Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of using a Planecta™ port with a three-way stopcock on the natural frequency of blood pressure transducer kits

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Blood pressure transducer kits are equipped with two types of Planecta™ ports—the flat-type Planecta™ port (FTP) and the Planecta™ port with a three-way stopcock (PTS). We reported that FTP application decreased the natural frequency of the kits. However, Planecta™ is an invaluable tool as it prevents infection, ensures technical simplicity, and excludes air. Hence, an ideal Planecta™ port that does not decrease the frequency characteristics is required. As a first step in this direction, we aimed to assess the influence of PTSs on the natural frequency of blood transducer kits. A DTXplus transducer kit (DT4812J; Argon Medical Devices, TX, USA) was used along with ≥1 PTSs (JMS, Hiroshima, Japan), and the frequency characteristics were assessed. The natural frequency and damping coefficient of each kit were obtained by using frequency characteristics analysis software, and these parameters were evaluated by plotting them on Gardner’s chart. Regardless of whether one or two PTSs were inserted, the natural frequency of the kits only slightly decreased (from 42.5 to 41.1 Hz, when 2 PTSs were used). Thus, the frequency characteristics of the kits with PTSs were adequate for pressure monitoring. The insertion of ≥2 FTPs in pressure transducer kits should be avoided, as they markedly decrease the natural frequency and lead to underdamping. However, the effect of PTS insertion in pressure transducer kits on the frequency characteristics is minimal. Thus, we found that the use of PTS markedly improved the frequency characteristics as compared to the use of FTP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gravenstein SJ, Paulus AD. Clinical monitoring practice. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: J. S. Lippincott Company; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. William TM, Jan MH, John AF. Quick guide to cardiopulmonary care. 2nd ed. California: Edwards Life sciences; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fujiwara S, Kawakubo Y, Mori S, Tachihara K, Toyoguchi I, Yokoyama T. Effect of planecta and ROSE™ on the frequency characteristics of blood pressure-transducer kits. J Clin Monit Comput (Open access). 2014;. doi:10.1007/s10877-014-9650-y.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crow S, Conrad SA, Chaney-Rowell C, King JW. Microbial contamination of arterial infusions used for hemodynamic monitoring: a randomized trial of contamination with sampling through conventional stopcocks versus a novel closed system. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1989;10:557–61. doi:10.2307/30144237.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Watanabe H, Yagi S, Namiki A. Recommendation of a clinical impulse response analysis for catheter calibration-dumping coefficient and natural frequency are incomplete parameters for clinical evaluation. J Clin Monit Comput. 2006;20:37–42. doi:10.1007/s10877-005-9008-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gardner RM. Direct blood pressure measurement—dynamic response requirements. Anesthesiology. 1981;54:227–36. doi:10.1097/00000542-198103000-00010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Todorovic M, Jensen EW, Thøgersen C. Evaluation of dynamic performance in liquid-filled catheter systems for measuring invasive blood pressure. Int J Clin Monit Comput. 1996;13:173–8. doi:10.1023/A:1016903508976.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Romagnoli S, Romano SM, Bevilacqua S, Lazzeri C, Gensini GF, Pratesi C, Quattrone D, Dini D, De Gaudio AR. Dynamic response of liquid-filled catheter systems for measurement of blood pressure: precision of measurements and reliability of the Pressure Recording Analytical Method with different disposable systems. J Crit Care. 2011;26:415–22. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.08.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gersh BJ. Measurement of intravascular pressure. In: Prys-Roberts C, editor. The circulation in anaesthesia. Applied physiology and pharmacology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1980. p. 511–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Watanabe H. A theory and practice for the accurate arterial blood pressure measurement. Life Support Anesth. 2007;14:630–4.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Runciman WB, Rutten AJ, Ilsley AH. An evaluation of blood pressure measurement. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1981;9:314–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by intradepartmental funds. No external financial support was obtained. We thank JMS for information dissemination, and Editage for editing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shigeki Fujiwara.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fujiwara, S., Tachihara, K., Mori, S. et al. Effect of using a Planecta™ port with a three-way stopcock on the natural frequency of blood pressure transducer kits. J Clin Monit Comput 30, 925–931 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9795-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9795-3

Keywords

Navigation