Skip to main content
Log in

What the Word Processing Skills of Prelingually Deafened Readers Tell About the Roots of Dyslexia

  • Published:
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present experiment represents an attempt to learn from the comparison of dyslectic readers, prelingually deafened readers, and a control group of typically developing hearing readers, in four particular areas, about factors determining their reading skills.Twenty-three students with diagnosed dyslexia (mean grade level 9.7 [1.53]), 20 students with prelingual deafness (mean grade level 8.9 [1.33]), and a control of 41 typically developing hearing students (mean grade level 8.9 [1.43]) participated in the study.Four distinct areas were examined which included: (a) the rapid, repetitive execution of two simple, familiar motor actions; (b) the rapid, consecutive judgment of the identicalness of two digit stimuli; (c) the rapid, consecutive, perceptual processing of word pairs; and (d) the rapid, consecutive, conceptual processing of word pairs. Findings obtained from th comparison of the three participant groups in the four tested areas indicate that the reading difficulties of dyslectic readers and prelingually deafened readers have differentsources, neither of which are directly, causally related to a phonological processing deficit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American National Standards Institute (1989). Specifications for Audiometers, (ANSI S3.6-1989), ANSI, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working Memory, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Human Memory: Theory and Practice. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigsby, P. (1986). The nature of reversible letter confusions in dyslectic and normal readers: Misinterpretation or mislabeling? Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 55: 264–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breznitz, Z. (2001). The determinants of reading fluency: A comparison of dyslectic and average readers. In Wolf, M. (ed.), Dyslexia, Fluency and the Brain, York Press, Timonium, Maryland, pp. 245–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B., and Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1989). Phonemic awareness and letter knowledge in the child's acquisition of the alphabetic principle. J. Educ. Psychol. 81(3): 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J. W., and Tunmer, W. E. (2003). Reading difficulties, reading-related self-perceptions, and strategies for overcoming negative self-beliefs. Read. Writ. Q.: Overcoming Learn. Difficulties 19(1): 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlier, B. L., and Leybaert, J. (2000). The rhyming skills of deaf children educated with phonetically augmented speech reading. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 53: 349–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, R. (1979). The Deaf School Child, Harper and Row, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damian, M. F. (2004). Asymmetries in the processing of Arabic digits and number words. Memory Cognit. 32: 164–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, A., MacSweeney, M., Szczerbinski, M., and Campbell, R. (2003). Predictors of reading delay in deaf adolescents: The relative contributions of rapid automatized naming speed and phonemic awareness and decoding. J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ. 8: 215–229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., and Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Rev. Educ. Res. 71(3): 393–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fias, W., Reynvoet, B., and Brysbeart, M. (2001). Are Arabic numerals processed as pictures in a Stroop interference task? Psychologic. Res. 65: 242–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trials. Psychologic. Bull. 123: 71–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, V. L. (1989). Phonology in reading: Evidence from profoundly deaf readers. In Shankweiler, D., and Libermann, I. Y. (eds.), Phonology and Reading Disabilities: Solving the Reading Puzzle, University of Michigan Press, Research Monograph Series. Ann Arbor, pp. 66–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, V. L. (1991). Phonological processing without sounds. In Brady, S., and Shankweiler, D. (eds.), Phonological Processes in Literacy: A Tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 153–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, V. L., and Fowler, C. A. (1987). Phonological coding in word reading: Evidence from hearing and deaf readers. Memory Cognit. 15: 199–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, V. L., Liberman, I. Y., and Shankweiler, D. (1984). Linguistic coding in deaf children in relation to beginning reading success. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 37: 378–393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, V. L., and Lichtenstein, E. H. (1990). Short-term memory coding by deaf signers: The primary language coding hypothesis reconsidered. Cognit. Psychol. 22: 211–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, V. L., and McGarr, N. S. (1989). Rhyme generation by deaf adults. J. Speech Hear. Res. 32: 2–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., and Moreno, C. (2004). Deaf children's use of phonological coding: Evidence from reading, spelling, and working memory. J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ. 9: 253–268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Izzo, A. (2002). Phonemic awareness and reading ability: An investigation with young readers who are deaf. Am. Ann. Deaf 147: 18–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kjeldsen, A. C., Niemi, P., and Olofsson, A. (2003). Training phonological awareness in kindergarten level children: Consistency is more important than quality. Learn. Instruct. 13: 349–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, W., Schack, B., Gibbons, H., and Kreise, B. (1997). On the distinguishability of conceptual and imaginal representations in elementary thinking. Zeitschrift Psychol. 205: 169–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillo-Martin, D., Hanson, V., and Smith, S. (1992). Deaf readers' comprehension of relative clauses. Appl. Psycholinguist. 13: 13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (1997). The effect of communication mode on the development of phonemic awareness in prelingually deaf students. J. Speech Hear. Res. 40: 1151–1163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (2000). Syntactic and semantic processing in deaf and hearing readers. Am. Ann. Deaf 145: 436–448.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (2002). Another look at the STM capacity of prelingually deafened individuals and its relation to reading comprehension. Am. Ann. Deaf 147: 56–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (2004a). Processing of written words by individuals with prelingual deafness. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 47: 979–989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (2004b). Processing of written word and non-word visual information by individuals with prelingual deafness. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 47: 990–1000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (2004c). The word decoding strategies of Hebrew readers with and without hearing impairments: Some insight from an associative learning task. Read. Writ. Special Issue 17: 823–845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (in press). What the word recognition skills of prelingually deafened readers tell about their reading comprehension problems. J. Dev. Phys. Disabil.

  • Musselman, C. (2000). How do children who can't hear learn to read an alphabetic script? A review of the literature on reading and deafness. J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ. 5: 11–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neubauer, A. C., Riemann, R., Mayer, R., and Angleitner, A. (1997). Intelligence and reaction times in the Hick, Sternberg and Posner paradigms. Pers. Ind. Diff. 22: 885–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, D. C., and Leutke-Stahlman, B. (2002). Phonological awareness: One key to the reading proficiency of deaf children. Am. Ann. Deaf 147: 11–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Padden, C. A., and Hanson, V. (2000). Search for the missing link: The development of skilled reading in deaf children. In Emmorey, K., and Lane, H. (eds.), The signs of language revised: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 435–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, P. (2001). Language and Deafness (3rd edn.), Singular Publishing Group, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., and Sandak, R. (2000). Reading optimally builds on spoken language: Implications for deaf readers. J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ. 5: 32–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Report of the National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

  • Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition 55(2): 151–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 72: 95–129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L., and Levin, I. (1999). Learning to read and write in Hebrew. In Harris, M., and Hatano, G. (eds.), Learning to Read and Write, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 89–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, A., Dowker, A., and Campbell, R. (1999). Deaf children's spelling: Does it show sensitivity to phonology? J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ. 4: 111–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., and Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children, National Academic Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., and Siegel, L. S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core difference model. J. Educ. Psychol. 86: 24–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transler, C., Leybaert, J., and Gomert, J. E. (1999). Do deaf children use phonological syllables as reading units? J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ. 4: 124–143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., and Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned over the past four decades? J. Child Psychol. Psychiatr. 45: 2–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Miller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, P. What the Word Processing Skills of Prelingually Deafened Readers Tell About the Roots of Dyslexia. J Dev Phys Disabil 17, 369–393 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-005-6620-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-005-6620-9

Key Words

Navigation