Skip to main content
Log in

A certifying algorithm for lattice point feasibility in a system of UTVPI constraints

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the design and analysis of a certifying algorithm for checking the lattice point feasibility of a class of constraints called unit two variable per inequality (UTVPI) constraints. A UTVPI constraint has at most two non-zero variables and the coefficients of the non-zero variables belong to the set \(\{+\,1,\ -\,1\}\). These constraints occur in a number of application domains, including but not limited to program verification, abstract interpretation, and operations research. As per the literature, the fastest known model generating algorithm for checking lattice point feasibility in UTVPI constraint systems runs in \(O(m \cdot n+n^{2} \cdot \log n)\) time and \(O(n^{2})\) space, where m represents the number of constraints and n represents the number of variables in the constraint system (Lahiri and Musuvathi, in: Proceedings of the 5th  international workshop on the frontiers of combining systems (FroCos), lecture notes in computer science, vol 3717, pp 168–183, 2005). In this paper, we design and analyze a new algorithm for checking the lattice point feasibility of UTVPI constraints. The presented algorithm runs in \(O(m \cdot n)\) time and \(O(m+n)\) space. Additionally it is certifying in that it produces a satisfying assignment in the event that it is presented with feasible instances and refutations in the event that it is presented with infeasible instances. The importance of providing certificates cannot be overemphasized, especially in mission-critical applications. Our approaches for the lattice point feasibility problem in UTVPI constraint systems is fundamentally different from existing approaches for this problem; indeed, it is based on new insights into combining well-known inference rules for these systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagnara R, Hill P M, Zaffanella E (2008) An improved tight closure algorithm for integer octagonal constraints. In: VMCAI, pp 8–21

  • Cherkassky BV, Goldberg AV, Radzik T (1996) Shortest paths algorithms: theory and experimental evaluation. Math Program 73:129–174

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cormen TH, Leiserson CE, Rivest RL, Stein C (2001) Introduction to algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cousot P, Cousot R (1977) Abstract interpretation: a unified lattice model for static analysis of programs by construction or approximation of fixpoints. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM symposium on the principles of programming languages (POPL), ACM Press, pp 238–252

  • Dantzig GB, Eaves BC (1973) Fourier–Motzkin elimination and its dual. J Comb Theory (A) 14:288–297

  • Fouilhe A, Monniaux D, Périn M (2013). Efficient generation of correctness certificates for the abstract domain of polyhedra. In: Static analysis: 20th international symposium, pp 345–365

  • Gerber R, Pugh W, Saksena M (1995) Parametric dispatching of hard real-time tasks. IEEE Trans Comput 44(3):471–479

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Haken A (1985) The intractability of resolution. Theor Comput Sci 39(2–3):297–308

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey W, Stuckey PJ (1997). A unit two variable per inequality integer constraint solver for constraint logic programming. In: Proceedings of the 20th Australasian computer science conference, pp 102–111

  • Hochbaum DS, Naor J (1994) Simple and fast algorithms for linear and integer programs with two variables per inequality. SIAM J Comput 23(6):1179–1192

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffar J, Maher MJ, Stuckey PJ, Yap HC (1994) Beyond finite domains. In: Proceedings of the second international workshop on principles and practice of constraint programming (PPCP), lecture notes in computer science, vol 874, pp 86–94

  • Lahiri SK, Musuvathi M (2005) An Efficient decision procedure for UTVPI constraints. In: Proceedings of the \(5{\rm th}\) international workshop on the frontiers of combining systems (FroCos), lecture notes in computer science, vol 3717, pp 168–183

  • Mehlhorn K, Näher S (1999) The LEDA platform of combinatorial and geometric computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Miné A (2006) The octagon abstract domain. High Order Symb Comput 19(1):31–100

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwenhuis R, Oliveras A (2005) DPLL(T) with exhaustive theory propagation and its application to difference logic. In: Proceedings of the \(17{\rm th}\) international conference on computer aided verification (CAV), lecture notes in computer science, vol 3576, pp 321–334

  • Nieuwenhuis R, Oliveras A, Tinelli C (2004) Abstract DPLL and abstract DPLL modulo theories. In: Proceedings of the  \(11{\rm th}\) international conference on logic for programming, artificial intelligence and reasoning (LPAR), lecture notes in computer science, vol 3452, pp 36–50

  • Revesz PZ (2009) Tightened transitive closure of integer addition constraints. In: Proceedings of the \(8{\rm th}\) symposium on abstraction, reformulation and approximation (SARA), AAAI

  • Schutt A, Stuckey PJ (2010) Incremental satisfiability and implication for UTVPI constraints. INFORMS J Comput 22(4):514–527

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sitzmann I, Stuckey PJ (2000) O-trees: a constraint-based index structure. In: Australasian database conference, pp 127–134

  • Subramani K (2004) On deciding the non-emptiness of 2SAT polytopes with respect to first order queries. Math Logic Q 50(3):281–292

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Subramani K, Wojciechowski P (2016) A combinatorial certifying algorithm for linear feasibility in UTVPI constraints. Algorithmica, First online: 28 April 2016

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was conducted primarily in the School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, where the first author was an Invited Professor.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Subramani.

Additional information

This research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation through Award CCF-1305054.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Subramani, K., Wojciechowski, P. A certifying algorithm for lattice point feasibility in a system of UTVPI constraints. J Comb Optim 35, 389–408 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-017-0176-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-017-0176-3

Keywords

Navigation