Abstract
This paper is devoted to the study of the following fourth order Schrödinger equation with mixed dispersion on \(M^N\), an N-dimensional Cartan-Hadamard manifold. Namely we consider
where \(\beta \ge 0\), \(\lambda =\{-1,1\}\), \(0<\sigma < 4/(N-4)_+\), \(\Delta _M\) is the Laplace-Beltrami operator on M and \(X=L^2 (M)\) or \(X=H^2 (M)\). At first, we focus on the case where M is the hyperbolic space \(\mathbb {H}^N\). Using the fact that there exists a Fourier transform on this space, we prove the existence of a global solution to (4NLS) as well as scattering for small initial data provided that \(N\ge 4\) and \(0<\sigma < 4/N\) if \(X=L^2 (\mathbb {H}^N)\) or \(0<\sigma < 4/(N-4)_+\) if \(X=H^2 (\mathbb {H}^N)\). Next, we obtained weighted Strichartz estimates for radial solutions to (4NLS) on a large class of rotationally symmetric manifolds by adapting the method of Banica and Duyckaerts (Dyn. Partial Differ. Equ., 07). Finally, we give a blow-up result for a rotationally symmetric manifold relying on a localized virial argument.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
We consider the following biharmonic (i.e. fourth-order) nonlinear Schrödinger equation with mixed dispersion on \(M^N\), an N-dimensional Cartan-Hadamard manifold,
where \(\beta \ge 0\),
\(\Delta _M\) is the Laplace-Beltrami operator on M and \(X=L^2 (M)\) or \(X=H^2 (M)\). When \(M=\mathbb {R}^N\), Karpman and Shagalov [28] introduced the fourth order term to regularize and stabilize the classical Schrödinger equation. We refer to [11, 12, 22] for more details concerning the stability of standing wave solutions to this equation. Our main focus in this paper will be to obtain well-posedness results for (1.1) on Cartan-Hadamard manifolds. Before proceeding, let us recall some results in the Euclidean space. The global existence of solution to (1.1) was proved by Pausader [31, 32]. To do so, he used the dispersive estimates of Ben-Artzi, Koch and Saut [9]. More precisely, let
be the propagator of our operator in \(\mathbb {R}^N\). Then there holds:
-
If \(\beta =0\),
$$\begin{aligned} |D^\alpha I_0 (t,x)|\le C t^{-\frac{N+|\alpha |}{4}} \big (1+ t^{-\frac{1}{4}}|x| \big )^{\frac{|\alpha |-N}{3}}, \end{aligned}$$for all \(t>0\) and \(x\in \mathbb {R}^N\).
-
For all \(0<t\le 1\) and all \(x\in \mathbb {R}^N\) or for all \(t>0\) and all \(|x|\ge t\),
$$\begin{aligned} |D^\alpha I_\beta (t,x)| \le C t^{-\frac{N+|\alpha |}{4}} \big (1+ t^{-\frac{1}{4}}|x| \big )^{\frac{|\alpha |-N}{3}} , \end{aligned}$$ -
For \(\beta >0\), all \(t\ge 1\) and \(|x|\le t\),
$$\begin{aligned} |D^\alpha I_{\beta } (t,x)| \le C t^{-\frac{N+|\alpha |}{2}} \big (1+ t^{-\frac{1}{2}}|x| \big )^{|\alpha |} . \end{aligned}$$
Thanks to these estimates, Pausader was able to obtain the following Strichartz estimates. Before stating them, let us introduce some notation. We say that a pair (q, r) is S-admissible if \(2\le q,r\le \infty \), \((q,r,N)\ne (2,\infty , 2)\), and
We say that a pair (q, r) is B-admissible if \(2\le q,r\le \infty \), \((q,r,N)\ne (2,\infty , 4)\), and
Let \(I=[0,T]\) and \(\psi \in C(I,H^{4})\) be a solution to
for some suitable function h smooth enough. Assume in addition that \(T\le 1\) if \(\beta <0\). Then, for any B-admissible pairs (q, r) and \((\tilde{q} ,\tilde{r})\), we have
whenever the right hand side is finite, where \(\tilde{q}^\prime \) and \(\tilde{r}^\prime \) are the conjugate exponents of \(\tilde{q}\) and \(\tilde{r}\). We also have, for S-admissible pairs (q, r), \((\tilde{q} ,\tilde{r})\), and any \(s\ge 0\),
whenever the right side is finite. Now, let us take \(h=\lambda |\psi |^{2\sigma }\psi \) and \(\psi _0 \in \mathbb {R}^N\) in (1.2), with \(\lambda =\{-1,1\}\) and \(\sigma <4/(N-4)_+ \). Then, using the conservation of the mass
and the conservation of the energy
Pausader [32] showed that there exists a global solution in the following cases:
-
\(\lambda \ge 0\);
-
\(\lambda <0\) and \(\sigma < 4/N\);
-
\(\lambda <0\), \(\sigma =4/N\) and \(\psi _0\) is sufficiently small in \(L^2\);
-
\(\lambda <0\), \(\sigma \le 4/(N-4) \) and \(\psi _0\) is sufficiently small in \(H^2\).
He also proved scattering in \(H^2 (\mathbb {R}^N)\) provided that \(\lambda \ge 0\), \(N\ge 5\), \(\beta \ge 0\) and \(4/N< \sigma < 4/(N-4)\). Let us also point out that Pausader also obtained some results when \(\sigma = 4/(N-4)\) but we will not consider this case.
In view of these results, it seems quite natural to investigate in which spaces the Strichartz estimates hold. For the classical Schrödinger equation i.e. for \(i\partial _t \psi =-\Delta _M \psi +h \), \(\psi (0)=\psi _0\in L^2 (M)\), where M is some manifold, this question has been intensively studied in recent decades. It has been proved that the Strichartz estimates holds for a much larger class of pairs (q, r), \((\tilde{q} ,\tilde{r})\), in the hyperbolic space or more generally in Damek-Ricci spaces than in the Euclidean one see [3,4,5,6, 33]. More precisely, for any S-admissible pair (q, r) and \((\tilde{q} ,\tilde{r})\), we have
whereas in \(\mathbb {H}^N\), the same inequality holds for pairs (p, q) and \((\tilde{p} ,\tilde{q})\) belonging to the triangle
Intuitively, on a non-compact negatively curved manifold, one can expect to have better Strichartz estimates than in the Euclidean space because of a faster volume growth. On the other hand, on a compact manifold M, Strichartz estimates only hold with loss of derivatives [16] i.e. if \(h=0\) and I is bounded, then we have, for any S-admissible pair (p, q),
In some compact manifolds, this inequality is known to be sharp [14].
In the present paper, we will show that the Strichartz estimates (1.3) can be improved on the hyperbolic space and on a class of rotationally symmetric Cartan-Hadamard manifolds. Our first main result concerns the case \(M=\mathbb {H}^N\). In this case, we say that (p, q) is an admissible pair if
Also, since the bottom of the continuous spectrum of the Laplace-Beltrami operator on \(\mathbb {H}^N\) is \(\rho ^2 = (N-1)^2/4\), instead of considering the operator \(\Delta _{\mathbb {H}^N}^2 - \beta \Delta _{\mathbb {H}^N}\), we set
By definition, the bottom of the continuous spectrum of P is 0.
Theorem 1.1
Suppose that \(N\ge 2\). Let \(\psi \) be a solution to
on \(I=[0,T]\). Assume that \(|I|\le 1\) if \(\beta \le 0\). Let (p, q) and \((\tilde{p},\tilde{q})\) be admissible pairs. Then there exists a constant \(C>0\) independent of T such that
Thanks to this Strichartz estimate, we can easily prove some global well-posedness and scattering results for
Theorem 1.2
Let \(N\ge 2\), \(\lambda =\{-1,1\}\), \(X_0=L^2 (\mathbb {H}^N)\) and \(X_1 =H^2 (\mathbb {H}^N)\). For \(i=0,1\), if \(\sigma < \tilde{\sigma }_i= {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \tfrac{4}{N},&{} i=0\\ \tfrac{4}{(N-4)_+} ,&{}i=1 \end{array}\right. }\), (1.4) is locally well-posed for arbitrary \(X_i\) data, i.e. for any \(\psi _0\in X_i (\mathbb {H}^N)\), there exists \(T>0\) such that the solution \(\psi (t,\cdot )\) to (1.4) exists for all \(|t|< T\). Moreover, if \(\sigma \le \tilde{\sigma }_i\) and \(\beta >0\), then there exists a constant \(c>0\) such that if \(\Vert \psi _0\Vert _{X_i (\mathbb {H}^N )}\le c\) then (1.4) is globally well-posed, i.e. \(\psi (t,\cdot )\) exists for all \(t\ge 0\). We also have that \(\psi \) satisfies the following scattering property: there exist \(\psi _\pm \in L^2 (\mathbb {H}^N)\) such that
Remark 1.1
We point out that the previous results also hold for the unshifted operator if we replace the conditions on \(\beta \) by conditions on \(\beta - 2\rho ^2\). For instance, Theorem 1.1 holds true for \(\beta - 2\rho ^2 \le 0\) if \(|I|\le 1\). Also notice that to get the global well-posedness result in Theorem 1.2, we need to assume that \(\beta >0\) (or \(\beta - 2\rho ^2>0\) for the unshifted operator). This comes from the large time behavior of the free propagator which is not integrable.
Notice, in particular, that our scattering result is a lot better than the one in the Euclidean space. We point out that this result holds for not necessarily radially symmetric functions. The proof of Theorem 1.2 is very standard once the Strichartz estimate holds. It relies on a fixed point argument for the existence part for an appropriate choice of functional spaces.
Let us make some comments on the proof of Theorem 1.1. We follow the \(TT^*\) method of Kato [29] and Ginibre and Velo [23] (see also Keel and Tao [30]). The main difficulty is to obtain \(L^p - L^q\)-estimates on the dispersive propagator \(e^{itP}\). Denoting by v the kernel of this propagator, we will deduce this estimate from a pointwise bound of v and the Kunze-Stein inequality (which is an improved Young convolution inequality). A crucial ingredient in our proof is the fact that it is possible to define a Fourier transform in the hyperbolic space enjoying most of the properties of the Euclidean Fourier transform. Using this transformation, we see that
where \(c(\lambda )\) is the Harish-Chandra coefficient and \(\Phi _\lambda \) is a explicit function (see (2.2) for a precise definition). At this point, we adopt the approach of Ionescu and Staffilani [27] to estimate this integral. Namely we split the integral into two parts depending on whether \(|\lambda |\in [0,2^J]\) or \(|\lambda |\in [2^J,\infty ]\) for a suitable choice of J which depends on the critical value of the phase and then apply a dyadic decomposition of \([2^J ,\infty ]\). Due to the mixed dispersion of our operator, the critical point of the phase will behave differently depending if r/|t| is large or not. Let us also mention that this method only gives a decay in \(|t|^{-1}\) when |t| is large. The same holds for the classical Schrödinger equation but was proved to be not optimal by Anker and Pierfelice [3] who obtained a decay in \(|t|^{-3/2}\). Here, we refined a bit the estimate for |t| large using the recent method of [2] to get the probably optimal decay in \(|t|^{-3/2}\). Let us also comment a bit on the method used by Anker and Pierfelice [3] to obtain the pointwise decay of the classical Schrödinger propagator. They use the fact that the inverse Fourier transform in the hyperbolic space can be obtained as the composition of the inverse Abel transform with the inverse Fourier transform on the real line. However, to use this fact, one has to obtain very precise estimates on the derivative of the real inverse Fourier transform of \(e^{-it (\cdot ^4 +\beta \cdot ^2 ) } \). Compared to the Euclidean case, the propagator estimates we obtained are decaying exponentially fast in space, however they are worse for |t| large. We end this first part dealing with the hyperbolic space by proving a trapping result saying that if the initial data is large enough then the solution to (1.4) with \(\lambda =1\) does not scatter whereas if it is small enough (in a quantified way), we get global existence.
The second part of this paper will focus on the case where M is a rotationally symmetric Cartan-Hadamard manifold. We recall that a Cartan-Hadamard manifold is a complete, connected and simply connected Riemannian manifold of non-positive sectional curvature. Due to the lack of Fourier transform in this space, we adopt a very different approach to prove Strichartz estimate. Following [7], one can see that up to a change of variables, (1.1) can be seen as an equation in the flat Euclidean space but with potentials for radially symmetric functions. We then apply Strichartz estimates for the pure fourth order Euclidean Schrödinger equation and consider the terms involving potential as inhomogeneous terms. Using the method of [7], we use a smoothing estimate to deal with those terms. The smoothing estimate is a consequence of a uniform weighted estimate for the resolvent \([(-\Delta _{\mathbb {R}^N} - V)(-\Delta _{\mathbb {R}^N} -V +\beta )]^{-1}\), for some appropriate potential V. Here, we rely on the fact that the resolvent of this operator can be written as the difference of resolvents of second order operator for which estimates were already known see [17]. Our result is the following:
Theorem 1.3
Let \(M=(\mathbb {R}^N ,g)\) be a complete rotationally symmetric manifold with Riemannian metric \(g= dr^2 + \phi ^2 (r) d\theta ^2\). Set \(\sigma (r)= \big (\frac{r}{\phi (r)}\big )^{(N-1)/2}\) and \(V=\frac{\sigma ''}{\sigma }+(N-1)\frac{\phi '}{\phi }\frac{\sigma '}{\sigma } \). Assume that \(V\in C^1 (\mathbb {R}^n \setminus \{0\})\) such that
and
where \(\langle x \rangle =(1+|x|^2)^{1/2}\). In addition, suppose that there exists \(\delta _0\) such that
in \(\mathbb {R}^N \setminus \{0\}\), and
resp.
Let \(\psi \) be a radial solution to
Then, there exists \(C>0\) such that, for all intervals I, and all B-admissible resp. S-admissible pairs \((p_i ,q_i)\), we have
Let us observe that (1.5) (resp. (1.6)) holds true if, for large r, \(V(r)\approx r^{-m}\), with \(m\ge 4\) (resp. \(m\ge 2\)). As in [7], one can show that Theorem 1.3 holds true for S-admissible pairs if for instance \(\phi (r)=r+a_1 r^3 +\ldots +a_k r^{2k +1}\), where \(k\ge 1\) and \(a_i>0\), \(i=1,\ldots ,k\), or more generally, if \(\phi (r)= Ar^m +o(r^m)\), with \(A>0\), \(m> (N-1)^{-1}\) and the radial sectional curvature of M (i.e. \(-\phi ^{\prime \prime }/\phi \)) at a point x is negative and strictly greater than \(- \dfrac{1}{2(N-1) }\dfrac{1}{r^2}\), where \(r(x)=d(o,x)\) is the distance to the pole \(o\in M\). Concerning B-admissible pairs, we need to impose stronger restrictions on the manifold for our result to hold. We see that the condition \(|V(r)|\le r^{-4}\) roughly implies that \(|\phi (r)| \le r e^{C/r^2}\), for some positive constant C. So our theorem holds at most for manifolds whose radial sectional curvature is greater than \(-1/r^4\), for r large. Let us observe in view of the result obtained in this paper that the validity of Strichartz inequality is still unknown for rotationally symmetric manifolds where \(\phi \) has an intermediate growth between polynomial and exponential (or in terms of sectional curvature \(K_M\), for \(-C_1\le K_M \le -C_2 /r^{-2}\)). This question is also open for the classical Schrödinger equation. We refer to [20, 24] for some examples of V for which the Strichartz inequality (related to the classical Schrödinger equation) does not hold. Let us point out that along our proof, we also obtain Strichartz estimate for fourth order Schrödinger equation with potentials which can be of independent interest. We refer to [21] for related results.
We finally end this paper by computing a localized virial inequality for radial functions on generic complete rotationally symmetric manifold following Boulenger and Lenzmann [13]. Thanks to this, we provide some conditions in order to construct finite time blowing-up solutions; see the beginning of Section 6. Let us point out that these conditions are hard to check due to the fact that contrarily to the flat Euclidean flat case it is not possible to use a scaling argument to get rid of what is happening in the ball of radius R, for R large enough. To check these conditions, we refer the readers to [1] where a Maple file using the same notation as below is available to verify if the fourth point is valid or not. The first condition corresponds to "star" and the second one to "star2".
The plan of this paper is the following: in Section 2, we recall some well-known facts about the hyperbolic space. We begin with some geometric facts and then recall the definition and main properties of the Fourier transform. In Section 3, we prove the pointwise estimate for the dispersive propagator. Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 are establsihed in Section 4 as well as our trapping result. Section 5 is dedicated to the proof of Theorem 1.3. In the last section, we give a proof of our finite-time blow-up result.
2 Preliminaries
2.1 The Hyperbolic Space
We consider the upper (sheet) hyperboloid model for the hyperbolic space \(\mathbb {H}^N\). Thus we equip \(\mathbb {R}^{N+1}\) with the Minkowski metric
and the symmetric bilinear form
The upper sheet model for the hyperbolic space is then
equipped with the Riemannian metric induced by the Minkowski metric. By fixing a pole \(o=(1,0,\ldots ,0)\in \mathbb {H}^N\), \(\mathbb {H}^N\) can be identified with the homogeneous space \(SO^{+}(N,1)/SO(N)\), where \(SO^{+}(N,1)\) is the connected Lie group of \((N+1)\times (N+1)\)-matrices X, with \(\det X=1\) and \(X_{00}>0\), that keep the form \([\cdot ,\cdot ]\) invariant and SO(N) is the subgroup of \(SO^{+}(N,1)\) that fixes the pole o. Furthermore, \(\mathbb {H}^N\) can be expressed as
where \(\mathbb {S}^{N-1}\subset o^{\perp }=\{(0,y^1,\ldots ,y^N)\in \mathbb {R}^{N+1}\}\), the orthogonal complement of o with respect to \([\cdot ,\cdot ]\). In (global) coordinates \((r,\omega )\), the SO(N, 1)-invariant Riemannian metric of \(\mathbb {H}^N\) is given by
where \(d\omega ^2\) is the standard metric on \(\mathbb {S}^{N-1}\), and the Riemannian volume form by
The distance between \(x=(\cosh r,\sinh r\,\omega )\) and the pole o is \(d(x,o)=r\) and, in general,
for any \(x,y\in \mathbb {H}^N\). Finally, the Laplace-Beltrami operator on \(\mathbb {H}^N\) is given by
where \(\Delta _{\mathbb {S}^{N-1}}\) is the Laplace-Beltrami operator on the unit sphere \(\mathbb {S}^{N-1}\).
2.2 The Fourier Transform
Following Helgason [25], Banica [5], and Ionescu and Staffilani [27] we define the Fourier transform on \(\mathbb {H}^N\) as follows. For \(\omega \in \mathbb {S}^{N-1}\) and \(\lambda \in \mathbb {R}\), let \(b(\omega )=(1,\omega )\in \mathbb {R}^{N+1}\) and \(h_{\lambda ,\omega }:\mathbb {H}^N\rightarrow \mathbb {C}\),
where \(\rho =(N-1)/2\). The functions \(h_{\lambda ,\omega }\) are generalized eigenfunctions of \(\Delta _{\mathbb {H}^N}\). Indeed, we have
The Fourier transform of a function \(f\in C_0(\mathbb {H}^N)\) (the space of continuous functions in \(\mathbb {H}^N\) with compact support) is now defined by
and the Fourier inversion formula is given by
where \(c(\lambda )\) is the Harish-Chandra coefficient
and \(d\omega \) is the standard measure on \(\mathbb {S}^{N-1}\) with a suitable normalisation. It follows from the definition that
see [26, Prop. A1]. A version of the Plancherel theorem holds in \(\mathbb {H}^N\). Indeed, the Fourier transform \(f\mapsto \hat{f}\) extends to an isometry of \(L^2(\mathbb {H}^N)\) onto \(L^2\big (\mathbb {R}\times \mathbb {S}^{N-1},|c(\lambda )|^{-2}\,d\lambda d\omega \big )\). If \(f\in C_0(\mathbb {H}^N)\) is SO(N)-invariant, i.e. radial with respect to o, we have
and
where
By denoting \(x=(\cosh r,\sinh r\,\vartheta )\), where \(r=r(x)=d(x,o)\), we can express \(\Phi _\lambda \) as
3 Estimates for Schrödinger Propagator
The most part of this section is devoted to the pointwise estimate for the dispersive propagator. As already written in the introduction, we will follow the proof of [27] but refine it a bit for large time using the approach of [2]. We will conclude this section by obtaining a \(L^p-L^q\) estimate for the propagator using the previous pointwise estimate and the Kunze-Stein inequality.
We begin by giving an expression of the propagator with the help of the Fourier transform defined in the previous section. Let \(\psi \) be a solution to the linear equation
By definition, we have, for f smooth enough,
so applying the Fourier transform to the equation, we obtain
Its solution is given by
By the Fourier inversion formula, we find
where \(r=r(x)\). For this quantity to be well-defined, we regularize it by the Fourier multiplier \(\lambda \mapsto e^{-\varepsilon ^2\lambda ^4}\), for \(\varepsilon >0\) small enough. So, we will consider
We will obtain pointwise estimate for this propagator. Compared to the one in the Euclidean space, we see that it decays exponentially in space. The behavior for short time is the same whereas it has a slower decay for large time. We will see in the following that to get global existence, we only need to have a decay better than \(t^{-1}\) for large time which in our case only seems to be available when \(\beta >0\).
Proposition 3.1
We have, if \(\beta >0\),
If \(\beta =0\), then there holds
whereas if \(\beta <0\), then we get
Proof
We follow closely the proof of [27, Lemma 3.2]. We start by recalling the estimate
for \(\alpha \in [0,N+2]\cap \mathbb {Z}\) and \(\lambda \in \mathbb {R}\) from [26, Prop. A1].
We will also need some estimates for the function \(\Phi _\lambda \) contained in [26, Prop. A2]. When \(r\ge 1/10\), we rewrite \(\Phi _\lambda \) as
where, for \(\alpha \in [0,N+2] \cap \mathbb {Z}\) and \(\lambda \in \mathbb {R}\),
On the other hand, if \(r\le 1\), \(\Phi _\lambda \) can be rewritten as
where, for \(\alpha \in [0,N+2] \cap \mathbb {Z}\) and \(\lambda \in \mathbb {R}\),
We will also use repeatedly the following two standard estimates for oscillatory integrals: if \(A,B,C \in \mathbb {R}\), \(m\in C^1 (\mathbb {R})\) is a compactly supported function, and \(\tilde{m} : \mathbb {R}\rightarrow \mathbb {C}\) is a smooth function supported in \([-2,-1/2] \cup [1/2 ,2]\), we have, by the van der Corput lemma,
where \(A_1= |A|^{1/4}\) if \({{\,\mathrm{sgn}\,}}(A) \ne {{\,\mathrm{sgn}\,}}(B)\) or \(A_2 = \max \{|A|^{1/4},|B|^{1/2}\}\) if \({{\,\mathrm{sgn}\,}}(A) = {{\,\mathrm{sgn}\,}}(B)\), and by integrating by parts \(k\in \mathbb {N}\) times
where
which is assumed to be positive.
We fix a smooth even function \(\eta _0 : \mathbb {R}\rightarrow [0,1]\) supported in \([-2,-1/2] \cup [1/2 ,2]\) such that, for any \(\lambda \in \mathbb {R}\setminus \{0\}\),
Let \(\eta _j (\lambda )= \eta _0 (\lambda /2^j)\) and \(\eta _{\le j}= \sum _{j^\prime \le j} \eta _{j^\prime }\), for any \(j\in \mathbb {Z}\). In view of (3.2) and (3.4), we will split our estimates depending on the value of r.
We begin by considering the case \(r\ge 1\). In view of (2.1), (3.2) and (3.8), we need to estimate
where \(\Psi (\lambda )= t (-\lambda ^4 -\beta \lambda ^2) +r\lambda \) and J is the smallest integer such that \(2^J \ge 2^{10}\lambda _{r,t}\), with
Notice that \(\lambda _{r,t}\) is chosen in view of the asymptotics of the roots of \(\Psi ^\prime \) when \(\beta \ge 0\). We will deal with the case \(\beta <0\) at the end of the proof (in this case, we have more critical points). Let us point out that thanks to the above definition of J, the phase only has critical points in the set where \(\eta _{\le J}\) is supported i.e. in the term I. In view of (3.6) and (3.7), we will need to estimate the partial derivatives of \(m_1 (\lambda ,r) c(-\lambda )^{-1}\) with respect to \(\lambda \). Using (3.1) and (3.3), we find, for any \(k\in \mathbb {N}\cap [0,N+2]\),
Using (3.9) with \(k=0,1\), the fact that the support of \(\eta _{\le J} \subset [-2^J,2^J]\) and (3.6), we get in case \(\beta >0\)
Above we have ignored the term \(e^{-\varepsilon ^2\lambda ^4}\) since it has no effect on the result. In all the following, we are going to do the same. So, if \(r/|t| \ge 1\) which implies that \(J\ge 0\), we deduce that
whereas, if \(r/|t|\le 1\) which implies that \(|t|\ge 1\), we get
We also used that \(2^J \le 2^{11}\lambda _{r,t}\).
If \(\beta \le 0\), we have instead
This implies that
if \(r/|t|\ge 1\), and
if \(r/|t| \le 1\).
Next, we are going to estimate the \(II_j\) terms. We recall that by definition of J, the phase does not have any critical point on the support of these integrals. On the other hand, for \(j\ge J+1\) and \(\beta > 0\), we deduce from (3.7), (3.9) and a change of variables, that
If \(J < 0\), we have
Notice that in the case \(j\ge 0\), we have \(\sum _{j\ge 0} II_j \le 1/(1+|t|)^N\). In case \(\beta =0\), we have
and
for \(J<0\). Combining the previous bounds, (3.10) and (3.11), we obtain that, for \(\beta > 0\),
whereas, if \(\beta =0\), using (3.12) and (3.13), we get
Next, we consider the case \(r\le 1\). We will need the following estimate, where we use (3.5),
Using the previous estimate and (3.6), we get in case \(\beta > 0\),
So, when \(r\le 1\), \(r/|t| \ge 1\) and \(2^J r\ge 1\), which implies \(r^4 \ge C|t|\), we have
When \(r\le 1\), \(r/|t| \ge 1\) and \(2^J r\le 1\), which imply \(r^4 \le C |t|\), we get
Finally, when \(r\le 1\) and \(r/|t| \le 1\), we find
since \(|t|^{-1/4-2 }\le |t|^{-3/2}\) if \(|t|\ge 1\) and \(|t|^{-1/2 }\le |t|^{-N/4}\), if \(|t|\le 1\). The same holds if \(\beta = 0\); instead of having \(\min (|t|^{-1/2},|t|^{-1/4})\), we have \(|t|^{-1/4}\), but the estimates still hold. So overall, we showed that
To conclude the proof, we consider the case where \(j\ge J+1\) and \(\beta > 0\). We have, using (3.7) and (3.14),
On the other hand, we also have
if \(j\le 0\). Thus, letting \(J_1\) be the largest integer such that \(2^{J_1}\le 1/|t|^{1/2}\), the previous estimate yields to
if \(J\le 0\). On the other hand, we have, using (3.15),
Overall, we showed that
if \(J\le 0\). In case \(\beta =0\) we have \(2^{4j}\) instead of \((2^{2j} +2^{4j})\) in the estimates above. Hence (3.16) holds for \(\beta =0\), too, and consequently
if \(\beta \ge 0\). When |t| is very large, we can improve the previous estimates by using the method of [2]. Indeed, instead of using a dyadic decomposition, we write
where \(\chi _t^0 (\lambda ) = \chi (\sqrt{t} |\lambda |)\) is an even cut-off function such that \(\chi (\lambda )=1\), if \(|\lambda | \le 1\) and \(\chi (\lambda )=0\), if \(|\lambda | \ge 2\) and \(\chi _t^\infty =1-\chi _t^0\). Using that \(|\Phi _\lambda (r)|\le |\Phi _0 (r)|\le C e^{-\rho r}\) and \(|c(\lambda )|^{-2}\le C\lambda ^2\), we find that
On the other hand, after integrating by parts \(\tilde{M} (=k_0+k_1+k_2+k_3)\) times, we obtain
provided that \(\tilde{M}>\max \{N, 3/2\}\). Here we used that \(|\lambda |\approx |t|^{-1/2}\) if \(k_0 \ge 1\), and \(4|\lambda |^3 + 2\beta |\lambda | \ge C |\lambda | \) if \(\beta >0\). If \(\beta =0\), we take \(\chi _t^0 (\lambda ) = \chi (t^{1/4} |\lambda |)\), then we have
If \(\beta <0\), we only have to consider two extra cases which correspond to the situation where \(\partial _\lambda \Psi (\lambda )\) degenerates, i.e. when r/|t| is small and \(|\lambda |\) is close to \(\sqrt{-\beta /2}=\lambda _0\) and when \(|r/|t| -\lambda _1|\) is small, where \(\lambda _1 =\sqrt{-\beta /6}\), and \(\lambda \) is close to \(\lambda _1\). Let \(\chi \) be a cut-off function supported in \([-1,1]\) and \(\tilde{M}\) a sufficiently large constant. When r/|t| is small, we find, by using the van der Corput lemma see [9, Step 6],
When \(|r/|t| -\lambda _1|\) is small, we find that
Notice that, \(r\approx t\) in this case, so using the exponential decay in r, we find the result. \(\square \)
Thanks to the previous proposition, we are able to estimate the norm of \(I_\varepsilon \) in the Lorentz space \(L^{q,\theta }(\mathbb {H}^N)\), with \(q>2\) and \(\theta \ge 1\). Let us recall that the norm of this space is defined by
where \(f^*\) is the decreasing rearrangement of f. If f is a positive radial decreasing function in \(\mathbb {H}^N\) then \(f^*= f \circ V^{-1}\) where
is the volume of a geodesic ball of radius r. So, using this last fact, we can rewrite the norm as
Using the asymptotics of V, we see that this norm is equivalent to
We are now in position to estimate the \(L^{q,\theta }(\mathbb {H}^N)\) norm of \(v_t=v(t,\cdot )=\lim _{\varepsilon \rightarrow 0}I_\varepsilon (t,.)\).
Proposition 3.2
Let \(q>2\) and \(1\le \theta \le \infty \). Then we have
Proof
Using Proposition 3.1, we see that
Taking
it is easy to see that \(\Vert f\Vert _{L^{q,\theta }(\mathbb {H}^N)}\le C\) since \(q>2\). This yields the result. \(\square \)
Recalling that \(P=(\Delta _{\mathbb {H}^N} +\rho ^2)^2 -\beta (\Delta _{\mathbb {H}^N} +\rho ^2)\), we obtain an \(L^p -L^q\) estimate for \(e^{itP}\) by using the Kunze-Stein inequality.
Proposition 3.3
For all \(2<q,\tilde{q}\le \infty \), there exists a constant \(C>0\) such that
Proof
By Young’s inequality for convolutions and recalling that \(L^{p,p}(\mathbb {H}^N)=L^p (\mathbb {H}^N)\), we have, for small |t|,
By duality, this implies that, for small |t|,
On the other hand, we have
Interpolating between the three previous inequalities, we get the result when \(|t|\le 1\). For large |t|, we will need the following sharp Kunze-Stein inequality due to Cowling, Meda and Setti [18, 19]
for \(q>2\). Using this inequality, we get that, when |t| is large and \(q>2\),
We also have
and, by duality,
Interpolating between the three previous inequalities, the proposition follows. \(\square \)
4 Strichartz Estimates and Applications on Global Existence and Scattering
In this section, we give the proof of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2. We end it by giving a trapping result in the spirit of [8].
We say that (p, q) is an admissible pair if
Observe that the set of admissible couples in the hyperbolic space is a lot larger than the corresponding one in the Euclidean space (as for the classical Schrödinger equation). Our proof of the Strichartz estimate is quite standard and follows the \(TT^*\) method of Keel-Tao [30]. We do not consider the endpoint cases of the Strichartz estimates but they can be obtained as in [30].
Theorem 4.1
Assume that (p, q) and \((\tilde{p},\tilde{q})\) are admissible pairs. Let \(\psi \) be a solution to
on \(I=[0,T]\). Assume moreover that \(|I|\le 1\) if \(\beta \le 0\). Then there exists a constant \(C>0\) such that
Proof
First, we recall that, using Duhamel’s formula, \(\psi \) is given by
We set
Its formal adjoint is then given by
By the \(TT^*\) method, we know that
is equivalent to the boundedness in \(L_t^{p^\prime }L_x^{q^\prime }\rightarrow L_{t}^p L_x^q\) of the operator
By symmetry, it is sufficient to consider the retarded version of the previous operator
Using the dispersive estimates in Proposition 3.3, we have that
Let \(N_1(s,t)=\mathbbm {1}_{ \{|s-t|\le 1\}}|t-s|^{-1/2 (1/2 - 1/q)N} \). Using Young’s inequality, we see that \(N_1\) is bounded from \(L_s^{p_1}\) to \(L_t^{p_2}\) provided that \(0\le 1/p_1 - 1/p_2 \le 1- (1-\frac{2}{q} )\frac{N}{4}\) and \(1<p_1,p_2 <\infty \). In particular, it is bounded from \(L_s^{p^\prime }\) to \(L_t^{p}\) if \(2\le p<\infty \) and \(\frac{1}{p}\ge (1-\frac{2}{q} )\frac{N}{8}\). On the other hand, \(N_2 (s,t)=\mathbbm {1}_{ \{|s-t|\ge 1\}}|t-s|^{-3/2 } \) is bounded in \(L_s^{p^\prime }\) into \(L_t^{p}\) provided that \(p> 2\). This proves the boundedness of \(TT^*F\) in \(L_t^{p^\prime }L_x^{q^\prime }\rightarrow L_{t}^p L_x^q\). The boundedness in \(L_t^{p^\prime }L_x^{q^\prime }\rightarrow L_{t}^{\tilde{p}} L_x^{\tilde{q}}\) can then be obtained as in Section 7 of [30]. The case \((p,q)=(\infty ,2)\) is settled by the conservation of the mass.
\(\square \)
Let us point out that to prove the \(L^{p^\prime }-L^p\) estimate, for \(p>2\), of \(N_2\), we use the fact that \(v_t\) decays faster than \(|t|^{-1}\) when |t| is large.
We consider
where \(X (\mathbb {H}^N)= L^2 (\mathbb {H}^N)\) or \(H^2 (\mathbb {H}^N)\), and F is a function satisfying
for some \(\gamma >1\). Thanks to Theorem 4.1, we will be able to obtain some global well-posedness results for small initial data in \(L^2 (\mathbb {H}^N)\) or \(H^2 (\mathbb {H}^N)\) by using a standard fixed point approach.
Theorem 4.2
If \(1<\gamma \le 1+ \tfrac{8}{N}\) and \(\beta >0\), then there exists a constant \(c>0\) such that if \(\Vert \psi _0\Vert _{L^2 (\mathbb {H}^N )}\le c\) then (4.2) is globally well-posed, i.e. \(\psi (t,\cdot )\) exists for all \(t\ge 0\). Moreover, if \(1<\gamma < 1+\tfrac{8}{N}\), (4.2) is locally well-posed for arbitrary \(L^2\) data, i.e. for any \(\psi _0\in L^2 (\mathbb {H}^N)\), there exists \(T>0\) such that \(\psi (t,\cdot )\) exists for all \(|t|< T\).
Proof
We begin by proving the global well-posedness for small initial data when \(\beta >0\). Let \(\psi =\Phi (\varphi )\) be the solution to
By Duhamel’s formula, we have
Using Strichartz estimate (4.1), we get
for admissible pairs (p, q) and \((\tilde{p},\tilde{q})\), i.e.
By the assumption on F, we have
We impose that \(p=\gamma \tilde{p}^\prime \) and \(q=\gamma \tilde{q}^\prime \), i.e. \(\tilde{p} = \tfrac{p}{p-\gamma }\) and \(\tilde{q} = \tfrac{q}{q-\gamma }\). In order for (p, q) and \((\tilde{p},\tilde{q})\) to be admissible, we need that \(p>2 \), \(q>2\) and
So we can find \(p,q,\tilde{p},\tilde{q}\) satisfying all the previous conditions provided that \(1<\gamma \le 1+8/N\). We have proved that \(\Phi \) is a self-map of a Banach space \(X=C(\mathbb {R};L^2 (\mathbb {H}^N))\cap L^p (\mathbb {R}; L^q (\mathbb {H}^N))\) with the norm
We want to show that \(\Phi \) is a contraction in the ball
provided that \(\varepsilon >0\) and \(\Vert \psi _0\Vert _{L^2 (\mathbb {H}^N)}\) are small enough. Let \(\varphi ,\tilde{\varphi } \in X\). We set \(\psi =\Phi (\varphi )\) and \(\tilde{\psi }=\Phi (\tilde{\varphi })\). Using (4.1) and our assumption on F, we obtain
So, we deduce that
If we assume that \(\Vert \varphi \Vert _X , \Vert \tilde{\varphi }\Vert _X \le \varepsilon \) and \(\Vert \psi _0\Vert _{L^2 (\mathbb {H}^N)}\le \delta \), then we get
Therefore, choosing \(C \varepsilon ^{\gamma -1}\le \tfrac{1}{4}\) and \(C\delta \le \tfrac{3}{4} \varepsilon \), we obtain
This concludes the proof of the global well-posedness for small \(L^2\) initial data. Next, we deal with an arbitrary initial data in \(L^2\).
When \(1<\gamma <1+\tfrac{8}{N}\), we restrict to a small time interval \(I=[-T,T]\). We proceed as above except that we define \((1-\tilde{\lambda }) p=\gamma \tilde{p}^\prime \), where \(\tilde{\lambda }>0\) is small enough. So, we get
Using Hölder’s inequality in time, we obtain
for some \(\lambda >0\), and
So \(\Phi \) is a contraction in the ball
if R is large enough and T small enough. \(\square \)
Theorem 4.3
Let \(1<\gamma \le \tfrac{N+4}{(N-4)_+}\) and \(\beta >0\), then (4.2) is globally well-posed for small \(H^2\) data. Moreover, if \(1<\gamma <\tfrac{N+4}{(N-4)_+}\), then (4.2) is locally well-posed for arbitrary \(H^2\) data.
Proof
As previously, we begin by showing the global well-posedness for small initial data when \(\beta >0\). We apply \(-\Delta _{\mathbb {H}^N}\) to our equation. Then the Strichartz estimate gives, for any admissible pairs (p, q) and \((\tilde{p},\tilde{q})\),
On the other hand, we have
and, with the Sobolev inequality,
provided that \(p=\gamma \tilde{p}^\prime \) and \(\frac{1}{\tilde{q}^\prime }\ge \frac{\gamma }{q} - \frac{2(\gamma -1)}{N}\). Combining the previous inequalities, we obtain that
We can choose \(p,\tilde{p},q,\tilde{q}\) as above since
provided that \(\gamma \le \tfrac{N+4}{(N-4)_+}\). So we proved that \(\Phi \) is a self-map of the Banach space \(X=C(\mathbb {R};H^2 (\mathbb {H}^N))\cap L^p (\mathbb {R}; H^{2,q} (\mathbb {H}^N))\) with the norm
We want to show that \(\Phi \) is a contraction in a ball
provided that \(\varepsilon >0\) and \(\Vert \psi _0\Vert _{H^2 (\mathbb {H}^N)}\) are small enough. Let \(\varphi ,\tilde{\varphi } \in X_\varepsilon \). We set \(\psi =\Phi (\varphi )\) and \(\tilde{\psi }=\Phi (\tilde{\varphi })\). As previously, we obtain
So, if \(\varepsilon \) is small enough, \(\Phi \) is a contraction in \(X_\varepsilon \) for the norm inherited from \(Y=L^p (\mathbb {R}; L^q (\mathbb {H}^N)\). We deduce from this fact the uniqueness of the possible fixed point of \(\Phi \) in \(X_\varepsilon \). Concerning the existence, let \(\psi _0 \in X_\varepsilon \). We define \(\psi _j=\Phi ^j (\psi _0)\). We see that \(\psi _j\) converges to some fixed point \(\psi \) in the closure of \(X_\varepsilon \) in Y. On the other hand, since X is reflexive and separable, \(\psi _j\) weakly converges in \(X_\varepsilon \) to some \(\tilde{\psi }\). But by the uniqueness, we deduce that \(\psi =\tilde{\psi }\). This concludes the proof of the global well-posedness for small \(H^2\) initial data. Concerning the local well-posedness for arbitrary initial data in \(H^2\) when \(1<\gamma <\frac{N+4}{(N-4)_+}\), we restrict to a small time interval \(I=[-T,T]\). We proceed as previously, using that
for some \(\lambda >0\), and
where \(X= C(I; H^2 (\mathbb {H}^N)) \cap L^p (I; H^{2,q} (\mathbb {H}^N))\) and \(Y=L^p (I; L^q (\mathbb {H}^N))\). \(\square \)
Another consequence of our Strichartz estimate are the following scattering results in \(L^2 (\mathbb {H}^N)\) and \(H^2 (\mathbb {H}^N)\).
Theorem 4.4
Let \(\beta >0\). Assume that \(1<\gamma \le 1+\tfrac{8}{N}\). Let \(\psi \) be a global solution with small \(L^2\) data of (4.2) obtained in Theorem 4.2. Then \(\psi \) has the following scattering property: there exist \(\psi _\pm \in L^2 (\mathbb {H}^N)\) such that
Proof
The scattering follows from the following Cauchy criterion: if
as \(t_i \rightarrow \infty \), then there exists \(z_+ \in L^2 (\mathbb {H}^N)\) such that \(\Vert z(t,\cdot )-z_+(\cdot )\Vert _{L^2 (\mathbb {H}^N)}\rightarrow 0\) as \(t\rightarrow \infty \). We apply this criterion for \(z(t,x)=e^{-itP}\psi (t,x)\). Using the Strichartz estimate, we have
Since \(u\in L^p (\mathbb {R};L^q (\mathbb {H}^n))\), the last term vanishes when \(t_1\le t_2\) tend both to \(\pm \infty \). \(\square \)
With the same proof but using Theorem 4.3 instead of Theorem 4.2, we obtain the following:
Theorem 4.5
Assume that \(1<\gamma \le \frac{N+4}{(N-4)_+}\). Let \(\psi \) be a global solution with small \(H^2\) data of (4.2) obtained in Theorem 4.3. Then \(\psi \) has the following scattering property: there exist \(\psi _\pm \in H^2 (\mathbb {H}^N)\) such that
We can also prove the existence of wave operator following Banica-Carles-Staffilani [6].
Theorem 4.6
Assume that \(F(z)=|z|^{\gamma -1} z\), \(\beta >0\) and that \(\gamma <\tfrac{N+4}{(N-4)_+}\). Then, for any \(\psi _0\in H^2 (\mathbb {H}^N)\), (4.2) has a unique global solution \(\psi (t,\cdot )\) with the scattering property
Finally, we conclude this section by proving a rough trapping result. Before stating our result, we need some notation. We set
We recall the following higher order Poincaré inequality (see Berchio-Ganguly [10]) for \(k,j\in \mathbb {N}\) with \(k>j\),
where
So assuming that \(\beta \ge 0\), we see that \(\Vert \cdot \Vert _{H_{\beta ,\lambda }(\mathbb {H}^N)}\) is equivalent to \(\Vert \cdot \Vert _{H^2 (\mathbb {H}^N)}\) if
We set
If \(\beta \ge 0\), \(\lambda \) satisfies (4.3), and \(0<\sigma <\frac{4}{(N-4)_+}\), it is standard to prove that the minimisation problem
admits a solution Q. We will say that Q is a ground state. We denote by \(\mathcal {Q}\) the set of all ground states, i.e.
It is easy to check that Q satisfies
So, setting \(\tilde{Q}= D^{-(2\sigma +1)} Q\), we see that \(\tilde{Q}\) satisfies (4.5) with \(D^{-1}\equiv 1\). We set
where \(Q \in \mathcal {Q}\). We prove the following:
Theorem 4.7
Let \(N\ge 2\), \(\beta \ge 0\), \(\lambda \) satisfying (4.3) and \(\psi (t)\) be the solution to
If \(0<\sigma <\frac{4}{(N-4)_+}\) and \(E_{\beta ,\lambda } (\psi _0)\le E_{\beta ,\lambda } (Q)\), \(Q\in \mathcal {Q}\), then \(\delta _\lambda (\psi (t))\) does not change sign. Moreover,
-
If \(\delta _\lambda (\psi _0)=0\), then there exists \(\theta \in \mathbb {R}\) and a hyperbolic isometry h such that \(\psi _0=e^{i\theta }Q\big (h(\cdot )\big )\) , \(Q\in \mathcal {Q}\).
-
if \(\delta _\lambda (\psi _0)<0\), then the solution \(\psi \) is global in time.
-
if \(\delta _\lambda (\psi _0)>0\) then the solution \(\psi \) does not scatter in any time direction.
Proof
We begin by proving the following claim: if \(E_{\beta ,\lambda } (\psi )\le E_{\beta ,\lambda } (Q)\) and
then there holds
Indeed, first as noticed previously, Q satisfies (4.5) with \(D=1\). So, we find
This implies that
and
So, using that Q is a ground state, we get
where
Let \(b(x)=a(x) - \frac{\sigma }{2\sigma +2} x\). One can check that \(b>0\) on \([0,\Vert Q\Vert _{H_{\beta ,\lambda } (\mathbb {H}^N)}^2]\). Since \(\Vert \psi \Vert _{H_{\beta ,\lambda } (\mathbb {H}^N)}^2 \le \Vert Q\Vert _{H_{\beta ,\lambda } (\mathbb {H}^N)}^2\), we get
Using (4.6), this proves the claim.
Now suppose that \(\delta (\psi _0)=0\). Then \(E_{\beta ,\lambda }(\psi _0)=E_{\beta ,\lambda }(Q)\). So \(\psi _0\) is a ground state. As a consequence, if \(\delta (\psi _0)\ne 0\), then \(\delta (\psi (t))\ne 0\) for all t such that \(\psi (t)\) exists.
Next, assume that \(\delta (\psi _0)<0\). Since the sign of \(\delta (\psi (t))\) does not depend on t, we deduce that \(\Vert \psi (t)\Vert _{H_{\beta ,\lambda } (\mathbb {H}^N)}\le C\), for some constant C not depending on t. Therefore, using the mass conservation, \(\psi (t)\) is uniformly bounded in \(H^2 (\mathbb {H}^N)\) so it exists globally.
Finally, suppose that \(\delta (\psi (t))>0\) and that \(\psi (t)\) scatters. In particular, we have
So, for \(\varepsilon >0\), we can find t large enough such that
On the other hand, we have
So, taking \(\varepsilon =\frac{1}{4(\sigma +1)} \Vert Q\Vert _{L^{2\sigma +2}(\mathbb {H}^N)}^{2\sigma +2} \), we get a contradiction. \(\square \)
5 Strichartz Estimates for Radial Solutions on a Complete Rotationally Symmetric Riemannian Manifold
In this section we adapt the method from [7] to obtain Strichartz estimates on rotationally symmetric manifolds. We assume that \(M=(\mathbb {R}^N,g)\) is an N-dimensional complete rotationally symmetric manifold with the Riemannian metric \(g=dr^2 + \phi ^2(r)d\theta ^2\), where \(d\theta ^2\) is the standard metric on the sphere \(\mathbb {S}^{N-1}\) and \(\phi \) is a \(C^\infty \)-smooth nonnegative function on \([0,\infty )\), strictly positive on \((0,\infty )\) such that \(\phi ^{(\text {2k})}(0)=0\,\ k=0,1,\ldots ,\) and \(\phi ^\prime (0)=1\). We recall that the Laplace-Beltrami operator on M is given by
where \(\Delta _{\mathbb {S}^{N-1}}\) is the Laplace-Beltrami operator on the unit sphere \(\mathbb {S}^{N-1}\). As in [7, §2.1] we set \(\sigma (r)=\big (r/\phi (r)\big )^{(N-1)/2}\) and \(\psi (t,r)=\sigma (r)\varphi (t,r)\). Then the Laplacian of a radial function \(\psi \) on M can be expressed in terms of the Euclidean Laplacian, denoted by \(\Delta _{\mathbb {R}^N}\) in what follows, with a potential as
where
By noticing that
we can write the bi-Laplacian on M as
Let \(\tilde{P}_M \psi = \Delta ^2_M \psi -\beta \Delta _M \psi \). Then we have
We denote \(P_V= \tilde{P}_M /\sigma \). Observe that, for any \(\mu \in \mathbb {C}\),
where \(\gamma _1 \gamma _2= -\mu \), \(\gamma _1 +\gamma _2 = \beta \). Thanks to this decomposition, we can split the resolvent \(R(P_V-\mu )=(P_V-\mu )^{-1}\) into a sum of resolvents of two second order operators. Indeed, we have
Next, let us recall the resolvent estimate of Burq et al. [17, Theorem 2.1]; see [7, Theorem 3.1].
Theorem 5.1
Let \(V\in C^1 (\mathbb {R}^N \setminus \{0\})\) such that
Suppose that there exists \(\delta _0>0\) such that
and
in \(\mathbb {R}^N \setminus \{0\}\). Then there exists \(C>0\) such that
Thanks to the previous theorem, we will prove a resolvent estimate for our operator.
Proposition 5.1
Assume that V satisfies the assumption in Theorem 5.1. Moreover, assume that
where \(\langle x\rangle =(1+|x|^2)^{1/2}\). Then there exists \(C>0\) such that
Proof
First, proceeding as in [7] (see in particular [7, (57)]), we see thanks to Theorem 5.1 and (5.1) that
Let \((P_V-\mu ) u= f/\langle x\rangle \). Multiplying by \(\bar{u}/\langle x\rangle \) and integrating by parts, we find
So, if (5.2) holds, then using once more Theorem 5.1, we deduce that
\(\square \)
Now we convert our resolvent estimate into smoothing estimate by using the method of Burq, Gerard and Tzvetkov [15].
Proposition 5.2
Let \(\varphi \) be a solution to
Assume that V satisfies the assumptions of Theorem 5.1 and (5.2). Then there exists a constant \(C>0\) such that for all \(\tilde{h}\) with \(\langle x\rangle \tilde{h} \in L^2 (\mathbb {R}, L^2)\), we have
for \(i=1,2\) with the convention that \(\nabla ^2 =\Delta _{\mathbb {R}^N}\).
Proof
Using the previous proposition and proceeding as in the proof of [15, Prop. 2.7], we find that
Noticing that
and
this establishes the proposition.
\(\square \)
We consider
where \(\tilde{W}=\Delta _{\mathbb {R}^N} V +V^2\). Using our smoothing estimate and the Strichartz estimate for the biharmonic Schrödinger equation, we will derive a Strichartz estimate for our equation with potentials. We will need the following two sets of assumptions: if we consider an S-admissible pair, we assume that
whereas, for a B-admissible pair, we assume that
Theorem 5.2
Let \(\varphi \) be a solution to
Assume that V satisfies the assumptions of Theorem 5.1, (5.2) and (5.3) (resp. (5.4)). Then, there exists a constant \(C>0\) such that for all B- (resp. S-) admissible pairs \((p_i,q_i)\), \(i=1,2\), we have
Proof
We start by considering the B-admissible pairs case. Using the standard end point Strichartz estimate in Lorentz space, we have
We recall the Hölder’s inequality in Lorentz space: let \(0<p_1,p_2,p<\infty \) and \(0<q_1,q_2, q \le \infty \) such that \(\frac{1}{p}= \frac{1}{p_1}+\frac{1}{p_2}\) and \(\frac{1}{q}=\frac{1}{q_1}+\frac{1}{q_2}\), then
So, we have, using the previous proposition and (5.4), that
and
Therefore, we get that
Let
Let \(g\in C_0^\infty (\mathbb {R}\times \mathbb {R}^N)\) and \(T>0\) such that \({{\,\mathrm{supp}\,}}\ g \subset (-T,T) \times \mathbb {R}^N\). Then
So, we get from (5.6) that
In fact, we have \( \Vert \langle x\rangle ^{-1} \varphi \Vert _{L^2 (\mathbb {R}; L^2)} \le \Vert \langle x\rangle \tilde{h}\Vert _{L^2 (\mathbb {R}; H^{-2})} \) (this is the dual of the previous proposition with \(\psi (0)\equiv 0\)) which implies that
By duality,
We deduce from this that, for \(i=1,2\),
This implies that
Next, using \(\dfrac{d}{dt}\int |\varphi |^2 dx = {{\,\mathrm{Im}\,}}\int \tilde{h} \bar{\varphi }\, dx\), we get that
and
Interpolating (5.7), (5.8), (5.9) as well as their dual, we get the result for B-admissible pairs. The result for S-admissible pairs follows in a similar way but instead of (5.5), we use
Since \(\Vert \langle x\rangle ^{-1}\Vert _{L^{N,\infty }}<\infty \), we use Hölder’s inequality but this time with weight \(\langle x\rangle \) and (5.3) to find
and
At this point, we can reproduce the above proof with obvious modifications. \(\square \)
Finally, we use a change of variables to apply the previous result to our original equation.
Corollary 5.1
Assume that V satisfies the assumptions of Theorem 5.1, (5.2) and (5.4) (resp. (5.3)). Let \(\psi \) be a radial solution to
on an interval \(I=[0,T]\). Then, there exists \(C>0\) such that, for all interval I, and all B- (resp. S-) admissible pairs \((p_i ,q_i)\), we have
Proof
Using the previous change of variables and the previous theorem, we know that
The corollary then follows from the remark that
and
\(\square \)
6 Blow-Up
In this section, we work on a complete rotationally symmetric Riemannian manifold \(M=(\mathbb {R}^N,g)\) equipped with the metric \(g =dr^2 +\phi ^2(r) d\theta ^2\). We assume that \(\phi (r)\ge r\) for every \(r\ge 0\). To simplify notation, we denote by \(\Delta \) the Laplace-Beltrami operator in M and by \(f^\prime = \dfrac{\partial }{\partial r}f\), for \(f\in C^\infty (M)\). We assume that there exists a radial function \(\varphi _R\) satisfying the following properties:
-
There exists a constant \(\gamma >0\) such that \(\Delta \varphi _R (r)=\gamma \) for \(r\le R\).
-
We have \(\varphi _R'' (r) \le 1\) for all \(r\ge 0\).
-
There holds \(|\Delta \varphi _R (r) -\gamma | \le C\) for every \(r\ge \)0.
-
We have
$$\begin{aligned}&-F_2 - 16 \big ((\Delta \varphi _R^\prime )' +(N-1)\frac{\phi '}{\phi } \Delta \varphi _R^\prime \big )\\&\quad +8(N-1) \big (\frac{\phi '}{\phi }\big )' + \frac{3}{2} \big (F_1 ' + (N-1)\frac{\phi '}{\phi } F_1\big ) \le o_R (1) \end{aligned}$$and
$$\begin{aligned}&8G -G_1 +\dfrac{1}{2} \big (\Delta F_2 +(N-1)\frac{\phi '}{\phi } F_2 ' +(N-1)^2 \big (\frac{\phi '}{\phi }\big )^2 F_2 + (N-1) \big (\frac{\phi '}{\phi }\big )' F_2\\&\ \ \ \ \ - F_3 '- (N-1)\frac{\phi '}{\phi } F_3 \big )+\Delta ^3 \varphi _R -\beta \Delta ^2 \varphi _R \le o_R (1). \end{aligned}$$ -
\(\varphi _R (r) \equiv C\) when \(r\ge 10R\).
The functions \(F_1,F_2,F_3,G\) and \(G_1\) are defined in the following. We refer to [13] for a choice of admissible function \(\varphi _R\) in the Euclidean setting and to the Maple file in [1] to produce examples of \(\varphi _R\) in a non-flat case.
We define the localized virial of \(u\in H^2(M)\) as
The following time evolution inequality for \(M_{\varphi _R}\) generalizes [13, Lemma 3.1].
Lemma 6.1
Let \(N\ge 2\) and \(R>0\). Suppose that \(u\in C([0,T);H^2 (M))\) is a radial solution to (1.1). Then, for any \(t\in [0,T)\), we have
Above
denotes quantities such that
Proof
We set \(\Gamma _{\varphi _R}=-i \big (\langle \nabla \varphi _R, \nabla (\cdot )\rangle +\Delta \varphi _R\big )\). Taking the time derivative of (6.1) and noticing that \(i\partial _t u\) is given by (1.1), we get
where
and
First, we deal with \(A_2\). After a long but straight-forward computation, we have that
Integrating by parts, we deduce from the previous line that
Next, we deal with \(A_1\). We have
where
and
Let
Integrating by parts, we find that
where
Doing the same for the other terms, we get
where
and
Also, noticing that
Thanks to our assumption on \(\varphi _R\), we observe that
and
This implies that
Finally, we consider the term B(u). One can see that
Using that \(\Delta \varphi _R (r) = \gamma \) if \(r\le R\), we get
From \(|\Delta \varphi _R -\gamma |\le C \), using the Strauss inequality and the fact that \(r^{N-1}\le \phi ^{N-1}(r)\), for all \(r\ge 0\), we find
The result then follows from (6.2), (6.3) and the last estimate. \(\square \)
Theorem 6.1
Let \(M=(\mathbb {R}^N,g)\) be a complete rotationally symmetric manifold equipped with the Riemannian metric \(g =dr^2 +\phi ^2(r) d\theta ^2\), with \(\phi (r)\ge r\). Suppose, furthermore, that there exists the radial function \(\varphi _R\) as defined previously for any \(R>0\). Let \(N\ge 2\), \(\beta \in \mathbb {R}\setminus \{0\}\), \(\sigma \le 4\), \(\sigma \gamma >4\) and \(\sigma < \dfrac{N}{(N-4)_+}\). Suppose that \(u_0 \in H^2 (M)\) is radial such that
for some constant \(a(N,\sigma )\) depending on N and \(\sigma \). Then, the solution \(u\in C([0,T);H^2 (M))\) of (1.1) blows-up in finite time.
Proof
We first consider the case \(\beta > 0\) and \(E(u_0)<0\). From the previous Lemma 6.1, we have
Using that \(\Vert \nabla u(t)\Vert _{L^2 (M)}\le C(u_0) \Vert \Delta u (t)\Vert _{L^2 (M)}^{1/2} \) and \(\sigma \le 4\), we can choose \(R>0\) large enough, such that
for some constant \(\delta >0\). Suppose on the contrary that \(T=\infty \). From (6.4), we see that there exists \(t_1 >0\) such that \(M_{\varphi _R} \big (u(t)\big ) \le 0\) for all \(t\ge t_1\). So, integrating (6.4) over \([t_1 ,t]\), \(t>t_1\), and using Cauchy-Schwartz inequality, we find
Setting
we see that \(z^\prime (t) \ge C z(t)^4\). It is easy to see that z(t) has to blow-up in finite time. Therefore, u(t) cannot exist for all \(t\ge 0\).
Next, we consider the case \(\beta <0\). In this case, we use that
for some \(\eta >0\). So, proceeding as above, we get
where \(A=\beta \big (4- 2\sigma \gamma +4 \max _{r\ge 0} |\varphi '' (r) -1|\big ) \) and \(\delta >0\). So assuming that
we get that
At this point, we can conclude as previously. \(\square \)
Data Availability
My manuscript has no associated data.
References
Maple file. https://www.dropbox.com/s/tmrv6kimhsgx82h/4NLS.mw?dl=0
Anker, J-P., Meda, S., Pierfelice, V., Vallarino, M., Zhang, H.W.: Schrödinger equation on noncompact symmetric spaces. Preprint arXiv:2104.00265 [math.AP], (2021)
Anker, J.-P., Pierfelice, V.: Nonlinear Schrödinger equation on real hyperbolic spaces. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 26(5), 1853–1869 (2009)
Anker, J.-P., Pierfelice, V., Vallarino, M.: Schrödinger equations on Damek-Ricci spaces. Comm. Partial Differential Equations 36(6), 976–997 (2011)
Banica, V.: The nonlinear Schrödinger equation on hyperbolic space. Comm. Partial Differential Equations 32(10–12), 1643–1677 (2007)
Banica, V., Carles, R., Staffilani, G.: Scattering theory for radial nonlinear Schrödinger equations on hyperbolic space. Geom. Funct. Anal. 18(2), 367–399 (2008)
Banica, V., Duyckaerts, T.: Weighted Strichartz estimates for radial Schrödinger equation on noncompact manifolds. Dyn. Partial Differ. Equ. 4(4), 335–359 (2007)
Banica, V., Duyckaerts, T.: Global existence, scattering and blow-up for the focusing NLS on the hyperbolic space. Dyn. Partial Differ. Equ. 12(1), 53–96 (2015)
Ben-Artzi, M., Koch, H., Saut, J.-C.: Dispersion estimates for fourth order Schrödinger equations. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math., 330(2), 87–92 (2000)
Berchio, E., Ganguly, D.: Improved higher order Poincaré inequalities on the hyperbolic space via Hardy-type remainder terms. Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 15(5), 1871–1892 (2016)
Bonheure, D., Casteras, J.-B., dos Santos, E.M., Nascimento, R.: Orbitally stable standing waves of a mixed dispersion nonlinear Schrödinger equation. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 50(5), 5027–5071 (2018)
Bonheure, D., Castéras, J.-B., Gou, T., Jeanjean, L.: Strong instability of ground states to a fourth order Schrödinger equation. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 17, 5299–5315 (2019)
Boulenger, T., Lenzmann, E.: Blowup for biharmonic NLS. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 50(3), 503–544 (2017)
Burq, N., Gérard, P., Tzvetkov, N.: An instability property of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation on \(S^d\). Math. Res. Lett. 9(2–3), 323–335 (2002)
Burq, N., Gérard, P., Tzvetkov, N.: On nonlinear Schrödinger equations in exterior domains. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 21(3), 295–318 (2004)
Burq, N., Gérard, P., Tzvetkov, N.: Strichartz inequalities and the nonlinear Schrödinger equation on compact manifolds. Amer. J. Math. 126(3), 569–605 (2004)
Burq, N., Planchon, F., Stalker, J.G., Tahvildar-Zadeh, A.S.: Strichartz estimates for the wave and Schrödinger equations with potentials of critical decay. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 53(6), 1665–1680 (2004)
Cowling, M.: Herz’s “principe de majoration” and the Kunze-Stein phenomenon. In Harmonic analysis and number theory (Montreal, PQ, 1996), volume 21 of CMS Conf. Proc., pages 73–88. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, (1997)
Cowling, M., Meda, S., Setti, A.G.: An overview of harmonic analysis on the group of isometries of a homogeneous tree. Exposition. Math. 16(5), 385–423 (1998)
Duyckaerts, T.: A singular critical potential for the Schrödinger operator. Canad. Math. Bull. 50(1), 35–47 (2007)
Feng, H., Soffer, A., Zhao, W., Yao, X.: Decay estimates for higher-order elliptic operators. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 373(4), 2805–2859 (2020)
Fibich, G., Ilan, B., Papanicolaou, G.: Self-focusing with fourth-order dispersion. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 62(4), 1437–1462 (2002)
Ginibre, J., Velo, G.: Smoothing properties and retarded estimates for some dispersive evolution equations. Comm. Math. Phys. 144(1), 163–188 (1992)
Goldberg, M., Vega, L., Visciglia, N.: Counterexamples of Strichartz inequalities for Schrödinger equations with repulsive potentials. Int. Math. Res. Not., pages Art. ID 13927, 16, (2006)
Helgason, S.: Radon-Fourier transforms on symmetric spaces and related group representations. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 71, 757–763 (1965)
Ionescu, A.D.: Fourier integral operators on noncompact symmetric spaces of real rank one. J. Funct. Anal. 174(2), 274–300 (2000)
Ionescu, A.D., Staffilani, G.: Semilinear Schrödinger flows on hyperbolic spaces: scattering \(H^1\). Math. Ann. 345(1), 133–158 (2009)
Karpman, V.I., Shagalov, A.G.: Stability of solitons described by nonlinear Schrödinger-type equations with higher-order dispersion. Phys. D 144(1–2), 194–210 (2000)
Kato, T.: Nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Schrödinger operators (Sonderborg, 1988), 218-263, Lecture Notes in Phys., 345, Springer, Berlin, (1989)
Keel, M., Tao, T.: Endpoint Strichartz estimates. Amer. J. Math. 120(5), 955–980 (1998)
Pausader, B.: The cubic fourth-order Schrödinger equation. J. Funct. Anal. 256(8), 2473–2517 (2009)
Pausader, B.: The focusing energy-critical fourth-order Schrödinger equation with radial data. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 24(4), 1275–1292 (2009)
Pierfelice, V.: Weighted Strichartz estimates for the radial perturbed Schrödinger equation on the hyperbolic space. Manuscripta Math. 120(4), 377–389 (2006)
Funding
Open Access funding provided by University of Helsinki including Helsinki University Central Hospital.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
Authors state no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
J.-B.C. supported by FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, under the project: UIDB/04561/2020; I.H. supported by the Magnus Ehrnrooth foundation.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Casteras, JB., Holopainen, I. Fourth Order Schrödinger Equation with Mixed Dispersion on Certain Cartan-Hadamard Manifolds. J Dyn Diff Equat (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-022-10197-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-022-10197-4
Keywords
- Nonlinear fourth-order Schrödinger equation
- Scattering
- Dispersive inequality
- Strichartz estimate
- Hyperbolic space