Skip to main content
Log in

Maximum cardinality neighbourly sets in quadrilateral free graphs

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neighbourly set of a graph is a subset of edges which either share an end point or are joined by an edge of that graph. The maximum cardinality neighbourly set problem is known to be NP-complete for general graphs. Mahdian (Discret Appl Math 118:239–248, 2002) proved that it is in polynomial time for quadrilateral-free graphs and proposed an \(O(n^{11})\) algorithm for the same, here n is the number of vertices in the graph, (along with a note that by a straightforward but lengthy argument it can be proved to be solvable in \(O(n^5)\) running time). In this paper we propose an \(O(n^2)\) time algorithm for finding a maximum cardinality neighbourly set in a quadrilateral-free graph.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aho AV, Hopcroft JE, Ullman JD (1974) The design and analysis of computer algorithms. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Boston

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Alon N, Yuster R, Zwick U (1997) Finding and counting given length cycles. Algorithmica 17:209–223

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett CL, Kumar VSA, Marathe MV, Thite S, Istrate G (2006) Strong edge coloring for channel assignment in wireless radio networks. In: Proceedings of the 4th annual IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications workshops, PERCOMW ’06, pp 106–110

  • Bezem GJ, van Leeuwen J (1987) Enumeration in graphs. Technical Report RUU-CS-87-07, Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University

  • Bollobas B (1998) Modern graph theory. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brown WG (1966) On graphs that do not contain a Thomsen graph. Can Math Bull 9(3):281–285

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron K (1989) Induced matchings. Discret Appl Math 24(1–3):97–102

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chiba N, Nishizeki T (1985) Arboricity and subgraph listing algorithms. SIAM J Comput 14(1):210–223

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Clapham CRJ, Flockhart A, Sheehan J (1989) Graphs without four-cycles. J Graph Theory 13(1):29–47

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Conlon D, Fox J, Sudakov B (2014) Large subgraphs without complete bipartite graphs. arXiv:1401.6711v1

  • Erdos P (1938) On sequences of integers no one of which divides the product of two others and on some related problems. Tomsk Gos Univ Ucen Zap 2:74–82

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Erdos P, Renyi A, Sos VT (1966) On a problem of graph theory. Stud Sci Math Hung 1:215–235

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Firke FA, Kosek PM, Nash ED, Williford J (2013) Extremal graphs without 4-cycles. J Comb Theory Ser B 103:327–336

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorini G, Lazebnik F (1994) On a bound for the maximum number of \(C_8\)’s in a 4-cycle free bipartite graph, Congressus Numerantium, vol 99, pp 191–197. http://www.math.udel.edu/~lazebnik/papers/GFC8

  • Fiorini G, Lazebnik F (1998) An extremal characterization of the incidence graphs of projective planes. Acta Appl Math 52:257–260

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorini G, Lazebnik F (2015) On the maximum number of C6’s in a quadrilateral-free bipartite graph. http://www.math.udel.edu/~lazebnik/papers/GFC6OLD

  • Foucaud F, Krivelevich M, Perarnau G (2015) Large subgraphs without short cycles. SIAM J Discret Math 29(1):65–78

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Furedi Z, Simonovits M (2013) The history of degenerate (bipartite) extremal graph problems. arXiv:1306.5167v2

  • Furedi Z (1983) Graphs without quadrilaterals. J Comb Theory Ser B 34(2):187–190

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Furedi Z (1996) On the number of edges of quadrilateral-free graphs. J Comb Theory Ser B 68:1–6

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Itai A, Rodeh M (1978) Finding a minimum circuit in a graph. SIAM J Comput 7(4):413–423

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Isobe S, Zhou X, Nishizeki T (2007) Total colorings of degenerate graphs. Combinatorica 27(2):167–182

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen TR, Tof B (1995) Graph coloring problems. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jukna S (2001) Extremal combinatorics—with applications in computer science. Texts in theoretical computer science. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mahdian M (2002) On the computational complexity of strong edge coloring. Discret Appl Math 118:239–248

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nikiforov V (2009) The maximum spectral radius of C4 -free graphs of given order and size. Linear Algebra Appl 430:2898–2905

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Reiman I (1959) Uber ein Problem von K. Zarankiewicz. Acta Math Acad Sci Hung 9:269–279

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A, Huson M (1996) A new model for scheduling packet radio networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM’96, vol 3, pp 1116–1124

  • Timmons C (2014) Lower bounds on the 4-cycle Turan number, Manuscript, December 5. http://webpages.csus.edu/~craig.timmons/papers/c4turanlb

  • Zhai M, Wang B (2012) Proof of a conjecture on the spectral radius of C4 -free graphs. Linear Algebra Appl 437:1641–1647

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank anonymous referees for careful reading of the manuscript, and their critical comments and suggestions. We believe these suggestions have helped in improving the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjeev Saxena.

Appendix

Appendix

Mahdian states and proves the following theorem:

Theorem 2

(Mahdian (2002)) In a quadrilateral-free graph G, for any neighbourly set A at least one of the following conditions hold:

  1. 1.

    There exists a triangle \(\triangle uvw\) such that \(A \subseteq E_u \cup E_v \cup E_w\)

  2. 2.

    There exists an edge uv such that \(A \subseteq E_u \cup E_v\)

  3. 3.

    There exists a vertex u such that A has at most 10 edges not in \(E_u\)

In Mahdian (2002) the author adds a remark, that the constant ten in Theorem 2 can be replaced by 4 and claims that would lead to an \(O(n m^4)\) time algorithm. It appears that the claim in the remark may not be correct (at least is not that obvious) as can be seen from the following example (see Fig. 20).

Fig. 20
figure 20

Counter example for remark in Mahdian (2002)

Let neighbourly set A consists of three disjoint paths abc,def and ghi of length two (each) and an additional edge lm, vertex disjoint, with these paths.

The connecting non-neighbourly set edges in the graph are bebheh (as in Fig. 19) and lm is connected with edges

$$\begin{aligned} al, cm, dl, fm, gl, im \end{aligned}$$

to each path of length two (as in Fig. 16b).

This graph is clearly quadrilateral free and A is neither in form (1) nor in form (2) of Theorem 2.

As each vertex has a maximum degree of two in A, and as there are seven edges in A, there is no vertex u for which A has 4 edges not in \(E_u\) (for example, five edges deefhghilm are not incident to b).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neethi, K.S., Saxena, S. Maximum cardinality neighbourly sets in quadrilateral free graphs. J Comb Optim 33, 422–444 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-015-9972-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-015-9972-9

Keywords

Navigation