Abstract
We consider dispersive systems of the form
in the singular limit \( \varepsilon \rightarrow 0 \), where \( \Lambda _U,\Lambda _V \) are linear and \( B_U,B_V \) bilinear mappings. We are interested in deriving error estimates for the approximation obtained through the regular limit system
from a more general point of view. Our abstract approximation theorem applies to a number of semilinear systems, such as the Dirac–Klein–Gordon system, the Klein–Gordon–Zakharov system, and a mean field polaron model. It extracts the common features of scattered results in the literature, but also gains an approximation result for the Dirac–Klein–Gordon system which has not been documented in the literature before. We explain that our abstract approximation theorem is sharp in the sense that there exists a quasilinear system of the same structure where the regular limit system makes wrong predictions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Added, H., Added, S.: Equations of Langmuir turbulence and nonlinear Schrödinger equation: smoothness and approximation. J. Funct. Anal. 79(1), 183–210 (1988)
Bergé, L., Bidégaray, B., Colin, T.: A perturbative analysis of the time-envelope approximation in strong Langmuir turbulence. Physica D 95(3–4), 351–379 (1996)
Bejenaru, I., Herr, S.: On global well-posedness and scattering for the massive Dirac–Klein–Gordon system. J. Eur. Math. Soc. 19(8), 2445–2467 (2017)
Bechouche, P., Nieto, J., Ruiz Arriola, E., Soler, J.: On the time evolution of the mean-field polaron. J. Math. Phys. 41(7), 4293–4312 (2000)
Colin, T., Ebrard, G., Gallice, G., Texier, B.: Justification of the Zakharov model from Klein–Gordon-wave systems. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 29(9–10), 1365–1401 (2004)
Dörfler, W., Lechleiter, A., Plum, M., Schneider, G., Wieners, C.: Photonic Crystals. Mathematical Analysis and Numerical Approximation. Springer, Berlin (2011)
Daub, M., Schneider, G., Schratz, K.: From the Klein–Gordon–Zakharov system to the Klein–Gordon equation. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 39(18), 5371–5380 (2016)
Fenichel, N.: Geometric singular perturbation theory for ordinary differential equations. J. Differ. Equ. 31, 53–98 (1979)
Fukuda, I., Tsutsumi, M.: On the Yukawa-coupled Klein–Gordon–Schrödinger equations in three space dimensions. Proc. Jpn. Acad. 51(6), 402–405 (1975)
Griesemer, M., Schmid, J., Schneider, G.: On the dynamics of the mean-field polaron in the high-frequency limit. Lett. Math. Phys. 107(10), 1809–1821 (2017)
Haas, T., Schneider, G.: Failure of the \(n\)-wave interaction approximation without imposing periodic boundary conditions. CRC 1173-Preprint 2018/41, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe (2018)
Jones, C.K.R.T., Kopell, N.: Tracking invariant manifolds with differential forms in singularly perturbed systems. J. Differ. Equ. 108(1), 64–88 (1994)
Kuehn, C.: Multiple Time Scale Dynamics. Springer, Cham (2015)
Masmoudi, N., Nakanishi, K.: From the Klein–Gordon–Zakharov system to the nonlinear Schrödinger equation. J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ. 2(4), 975–1008 (2005)
Ozawa, T., Tsutsumi, Y.: Existence and smoothing effect of solutions for the Zakharov equations. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 28(3), 329–361 (1992)
Schneider, G.: Validity and limitation of the Newell–Whitehead equation. Math. Nachr. 176, 249–263 (1995)
Schneider, G.: Validity and non-validity of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation as a model for water waves. In: Lectures on the Theory of Water Waves. Papers from the talks given at the Isaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Cambridge, UK, July–August, 2014, pp. 121–139. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016)
Schneider, G., Sunny, D.A., Zimmermann, D.: The NLS approximation makes wrong predictions for the water wave problem in case of small surface tension and spatially periodic boundary conditions. J. Dyn. Differ. Equ. 27(3), 1077–1099 (2015)
Schneider, G., Uecker, H.: Nonlinear PDEs. A Dynamical Systems Approach, vol. 182. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (2017)
Sanders, J.A., Verhulst, F., Murdock, J.: Averaging Methods in Nonlinear Dynamical Systems, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, NY (2007)
Schochet, S.H., Weinstein, M.I.: The nonlinear Schrödinger limit of the Zakharov equations governing Langmuir turbulence. Commun. Math. Phys. 106(4), 569–580 (1986)
Schneider, G., Zimmermann, D.: Justification of the Ginzburg–Landau approximation for an instability as it appears for Marangoni convection. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 36(9), 1003–1013 (2013)
Texier, B.: Derivation of the Zakharov equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 184(1), 121–183 (2007)
Acknowledgements
The paper is partially supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG through the SFB 1173 “Wave phenomena”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Local Existence and Uniqueness of the Limit Systems
Local Existence and Uniqueness of the Limit Systems
For completeness we add the following local existence and uniqueness result for (16).
Theorem A.1
For all \( C_0 > 0 \) there exists a \( T_0 > 0 \) such that for all \( U_0 \in X_U \) with \( \Vert U_0 \Vert _{X_U} \le C_0 \) there exists a unique mild solution \( \psi _U \in C([0,T_0], X_U) \) of (16) with \( \psi _U|_{t = 0} = U_0 \).
Proof
We consider the variation of constant formula
associated to (16). Due to the assumptions (S1), (B1), and (I), for all fixed \( C_1 > 0 \) the right-hand side of (60) is a contraction in a ball
for a \( T_0 > 0 \) sufficiently small. By the contraction mapping principle there is a unique fixed point of the right-hand side of (60) which by definition is the unique mild solution \( \psi _U \in C([0,T_0], X_U) \) of (16) with \( \psi _U|_{t = 0} = U_0 \). \(\square \)
Remark A.2
In one of the previous applications, for estimating the residual terms, we used solutions \( \psi _U \in C([0,T_0], X_{\psi }) \) with \( X_{\psi } \subset X_U \) another suitably chosen Banach space. The local existence and uniqueness proof in \( X_{\psi } \) will work exactly the same since \( X_U \) and \( X_{\psi } \) have been chosen as Sobolev spaces \( H^{s_U} \) and \( H^{s_{\psi }} \) with \( s_U < s_{\psi } \).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baumstark, S., Schneider, G., Schratz, K. et al. Effective Slow Dynamics Models for a Class of Dispersive Systems. J Dyn Diff Equat 32, 1867–1899 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-019-09791-w
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-019-09791-w