Skip to main content
Log in

Empowering for Community Integration in Hong Kong

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because of purported obstacles to empowering adults with developmental disabilities to enhance their community integration, particularly in a Chinese context as Hong Kong, it is important to gauge the contribution of empowerment in such a place. The present study thereby assesses community integration in terms of knowledge, assertiveness, desire, feeling accepted, and participation and empowerment in terms of involvement in planning, leading, and reviewing in the social service setting. This study involves a survey of adults with developmental disabilities of various grades. It turns out that empowerment is significantly helpful for the adult’s community integration, regardless of the grade and proxy response by a family member or social worker. Hence, empowerment can be feasible in social service settings to raise the adult’s community integration effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnes, C. (2003). What a difference a decade makes: Reflections on doing emancipatory disability research. Disability & Society, 18(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayley, M. (1997). Empowering and relationships. In P. Ramcharan, G. Roberts, G. Grant, & J. Borland (Eds.), Empowerment in everyday life learning disability (pp. 15–34). London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, T., Cheung, P.-C., Lau, S., Hau, K.-T., & Lew, W. J. F. (1993). Perceptions of parenting in Mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong: Sex differences and societal differences. Developmental Psychology, 29(1), 156–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. I., Bayer, M. B., & Brown, P. M. (1992). Empowerment and developmental handicaps: Choices and quality of life. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchard, S. N. (1999). Normalization and residential services: The vermont studies. In R. J. Flynn & R. A. Lemay (Eds.), A quarter-century of normalization and social role valorization: Evolution and impact (pp. 241–270). Ottawa, Canada: University of Ottawa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou, K.-L., & Mak, K.-Y. (1998). Attitudes to mental patients among Hong Kong Chinese: A trend study over two years. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 44(3), 15–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, I. H.-S., & Ng, I. (2004). The characteristics of Chinese personal ties (Guanxi): Evidence from Hong Kong. Organization Studies, 25(&), 1075–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cocks, E., & Cockram, J. (1997). Empowerment and the limitations of formal human service and legislation. In P. Ramcharan, G. Roberts, G. Grant, & J. Borland (Eds.), Empowerment in everyday life learning disability (pp. 222–240). London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. A. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(4), 584–594.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, I., & Dunst, C. J. (2004). Helping styles and parent empowement in families with a young child with disability. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 29(1), 40–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowson, S. (1997). Empowerment within services: A comfortable delusion. In P. Ramcharan, G. Roberts, G. Grant, & J. Borland (Eds.), Empowerment in everyday life learning disability (pp. 101–120). London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferry, J., & Felce, D. (1995). Measure for measure: How do measures of quality of life compare? British Journal of Learning Disability, 23, 134–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, R. J. (1999). A comprehensive review of research conducted with the program evaluation instruments PASS and PASSING. In R. J. Flynn & R. A. Lemay (Eds.), A quarter-century of normalization and social role valorization: Evolution and impact (pp. 317–349). Ottawa, Canada: University of Ottawa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gow, L., Balla, J., Sung, C. W., Jenks, P., Chan, S., & Ledesma, J. A. (1992). Quality of life of ageing people with mental handicap in Hong Kong: Report on phase III. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Polytechnic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granfield, R. (1996). Constructing disability: Organizational practice and community response. Journal of Applied Sociology, 13(2), 58–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagendoorn, M., van Yperen, N. W., van de Vliert, E., & Buunk, B. P. (1999). Employees’ reactions to problematic events: A circumplex structure of five categories of responses, and the role of job satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 309–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatton, C., Emerson, E., Robertson, J., Gregory, N., Kessisoglou, S., & Walsh, P. N. (2004). The resident choice scale: A measure to assess opportunisties for self-determination in residential settings. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 48(2), 103–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, M., van Berkum, G., Reijnders, R., & Heller, T. (1997). Differences in service needs, time demands, and caregiving burden among parents of persons with mental retardation across the life cycle. Family Relations, 46(4), 417–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, T., Miller, A. B., & Hsieh, K. (1999). Impact of a consumer-directed family support program on adults with developmental disabilities and their family caregivers. Family Relations, 48, 419–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henbach, R. F., Bruininks, R. H., Thurlow, M. L., & McGrew, K. S. (1993). Community integration of young adult with mental retardation: A multivariate analysis of adjustment. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 14, 275–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobman, J. G., & Bruininks, R. H. (1985). Assessing and training adaptive behaviors. In K. C. Lakin & R. H. Bruininks (Eds.), Strategies for achieving community integration of developmentally disabled citizens (pp. 73–104). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itzhaky, H., & Schwartz, C. (1998). Empowering the disabled: A multidimensional approach. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 21, 301–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itzhaky, H., & York, A. S. (2000). Empowerment and community participation: Does gender make a difference? Social Work Research, 24, 225–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, C. A., Bergen, K. P., & McKnight, T. J. (1998). Choice availability and persons with mental retardation: A longitudinal and regression analysis. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 10(3), 291–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosciulek, J. F. (1999). The consumer-directed theory of empowerment. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 42(3), 196–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, J. T.-F., & Cheung, C.-K. (1999). Factors associated with discriminatory attitudes towards mentally retarded persons and psychiatric patients. International Social Work, 42(4), 431–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. M., Jessop, D. J., Rimmerman, A., & Levy, P. H. (1992). Attitudes of fortune 500 corporation executives toward the employability of persons with severe disabilities: A national study. Mental Retardation, 30(2), 67–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li, E. P.-Y. (1998). Vocational aspirations of sheltered workshop workers with intellectual disability in Hong Kong. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 42(3), 208–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lunsky, Y., & Benson, B. A. (1999). Social circles of adults with mental retardation as viewed by their caregivers. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 11(2), 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michailakis, D. (2003). The systems theory concept of disability: One is not born a disabled person, one is observed to be one. Disability & Society, 18(2), 209–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. B., & Keys, C. B. (1996). Awareness, action, and collaboration: How the self-advocacy movement and empowering for persons with developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation, 34(5), 312–319.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, D. E., Revell, G., & West, M. (2003). The impact of the current employment policy environment on the self-determination of individuals with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 19, 105–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, V., Wong, Y.-C., & Pierini, J. (2002). The structure and content of social inclusion: Voices of young adults with learning difficulties in Guangzhou. Disability & Society, 17(4), 365–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peffer, R. G. (1990). Marxism, morality, and social justice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierini, J., Pearson, V., & Wong, Y.-C. (2001). Glorious work: Employment of adults with a learning disability in Guangzhou from the perspective of their parents. Disability & Society, 16(2), 255–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Price, L., & Patton, J. R. (2003). A new world order: Connecting adult development to learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24(6), 328–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, J. W., Werder, J. K., & Schleien, S. J. (1985). Leisure and recreation services for handicapped persons. In K. C. Lakin & R. H. Bruininks (Eds.), Strategies for achieving community integration of developmentally disabled citizens (pp. 253–276). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramcharan, P., McGrath, M., & Grant, G. (1997a). Voices and choices: Mapping entitlements to friendships and community contacts. In P. Ramcharan, G. Roberts, G. Grant, & J. Borland (Eds.), Empowerment in everyday life learning disability (pp. 48–69). London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramcharan, P., Roberts, G., Grant, G., & Borland, J. (1997b). Citizenship, empowerment and everyday life: Ideal and illusion in the new millennium. In P. Ramcharan, G. Roberts, G. Grant, & J. Borland (Eds.), Empowerment in everyday life learning disability (pp. 241–258). London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapley, M., & Beyer, S. (1998). Daily activitiy, community participation, and quality of life in an ordinary housing network: A two-year follow-up. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 11(1), 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapley, M., & Lobley, J. (1995). Factor analysis of the Shalock & Keith (1993) quality of life questionnaire: A replication. Mental Handicap Research, 8(3), 194–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalock, R. L., & Kiernan, W. E. (1990). Habilitation planning for adults with disabilities. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, C., & Armony-Sivan, R. (2001). Students’ attitudes to the inclusion of people with disabilities in the community. Disability & Society, 16(3), 403–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, M. M. (1984). Correlates of community opposition to community residences for mentally retarded persons. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 89(1), 1–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stancliffe, R. J., & Kenne, S. (2000). Outcomes and costs of community living: A matched comparison of group homes and semi-independent living. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 25, 281–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stancliffe, R. J., & Lakin, K. C. (1999). A longitudinal comparison of day program services and outcomes of people who left institutions and those who stayed. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24(1), 44–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroebe, W., & Insko, C. A. (1989). Stereotype, prejudice, and discrimination: Changing conceptions in theory and research. In D. Bar-Tal, C. F. Graumann, A. W. Kruglanski, & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Stereotyping and prejudice: Changing conceptions (pp. 3–34). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabainia, M. M. (2003). Listening to families’ views regarding institutionalization & deinstitutionalization. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 28(3), 241–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tse, J. W. L. (1994a). Community resistance to mental handicap facilities in Hong Kong. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 100–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tse, J. W. L. (1994b). Discriminating against people with mental retardation in Hong Kong. International Social Work, 37, 357–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Housten, D., & Bellemakers, C. (2002). Equal citizenship for all: Disability policies in The Netherlands: Empowerment of marginals. Disability & Society, 17(2), 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Loon, J., & van Hove, G. (2001). Emancipation and self-determination of people with learning disabilities and down-sizing institutional care. Disability & Society, 16(2), 233–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Ven, T. M., Cullen, F. T., Carrozza, M. A., & Wright, J. P. (2001). Home alone: The impact of maternal employment on delinquency. Social Problems, 48(2), 236–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, C., Ryan, T., & Walker, A. (1996). Fair shares for all? Disparities in service provision for different groups of people with learning difficulties living in the community. Brighton, UK: Pavilion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walmsley, J. (2001). Normalisation, emancipatory research and inclusive research in learning disability. Disability & Society, 16(2), 187–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, D., Pearson, V., Ip, F., & Lo, E. (1999). A slippery road to equality: Hong Kong’s experience of unplanned integrated education. Disability & Society, 14(6), 771–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, S. Y., & Wong, T. K. S. (2003). An exploratory study on needs of parents of adults with a severe learning disability in a residential setting. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 24, 795–811.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wun, W.-L., Evans, J. H., Cumella, S., Chan, S. S. Y., Kwan, A. Y. H., Li, E. W. P. et al. (1995). Quality of life for aging people with mental handicap: Care management in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yip, K.-S. (2004). The empowerment model: A critical reflection of empowerment in Chinese culture. Social Work, 49(3), 479–487.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yuker, H. E. (1994). Variables that influence attitudes toward people with disabilities: Conclusions from the data. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 9(5), 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeizl, E., te Poel, Y., du Bois-Reymond, M., Ravesloot, J., & Meulman, J. J. (2000). The role of parents and peers in the leisure activities of young adolescents. Journal of Leisure Research, 32(3), 281–302.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Acknowledge the funding support for the study as Strategic Research Grant (#7000819) of the City University of Hong Kong.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chau-kiu Cheung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheung, Ck., Ngan, R.Mh. Empowering for Community Integration in Hong Kong. J Dev Phys Disabil 19, 305–322 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-007-9049-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-007-9049-5

Keywords

Navigation