Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Asymptotic Finite-dimensional Character of a Spectrally-hyperviscous Model of 3D Turbulent Flow

  • Published:
Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

We obtain attractor and inertial-manifold results for a class of 3D turbulent flow models on a periodic spatial domain in which hyperviscous terms are added spectrally to the standard incompressible Navier–Stokes equations (NSE). Let P m be the projection onto the first m eigenspaces of A =−Δ, let μ and α be positive constants with α ≥3/2, and let Q m =IP m , then we add to the NSE operators μ A φ in a general family such that A φQ m A α in the sense of quadratic forms. The models are motivated by characteristics of spectral eddy-viscosity (SEV) and spectral vanishing viscosity (SVV) models. A distinguished class of our models adds extra hyperviscosity terms only to high wavenumbers past a cutoff λ m0 where m 0m, so that for large enough m 0 the inertial-range wavenumbers see only standard NSE viscosity.

We first obtain estimates on the Hausdorff and fractal dimensions of the attractor \({\mathcal{A}}\) (respectively \(\dim_{\rm H}{\mathcal{A}}\) and \(\dim_{\rm F}{\mathcal{A}}\)). For a constant K α on the order of unity we show if μ ≥ ν that \(\dim_{\rm H} {\mathcal{A}} \leq \dim_{\rm F} {\mathcal{A}} \leq K_{\alpha} \left[\lambda_{m}/\lambda_{1}\right]^{9\left(\alpha - 1\right)/(10\alpha)} \left[l_{0}/l_{\epsilon}\right]^{(6\alpha+9)/(5\alpha)}\) and if μ ≤ ν that \(\dim_{\rm H} {\mathcal{A}} \leq \dim_{\rm F} {\mathcal{A}} \leq K_{\alpha} \left(\nu/\mu\right)^{9/(10\alpha)}\left[\lambda_{m}/\lambda_{1}\right]^{9\left(\alpha -1\right)/(10\alpha)} \left[l_{0}/l_{\epsilon}\right]^{(6\alpha + 9)/(5\alpha)}\) where ν is the standard viscosity coefficient, l 0 = λ −1/21 represents characteristic macroscopic length, and \(l_{\epsilon}\) is the Kolmogorov length scale, i.e. \(l_{\epsilon} = (\nu^{3}/\epsilon)\) where \(\epsilon\) is Kolmogorov’s mean rate of dissipation of energy in turbulent flow. All bracketed constants and K α are dimensionless and scale-invariant. The estimate grows in m due to the term λ m 1 but at a rate lower than m 3/5, and the estimate grows in μ as the relative size of ν to μ. The exponent on \(l_{0}/l_{\epsilon}\) is significantly less than the Landau–Lifschitz predicted value of 3. If we impose the condition \(\lambda_{m} \leq (1/l_{\epsilon})^{2}\), the estimates become \(K_{\alpha} \left[l_{0}/l_{\epsilon}\right]^{3}\) for μ ≥ ν and \(K_{\alpha}\left(\nu/\mu \right)^{\frac{9}{10\alpha}}\left[l_{0}/l_{\epsilon}\right]^{3}\) for μ ≤  ν. This result holds independently of α, with K α and c α independent of m. In an SVV example μ ≥  ν, and for μ ≤  ν aspects of SEV theory and observation suggest setting \(\mu \thicksim c\nu\) for 1/c within α orders of magnitude of unity, giving the estimate \(c_{\alpha}K_{\alpha}\left[l_{0}/l_{\epsilon}\right]^{3}\) where c α is within an order of magnitude of unity. These choices give straight-up or nearly straight-up agreement with the Landau–Lifschitz predictions for the number of degrees of freedom in 3D turbulent flow with m so large that (e.g. in the distinguished-class case for m 0 large enough) we would expect our solutions to be very good if not virtually indistinguishable approximants to standard NSE solutions. We would expect lower choices of λ m (e.g. \(\lambda_{m}\thicksim a(1/l_{\epsilon})\) with a >  1) to still give good NSE approximation with lower powers on l 0/l ε, showing the potential of the model to reduce the number of degrees of freedom needed in practical simulations. For the choice \(\epsilon \thicksim \nu^{\alpha}\), motivated by the Chapman–Enskog expansion in the case m =  0, the condition becomes \(\lambda_{m}\leq \nu (1/l_{\epsilon})^{2}\), giving agreement with Landau–Lifschitz for smaller values of λ m then as above but still large enough to suggest good NSE approximation. Our final results establish the existence of a inertial manifold \({\mathcal{M}}\) for reasonably wide classes of the above models using the Foias/Sell/Temam theory. The first of these results obtains such an \({\mathcal{M}}\) of dimension Nm for the general class of operators A φ if α >  5/2.

The special class of A φ such that P m A φ =  0 and Q m A φ ≥ Q m A α has a unique spectral-gap property which we can use whenever α ≥  3/2 to show that we have an inertial manifold \({\mathcal{M}}\) of dimension m if m is large enough. As a corollary, for most of the cases of the operators A φ in the distinguished-class case that we expect will be typically used in practice we also obtain an \({\mathcal{M}}\), now of dimension m 0 for m 0 large enough, though under conditions requiring generally larger m 0 than the m in the special class. In both cases, for large enough m (respectively m 0), we have an inertial manifold for a system in which the inertial range essentially behaves according to standard NSE physics, and in particular trajectories on \({\mathcal{M}}\) are controlled by essentially NSE dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Avrin, J. Approximate globally-regular solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations via spectral methods, submitted.

  2. Avrin J. (1996). Large-eigenvalue global existence and regularity results for the Navier–Stokes equation. J. Diff. Eqns. 12, 365–390

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Avrin J. (2003). Singular initial data and uniform global bounds for the hyperviscous Navier–Stokes equations with periodic boundary conditions. J. Diff. Eq. 190, 330–351

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Ball, J. (1997). Continuity properties and global attractors of generalized semiflows and the Navier–Stokes equations. J. Nonlinear Sci. 7, 475–502. Erratum: J. Nonlinear Sci. 8 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Borue V., Orszag S. (1996). Numerical study of three-dimensional Kolmogorov flow at high Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 306, 293–323

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Borue V., Orszag S. (1998). Local energy flux and subgrid-scale statistics in three-dimensional turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 306, 1–31

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Cerutti S., Meneveau C., Knio O.M. (2000). Spectral and hyper-eddy viscosity in high-Reynolds-number turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 421, 307–338

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen G.Q., Du Q., Tadmor E. (1993). Spectral viscosity approximations to multidimensional conservation laws. Math. Comp. 61, 629

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Chollet, J. (1985). Two point closure used for a sub-grid scale model in LES. In Bradbury, J. L., Durst, F., Launder, B., Schmidt, F., and Whitelaw, J. (eds.), Turbulent Shear Flows, Vol. 4, Springer, pp. 62–72.

  10. Chollet J., Lesieur M. (1981). Parametrization of small scales of three-dimensional isotropic turbulence utilizing spectral closures. J. Atmos. Sci. 38, 2747–2757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Constantin P., Foias C.F. (1985). Global Liapunov exponents, Kaplan-Yorke formulas and the dimension of the attractor for the 2-d Navier–Stokes equations. Com. Pure Appl. Math 38, 1–27

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Constantin P., Foias C., Manley O., Temam R. (1985). Determining modes and fractral dimensions of turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 150, 427–440

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Constantin P., Foias C.F., Temam R. (1985). Attractors representing turbulent flows. Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 53, 114

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Constantin P., Foias C., Temam R. (1988). On the dimension of the attractors in two dimensional turbulence. Phys. D 30, 284–296

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Foias C., Holm D.D., Titi E.S. (2002). The three-dimensional viscous Camassa–Holm equations and their relation to the Navier–Stokes equations and turbulence theory. J. Dyn. Diff. Eqns. 14, 1–34

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Foias, C., Manley, O., Rosa, R., and Temam, R. (2001). Navier–Stokes Equations and Turbulence. Cambridge University Press.

  17. Foias C., Sell G.R., Temam R. (1985). Variétés inertielles des équations differentielles dissipatives. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sér I. 301, 139–142

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Foias C., Sell G.R., Temam R. (1988). Inertial manifolds, for nonlinear evolutionary equations. J. Diff. Eqns. 73, 309–353

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Holm D.D., Marsden J.E., Ratiu T.S. (1998). Euler-Poincaré equations and semidirect products with applications to continuum theories. Adv. Math. 137, 1–81

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Holm D.D., Marsden J.E., Ratiu T.S. (1998). Euler-Poincaré models of ideal fluids with nonlinear dispersion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4173–4176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Karamanos G.S., and Karniadakis G.E. (2000). A spectral vanishing viscosity method for large-eddy simulations. J. Comp. Phys. 163, 22–50

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Kolmogorov A.N. (1941). The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds numbers. C.R. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. URSS. 30, 301–305

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Kraichnan R.H. (1967). Inertial ranges in two-dimensional turbulence. Phys. Fluids. 10, 1417–1423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kraichnan R.H. (1976). Eddy viscosity in two and three dimensions. J. Atmos. Sci. 33, 1521–1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kukavica I. (1995). Level sets of the vorticity and the stream function for the 2D periodic Navier–Stokes equations with potential forces. J. Diff. Eq. 126, 374–388

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Kukavica I. (2003). Length of vorticity nodal sets for solutions of the 2D Navier–Stokes equations. Comm. PDE 28, 771–793

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Landau L., Lifschitz E. (1953). Fluid Mechanics. Addison-Wesley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Marsden J.E., Shkoller S. (2002). The anisotropic Lagrangian-averaged Euler and Navier–Stokes equations. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 166, 27–46

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Sell G.R. (1996). Global attractors for the three-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations. J. Dynam. Diff. Eqns. 8, 1–33

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Tadmor E. (1989). Convergence of spectral methods for nonlinear conservation laws. SIAM J. Nimer. Anal. 26, 30

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Temam R. (1985). Attractors for Navier–Stokes equations. Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations and Their Applications. In: Brézis H., Lions J.L. (eds). Séminaire du Collège de France, Vol. 7. Pittman, Boston, pp. 272–292

    Google Scholar 

  32. Temam, R. (1986). Infinite-dimensional dynamical systems in fluid mechanics. In Browder, F. (ed.), Nonlinear Functional Analysis and its Applications. Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Vol. 45, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, pp. 40–45.

  33. Temam R. (1996). Infinite-Dimensional Dynamical Systems in Mechanics and Physics. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joel Avrin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Avrin, J. The Asymptotic Finite-dimensional Character of a Spectrally-hyperviscous Model of 3D Turbulent Flow. J Dyn Diff Equat 20, 479–518 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-007-9100-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-007-9100-3

Keywords

AMS Subject Classifications

Navigation