Abstract
Many plant species, particularly legumes, protect themselves with saponins. Previously, a correlation was observed between levels of oleanolic acid-derived saponins, such as hederagenin-derived compounds, in the legume Medicago truncatula and caterpillar deterrence. Using concentrations that reflect the foliar levels of hederagenin-type saponins, the sapogenin hederagenin was not toxic to 4th instar caterpillars of the cabbage looper Trichoplusia ni nor did it act as a feeding deterrent. Female caterpillars consumed more diet than males, presumably to obtain the additional nutrients required for oogenesis, and are, thus, exposed to higher hederagenin levels. When fed the hederagenin diet, male caterpillars expressed genes encoding trypsin-like proteins (LOC113500509, LOC113501951, LOC113501953, LOC113501966, LOC113501965, LOC113499659, LOC113501950, LOC113501948, LOC113501957, LOC113501962, LOC113497819, LOC113501946, LOC113503910) as well as stress-responsive (LOC113503484, LOC113505107) proteins and cytochrome P450 6B2-like (LOC113493761) at higher levels than females. In comparison, female caterpillars expressed higher levels of cytochrome P450 6B7-like (LOC113492289). Bioinformatic tools predict that cytochrome P450s could catalyze the oxygenation of hederagenin which would increase the hydrophilicity of the compound. Expression of a Major Facilitator Subfamily (MFS) transporter (LOC113492899) showed a hederagenin dose-dependent increase in gene expression suggesting that this transporter may be involved in sapogenin efflux. These sex-related differences in feeding and detoxification should be taken into consideration in insecticide evaluations to minimize pesticide resistance.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Saponins are plant specialized metabolites important for defense against pathogens and insect herbivores, particularly in legume crops (Hussain et al. 2019; Roopashree and Naik 2019; Zaynab et al. 2021). Saponin levels, specifically oleanolic acid-derived saponins, have been correlated to resistance of the barrel medic, Medicago truncatula, and related plant species to caterpillar herbivory (Adel et al. 2000; Agrell et al. 2003; Cai et al. 2017). This research was performed to determine if the oleanolic acid-derived sapogenin hederagenin acts as a toxin or antifeedant, contributing to this resistance. In addition, caterpillar countermeasures to detoxify hederagenin were investigated through a transcriptomic study with special attention paid to sex-related differences in the expression of genes encoding detoxification enzymes.
The barrel medic Medicago truncatula, a forage crop in Australia and Mediterranean countries (Crawford et al. 1989; Howieson et al. 2000), has morphological and chemical defenses to protect itself against insect herbivores of which triterpenoid saponins are key defensive plant specialized metabolites (Bede 2020). Over 85 triterpenoid saponins are found in M. truncatula roots and above-ground tissues (Lei et al. 2019). From the precursor β-amyrin, triterpenoid saponins can be classified into groups depending on the aglycone: soyasaponin B and E, hederagenin, bayogenin and medicagenic acid, of which the last three are derived from oleanolic acid (Vincken et al. 2007; Moses et al. 2014). Cai et al. (2017) compared different M. truncatula ecotypes for resistance against herbivory by caterpillars of the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua (Hübner). Ecotypes with higher oleanolic acid-derived saponins were more resistant to caterpillar herbivory which appear to reflect antifeedant activity. In particular, foliar levels of medicagenic-, zanhic acid- and hederagenin-type saponins, are more than twice as high in the more caterpillar-resistant HM006 (F83005.5) compared to the caterpillar-susceptible HM020 (TN1.11) ecotype (Cai et al. 2017; Lei et al. 2019). Foliar tissues of the more caterpillar-resistant HM006 had a higher number of unique (hexose-hexose-hexose-hederagenin, hexose-hexenuronic acid-hederagenin) or twofold higher levels (hexose-rhamnose-hexose-hexose-hederagenin, hexose-hexose-hexenuronic acid-hederagenin, hexose-deoxyhexose-hexose-hexenuronic acid-hederagenin) of hederagenin-type saponins than the more susceptible HM020 (Cai et al. 2017; Lei et al. 2019).
Saponins can negatively affect insect herbivores in different ways (De Geyter et al. 2007). Haemolytic-type saponins, for example oleanolic acid-derivatives, can form pores in the lining of the insect gut, leading to fluid loss and eventually death (Voutquenne et al. 2002; Gauthier et al. 2009; De Geyter et al. 2012). Less haemolytic saponins, for example medicagenic acid-derivatives, form micelles that can prevent the absorption of hydrophobic nutrients, such as sterols. Since insects cannot synthesize steroidal precursors and rely on obtaining them from their diet (Behmer and Nes 2003; Lavrynenko et al. 2015), reduction of dietary lipids could impact levels of sterol-derived ecdysteroid hormones that are crucial for insect development. Saponins may also non-specifically inhibit insect gut-associated digestive enzymes through protein–saponin interactions (Ishaaya 1986).
Saponins may also act as antifeedants (Jain and Tripathi 1991; Koul 2008; Zalucki and Furlong 2017). When insects detect these compounds, they may or will not feed on the plant. The triterpenoid saponin, 3-O-[O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1 → 4)-β-D-glucopyranosyl]-hederagenin, found in bittercress Barbarea vulgaris, is a strong feeding deterrent to caterpillars of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Shinoda et al. 2002). Wound-induced saponins, particularly soyasaponin- and medicagenin-type saponins, are proposed to act as antifeedants to Egyptian cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis, caterpillars (Agrell et al. 2003).
Upon ingestion, plant- and caterpillar midgut-associated glycosidases may hydrolyze the ester linkage between the sugar group(s) and the sapogenin aglycone (Liu et al. 2017; Terra et al. 2019; Lacchini et al. 2023). In M. truncatula roots, upon tissue damage, β-glucosidase G1 hydrolyzes the sugar from the C28 position of 3-Glc-28-Glc-medicagenic acid (Lacchini et al. 2023). Likely similar β-glycosidases that hydrolyze glycosyl ester bonds may be found in foliar tissue. As well, caterpillars secrete α-glucosidases and β-glycosidases into their midguts (Liu et al. 2018; Terra et al. 2019; Lacchini et al. 2023); presently, little is known if these enzymes are able hydrolyze the saponin ester bond linking the sugar to the aglycone. Saponins are also labile in alkali solutions releasing the sapogenin. Thus, the alkaline caterpillar gut (~ pH 9), the hydrolysis of the saponin to the aglycone may occur spontaneously (Dow, 1992).
Though some biological activity is linked to the saponin, in particular, the enhanced water solubility of the saponin is important for biological function, the sapogenin aglycone may also have biological activity. For some haemolytic saponins, after interaction with the red blood cell, hydrolysis of the glycosidic ester bonds precedes haemolysis (Segal et al. 1974; Segal and Milo-Goldzweig 1974; Voutquenne et al. 2002). Similarly, the aglycone is responsible for the antifungal cell lytic activity of some saponins (digitonin, tomatine, α-hederin) against Rhizoctonia solani and Botrytis cinerea mycelia (Segal and Schlösser 1975). The sapogenin hederagenin showed antibacterial activity against the gram positive Bacillus subtilis (Avato et al. 2006). The insecticidal effects of hederagenin on caterpillars of the Egyptian cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis, was more potent than the saponin 28-O-β-glucopyranosyl-3-O-[α-L-arabinopyranosyl (1 → 2)-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1 → 2)-α-L-arabinopyranosyl]-hederagenin (3-Ara-Glc-Ara, 28-Glc H) (Adel et al. 2000). Feeding caterpillars hederagenin or the saponin increased days to pupation and resulted in decreased pupal weight. However, in addition a decrease in fecundity (eggs laid/female) was also noted for caterpillars fed hederagenin.
How oleanolic-derived saponins protect M. truncatula, as toxins or antifeedants, is unclear. To understand this, we used caterpillars of the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni. These insects are adaptive specialists; they can feed on a broad range of plant hosts but prefer Brassicaceous plants, making them aggressive pests of cruciferous crops, particularly in greenhouses (Capinera 2003; Cervantes et al 2011). Brassicaceous plants, such as those in the Barbarea genus, protect themselves with saponins, particularly hederagenin-derived compounds (Shinoda et al. 2002). As explained above, these compounds can act as antifeedants and modify caterpillar feeding behaviour or may have direct noxious effects on the insect. However, insects have multiple strategies to reduce the impact of toxins, such as reducing penetration, target site modification and detoxification enzymes (Siddiqui et al. 2023). In particular, caterpillars often upregulate expression of gut- and Malpighian tubule-associated detoxification genes when exposed to xenobiotics (Amezian et al. 2021).
After uptake, xenobiotic detoxifications involve three phases: functionalization, conjugation and excretion (Amezian et al. 2021; Esteves et al. 2021). In phase 1, enzymes, such as esterases or cytochrome P450s, modify the xenobiotic either catabolizing it or making it more hydrophilic for excretion. In phase 2, molecules, such as glutathione or glycosides, can be added either directly to the xenobiotic or to the modified xenobiotic, by enzymes such as glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) or UDP-glycosyl transferases (UGTs), respectively, again, often to enhance excretion. In the T. ni genome, 199 putative detoxification genes have been identified: 108 cytochrome P450s, 34 GSTs and 57 α-carboxylesterases (Fu et al. 2018). Our understanding of which of these enzymes are involved in the detoxification of plant specialized metabolites and insecticides as well as the regulation of their expression is still relatively preliminary (Amezian et al. 2021).
Male and female insects may have different abilities to detoxify xenobiotics. Female caterpillars need to acquire sufficient protein at the larval stage for ovarian development and yolk production (Wheeler 1996; Wheeler et al. 2000). This is reflected in their feeding and nutrient utilization. Female Spodoptera litura caterpillars select a more protein-rich diet than males and utilize these proteins for growth more efficiently (Lee 2010). Considering this difference in nutrient requirements, females may invest less in detoxification enzymes prioritizing egg production over detoxification or may invest more in detoxification to ensure overall fitness. As well, more detoxification genes are associated with female sex-linked genes than males as evidenced by the higher levels of CYP and GST genes on the W chromosome of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (You et al. 2013).
Saponins are involved in protection of many plant species against pathogens and insect herbivores (Hussain et al. 2019; Roopashree and Naik 2019; Bede 2020; Zaynab et al. 2021). Foliar levels of oleanoic acid-derived saponins, such as hederagenin-derivatives, are correlated with caterpillar deterrence (Cai et al. 2017). In vitro toxicity and antifeedant assays were performed with caterpillars of the cabbage looper, T. ni. Given that plant β-glycosidases may be needed to convert the saponin to the aglycone, we investigated the direct effect of the sapogenin hederagenin on the insect. As well, transcriptomic experiments were conducted to understand possible mechanisms of detoxification and if there is a sex-specific difference in detoxification-related gene expression.
Methods and Materials
Chemicals
Hederagenin was purchased from Cayman Chemical Company. All other chemicals, including ethanol, RNAlater™ Solution etc., were purchased from ThermoFisher Scientific.
Insect Colony
From Trichoplusia ni eggs initially obtained from the Canadian Forest Service – Great Lakes Forestry Service (CFS-GLFS), caterpillars were reared on a modified McMorran-Grisdale diet and kept at 28.5 °C, 28–40% humidity, 16:8 light to dark cycle (Cai et al. 2017). Pupae were moved to an aquarium to allow adult moths to emerge and mate. Eggs were collected from a sterile mesh hung from the roof of the aquarium and used to maintain the colony. Adults were provided with a 10% honey solution (Ebling and Dedes 2015). For the experiments, when insects were third instars, males and females were separated based on the presence of yellow gonads in the males. Fourth instar caterpillars were used in the experiments.
Determination of the Hederagenin Concentration to use in Bioassays
Hederagenin-type saponin levels range from 0.018 to 0.2 mg/g DW in M. truncatula (Huhman et al. 2005; Tava and Pecetti 2012; D'Addabbo et al. 2020). Based on the assumptions that M. truncatula leaves are approximately 80% water and caterpillars (Spodoptera exigua) normally eat ~ 25 mg DW of leaf material in a day (Cai et al. 2017), a caterpillar should be exposed to 25 × the measured foliar saponin (DW) levels. Therefore, 8 μg and 80 μg hederagenin added to the diet approximate the constitutive and induced levels that a caterpillar would be exposed to while feeding on M. truncatula plants.
Experiment 1. Hederagenin Toxicity
Hederagenin (concentration range: 2 to 80 μg in ethanol) or ethanol (4 μL) was added to a small piece of artificial diet (~ 0.1 g) to ensure that it would be consumed in 24 h. The concentration range of hederagenin tested was reflective of levels in M. truncatula leaves and was limited by the solubility of the compound in ethanol (D'Addabbo et al. 2020; Tava and Pecetti 2012; Huhman et al. 2005). The diet was placed in the centre of an unsealed Petri dish and allowed to sit for 2 h to ensure that the ethanol evaporated. A male or female T. ni caterpillar was placed in the dish and allowed to feed. If the caterpillar consumed all the diet, artificial diet alone was added to ensure that the mortality was due to hederagenin and not lack of food. Mortality was recorded at 24 and 48 h. Mortality was determined by lack of movement when the insect was prodded with forceps. For each sex and concentration, 10 caterpillars were tested. The experiment was repeated with no toxicity observed over the concentration range tested.
Experiment 2. Hederagenin Antifeedant Activity
In no-choice studies, 4th instar T. ni caterpillars were given artificial diet spiked with either ethanol or hederagenin and the amount of diet eaten in 18 h determined. In a 60 mm Petri dish, a large piece of pre-weighed artificial diet (0.5 ~ 0.6 g) was placed in the middle to which ethanol or 8 μg or 80 μg hederagenin dissolved in ethanol (4μL) added. After the ethanol evaporated (2 h), a male or female caterpillar was added to the Petri dish at 16:00 and allowed to feed for 18 h in the growth chamber with settings: 28.5 °C, 28–40% humidity, 16 h light and 8 h dark cycle. At that time, any diet left in the Petri dish was collected into labeled envelopes, followed by drying in the oven at 50 °C for 3 days and then weighed in preweighed envelopes. In addition, a control without caterpillars was performed to determine the fresh weight (FW) to dry weight (DW) conversion ratio of the diet: R(FW/DW) = FW/DW. In each replicate, ten caterpillars were tested per treatment (ethanol control or two hederagenin concentrations, male or female = 60 insects). Four temporal replicates were performed.
The amount of diet consumed was analyzed by two-factor analysis of variance (2-way ANOVA) (Factors: sex, concentration) (SPSS statistics ver. 28) followed by a Tukey HSD post-hoc test.
Experiment 3. Effect of Hederagenin on Trichoplusia ni Detoxification Gene Expression.
The experimental set-up was as described in Experiment 2, except that the caterpillar was allowed to feed for 24 h. The whole gut with attached Malpighian tubules was dissected, rinsed in sterile lepidopteran saline (0.25 g NaCl, 0.768 g KCl, 1.7 g CaCl2•2H2O, 1.63 g MgCl2•6H2O, 0.476 g HEPES, 6.48 g glucose dissolved in 400 mL distilled water, pH 7.2 (Christensen et al. 1991)), placed in RNA later and stored at -20 °C until RNA extraction. A food bolus in the gut was not observed for any samples. One caterpillar was dissected per treatment (ethanol control or two hederagenin concentrations, male or female). The experiment was temporally repeated three times.
RNA Extraction and Next-Generation Sequencing (RNA-Seq)
Total RNA was extracted from T. ni samples using Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit following the manufacturer’s protocol. The gut and attached Malpighian tubules were removed from the RNA later and placed in a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube containing lysis buffer (600 μL of 1:100 μL β-mercaptoethanol:Buffer RLT) and kept at room temperature for 3 min. Tissues were disrupted by homogenization (ProCulture™ Cordless Homogenizer Unit) using a sterile grinder that was changed between samples. Homogenized samples were centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 3 min to separate phases. The supernatant containing the total RNA was carefully moved into another Eppendorf tube to which ethanol (70%, 600 μL) was added followed by mixing the lysate by pipetting. The sample (600 μL) was transferred onto a RNeasy Mini spin column in a collection tube (2 mL) and centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 15 s. RW1 buffer (350 μL) was added to each column and centrifuged again for 15 s at the same speed and the flow-through discarded. On column DNase digestion was conducted to avoid potential DNA contamination in the sample. Samples were incubated at room temperature for 15 min. After adding RW1 buffer (350 μL) to the column, samples were centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 15 s. Similarly, RPE Buffer (500 μL) was added to each column and samples were centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 15 s. After discarding the flow-through, Buffer RPE (500 μL) was added again and samples were centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 2 min. Columns were placed in new collection tube and total RNA was eluted by adding RNase-free water (50 μL) followed by centrifugation at 16,000 × g for 1 min. To ensure a high RNA yield, the collection step was repeated twice.
Total RNA samples were submitted to Genome Québec (Montreal, Canada) who prepared libraries (NEB) followed by sequencing (Illumina NovaSeq6000 S4 PE100). The obtained reads were analyzed following the pipeline outlined in Kolosov et al. (2019).
RNA-Seq Data Analysis
Paired-end reads were analyzed on the Unix-based server Narval provided by the Digital Research Alliance of Canada. Quality check for raw reads data was performed using FastQC (Andrews 2010). Raw reads were processed through fastp version 0.20.1 which removed adapters, low quality bases (Phred score < 20) and reads shorter than 25 bp from the 3’end (Chen et al. 2018a). Reads were mapped against the Trichoplusi ni reference genome GCF_003590095.1 (National Center for Biotechnology Information) using STARv2.7.9a (Dobin et al. 2013; Fu et al. 2018; Liu and Li 2019). FeatureCounts was used to obtain the raw gene counts (Supplemental Table 3). Only genes with expression counts greater than 15 in at least one sample were considered. Differentially expressed genes were identified using DESeq2 assuming a negative binomial (gamma-Poisson) distribution and using a criteria of log2-fold change (logFC) (Love et al. 2014). Differentially expressed genes were identified by adjusting for false discovery rate p value (padj) ≤ -0.5 and a fold change that is ≥ 2 or ≤ -2 (Supplemental Table 2). Data visualization was performed using MetaboAnalyst and ExpressAnalyst platforms (Pang et al. 2020; Liu et al. 2023). The raw read data (FASTQ) from this study have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (Bioproject ID #PRJNA1073690).
Bioinformatic Prediction of Hederagenin Modification by Cytochrome P450
Three computational platforms were used to identify the putative site of cytochrome P450 oxidation. Way2Drug (http://www.way2drug.com/somp/) uses a machine learning approach incorporating data from known structure–activity relationships to predict the modification of novel substrates (Druzhilovskiy et al. 2017). Xenosite (https://xenosite.org) uses publicly available cytochrome P450 metabolism data of over 680 compounds to build neural networks for predictive models (Matlock et al. 2015; Zaretzki et al. 2013; Dang et al. 2020). SMARTCyp (https://smartcyp.sund.ku.dk/mol_to_som) uses the density functional theory determinations to calculate the activation energy of the different residues on the molecule to identify the most reactive atoms (Rydberg et al 2010; Olsen et al. 2019). To identify the putative target site of cytochrome P450 enzymes on hederagenin, the simplified molecular input line entry system (SMILES) format for hederagenin was deposited into these different tools.
Results
Hederagenin Toxicity and Antifeedant Activity
Fourth instar T. ni caterpillars were fed artificial diet containing ethanol or hederagenin (2–80 μg) for 48 h. Mortality was not observed over the hederagenin levels tested.
Hederagenin concentration did not affect feeding behaviour of 4th instar caterpillars fed artificial diet containing ethanol or hederagenin (8 μg and 80 μg) for 18 h (Hederagenin: F(2,218) = 0.413; p = 0.662) (Fig. 1). However, female caterpillars consumed about 7% more diet than males (Sex: F(1,218) = 5.628; p = 0.019).
No choice feeding experiment. Male and female 4th instar Trichoplusia ni caterpillars were fed artificial diet with ethanol (EtOH, control) or the saponin aglycone hederagenin (Hed, 8 or 80 μg). The amount of diet (fresh weight, FW) consumed by caterpillars in 18 h is represented by a violin plot. The dashed line represents the median amount consumed. An asterisk indicates significant differences (p ≤ 0.05)
Effect of Hederagenin on Trichoplusia ni Gene Expression
Caterpillars were allowed to feed on diet for 24 h and then their guts + Malpighian tubules dissected for transcriptomic analysis. For each sample, an average of 35.2 million total 100 bp reads were obtained (Supplemental Table S1). After processing to remove adaptor sequences and poor quality reads, the sample average was 35.3 million reads with a Phred score ≥ 20. The high quality reads were aligned to the T. ni genome (NCBI) with a mapping efficiency of 81.9%.
In total, 12,109 genes were expressed in T. ni gut + Malpighian tubule tissues (Fig. 2A; Supplemental Table 2). As expected, > 99% of the genes were constitutively expressed between treatments and only 73 genes were found to be differentially expressed (Fig. 2B, C; Supplemental Fig. S1, S2, Supplemental Table S3). A number of genes encoding glucosidases (LOC113503307, LOC113494402, LOC113496754, LOC113505102, LOC113506768) and other glycosidases (LOC113504563, LOC113496200, LOC113499077, LOC113495720, LOC113498692, LOC113504733, LOC113506721, LOC113500731, LOC113492303) were expressed (Fig. 3) (Supplemental Table 2).
Gut + Malpighian tubule gene expression of 4th instar Trichoplusia ni caterpillars fed artificial diet with the saponin aglycone hederagenin. 4th instar caterpillars were fed on diet spiked with ethanol (control) or hederagenin (8 or 80 μg) for 24 h. Total RNA was extracted from dissected gut + Malpighian tubule samples for transcriptomics (RNA-Seq). A) Principal component analysis (PCA) of gene expression (Supplemental Table S2). B) PCA of differentially expressed genes (Supplemental Table S3). C) Heat map of differentially expressed genes. PCA plots depict female (red circles,
) and male (blue circles,
) T. ni caterpillar gene expression patterns on the EtOH control (small circles) or diet containing 8 μg (medium circles) or 80 μg (large circles) hederagenin. The gene annotations associated with the heat map are found in Supplemental Table S3
Expression patterns of genes encoding glycosidase enzymes in Trichoplusia ni caterpillars fed artificial diet with the saponin aglycone hederagenin. Male and female T. ni caterpillars were fed diet spiked with ethanol (EtOH; control) or hederagenin (8 or 80 μg) for 24 h. Total RNA was extracted from dissected gut + Malpighian tubule samples for transcriptomics (RNA-Seq). Transcript expression is represented in a heat map. The gene annotations associated with the heat map are found in Supplemental Table S3
Female Trichoplusia ni Caterpillars: Effect of Hederagenin on Gene Expression
In female T. ni caterpillars fed artificial diet spiked with the hederagenin, there was little difference in gut + Malpighian tubule gene expression compared to the ethanol control. At low hederagenin concentration (8 μg), only two genes were differentially expressed: uncharacterized LOC113496501 and lachesin-like (LOC113502562) which are down- and upregulated, respectively, and there was no difference in gene expression in insects fed the higher hederagenin diet (80 μg) (Supplemental Fig. S1A, B, Table S3).
Male Trichoplusia ni Caterpillars: Effect of Hederagenin on Gene Expression
In contrast to female caterpillars, male caterpillars had more differentially expressed genes when fed the hederagenin-spiked diets compared to the ethanol control. At low hederagenin concentration (8 μg); 20 genes were upregulated and 2 genes were downregulated (Supplemental Fig. S1C, Supplemental Table S3). Many of the gut + MT-associated genes upregulated in response to hederagenin were trypsin-like proteins that are involved in protein digestion (differentially expressed trypsin genes: LOC113500509, LOC113501951, LOC113501953, LOC113501966, LOC113501965, LOC113499659, LOC113501950, LOC113501948, LOC113501957, LOC113501962, LOC113497819, LOC113501946, LOC113503910) (Fig. 4A).
Sex-specific gene expression of Trichoplusia ni caterpillars fed artificial diet with the saponin aglycone hederagenin. Male (solid line) and female (dashed line) 4th instar T. ni caterpillars were fed on diet spiked with ethanol (EtOH; control) or hederagenin (Hed; 8 or 80 μg) for 24 h. Total RNA was extracted from dissected gut + Malpighian tubule samples for transcriptomics (RNA-Seq). Expression of genes higher in male caterpillars A) Representative alkaline trypsin-like genes (LOC113501950, LOC501957, LOC113497819), B) Holotricin-3-like (likely the homolog gloverin-type antimicrobial protein) (LOC113503384), C) Calphotin-like (LOC113505107), D) Major facilitor superfamily (MFS) transporter-like (LOC113492289). Expression of genes higher in female caterpillars E) Doublesex-like (LOC113508204)
In males fed on artificial diet spiked with the higher hederagenin concentration (80 μg), 21 genes were upregulated and 1 gene was downregulated (Supplemental Fig. S1D, Supplemental Table S3). In particular, the stress-responsive gene encoding the glycine-rich, antimicrobial peptide putative holotricin-3-like protein (LOC113503484) was upregulated in male caterpillars facing hederagenin challenge (Bulet et al. 1999; Tatić et al. 2023) (Fig. 4B); this is likely a gloverin-type peptide which are found in Lepidoptera and share sequence similarity with coleopteran holotricins. Another stress-responsive gene, calphotin-like (LOC113505107), was upregulated in male T. ni caterpillars fed diet with the lower hederagenin concentration (Fig. 4C). The major facilitator superfamily (MFS) transporter is a single polypeptide transporter involved in the transport of endogenous metabolites or xenobiotics (Reddy et al. 2012). The expression of this gene (LOC113492899) increased with hederagenin dosage and in caterpillars fed 8 μg hederagenin, an increase in gene expression is observed in male caterpillars (Fig. 4D).
Male vs Female Trichoplusia ni Caterpillar Gene Expression
Male and female caterpillars showed some distinct gene expression patterns. In particular, genes encoding trypsin (LOC113500509, LOC113501951, LOC113501953, LOC113501966, LOC113501950, LOC113501948, LOC113501957, LOC113501962, LOC113497819, LOC113501946, LOC113503910) were higher in males exposed to hederagenin than females (Fig. 4A, Supplemental Fig. S2. In contrast, a gene encoding doublesex-like (LOC113508204) was more highly expressed in females (Fig. 4E, Supplemental Fig. S2).
Regardless of diet or caterpillar sex, most detoxification genes were constitutively expressed (as an example see Fig. 5A); approximately 17 UDP-glycosyl transferases, 48 esterases, 23 GST and 62 CYP genes were not affected by hederagenin diet or sex-specific. Many of these genes are likely involved in metabolic processes related to cellular homeostasis and do not necessarily play a detoxification role, but there may be some generic detoxification genes constitutively upregulated when the caterpillar is feeding to enable the insect to cope with the myriad of plant compounds that may be in its diet. However, two genes encoding cytochrome P450 6B7-like (LOC113492289) and cytochrome P450 6B2-like (LOC113493761) showed diet- and/or sex-related expression patterns. Cytochrome P450 enzymes are involved in xenobiotic detoxification, particularly those associated with the subfamily 6B (Table 1) (Hlavica 2011). Expression levels of cytochrome P450 6B7-like (CYP6B7-like; LOC113492289) in female gut + Malpighian tissues were ~ 90 times higher than in male caterpillars (Fig. 5C, Supplemental Fig. S2C). In male caterpillars, transcript expression of cytochrome P450 6B2-like (LOC113493761) increased in response to hederagenin and was twice as high in males fed artificial diet with 80 μg hederagenin compared to female caterpillars (Fig. 5B, Supplemental Fig. S1A).
Cytochrome P450 (CYP450) gene expression in Trichoplusia ni caterpillars fed artificial diet with the saponin aglycone hederagenin. Male (solid line) and female (dashed line) 4th instar T. ni caterpillars were fed diet spiked with ethanol (EtOH; control) or hederagenin (Hed; 8 or 80 μg) for 24 h. Total RNA was extracted from dissected gut + Malpighian tubule samples for transcriptomics (RNA-Seq). A) Representative CYP genes (LOC113500882, LOC113492567, LOC113502915) that do not have a diet- or sex-specific difference, B) CYP6B2-like (LOC113493761), C) CYP6B7-like (LOC11349289)
Computational Identification of the Potential Site of Cytochrome P450-Mediated Hederagenin Modification
Computational platforms designed to identify drug target sites by human cytochrome P450 enzymes were used to identify putative site(s) of modification on hederagenin. The sites most consistently identified for oxygenation of hederagenin by cytochrome P450 were C23, C3, C19 and C21 (Fig. 6, Supplemental Table S4). However, it must be considered that these platforms were developed to identify the targets of human enzymes rather than insect cytochrome P450s. However, the consistent ranking does suggest that these carbons may be promising sites of modification.
Structure of the saponin aglycone hedragenin. The triterpenoid aglycone hederagenin (R1 = H, R2 = H) is typically glycosylated at position C3 or C28. Asterisks indicate putative sites of saponin modification by cytochrome P450s identified using bioinformatic tools (Xenosite, Way2Drug and SMARTCyp) (Supplemental Table S4)
Discussion
At the concentrations tested, hederagenin was not toxic to T. ni caterpillars. As well, the aglycone hederagenin did not have an antifeedant role contrary to other studies that identified the saponin 3-O-[O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1➙4-β-D-glucopyranosyl]-hederagenin as a feeding deterrent for 3rd instar P. xylostella caterpillars (Shinoda et al. 2002), which was confirmed by Liu et al (2019) who showed that hederagenin monoglucosides reduced P. xylostella and M. sexta feeding by 90%. This may reflect the difference between the aglycone and the saponin or that M. sexta and P. xylostella are specialists on Solanaceous and Brassicaceous plants, respectively, while in our study, we used T. ni caterpillars, considered an adaptive specialist of Brassicaceous plants. As some plants in the Brassicacea, for example in the genus Barbarea, contain saponins as defensive compounds (Shinoda et al. 2002; Hussain et al. 2019), T. ni caterpillars likely have strategies, such as detoxification enzymes, that allow them to feed on a plant diet containing hederagenin-type saponins.
Once the saponin is ingested, plant- or insect gut-derived glycosidases likely hydrolyze the sugar ester bond to release the sapogenin (Terra et al. 2019; Lacchini et al. 2023). We identified 14 genes encoding glucosidases and other glycosidases expressed in T. ni midgut-Malpighian tubule tissue (Fig. 3, Supplemental Table S2). However, it is unclear which of these enzymes are able to hydrolyze the sugar ester bond of saponins (Liu et al. 2017; Terra et al. 2019). Though in the extremely alkaline midgut of caterpillars (Dow, 1992), some saponins may be labile which may spontaneously lead to their hydrolysis to the sapogenin and sugar.
In response to hederagenin-spiked diet, extremely few genes were differentially regulated in female caterpillars (Supplemental Fig. S1A, B, Supplemental Table S3). In comparison, > 40 genes were upregulated in response to hederagenin in male caterpillars (Fig. 2C, Supplemental Fig. S1C, D, Supplemental Table S3). Both male and female caterpillars had high expression levels of transcripts that encode proteases (i.e. trypsin, chemotrypsin etc.). In addition, a broader expression of genes encoding the serine protease trypsin was observed in male caterpillars (Fig. 4A). The reason for this is unclear. However, in the aquatic microcrustacean Daphnia sinensis, genes that encode a number of serine proteases, including 5 trypsin genes, are expressed more highly in males (Wang et al. 2022). Saponins can nonspecifically interact and inhibit digestive enzymes (Ishaay, 1986); this increase in trypsin expression may be a mechanism to counteract this. However, it is unknown if sapogenins, such as hederagenin, have this property.
Moreover, in male caterpillars, the expression of genes encoding stress-related proteins were observed, for example calphotin-like (LOC113505107) (Fig. 4C) (Wang et al. 2021; Brumin et al. 2020; Pingault et al. 2022; Mahanta et al. 2022; Tatić et al. 2023; Mulla and Tamhane 2023). Even though in Drosophila melanogaster, this Ca2+-binding protein plays a role in Ca2+ buffering in photoreceptors (Weiss et al. 2012), calphotin in other insect Orders appears to be regulated by stress. This gene was downregulated in H. armigera caterpillars fed the plant protein defensin and also in P. xylostella caterpillars infected with the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana (Wang et al. 2021; Mulla and Tamhane 2023). In our study, calphotin-like (LOC113505107) was upregulated in male T. ni caterpillars exposed to the lower hederagenin dose (Fig. 4C), which supports other studies which found that this gene was upregulated in Western corn root, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera, larvae exposed to Bt-corn, thrips Thrips palmi infected by groundnut bud necrosis virus, rickettsia-infected whitefly Bemisia tabaci, (Brumin et al. 2020; Mahanta et al. 2022; Pingault et al. 2022), which suggests that these homologues have broader functions in stress responses likely related to their Ca2+ binding activity.
Female caterpillars had higher expression of doublesex-like (Fig. 4E). Doublesex is involved in sex-differentiation and different alternative splice variants are seen in males vs females (Suzuki et al. 2003).
Female caterpillars ate more diet, regardless of hederagenin levels, than males (Fig. 1). This may be because female caterpillars, compared to males, must accumulate sufficient resources at the larval stage for egg production as adults (Wheeler 1996; Wheeler et al. 2000). It also means that females are exposed to higher levels of plant chemical defenses, in the case of our study hederagenin.
Female caterpillars had high expression levels of the gene encoding cytochrome P450 6B7-like protein (LOC113492289) (Fig. 5C). Cytochrome P450 enzymes are involved in phase I detoxification, catalyzing the oxygenation of xenobiotic to facilitate their excretion or provide sites for phase II reactions, such as the addition of glutathione by glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) (Feyereisen 2012; Esteves et al. 2021; Amezian et al. 2021). Lepidopterans have superfamilies of detoxification genes (i.e. cytochrome P450s, GSTs, carboxylesterases) that may reflect their herbivorous lifestyle exposing them to a diversity of plant specialized metabolites, but this also makes them adept at insecticide detoxification leading to pesticide resistance. The T. ni genome contains 108 genes that encode cytochrome P450 enzymes compared to 90 in the Brassicacea specialist P. xylostella and 84 in the mulberry specialist Bombyx mori (You et al. 2013; Fu et al. 2018). Most of detoxification-related transcripts were constitutively expressed (for example Fig. 5A); a sex-specific difference in the expression of two CYP6B genes (LOC113493761 and LOC113492289) was observed (Fig. 5B, C), highlighting the importance of members of the cytochrome P450 6B family in plant specialized metabolite and insecticide detoxification (Table 1) (Hlavica 2011; Lu et al. 2021; Nauen et al. 2022). Expression of CYP6B7-like (LOC113492289) was ~ 90% higher in female insects than males (Fig. 5C). In comparison, CYP6B2-like (LOC113493761) was induced in males feeding on hederagenin-containing diet (Fig. 5B). Though not definitive, computational tools identified a few select carbons as possible sites for cytochrome P450 modification of hederagenin (Fig. 6, Supplemental Table S4).
Another interesting gene expressed in gut + Malpighian tubules encodes a major facilitator superfamily-like transporter (LOC113492899). The major facilitator superfamily (MFS) transporter is a single polypeptide transporter involved in the transport of endogenous metabolites or xenobiotics (Reddy et al. 2012). In the generalist two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, strong upregulation of genes in this family was associated with pesticide resistance or exposure to plant specialized metabolites (Dermauw and Leeuwen 2014). Even though this gene was differentially expressed in male caterpillars exposed to low hederagenin, in both males and females, gene expression increased with dosage suggesting that this transporter may be involved in hederagenin and/or hederagenin-derivative transport (Fig. 4D).
The host plants that herbivorous caterpillars feed upon reflect their ability to detoxify the defensive specialized metabolites found in those plants (Calla et al. 2017). Caterpillars of T. ni that feed on plants of the Brassicacea genus Barbarea are exposed to hederagenin-type saponins. This may explain why the sapogenin hederagenin is not toxic or an antifeedant to T. ni caterpillars. What is striking is that female caterpillars ate 7% more diet than males, implying that, in nature, they may be exposed to more noxious plant compounds than males (Fig. 1). This was reflected in the detoxification-related gene expression where CYP6B7-like (LOC113492289) expression was higher in female caterpillars or CYP6B2-like (LOC113493761) which was induced in response to hederagenin in males (Fig. 5B, C). However, detoxification enzymes not only metabolize plant specialized metabolites but also other xenobiotics such as insecticides. Indeed, sex-linked resistance has been identified in a number of insect species (examples: Heckel et al 1998; Kanga et al. 2001; Reyes and Sauphanor 2008; Banazeer et al. 2022). Thus, identifying sex-specific detoxification genes and understanding their links to resistance strategies has important implications for pesticide management and sustainable agricultural practices.
Data Availability
Raw read data (FASTQ) has been deposited to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (Bioproject ID#PRJNA1073690).
Abbreviations
- DEGs:
-
Differentially expressed genes
References
Abd El-Latif AO, Kranthi KR, Kranthi S, Sarwar A, Subrahmanyam B (2014) Overexpression of cytochrome P450 CYP6B7 mediated pyrethroid resistance in Indian strains of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). J Plant Protect Res 54:287–293. https://doi.org/10.2478/jppr-2014-0043
Adel MM, Sehnal F, Jurzysta M (2000) Effects of alfalfa saponins on the moth Spodoptera littoralis. J Chem Ecol 26:1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005445217004
Agrell J, Oleszek W, Stochmal A, Olsen M, Anderson P (2003) Herbivore-induced responses in alfalfa (Medicago sativa). J Chem Ecol 29:303–320. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022625810395
Amezian D, Nauen R, Le Goff G (2021) Transcriptional regulation of xenobiotic detoxification genes in insects - An overview. Pestic Biochem Physiol 174:104822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2021.104822
Andrews S (2010) FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput seqence data. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/. Accessed 2023-07-14
Avato P, Bucci R, Tava A, Vitali C, Rosato A, Bialy Z, Jurzysta M (2006) Antimicrobial activity of saponins from Medicago sp.: Structure-activity relationship. Phytother Res 20:454–457. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.1876
Banazeer A, Afzal MBS, Hassan S (2022) Status of insecticide resistance in Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) from 1997 to 2019: cross-resistance, genetics, biological costs, underlying mechanisms, and implications for management. Phytoparasitica 50:465–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-021-00959-z
Bede JC (2020) Leaf me alone: medicago truncatula defenses against foliar lepidopteran herbivores. In: de Bruijn F (ed) The Model Legume Medicago truncatula. Wiley, 409–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119409144.ch51
Behmer ST, Nes DW (2003) Insect sterol nutrition and physiology: A global overview. Adv Insect Physiol 31:1–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2806(03)31001-x
Brumin M, Lebedev G, Kontsedalov S, Ghanim M (2020) Levels of the endosymbiont Rickettsia in the whitefly Bemisia tabaci are influenced by the expression of vitellogenin. Insect Mol Biol 29:241–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/imb.12629
Bulet P, Hetru C, Dimarcq JL, Hoffmann D (1999) Antimicrobial peptides in insects; Structure and function. Dev Comp Immunol 23:329–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-305X(99)00015-4
Cai F, Watson BS, Meek D, Huhman DV, Wherritt DJ, Ben C, Gentzbittel L, Driscoll BT, Sumner LW, Bede JC (2017) Medicago truncatula oleanolic-derived saponins are correlated with caterpillar deterrence. J Chem Ecol 43:712–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-017-0863-7
Capinera JL (2003) Cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni (Hübner) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). https://entnemdept.ufl.edu/creatures/veg/leaf/cabbage_looper.htm. Accessed 2023-02-08
Cervantes VM, Sarfraz RM, Myers JH (2011) Survival of cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), through winter cleanups of commercial vegetable greenhouses: Implications for insecticide resistance management. Crop Prot 30:1091–1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2011.03.021
Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J (2018a) fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34:i884-890. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560
Chen C, Han P, Yan W, Wang S, Shi X, Zhou X, Desneux N, Gao X (2018b) Uptake of quercetin reduces larval sensitivity to lambda-cyhalothrin in Helicoverpa armigera. J Pest Sci 91:919–926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-017-0933-1
Chen S, Elzaki MEA, Ding C, Li Z-f, Wang J, Zeng R-s, Song YY (2019) Plant allelochemicals affect tolerance of polyphagous lepidopteran pest Helicoverpaarmigera (Hübner) against insecticides. Pestic Biochem Physiol 154:32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2018.12.009
Christensen TA, Itagaki H, Teal PE, Jasensky RD, Tumlinson JH, Hildebrand JG (1991) Innervation and neural regulation of the sex pheromone gland in female Heliothis moths. Proc Natl Acad Sci 88:4971–4975. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.11.4971
Crawford EJ, Lake AWH, Boyce KG (1989) Breeding annual Medicago species for semiarid conditions in southern Australia. Adv Agron 42:399–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2113(08)60530-1
D’Addabbo T, Argentieri MP, Zuchowski J, Biazzi E, Tava A, Oleszek W, Avato P (2020) Activity of saponins from Medicago species against phytoparasitic nematodes. Plants 9:443–443. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9040443
Dai W-T, Li J, Ban L-P (2022) Genome-wide selective signature analysis revealed insecticide resistance mechanisms in Cydia pomonella. Insects 13:2. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13010002
Dang NL, Matlock MK, Hughes TB, Swamidass SJ (2020) The metabolic rainbow: deep learning phase I metabolism in five colors. J Chem Inf Model 60:1146–1164. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00836
De Geyter E, Lambert E, Geelen D, Smagghe G (2007) Novel advances with plant saponins as natural insecticides to control pest insects. Pest Technology 1:96–105
De Geyter E, Swevers L, Caccia S, Geelen D, Smagghe G (2012) Saponins show high entomotoxicity by cell membrane permeation in Lepidoptera. Pest Manag Sci 68:1199–1205. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3284
Dermauw W, Van Leeuwen T (2014) The ABC gene family in arthropods: comparative genomics and role in insecticide transport and resistance. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 45:89–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2013.11.001
Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, Batut P, Chaisson M, Gingeras TR (2013) STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29:15–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635
Druzhilovskiy DS, Rudik AV, Filimonov DA, Gloriozova TA, Lagunin AA, Dmitriev AV, Pogodin PV, Dubovskaya VI, Ivanov SM, Tarasova OA, Bezhentsev VM, Murtazalieva KA, Semin MI, Maiorov GAS, Sastry GN, Poroikov VV (2017) Computational platform Way2Drug: from prediction of biological activity to drug repurposing. Russion Chemical Bulletin 66:1832–1841
Ebling PM, Dedes J (2015) Rearing Trichoplusia ni. Insect production standard operating procedure, Great Lakes Forestry Centre IPS/019/003. pp 18. https://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/publications/telecharger-pdf/36012
Esteves F, Rueff J, Kranendonk M (2021) The central role of cytochrome P450 in xenobiotic metabolism - a brief review on a fascinating enzyme family. J Xenobiotics 11:94–114. https://doi.org/10.3390/jox11030007
Feyereisen R (2012) Insect CYP genes and P450 enzymes. In: Gilbert LI (ed) Insect Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Academic Press, 236–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384747-8.10008-X.
Fu Y, Yang Y, Zhang H, Farley G, Wang J, Quarles KA, Weng Z, Zamore PD (2018) The genome of the Hi5 germ cell line from Trichoplusia ni, an agricultural pest and novel model for small RNA biology. Elife 7:e31628. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31628
Gauthier C, Legault J, Girard-Lalancette K, Mshvildadze V, Pichette A (2009) Haemolytic activity, cytotoxicity and membrane cell permeabilization of semi-synthetic and natural lupane- and oleanane-type saponins. Bioorg Med Chem 17:2002–2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2009.01.022
Giraudo M, Hilliou F, Fricaux T (2015) Cytochrome P450s from the fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda): responses to plant allelochemicals and pesticides. Insect Mol Biol 24:115–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/imb.12140
Heckel DG, Bryson PK, Brown TM (1998) Linkage analysis of insecticide-resistant acetylcholinesterase in Heliothis virescens. J Hered 89:71–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/89.1.71
Hlavica P (2011) Insect cytochromes P450: topology of structural elements predicted to govern catalytic versatility. J Inorg Biochem 105:1354–1364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2011.05.003
Howieson JG, O’Hara GW, Carr SJ (2000) Changing roles for legumes in Mediterranean agriculture: developments from an Australian perspective. Field Crop Res 65:107–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4290(99)00081-7
Huang Y, Luo Y, Wu P, Zheng J, Qiu L (2021) Effects of three insecticides on the expression of cytochrome P450 CYP6B7 in Helicoverpa armigera. J Appl Entomol 145:440–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/jen/12862
Huhman DV, Berhow MA, Sumner LW (2005) Quantification of saponins in aerial and subterranean tissues of Medicago truncatula. J Agric Food Chem 53:1914–1920. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0482663
Hung C-F, Prapaipong H, Berenbaum MR, Schuler MA (1995a) Differential induction of cytochrome P450 transcripts in Papilio polyxenes by linear and angular furanocoumarins. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 25:89–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.15.3210
Hung C-F, Harrison TL, Berenbaum MR, Schuler MA (1995) CYP6B3: a second furanocoumarin inducible cytochrome P450 expressed in Papiliopolyxenes. Insect Mol Biol 4:149–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2583.1995.tb0020.x
Hung CF, Berenbaum MR, Schuler MA (1997) Isolation and characterization of CYP6B4, a furanocoumarin-inducible cytochrome P450 from a polyphagous caterpillar (Lepidoptera:papilionidae). Insect Biochem Mol Biol 27:377–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0965-1748(97)00009-x
Hussain M, Debnath B, Qasim M, Bamisile BS, Islam W, Hameed MS, Wang L, Qiu D (2019) Role of saponins in plant defense against specialist herbivores. Molecules 24:2067. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24112067
Idier M, Siegwart M, Barrès B, Maugin S, Olivares J, Gauffre B (2023) Genetic characterization of multiple insecide resistances in Cydia pomonella (L.) using RNAseq. Entomologia Generalis 43:545–554. https://doi.org/10.1127/entomologia/2023/2029
Ishaaya I (1986) Nutritional and allelochemic insect-plant interactions relating to digestion and food intake: some examples. In: Millar JR, Miller TA (ed) Insect Plant Interactions. Springer, New York, pp 191–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4910-8_7
Jain DC, Tripathi AK (1991) Insect feeding-deterrent activity of some saponin glycosides. Phytother Res 5:139–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.2650050311
Kanga LHB, Pree DJ, Plapp FW Jr, Van Lier JL (2001) Sex-linked altered acetylcholinesterase resistance to carbamate insecticides in adults of the oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Pestic Biochem Physiol 71:29–39. https://doi.org/10.1006/pest.2001.2562
Kolosov D, Donly C, MacMillan H, O’Donnell MJ (2019) Transcriptomic analysis of the Malpighian tubules of Trichoplusia ni: clues to mechanisms for switching from ion secretion to ion reabsorption in the distal ileac plexus. J Insect Physiol 112:73–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2018.12.005
Koul O (2008) Phytochemical and insect control: An antifeedant approach. Crit Rev Plant Sci 27:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680802053908
Lacchini E, Erffelinck M-L, Mertens J, Marcou S, Molina-Hidalgo FJ, Tzfadia O, Venegas-Molina J, Cárdenas PD, Pollier J, Tava A, Bak S, Höfte M, Goossens A (2023) The saponin bomb: a nucleolar-localized β-glucosidase hydrolyses triterpene saponins in Medicago truncatula. New Phytol 239:705–719. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18763
Lavrynenko O, Rodenfels J, Carvalho M, Dye NA, Lafont R, Eaton S, Shevchenko A (2015) The ecdysteroidome of Drosophila: influence of diet and development. Development 142:3758–3768. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.124982
Lee KP (2010) Sex-specific differences in nutrient regulation in a capital breeding caterpillar, Spodoptera litura (Fabricius). J Insect Physiol 56:1685–1695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2010.06.014
Lei Z, Watson BS, Huhman D, Yang DS, Sumner LW (2019) Large-scale profiling of saponins in different ecotypes of Medicago truncatula. Front Plant Sci 20:850. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00850
Li X, Berenbaum MR, Schuler MA (2000) Molecular cloning and expression of CYP6B8: a xanthotoxin-inducible cytochrome P450 cDNA from Helicoverpa zea. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 30:75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-1748(99)00102-2
Li W, Schuler MA, Berenbaum MA (2003) Diversification of furanocourmarin-metabolizing cytochrome P450 monooxygenases in two papilionids: Specificity and substrate encounter rate. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:14593–14598. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1934643100
Li X, Baudry J, Berenbaum MR, Schuler MA (2004) Structural and functional divergence of insect CYP6B proteins: from specialist to generalist cytochrome P450. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101:2939–2944. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0308691101
Liu T, Li Z (2019) The complete mitochondrial genome sequence of the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B Resources 4:2005–2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802359.2019.1617063
Liu L, Qu M, Yang J, Yang Q (2018) The physiological differentiation along the midgut of Bombyx mori - inspirations from proteomics and gene expression patterns of the secreted proteins in the ectoperitrophic space. Insect Mol Biol 27:247–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/imb.12368
Liu Q, Khakimov B, Cárdenas PD, Cozzi F, Olsen CE, Rysbjerg Jensen K, Hauser T, Bak S (2019) The cytochrome P450 CYP72A552 is key to production of hederagenin-based saponins that mediate plant defense against herbivores. New Phytol 222:1599–1609. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15689
Liu P, Ewald J, Pang Z, Legrand E, Jeon YS, Sangiovanni J, Hacariz O, Zhou G, Head JA, Basu N, Xia J (2023) ExpressAnalyst: A unified platform for RNA-sequencing analysis in non-model species. Nat Commun 14:2995. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38785-y
Love M, Anders S, Huber W (2014) Differential analysis of count data–the DESeq2 package. Genome Biol 15:10–1186. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
Lu K, Cheng Y, Li W, Ni H, Chen X, Li Y, Tang B, Li Y, Chen D, Zeng R, Song Y (2019) Copper-induced H2O2 accumulation confers larval tolerance to xanthotoxin by modulating CYP6B50 expression in Spodoptera litura. Pestic Biochem Physiol 159:118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.06.004
Lu K, Song Y, Zeng R (2021) The role of cytochrome P450-mediated detoxification in insect adaptation to xenobiotics. Current Opinion in Insect Science 43:103–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2020.11.004
Ma RL, Cohen MB, Berenbaum MR, Schuler MA (1994) Black swallowtail (Papilio polyxenes) alleles encode cytochrome P450s that selectively metabolize linear furanocoumarins. Arch Biochem Biophys 310:332–340. https://doi.org/10.1006/abbi.1994.1175
Mahanta DK, Jangra S, Priti Ghosh A, Sharma PK, Iquebal MA, Jaiswal S, Baranwal VK, Kalia VK, Chander S (2022) Groundnut bud necrosis virus modulates the expression of innate immune, endocytosis, and cuticle development-associated genes to circulate and propagate in its vector. Thrips Palmi Front Microbiol 13:773238. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.773238
Mao W, Schuler MA, Berenbaum MR (2007) Cytochrome P450s in Papilio multicaudatus and the transition from oligophagy to polyphagy in the Papilionidae. Insect Mol Biol 16:481–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2583.2007.00741.x
Matlock MK, Hughes TB, Swamidass SJ (2015) XenoSite server: a web-available site of metabolism prediction tool. Bioinformatics 31:1136–1137. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu761
McDonnell CM, Brown RP, Berenbaum MR, Schuler MA (2004) Conserved regulatory elements in the promoters of two allelochemical-inducible cytochrome P450 genes differentially regulate transcription. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 34:1129–1139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2004.06.014
Moses T, Papadopoulou KK, Osbourn A (2014) Metabolic and functional diversity of saponins, biosynthetic intermediates and semi-synthetic derivatives. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 49:439–462. https://doi.org/10.3109/10409238.2014.953628
Mulla JA, Tamhane VA (2023) Novel insights into plant defensin ingestion induced metabolic responses in the polyphagous insect pest Helicoverpa armigera. Sci Rep 13:3151. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29250-3
Nauen R, Bass C, Feyereisen R, Vontas J (2022) The role of cytochrome P450s in insect toxicology and resistance. Annu Rev Entomol 67:105–124. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-070621-061328
Olsen L, Montefiori M, Tran KP, Jørgensen FS (2019) SMARTCyp 3.0: enhanced cytochrome P450 site-of-metabolism prediction server. Bioinformatics 35:3177–3175. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz037
Pang Z, Chong J, Li S, Xia J (2020) MetaboAnalystR 3.0: Toward an optimized workflow for global metabolomics. Metabolites 10:186. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo10050186
Petersen RA, Zangerl AR, Berenbaum MR, Schuler MA (2001) Expression of CYP6B1 and CYP6B3 cytochrome P450 monooxygenase and furanocoumarin metabolism in different tissues of Papilio polyxenes (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Insect Biochem Mol Biol 31:679–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0965-1748(00000174.0
Pingault L, Basu S, Vellichirammal NN (2022) Co-transcriptomic analysis of the maize–western corn rootworm interaction. Plants 11:2335. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11182335
Ranasinghe C, Hobbs AA (1998) Isolation and characterization of two cytochrome P450 cDNA clones for CYP6B6 and CYP6B7 from Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner): possible involvement of CYP6B7 in pyrethroid resistance. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 28:571–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0965-1748(98)00045-9
Ranasinghe C, Hobbs AA (1999) Induction of cytochrome P450 CYP6B7 and cytochrome b5 mRNAs from Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) by pyrethroid insecticides in organ culture. Insect Mol Biol 8:443–447. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2583.1999.00135.x
Ranasinghe C, Campbell B, Hobbs AA (1998) Over-expression of cytochrome P450 CYP6B7 mRNA and pyrethroid resistance in Australian populations of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Pestic Sci 54:195–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(1998110)54:3%3c195::AID-PS813%3e3.0.CO;2-8
Reddy VS, Shlykov MA, Castillo R (2012) The major facilitator superfamily (MFS) revisited. FEBS J 279:2022–2035. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2012.08588.x
Reyes M, Sauphanor B (2008) Resistance monitoring in codling moth: a need for standardization. Pestic Manag Sci 64:945–953. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1588
Roopashree KM, Naik D (2019) Saponins: Properties, applications and as insecticides: A review. Biosci Trends 8:1–14
Rydberg P, Gloriam DE, Zaretzki J (2010) SMARTCyp: A 2D method for prediction of cytochrome P450-mediated drug metabolism. ACS Med Chem Lett 1:96–100. https://doi.org/10.1021/ml100016x
Segal R, Milo-Goldzweig I (1974) On the mechanism of saponin hemolysis - II Inhibition of hemolysis by aldonolactones. Biochem Pharmacol 23:77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-2952(75)90317-2
Segal R, Schlösser E (1975) Role of glycosidases in the membranlytic, antifungal action of saponins. Arch Microbiol 104:147–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00447315
Segal R, Shatkovsky P, Milo-Goldzweig I (1974) On the mechanism of saponin hemolysis - I Hydrolysis of the glycosidic bond. Biochem Pharmacol 23:973–981. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-2952(74)90027-6
Seki H, Tamura K, Muranaka T (2015) P450s and UGTs: Key players in the structural diversity of triterpeoid saponins. Plant Cell Physiol 56:1463–1471. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcv062
Shi Y, Jiang Q, Yang Y, Feyereisen R, Wu Y (2021) Pyrethroid metabolism by eleven Helicoverpa armigera P450s from the CYP6B and CYP9A subfamilies. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 135:103597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2021.103597
Shinoda T, Nagao T, Nakayama M, Serizawa H, Koshioka M, Okabe H, Kawai A (2002) Identification of a triterpenoid saponin from a crucifer, Barbarea vulgaris, as a feeding deterrent to the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella. J Chem Ecol 28:587–599. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014500330510
Siddiqui JA, Fan R, Naz H, Bamisile BS, Hafeez M, Ghani MI, Wei Y, Xu Y, Chen X (2023) Insights into insecticide-resistance mechanisms in invasive species: challenges and control strategies. Front Physiol 13:1112278. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.1112278
Suzuki MG, Funaguma S, Kanda T (2003) Analysis of the biological functions of a doublesex homologue in Bombyx mori. Dev Genes Evol 213:345–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-003-0334-8
Tatić V, Spremo J, Uzelac I, Avramov M, Grčak D, Gošić-Dondo S, Popović ŽD (2023) Prolonged heat stress during winter diapause downregulates gene expression of attacin and gloverin, two antimicrobial peptides in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner). Biologia Serbica 45:48–55. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8304724
Tava A, Pecetti L (2012) Chemical investigation of saponins from twelve annual Medicago species and their bioassay with the brine shrimp Artemia salina. Nat Prod Commun 7:837–840. https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578x1200700708
Terra WR, Barroso IG, Dias RO, Ferreira C (2019) Molecular physiology of insect midgut. Adv Insect Physiol 56:117–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aiip.2019.01.004
Tian K, Liu D, Yuan Y, Li M, Qiu X (2017) CYP6B6 is involved in esfenvalerate detoxification in the polyphagous lepidopteran pest, Helicoverpa armigera. Pestic Biochem Physiol 138:51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2017.02.006
Vincken JP, Heng L, de Groot A, Gruppen H (2007) Saponins, classification and occurrence in the plant kingdom. Phytochemistry 68:275–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.10.008
Voutquenne L, Lavaud C, Massiot G, Men-Olivier LL (2002) Structure-Activity relationships of haemolytic saponins. Pharm Biol 40:253–262. https://doi.org/10.1076/phbi.40.4.253.8470
Wan F, Yin C, Tang R, Chen M, Wu Q et al (2019) A chromosome-level genome assembly of Cydia pomonella provides insights into chemical ecology and insecticide resistance. Nat Commun 10:4237. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12175-9
Wang Y, Zhou Q, Zhang H, Qin L, Huang B (2020) Immunotranscriptome analysis of Plutella xylostella reveals differences in innate immune responses to low- and high-virulence Beauveria bassiana strain challenges. Pest Manag Sci 77:1070–1080. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6124
Wang Z, Zhang F, Jin Q, Wang Y, Wang W, Deng D (2022) Transcriptome analysis of different life-history stages and screening of male-biased genes in Daphnia sinensis. BMC Genomics 23:589. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08824-x
Weiss S, Kohn E, Dadon D, Katz B, Peters M, Lebendiker M, Kosloff M, Colley NJ, Minke B (2012) Compartmentalization and Ca2+ buffering are essential for prevention of light-induced retinal degeneration. J Neurosci 32:14696–14708. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2456-12.2012
Wen Z, Pan L, Berenbaum MR, Schuler MA (2003) Metabolism of linear and angular furanocoumarins by Papilio polyxenes CYP6B1 co-expressed with NADPH cytochrome P450 reductase. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 33:937–947. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0965-1748(03)00100-0
Wen Z, Rupasinghe S, Niu G, Berenbaum MR, Schuler MA (2006a) CYP6B1 and CYP6B3 of the black swallowtail (Papilio polyxenes): adaptive evolution through subfunctionalization. Mol Biol Evol 23:2434–2443. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msl118
Wen Z, Berenbaum MR, Schuler MA (2006b) Inhibition of CYP6B10-mediated detoxification of xanthotoxin by plant allelochemicals in the black swallowtail (Papilio polyxenes). J Chem Ecol 32:507–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-005-9014-7
Wheeler D (1996) The role of nourishment in oogenesis. Annu Rev Entomol 41:407–431. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.002203
Wheeler DE, Tuchinskaya II, Buck NA, Tabashnik BE (2000) Hexameric storage proteins during metamorphosis and egg production in the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera). J Insect Physiol 46:951–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1910(99)00202-4
Wu S-y, Shi X-y, Wang Y, Gao X-w (2013) Response of cytochrome P450 expression to maize volatiles in Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). J Integr Agric 12:646–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2095-3119(13)60282-8
Wu C, Ding C, Chen S, Wu X, Zhang L, Song Y, Li W, Zeng R (2021) Exposure of Helicoverpa armigera larvae to plant volatile organic compounds induce cytochrome P450 monooxygenases and enhances larval tolerance to the insecticide methomyl. Insects 12:238. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12030238
You M, Yue Z, He W, Yang X, Yang G et al (2013) A heterozygous moth genome provides insights into herbivory and detoxification. Nat Genet 45:220–225. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2524
Zalucki MP, Furlong MJ (2017) Behavior as a mechanism of insecticide resistance: evaluation of the evidence. Curr Opin Insect Sci 21:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2017.05.006
Zaretzki J, Matlock M, Swamidass SJ (2013) XenoSite: Accurately predicting CYP-mediated sites of metabolism with neural networks. J Chem Inf Model 53:3373–3383. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci400518g
Zaynab M, Sharif Y, Abbas S, Afzal MZ, Qasim M, Khalofah A, Ansari MJ, Khan KA, Tao L, Li B (2021) Saponin toxicity as key player in plant defense against pathogens. Toxicon 193:21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2021.01.009
Zhang H, Tang T, Cheng Y, Shui R, Zhang Q, Qiu L (2010) Cloning and expression of cytochrome P450 CYP6B7 in fenvalerate-resistant and susceptible Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) from China. J Appl Entomol 134:754–761. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2009.01496.x
Zhang X, Yuan D, Ding L, Li P, Li F, Liu X (2013) Expression of cytochrome P450 CYP6B6 in different developmental stages of the insect Helicoverpaarmigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Eur J Entomol 110:39–54
Zhao C, Song G, Duan H, Tang T, Wang C, Qiu L (2017) Heterologous expression of Helicoverpa armigera cytochrome P450 CYP6B7 in Pichia pastoralis and interactions of CYP6B7 with insecticides. Pest Manag Sci 73:1866–1872. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps4552
Zhou X, Sheng C, Li M, Wan H, Liu D, Qiu X (2010) Expression responses of nine cytochrome P450 genes to xenotiotics in the cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera. Pestic Biochem Physiol 97:209–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2010.02.003.s
Zhou J, Zhang G, Zhou Q (2012a) Molecular characterization of cytochrome P450 CYP6B47 cDNAs and 5’-flanking sequence from Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): its response to lead stress. J Insect Physiol 58:726–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2012.02.008
Zhou J, Shu Y, Zhang G, Zhou Q (2012b) Lead exposure improves the tolerance of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to cypermethrin. Chemosphere 88:507–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.03.011
Acknowledgements
Our insect colony was established from Trichoplusia ni eggs and first instars received from the Insect Production Services (Canadian Forestry Service). We are grateful to them for the insects and also all the advice given to us on insect maintenance. The generation of RNA libraries and RNA-Seq analyses was conducted by Genome Québec and transcriptomic analysis was enabled by support provided by the Digital Alliance of Canada (alliancecan.ca). We thank the reviewers of this manuscript for excellent comments.
Funding
We gratefully acknowledge our funding sources for supporting this research: the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery Grant (2019–04516) as well as support from the Fonds de recherche du Québec – nature et technologies (FRQNT) Centre SÈVE (RQT00335) to JCB. The authors declare no financial or non-financial interests related to this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The research was primarily conducted by Yinting Chen (experimental design, experiments, data collection, analyses), under the supervision of Brian T. Driscoll and Jacqueline C. Bede. Ryan J. Smith was involved in assistance with caterpillar maintenance and experiments. Christine LaFleur was involved in molecular training and assisted in this part of the experiments. Transcriptomic data analysis was conducted by Yinting Chen under the direction of Diljot Kaur. The manuscript was written by Yinting Chen and Jacqueline C. Bede and incorporated comments from all co-authors. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, Y., Lafleur, C., Smith, R.J. et al. Trichoplusia ni Transcriptomic Responses to the Phytosaponin Aglycone Hederagenin: Sex-Related Differences. J Chem Ecol 50, 168–184 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-024-01482-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-024-01482-1