Skip to main content
Log in

Effective Slow Dynamics Models for a Class of Dispersive Systems

  • Published:
Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider dispersive systems of the form

$$\begin{aligned} \partial _t U = \Lambda _U U + B_U(U,V) , \qquad \varepsilon \partial _t V = \Lambda _V V + B_V(U,U) \end{aligned}$$

in the singular limit \( \varepsilon \rightarrow 0 \), where \( \Lambda _U,\Lambda _V \) are linear and \( B_U,B_V \) bilinear mappings. We are interested in deriving error estimates for the approximation obtained through the regular limit system

$$\begin{aligned} \partial _t \psi _U = \Lambda _U \psi _U - B_U(\psi _U, \Lambda _V^{-1} B_V(\psi _U,\psi _U) ) \end{aligned}$$

from a more general point of view. Our abstract approximation theorem applies to a number of semilinear systems, such as the Dirac–Klein–Gordon system, the Klein–Gordon–Zakharov system, and a mean field polaron model. It extracts the common features of scattered results in the literature, but also gains an approximation result for the Dirac–Klein–Gordon system which has not been documented in the literature before. We explain that our abstract approximation theorem is sharp in the sense that there exists a quasilinear system of the same structure where the regular limit system makes wrong predictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Added, H., Added, S.: Equations of Langmuir turbulence and nonlinear Schrödinger equation: smoothness and approximation. J. Funct. Anal. 79(1), 183–210 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergé, L., Bidégaray, B., Colin, T.: A perturbative analysis of the time-envelope approximation in strong Langmuir turbulence. Physica D 95(3–4), 351–379 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bejenaru, I., Herr, S.: On global well-posedness and scattering for the massive Dirac–Klein–Gordon system. J. Eur. Math. Soc. 19(8), 2445–2467 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bechouche, P., Nieto, J., Ruiz Arriola, E., Soler, J.: On the time evolution of the mean-field polaron. J. Math. Phys. 41(7), 4293–4312 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Colin, T., Ebrard, G., Gallice, G., Texier, B.: Justification of the Zakharov model from Klein–Gordon-wave systems. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 29(9–10), 1365–1401 (2004)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dörfler, W., Lechleiter, A., Plum, M., Schneider, G., Wieners, C.: Photonic Crystals. Mathematical Analysis and Numerical Approximation. Springer, Berlin (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Daub, M., Schneider, G., Schratz, K.: From the Klein–Gordon–Zakharov system to the Klein–Gordon equation. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 39(18), 5371–5380 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Fenichel, N.: Geometric singular perturbation theory for ordinary differential equations. J. Differ. Equ. 31, 53–98 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Fukuda, I., Tsutsumi, M.: On the Yukawa-coupled Klein–Gordon–Schrödinger equations in three space dimensions. Proc. Jpn. Acad. 51(6), 402–405 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Griesemer, M., Schmid, J., Schneider, G.: On the dynamics of the mean-field polaron in the high-frequency limit. Lett. Math. Phys. 107(10), 1809–1821 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Haas, T., Schneider, G.: Failure of the \(n\)-wave interaction approximation without imposing periodic boundary conditions. CRC 1173-Preprint 2018/41, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe (2018)

  12. Jones, C.K.R.T., Kopell, N.: Tracking invariant manifolds with differential forms in singularly perturbed systems. J. Differ. Equ. 108(1), 64–88 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuehn, C.: Multiple Time Scale Dynamics. Springer, Cham (2015)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Masmoudi, N., Nakanishi, K.: From the Klein–Gordon–Zakharov system to the nonlinear Schrödinger equation. J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ. 2(4), 975–1008 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Ozawa, T., Tsutsumi, Y.: Existence and smoothing effect of solutions for the Zakharov equations. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 28(3), 329–361 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Schneider, G.: Validity and limitation of the Newell–Whitehead equation. Math. Nachr. 176, 249–263 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Schneider, G.: Validity and non-validity of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation as a model for water waves. In: Lectures on the Theory of Water Waves. Papers from the talks given at the Isaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Cambridge, UK, July–August, 2014, pp. 121–139. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016)

  18. Schneider, G., Sunny, D.A., Zimmermann, D.: The NLS approximation makes wrong predictions for the water wave problem in case of small surface tension and spatially periodic boundary conditions. J. Dyn. Differ. Equ. 27(3), 1077–1099 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Schneider, G., Uecker, H.: Nonlinear PDEs. A Dynamical Systems Approach, vol. 182. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (2017)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Sanders, J.A., Verhulst, F., Murdock, J.: Averaging Methods in Nonlinear Dynamical Systems, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, NY (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Schochet, S.H., Weinstein, M.I.: The nonlinear Schrödinger limit of the Zakharov equations governing Langmuir turbulence. Commun. Math. Phys. 106(4), 569–580 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schneider, G., Zimmermann, D.: Justification of the Ginzburg–Landau approximation for an instability as it appears for Marangoni convection. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 36(9), 1003–1013 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Texier, B.: Derivation of the Zakharov equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 184(1), 121–183 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The paper is partially supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG through the SFB 1173 “Wave phenomena”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guido Schneider.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Local Existence and Uniqueness of the Limit Systems

Local Existence and Uniqueness of the Limit Systems

For completeness we add the following local existence and uniqueness result for (16).

Theorem A.1

For all \( C_0 > 0 \) there exists a \( T_0 > 0 \) such that for all \( U_0 \in X_U \) with \( \Vert U_0 \Vert _{X_U} \le C_0 \) there exists a unique mild solution \( \psi _U \in C([0,T_0], X_U) \) of (16) with \( \psi _U|_{t = 0} = U_0 \).

Proof

We consider the variation of constant formula

$$\begin{aligned} \psi _U(t) = e^{\Lambda _U t} U_0 - \int _0^t e^{\Lambda _U (t-\tau )} B_U(\psi _U, \Lambda _V^{-1} B_V(\psi _U,\psi _U) )(\tau )d\tau \end{aligned}$$
(60)

associated to (16). Due to the assumptions (S1), (B1), and (I), for all fixed \( C_1 > 0 \) the right-hand side of (60) is a contraction in a ball

$$\begin{aligned} \{ \psi _U \in C([0,T_0], X_U) : \Vert \psi _U - e^{\Lambda _U t} U_0 \Vert _{X_U} \le C_1 \} \end{aligned}$$

for a \( T_0 > 0 \) sufficiently small. By the contraction mapping principle there is a unique fixed point of the right-hand side of (60) which by definition is the unique mild solution \( \psi _U \in C([0,T_0], X_U) \) of (16) with \( \psi _U|_{t = 0} = U_0 \). \(\square \)

Remark A.2

In one of the previous applications, for estimating the residual terms, we used solutions \( \psi _U \in C([0,T_0], X_{\psi }) \) with \( X_{\psi } \subset X_U \) another suitably chosen Banach space. The local existence and uniqueness proof in \( X_{\psi } \) will work exactly the same since \( X_U \) and \( X_{\psi } \) have been chosen as Sobolev spaces \( H^{s_U} \) and \( H^{s_{\psi }} \) with \( s_U < s_{\psi } \).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baumstark, S., Schneider, G., Schratz, K. et al. Effective Slow Dynamics Models for a Class of Dispersive Systems. J Dyn Diff Equat 32, 1867–1899 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-019-09791-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-019-09791-w

Keywords

Navigation