Abstract
This study adopted a brief component analysis to examine the active variable in a tolerance for delay of reinforcement (TFD) intervention procedure to decrease tangible-maintained problem behavior for a male adolescent with autism. Antecedent-based functional analysis suggested that problem behavior occurred most when access to tangible items or activities was restricted. With the introduction of a TFD intervention procedure using a combination of a general delay cue and an explicit delay cue, the learner’s problem behavior decreased to a low level and he quickly learned to wait for access to preferred items for 10 min with no problem behavior. Two weeks after the learner met the mastery criterion, a component analysis was conducted through a brief ABA withdrawal design, to separate the relative contributions of the general delay cue and the explicit delay cue in the maintenance of the TFD intervention. The combination of general and explicit delay cues resulted in low levels of problem behavior and higher toleration of delays to reinforcement relative to the general delay cue alone. Implications and limitations are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, C. M., & Long, E. S. (2002). Use of a structured descriptive assessment methodology to identify variables affecting problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35(2), 137–154.
Bruininks, R. H., Woodcock, R. W., Weatherman, R. F., & Hill, B. K. (1996). Scales of independent behavior – Revised (SIB – R). Itasca: Riverside Publishing.
Carr, E. G., & Carlson, J. I. (1993). Reduction of severe behavior problems in the community using a multicomponent treatment approach. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26(2), 157–172.
Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18(2), 111–126.
Carr, E. G., Levin, L., McConnachie, G., Carlson, J. I., Kemp, D. C., & Smith, C. (1994). Communication based intervention for problem behavior: A user’s guide for producing positive change. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C., Bowman, L., Hagopian, L., Owens, J., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491–498.
Fisher, W. W., Thompson, R. H., Hagopian, L. P., Bowman, L. G., & Krug, A. (2000). Facilitating tolerance of delayed reinforcement during functional communication training. Behavior Modification, 24, 3–29.
Grey, I., Healy, O., Leader, G., & Hayes, D. (2009). Using a time timer™ to increase appropriate waiting behavior in a child with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 30, 359–366.
Hong, E. R., Neely, L., Rispoli, M. J., Trepinski, T. M., Gregori, E., & Davis, T. (2014). A comparison of general and explicit delay cues to reinforcement for tangible-maintained challenging behavior. Developmental Neurorehabilitation. doi:10.3109/17518423.2013.874378.
Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209. Reprinted from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20, 1982.
Kemp, D. C., & Carr, E. G. (1995). Reduction of severe problem behavior in community employment using a hypothesis-driven multicomponent intervention approach. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 20, 229–247.
Kern, L., Carberry, N., & Haidra, C. (1997). Analysis and intervention with two topographies of challenging behavior exhibited by a young woman with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 18, 275–287.
Reichle, J. & Wacker, D. (2014). Functional communication training. Unpublished manuscript. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
Reichle, J., Johnson, L., Monn, E., & Harris, M. (2010). Task engagement and escape maintained challenging behavior: differential effects of general and explicit cues when implementing a signaled delay in the delivery of reinforcement. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 709–720.
Vollmer, T. R., Borrero, J. C., Lalli, J. S., & Daniel, D. (1999). Evaluating self-control and impulsivity in children with severe behavior disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32(4), 451–466.
Wechsler, D. (2004). The Wechsler intelligence scale for children—fourth edition. London: Pearson Assessment.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, M., McComas, J.J., Reichle, J.E. et al. Brief Component Analysis to Identify the Active Variable in the Maintenance of Tolerance for Delay of Reinforcement Intervention for an Adolescent with Autism. J Dev Phys Disabil 27, 393–404 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-015-9422-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-015-9422-8