (revised October 2019). Paris: World Inequality Lab, Paris School of Economics (2019)
Brandolini, A., Jenkins, S.P., Micklewright, J., 14 others: Tony Atkinson and his legacy. Rev. Income Wealth. 63(3), 411–444 (2017)
Burkhauser, R.V., Feng, S., Jenkins, S.P., Larrimore, J.: Recent trends in top income shares in the USA: reconciling estimates from march CPS and IRS tax return data. Rev. Econ. Stat. 94(2), 371–388 (2012)
Burkhauser, R.V., Hérault, N., Jenkins, S.P., Wilkins, R.: Survey under-coverage of top incomes and estimation of inequality: what is the role of the UK’s SPI adjustment? Fisc. Stud. 39(2), 213–240 (2018a)
Burkhauser, R.V., Hérault, N., Jenkins, S.P., Wilkins, R.: Top incomes and inequality in the UK: reconciling estimates from household survey and tax return data. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 70(2), 301–326 (2018b)
Burkhauser, R. V., Hérault, N., Jenkins, S. P., and Wilkins, R. ‘What Accounts for the Rising Share of Women in the Top 1%?’. IZA Discussion Paper No. 13359. Bonn: IZA. Revised June 2021. (2020)
Canberra Group: Handbook on Household Income Statistics, 2nd edn. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, New York and Geneva (2011)
Carranza, R., Morgan, M., and Nolan, B. ‘Top income adjustments and inequality: an investigation of the EU-SILC’, INET Oxford Working Paper no. 2021-16. Oxford: Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford. (2021)
Citro, C.F., Michael, R.T. (eds.): Measuring Poverty: a New Approach. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. (1985)
Cowell, F.A., Flachaire, E.: Income distribution and inequality measurement: the problem of extreme values. J. Econ. 141(2), 1044–1072 (2007)
Cribb, J., Waters, T., Wernham, T., and Xu, X. Living Standards, Poverty and Inequality in the UK: 2021. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies. https://ifs.org.uk/publications/15512. (2021)
Department of Health and Social Security: Low Income Statistics. Report of a Technical Review. Department of Health and Social Security, London (1988a)
Department of Health and Social Security: Households Below Average Income: a Statistical Analysis 1981–1985. Department of Health and Social Security, London (1988b)
Department of Health and Social Security: Low Income Families - 1985. Department of Health and Social Security, London (1988c)
Department of Social Security. Households Below Average Income. Stocktaking. Report of a Working Group, London: Department of Social Security (1991)
Department of Social Security. Households Below Average Income. Methodological Review. Report of a Working Group, London: Department of Social Security (1996)
Department for Work and Pensions, Households Below Average Income: Quality and Methodology Information Report – 2014/15, London: Department for Work and Pensions (2016)
Department for Work and Pensions. Households Below Average Income, 1994/95 to 2019/20. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/households-below-average-income-hbai%2D%2D2 (2021a)
Department for Work and Pensions. Households below average income series. Quality and Methodological Information Report, FYE 2020. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/households-below-average-income-hbai%2D%2D2 (2021b)
Fixler, D., Gindelsky, M., Johnson, D.: Improving the measure of the distribution of personal income. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings. 109, 302–306 (2019)
Flachaire, E., Lustig, N., and Vigorito, A. ‘Underreporting of top incomes and inequality: an assessment of correction methods using linked survey and tax data’. Paper presented at the IARIW conference, 23–27 August 2021. https://iariw.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/FLV_correctionmethods_paper.pdf (2021)
Jenkins, S.P.: Pareto models, top incomes, and recent trends in UK income inequality. Economica. 84(334), 261–289 (2017)
Jenkins, S. P. ‘Measurement Error – at the Top, Bottom, and Middle’, Presidential Lecture, Ninth ECINEQ Conference. http://www.ecineq.org/ecineq-meeting-plenary-lectures/. (2021)
Jenkins, S. P. and Rios-Avila, F. ‘Reconciling reports: modelling employment earnings and measurement error using survey and administrative data’, IZA Discussion Paper 14405. Bonn: IZA. (2021)
Johnson, P., Webb, S.: Counting people with low incomes: the impact of recent changes in official statistics. Fisc. Stud. 10(4), 66–82 (1989)
Korinek, A., Mistiaen, J., Ravallion, M.: Survey nonresponse and the distribution of income. J. Econ. Inequal. 4(2), 33–55 (2006)
Morelli, S. and Muñoz, E. ‘Unit Nonresponse bias in the Current Population Survey’, Unpublished Paper, City University of New York Graduate Center. https://www.erciomunoz.org/files/Draft_cps.pdf. (2019)
Nolan, B.: An evaluation of the new official low income statistics. Fisc. Stud. 10(4), 53–65 (1989)
Office for National Statistics. ‘Transformation of ONS Household Financial Statistics: ONS Statistical Outputs Workplan, 2018 to 2019’, 20 June 2018. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/personalandhouseholdfinances/incomeandwealth/articles/transformationofhouseholdfinancialstatistics/statisticaloutputsworkplan2018to2019 (2018)
Office for National Statistics. ‘Using Tax Data to Better Capture Top Earners in Household Income Inequality Statistics. Adjustments to Deal with Issues of under-Reporting of UK Top Incomes’, 26 February 2019. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/personalandhouseholdfinances/incomeandwealth/articles/usingtaxdatatobettercapturetopearnersinhouseholdincomeinequalitystatistics/2019-02-26 (2019)
Office for National Statistics. ‘Top income adjustment in effects of taxes and benefits data: methodology. Analysis of a recently introduced approach to addressing survey under-coverage of the highest earners in effects of taxes and benefits data, using tax record information’, 23 February 2020. https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/nationalaccounts/uksectoraccounts/compendium/economicreview/february2020/topincomeadjustmentineffectsoftaxesandbenefitsdatamethodology (2020a)
Office for National Statistics. ‘Improving the Measurement of Household Income’, 26 November 2020. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/personalandhouseholdfinances/incomeandwealth/methodologies/improvingthemeasurementofhouseholdincome (2020b)
Office for National Statistics. ‘Household Income Inequality, UK: Financial Year Ending 2020’, 21 January 2021. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/personalandhouseholdfinances/incomeandwealth/bulletins/householdincomeinequalityfinancial/financialyearending2020. (2021a)
Office for National Statistics. ‘Effects of Taxes and Benefits on UK Household Income: Financial Year Ending 2020’, 28 May 2021. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/personalandhouseholdfinances/incomeandwealth/bulletins/theeffectsoftaxesandbenefitsonhouseholdincome/financialyearending2020 (2021b)
Seely, A.: Income Tax: the Additional 50p Rate, Standard Note SN 249. House of Commons Library, London (2014)
Webber, D., Tonkin, R., and Shine, M. ‘Using tax data to better capture top incomes in official UK income inequality statistics’. In: Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., Gornick, J. C., Johnson, B., and Kennickell, A. (Eds.) Measuring and Understanding the Distribution and Intra/Inter-Generational Mobility of Income and Wealth. National Bureau of economic research, forthcoming. (2020)
Acknowledgements
This paper was prepared for a special issue of the Journal of Economic Inequality on ‘Finding the upper tail’. Many thanks to Richard Burkhauser, Nicholas Hérault, and Roger Wilkins. I have drawn heavily on our joint work (especially Burkhauser et al. 2018a, 2018b) in Sections 2 and 3 but they are not responsible for how I have done so. Richard Burkhauser and Nora Lustig provided helpful comments on earlier drafts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The author has no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Jenkins, S.P. Top-income adjustments and official statistics on income distribution: the case of the UK. J Econ Inequal 20, 151–168 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-022-09532-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-022-09532-y