Skip to main content
Log in

Nectar Minerals as Regulators of Flower Visitation in Stingless Bees and Nectar Hoarding Wasps

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various nectar components have a repellent effect on flower visitors, and their adaptive advantages for the plant are not well understood. Persea americana (avocado) is an example of a plant that secretes nectar with repellent components. It was demonstrated that the mineral constituents of this nectar, mainly potassium and phosphate, are concentrated enough to repel honey bees, Apis mellifera, a pollinator often used for commercial avocado pollination. Honey bees, however, are not the natural pollinator of P. americana, a plant native to Central America. In order to understand the role of nectar minerals in plant—pollinator relationships, it is important to focus on the plant’s interactions with its natural pollinators. Two species of stingless bees and one species of social wasp, all native to the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico, part of the natural range of P. americana, were tested for their sensitivity to sugar solutions enriched with potassium and phosphate, and compared with the sensitivity of honey bees. In choice tests between control and mineral-enriched solutions, all three native species were indifferent for mineral concentrations lower than those naturally occurring in P. americana nectar. Repellence was expressed at concentrations near or exceeding natural concentrations. The threshold point at which native pollinators showed repellence to increasing levels of minerals was higher than that detected for honey bees. The results do not support the hypothesis that high mineral content is attractive for native Hymenopteran pollinators; nevertheless, nectar mineral composition may still have a role in regulating flower visitors through different levels of repellency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler LS (2000) The ecological significance of toxic nectar. Oikos 91:409–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler LS, Irwin RE (2005) Ecological costs and benefits of defenses in nectar. Ecology 86:2968–2978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afik O, Dag A, Kerem Z, Shafir S (2006a) Analyses of avocado (Persea americana) nectar properties and their perception by honey bees (Apis mellifera). J Chem Ecol 32:1949–1963

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Afik O, Dag A, Shafir S (2006b) The effect of avocado (Persea americana) nectar composition on its attractiveness to honey bees (Apis mellifera). Apidologie 37:317–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afik O, Dag A, Shafir S (2007) The perception of avocado (Persea americana: Lauraceae) bloom by the honey bee (Apis mellifera: Hymenoptera). Entomol Gen 30:135–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afik O, Dag A, Shafir S (2008) Honeybee, Apis mellifera, round dance is influenced by trace components of floral nectar. Anim Behav 75:371–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bänziger H, Boongird S, Sukumalanand P, Bänziger S (2009) Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) that drink human tears. J Kansas Entomol Soc 82:135–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay RMR (2002) Do plants pollinated by flying fox bats (Megachiroptera) provide an extra calcium reward in their nectar? Biotropica 34:168–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard S, Vonhof MJ, Fenton MB, Monette G (2000) Nutrient preferences of Brazilian hummingbirds. Wilson Bull 112:558–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Can-Alonzo C, Quezada-Euan JJG, Xiu-Ancona P, Moo-Valle H, Valdovinos-Nunez GR, Medina-Peralta S (2005) Pollination of ‘criollo’ avocados (Persea americana) and the behaviour of associated bees in subtropical Mexico. J Apic Res 44:3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll SP, Moore L (1993) Hummingbirds take their vitamins. Anim Behav 46:817–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter C, Shafir S, Yehonatan L, Palmer RG, Thornburg R (2006) A novel role for proline in plant floral nectars. Naturwissenschaften 93:72–79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eardley CD, Mansell MW (1996) The natural occurrence of insect pollinators in an avocado orchard. SAAGA Yearbook 19:36–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Escuredo O, Seijo MC, Fernandez-Gonzalez M (2011) Descriptive analysis of Rubus honey from the north-west of Spain. Int J Food Sci Technol 46:2329–2336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galen C (1983) The effect of nectar thieving ants on seedset in floral scent morphs of Polemonium viscosum. Oikos 41:245–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazit S, Degani C (2002) Reproductive biology. In: Whiley AW, Schaffer B, Wolstenholme BN (eds) The avocado: Botany, production and uses. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 101–133

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hagler JR (1990) Honey bee (Apis mellifera L) response to simulated onion nectars containing variable sugar and potassium concentrations. Apidologie 21:115–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagler JR, Buchmann SL (1993) Honey-bee (Hymenoptera, Apidae) foraging responses to phenolic-rich nectars. J Kansas Entomol Soc 66:223–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert SM, Calder WA (1983) Sodium, potassium, and chloride in floral nectars: energy-free contributions to refractive-index and salt balance. Ecology 64:399–402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ish-Am G, Eisikowitch D (1998) Low attractiveness of avocado (Persea americana Mill.) flowers to honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) limits fruit set in Israel. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 73:195–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Ish-Am G, Barrientos-Priego AF, Castaneda-Vildozola A, Gazit S (1999) Avocado (Persea americana Mill.) pollinators in its region of origin. Rev Chapingo Ser Hortic 5:137–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson S, Hargreaves AL, Brown M (2006) Dark, bitter-tasting nectar functions as a filter of flower visitors in a bird-pollinated plant. Ecology 87:2709–2716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Junker R, Chung AYC, Bluthgen N (2007) Interaction between flowers, ants and pollinators: additional evidence for floral repellence against ants. Ecol Res 22:665–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler D, Baldwin IT (2006) Making sense of nectar scents: the effects of nectar secondary metabolites on floral visitors of Nicotiana attenuata. Plant J 49:840–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler D, Gase K, Baldwin IT (2008) Field experiments with transformed plants reveal the sense of floral scents. Science 321:1200–1202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knight RJ (2002) History, distribution and uses. In: Whiley AW, Schaffer B, Wolstenholme BN (eds) The avocado: Botany, production and uses. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 1–14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Liu FL, Fu WJ, Yang DR, Peng YQ, Zhang XW, He JZ (2004) Reinforcement of bee-plant interaction by phenolics in food. J Apic Res 43:155–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Chen J, Chai J, Zhang X, Bai X, He D, Roubik DW (2007) Adaptive functions of defensive plant phenolics and a non-linear bee response to nectar components. Funct Ecol 21:96–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London-Shafir I, Shafir S, Eisikowitch D (2003) Amygdalin in almond nectar and pollen—facts and possible roles. Plant Syst Evol 238:87–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzon MCA, Matrangolo CAR (2005) Foraging on some nonfloral resources by stingless bees (Hymenoptera, Meliponini) in a Caatinga region. Braz J Biol 65:291–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolson SW, W.-Worswick PV (1990) Sodium and potassium concentrations in floral nectars in relation to foraging by honey bees. S Afr J Zool 25:93–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Balam J, Quezada-Euan JJG, Alfaro-Bates R, Medina S, McKendrick L, Soro A, Paxton RJ (2012) The contribution of honey bees, flies and wasps to avocado (Persea americana) pollination in southern Mexico. J Poll Ecol 8:42–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Petanidou T (2007) Ecological and evolutionary aspects of floral nectars in Mediterranean habitats. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E (eds) Nectaries and nectar. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 343–376

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Plesser Y (2007) Factors that affect the attraction of bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) to the cotton plant (Gossypium spp.). M.Sc. Dissertation, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem

  • Rhoades DF, Bergdahl JC (1981) Adaptive significance of toxic nectar. Am Nat 117:798–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roubik DW (1989) Ecological and natural history of tropical bees. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shafir S (1996) Color discrimination conditioning of a wasp, Polybia occidentalis (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Biotropica 28:243–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva EM, Dean BB (2000) Effect of nectar composition and nectar concentration on honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) visitations to hybrid onion flowers. J Econ Entomol 93:1216–1221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singaravelan N, Nee’man G, Inbar M, Izhaki I (2005) Feeding responses of free-flying honeybees to secondary compounds mimicking floral nectars. J Chem Ecol 31:2791–2804

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soto VC, Maldonado IB, Gil RA, Peralta IE, Silva MF, Galmarini CR (2013) Nectar and flower traits of different onion male sterile lines related to pollination efficiency and seed yield of F1 hybrids. J Econ Entomol 106:1386–1394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Souza B, Roubik D, Barth O, Heard T, Enriquez E, Carvalho C, Villas-Bôas J, Marchini L, Locatelli J, Persano-Oddo L, Almeida-Muradian L, Bogdanov S, Vit P (2006) Composition of stingless bee honey: setting quality standards. Interciencia 31:867–875

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson AG (1981) Toxic nectar deters nectar thieves of Catalpa speciosa. Am Midl Nat 105:381–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan K, Wang ZW, Yang MX, Fuchs S, Luo LJ, Zhang ZY, Li H, Zhuang D, Yang S, Tautz J, Beekman M, Oldroyd BP (2012) Asian hive bees, Apis cerana, modulate dance communication in response to nectar toxicity and demand. Anim Behav 84:1589–1594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vit P, Persano-Oddo L, Marano ML, Salas de Mejiasc E (1998) Venezuelan stingless bee honeys characterized by multivariate analysis of physicochemical properties. Apidologie 29:377–389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vithanage V (1990) The role of the European honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) in avocado pollination. J Hortic Sci 65:81–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller GD, Carpenter EW, Ziehl OA (1972) Potassium in onion nectar and its probable effect on attractiveness of onion flowers to honey bees. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 97:535–539

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White JW (1992) Honey. In: Graham JM (ed) The hive and the honey bee. Dadant and Sons, Hamilton, pp 869–925

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright GA, Baker DD, Palmer MJ, Stabler D, Mustard JA, Power EF, Borland AM, Stevenson PC (2013) Caffeine in floral nectar enhances a pollinator’s memory of reward. Science 339:1202–1204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Horacio Gomez Chan who allowed us to work in his avocado orchard and Cecil Smith from the Georgia Museum of Natural History who identified the wasps. The research was partly supported by a Vaadia-BARD postdoctoral fellowship, FI-407-2008 from BARD, the United States-Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund (O.A.). The experiments at UADY were partly funded by the project MUTUAL (Foncicyt 2008-94293).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ohad Afik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Afik, O., Delaplane, K.S., Shafir, S. et al. Nectar Minerals as Regulators of Flower Visitation in Stingless Bees and Nectar Hoarding Wasps. J Chem Ecol 40, 476–483 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-014-0455-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-014-0455-8

Keywords

Navigation