Abstract
Field study in tropical dry forest in Tikal National Park, Guatemala, revealed that spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) devoted about 57% of feeding time to fruit (pulp), 20% to the unripe seeds of a single tree species, and the remainder largely to leaves and buds. Fruit, seeds, flowers and leaves ofBrosimum alicastrum (Moraceae) accounted for 56% of the diet, and there was very little predation on invertebrates. A severe drought occurred during 1975, the first year of the study, and a comparison between July of that year with July, 1978 shows that in the drought year there was heavier than normal reliance on fruit of the genusFicus (46% versus 14%) and depressed consumption ofBrosimum (11% vs. 54%). Dietary species diversity (Shannon's measureH) and evenness (Hill'sE) were markedly higher during the drought July than the normal July.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Cant J.G.H., 1977.Ecology, Locomotion, and Social Organization of Spider Monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). PhD thesis, University of California, Davis, California.
Cant J.G.H., 1978.Population survey of the spider monkey Ateles geoffroyi at Tikal, Guatemala. Primates, 19: 525–535.
Cant J.G.H., 1986.Locomotion and feeding postures of spider and howling monkeys: field study and evolutionary interpretation. Folia Primatologica, 46: 1–4.
Chapman C., 1987.Flexibility in the diets of three species of Costa Rican primates. Folia Primatologica, 49: 90–105.
Coelho A.M. Jr,Bramblett C.A., Quick L.B. &Bramblett S.S., 1976. Resource availability and population density of primates: a socio-bioenergetic analysis of the energy budgets of Guatemalan howler and spider monkeys. Primates, 17: 63–80.
Eisenberg J.F., 1976.Communication mechanisms and social integration in the black spider monkey, Atles fusciceps robustus, and related species. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 113.
Glander K.E., 1975.Habitat description and resource utilization: a preliminary report on mantled howling monkey ecology. In: R. Tuttle (ed.) Socioecology and Psychology of Primates, pp. 37–57, Mouton, The Hague.
Glander K.E., 1981.Feeding patterns in mantled howling monkeys. In: A.C. Kamil and T.D. Sargent (eds.) Foraging Behavior: Ecological, Ethological, and Psychological Approaches, pp. 231–257, Garland Press, New York.
Harvey P.H., 1977.The measurement of dietetic diversity. In: T.H. Clutton-Brock ed. Primate Ecology: Studies of Feeding and Ranging Behaviour in Lemurs, Monkeys and Apes, pp. 591–594, Academic Press, London.
Hill M. O., 1973.Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology, 54: 427–432.
Holdridge L.R., 1967.Life Zone Ecology. 2nd Ed. Thopical Science Research Center, San Jose, Costa Rica.
Homewood K.M., 1978.Feeding strategy of the Tana mangabey (Cercocebus galeritus galeritus) (Mammalia: Primates). Journal of Zoology, 186: 375–391.
Incap, 1961.Composición de Alimentos Comunmente Usados en America Latina. (Instituto de Nutrición de Centro America y Panama, Guatemala City.
Jungers W.L., 1985.Body size and scaling of limb proportions in primates. In: W.L. Jungers (ed.) Size and Scaling in Primate Biology, pp. 346–381, Plenum Press, New York.
Klein L.L. &Klein D.B., 1977.Feeding behaviour of the Colombian spider monkey. In: T.H. Clutto-Brock (ed.) Primate Ecology: Studies of Feeding and Ranging Behaviour in Lemurs, Monkeys and Apes, pp. 153–181, Academic Press, London.
Lundell C.L., 1937. TheVegetation of Petén. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publ. 478.
Mittermeier R.A. &Van Roosmalen G.M., 1981.Preliminary observations on habitat utilization and diet in eight Surinam monkeys. Folia Primatologica, 36: 1–39.
Oate J.F., 1977.The guereza and its food. In T.H. Clutton-Brock (ed.) Primate Ecology: Studies of Feeding and Ranging Behaviour in Lemurs, Monkeys and Apes, pp. 276–321, Academic Press, London.
Pennington T.D. &Sarukhan J., 1968.Arboles Tropicales de Mexico. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Mexico City.
Pielou E.C., 1969.An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
Puleston D.E., 1973.Ancient Maya Settlement Patterns and Environment at Tikal: Implications for Subsistence Models. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Smithe F.B., 1966.The Birds of Tikal. Natural History Press, Garden City, New York.
Struhsaker T.T., 1975.The Red Colobus Monkey. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Symington M. McFarland, 1988.Food competition and foraging party size in the black spider monkey (Ateles paniscus chamek). Behaviour, 105: 117–134.
Terborgh J., 1984.Five New World Primates: a Study in Comparative Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
White F., 1986.Census and Preliminary observations on the ecology of the black-faced black spider monkey (Ateles paniscus chamek) in Manu National Park, Peru. American Journal of Primatology, 11: 125–132.
Whitten P.L., 1983.Diet and dominance among female vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops). American Journal of Primatology, 5: 139–159.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cant, J.G.H. Feeding ecology of spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) at Tikal, Guatemala. Hum. Evol. 5, 269–281 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02437243
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02437243