Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Frequency of Occurrence of Acyclic Monoterpene Alcohols in the Chemical Environment does not Determine Olfactory Sensitivity in Nonhuman Primates

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a conditioning paradigm, the olfactory sensitivity of five spider monkeys, three squirrel monkeys, and three pigtail macaques for six acyclic monoterpene alcohols that differ markedly in their frequency of occurrence in plant odors was assessed. The results showed that: (1) all three primate species have a well-developed olfactory sensitivity for acyclic monoterpene alcohols; (2) squirrel monkeys are significantly more sensitive for members of this class of odorants than the other two species and are able to detect all six odorants at concentrations below 0.1 ppm; and (3) there is a lack of positive correlations between olfactory sensitivity and the abundance of the acyclic monoterpene alcohols in flower odors and etheric oils. The results lend support to the growing body of evidence that suggests between-species comparisons of the number of functional olfactory receptor genes or of neuroanatomical features are poor predictors of olfactory performance. The findings do not support the hypothesis that olfactory sensitivity for members of a chemical class may be related to the frequency of occurrence of such odorants in a species' chemical environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burdock, G. A. 2001. Handbook of Flavor Ingredients, 4th ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldecott, J. O. 1986. An Ecological and Behavioural Study of the Pig-tailed Macaque. Contributions to Primatology, Vol. 21. Karger, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cant, J. G. H. 1990. Feeding ecology of spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) at Tikal, Guatemala. Hum. Evol. 5:269–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, P., Doolittle, N., and Breslin, P. A. S. 2002. Gender-specific induction of enhanced sensitivity to odors. Nat. Neurosci. 5:199–200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dorries, K. M., Adkins-Regan, E., and Halpern, B. P. 1995. Olfactory sensitivity to the pheromone androstenone is sexually dimorphic in the pig. Physiol. Behav. 57:255–259.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilad, Y., Wiebe, V., Przeworski, M., Lancet, D., and PÄÄbo, S. 2004. Loss of olfactory receptor genes coincides with the acquisition of full trichromatic vision in primates. PLoS Biol. 2:120–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glusman, G., Yanai, I., Rubin, I., and Lancet, D. 2001. The complete human olfactory subgenome. Genome Res. 11:685–702.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, L. 2003. Psychophysical evaluation of olfaction in nonhuman mammals, pp. 385–401, in R. L. Doty (ed.). Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation, 2nd ed. Marcel Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez Salazar, L. T., Laska, M., and Rodriguez Luna, E. 2003. Olfactory sensitivity for aliphatic esters in spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). Behav. Neurosci. 117:1142–1149.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, R. 1999. From molecule to mind: the role of experience in shaping olfactory function. J. Comp. Physiol. A 185:297–304.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • HÜbener, F. and Laska, M. 2001. A two-choice discrimination method to assess olfactory performance in pigtailed macaques. Macaca nemestrina. Physiol. Behav. 72:511–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, J. T., Tollsten, L., and BergstrÖm, L. G. 1993. Floral scents—A checklist of volatile compounds isolated by head-space techniques. Phytochemistry 33:253–280.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kubeczka, K. H. 2002. Essential Oil Analysis, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laska, M. and Freyer, D. 1997. Olfactory discrimination ability for aliphatic esters in squirrel monkeys and humans. Chem. Senses 22:457–465.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laska, M. and Hudson, R. 1993. Assessing olfactory performance in a New World primate. Saimiri sciureus. Physiol. Behav. 53:89–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laska, M. and Hudson, R. 1995. Ability of female squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) to discriminate between conspecific urine odours. Ethology 99:39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laska, M. and Seibt, A. 2002a. Olfactory sensitivity for aliphatic esters in squirrel monkeys and pigtail macaques. Behav. Brain Res. 134:165–174.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laska, M. and Seibt, A. 2002b. Olfactory sensitivity for aliphatic alcohols in squirrel monkeys and pigtail macaques. J. Exp. Biol. 205:1633–1643.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laska, M. and Teubner, P. 1998. Odor structure–activity relationships of carboxylic acids correspond between squirrel monkeys and humans. Am. J. Physiol., Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 274:R1639–R1645.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laska, M., Liesen, A., and Teubner, P. 1999a. Enantioselectivity of odor perception in squirrel monkeys and humans. Am. J. Physiol., Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 277:R1098–R1103.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laska, M., Trolp, S., and Teubner, P. 1999b. Odor structure–activity relationships correspond between human and non-human primates. Behav. Neurosci. 113:998–1007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laska, M., Seibt, A., and Weber, A. 2000. “Microsmatic” primates revisited—olfactory sensitivity in the squirrel monkey. Chem. Senses 25:47–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laska, M., Hernandez Salazar, L. T., and Rodriguez Luna, E. 2003a. Successful acquisition of an olfactory discrimination paradigm by spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). Physiol. Behav. 78:321–329.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laska, M., Hofmann, M., and Simon, Y. 2003b. Olfactory sensitivity for aliphatic aldehydes in squirrel monkeys and pigtail macaques. J. Comp. Physiol. A 189:263–271.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laska, M., Wieser, A., Rivas Bautista, R. M., and Hernandez Salazar, L. T. 2004. Olfactory sensitivity for carboxylic acids in spider monkeys and pigtail macaques. Chem. Senses 29:101–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laska, M., Fendt, M., Wieser, A., Endres, T., Hernandez Salazar, L. T., and Apfelbach, R. 2005a. Detecting danger—or just another odorant? Olfactory sensitivity for the fox odor component 2,4,5-trimethylthiazoline in four species of mammals. Physiol. Behav. 84:211–215.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laska M., Genzel, D., and Wieser, A. 2005b. The number of functional olfactory receptor genes and the relative size of olfactory brain structures are poor predictors of olfactory discrimination with enantiomers. Chem. Senses 30:171–175.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laska, M., Miethe, V., Rieck, C., and Weindl, K. 2005c. Olfactory sensitivity for aliphatic ketones in squirrel monkeys and pigtail macaques. Exp. Brain Res. 160:302–311.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laska, M., Rivas Bautista, R. M., and Hernandez Salazar, L. T. 2006. Olfactory sensitivity for aliphatic alcohols and aldehydes in spider monkeys. Ateles geoffroyi. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 129:112–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima, E. M. and Ferrari, S. F. 2003. Diet of a free-ranging group of squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) in eastern Brazilian Amazonia. Folia Primatol. 74:150–158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maarse, H. 1991. Volatile Compounds in Foods and Beverages. Marcel Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • MÖller, R., Pause, B. M., and Ferstl, R. 1999. Induction of olfactory sensitivity by odor exposure in subjects with specific anosmia. Z. Exp. Psychol. 46:53–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olender, T., Fuchs, T., Linhart, C., Shamir, R., Adams, M., Kalush, F., Ken, M., and Lancet, D. 2004. The canine olfactory subgenome. Genomics 83:361–372.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pichersky, E. and Gershenzon, J. 2002. The formation and function of plant volatiles: perfumes for pollinator attraction and defense. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 5:237–243.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raguso, R. A. 2004. Why do flowers smell? The chemical ecology of fragrance-driven pollination, pp. 151–178, in R. T. Carde and J. G. Miller (eds.). Advances in Insect Chemical Ecology. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouquier, S., Blancher, A., and Giorgi, D. 2000. The olfactory receptor gene repertoire in primates and mouse: evidence for reduction of the functional fraction in primates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97:2870–2874.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, C. 1982. Behavioral and neurophysiological studies on the olfactory sensitivity in the albino mouse. Z. Säugetierkd. 47:162–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, H., Baron, G., and Frahm, H. D. 1988. Comparative size of brains and brain structures, pp. 1–38, in H. Steklis and J. Erwin (eds.). Comparative Primate Biology, Vol. 4. Alan R. Liss, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. C., Cain, W. S., and Burke, R. J. 1988. Variability of olfactory thresholds. Chem. Senses 13:643–653.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gemert, L. J. 2003. Compilations of Odour Threshold Values in Air, Water, and Other Media. Bacis, Zeist, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Voznessenskaya, V. V., Parfyonova, V. M., and Wysocki, C. J. 1994. Induced olfactory sensitivity in rodents: a general phenomenon. Adv. Biosci. 93:399–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. W., Wysocki, C. J., and Gold, G. H. 1993. Induction of olfactory receptor sensitivity in mice. Science 260:998–1000.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weast, R. C. 1987. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 68th ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, T. D. 2003. Pheromones and Animal Behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yee, K. K. and Wysocki, C. J. 2001. Odorant exposure increases olfactory sensitivity: olfactory epithelium is implicated. Physiol. Behav. 72:705–711.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft is gratefully acknowledged (La 635/10-2). The experiments reported here comply with the “Principles of animal care,” publication no. 86-23, revised 1985 of the National Institutes of Health, and also with current German laws.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Psychology, University of Munich Medical School, Goethestr. 31, D-80336, Munich, Germany

    Matthias Laska, Daniela Höfelmann, Diana Huber & Marie Schumacher

Authors
  1. Matthias Laska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniela Höfelmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Diana Huber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marie Schumacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Laska.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laska, M., Höfelmann, D., Huber, D. et al. The Frequency of Occurrence of Acyclic Monoterpene Alcohols in the Chemical Environment does not Determine Olfactory Sensitivity in Nonhuman Primates. J Chem Ecol 32, 1317–1331 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-006-9090-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-006-9090-3

Key words

Search

Navigation