Skip to main content
Log in

Frequency characteristics of pressure transducer kits with inserted pressure-resistant extension tubes

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The accurate monitoring of arterial blood pressure is important for cardiovascular management. However, the frequency characteristics of pressure transducer kits are influenced by the length of the pressure-resistant tube. To date, there have been few studies addressing the frequency characteristics of pressure transducer kits with inserted pressure-resistant extension tubes (pressure-resistant extension tube (ET) circuits). In this study, we examine ET circuits from the viewpoint of the frequency characteristics of pressure transducer kits. DT4812J transducer kits (length 150 cm; Argon Medical Devices, TX, USA) were used. Three original ET circuits were prepared, with the pressure-resistant tube of the DT4812J being extended with a 30-cm length of pressure-resistant tube (180ET circuit), a 60-cm length of pressure-resistant tube (210ET circuit), and a 90-cm length of pressure-resistant tube (240ET circuit). Each of these circuits was evaluated as part of this study. The natural frequency of the original DT4812J circuit was 45.90 Hz while the damping coefficient was 0.160. For the 180 ET circuit, the natural frequency and damping coefficient were 36.4 Hz and 0.162, respectively. For the ET210 circuit, the natural frequency and damping coefficient were 30.3 Hz and 0.175, respectively. For the ET210 circuit, the natural frequency and damping coefficient were 25.3 Hz and 0.180, respectively. As a result of extending the circuit, it was found that the natural frequency decreased drastically, while the damping coefficient increased slightly. When the extension of a pressure transducer kit is required, we should pay careful attention to the major decrease in the natural frequency, which may influence the pressure monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gravenstein SJ, Paulus AD. Clinical monitoring practice. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: J. S. Lippincott Company; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. William TM, Jan MH, John AF. Quick guide to cardiopulmonary care. 2nd ed. California: Edwards Life Sciences; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fujiwara S, Kawakubo Y, Mori S, Tachihara K, Toyoguchi I, Yokoyama T. Effect of planecta and ROSE™ on the frequency characteristics of blood pressure-transducer kits. J Clin Monit Comput (Open Access). 2014;. doi:10.1007/s10877-014-9650-y.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fry DL. Physiologic recording by modern instruments with particular reference to pressure recording. Physiol Rev. 1960;40:753–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Geddes LA. The direct and indirect measurement of blood pressure. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1970. p. 49–66.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gersh BJ. Measurement of intravascular pressure. In: Prys-Roberts C, editor. The circulation in anaesthesia: applied physiology and pharmacology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1980. p. 511–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fujiwara S, Tachihara K, Mori S, Ouchi K, Yokoe C, Imaizumi U, Morimoto Y, Miki Y, Toyoguchi I, Yoshida K, Yokoyama T (2015) Effect of using a Planecta™ port with a three-way stopcock on the natural frequency of blood pressure transducer kits. J Clin Monit Comput (in press). doi:10.1007/s10877-015-9795-3.

  8. Watanabe H, Yagi S, Namiki A. Recommendation of a clinical impulse response analysis for catheter calibration-dumping coefficient and natural frequency are incomplete parameters for clinical evaluation. J Clin Monit Comput. 2006;20:37–42. doi:10.1007/s10877-005-9008-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gardner RM. Direct blood pressure measurement—dynamic response requirements. Anesthesiology. 1981;54:227–36. doi:10.1097/00000542-198103000-00010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hunziker P. Accuracy and dynamic response of disposable pressure transducer tubing systems. Can J Anaesth. 1987;34:409–14. doi:10.1007/BF03010146.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kleinman B, Poweill S, Gardner RM. Equivalence of fast flush and square wave testing of blood pressure monitoring systems. J Clin Monit. 1996;12:149–54. doi:10.1007/BF02078135.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fujiwara S, Tachihara K, Kawakubo Y, Mori S, Toyoguti I, Yokoyama T. Factors affecting arterial blood pressure monitoring. J Jpn Soc Clin Anest. 2015;35:406–13. doi:10.2199/jjsca.35.406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Morisaki Y. A new formula describing the flow impedance of a cylindrical tube and its application to a frequency response analysis of catheter-manometer system. Jpn J Med Electron Biol Eng. 1999;37:129–32. doi:10.11239/jsmbe1963.37.129.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Crow S, Conrad SA, Chaney-Rowell C, King JW. Microbial contamination of arterial infusions used for hemodynamic monitoring: a randomized trial of contamination with sampling through conventional stopcocks versus a novel closed system. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1989;10:557–61. doi:10.2307/30144237.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Todorovic M, Jensen EW, Thøgersen C. Evaluation of dynamic performance in liquid-filled catheter systems for measuring invasive blood pressure. Int J Clin Monit Comput. 1996;13:173–8. doi:10.1023/A:1016903508976.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Romagnoli S, Romano SM, Bevilacqua S, Lazzeri C, Gensini GF, Pratesi C, Quattrone D, Dini D, De Gaudio AR. Dynamic response of liquid-filled catheter systems for measurement of blood pressure: precision of measurements and reliability of the pressure recording analytical method with different disposable systems. J Crit Care. 2011;26:415–22. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.08.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hirayama H, Ohtsuki T. Electric circuit theory. 3rd ed. Tokyo: The Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shigiya R, Motiduki M, Kanai H. Hemodynamics and its Measurements. Tokyo: Corona Publishing Co., Ltd; 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sakamoto K, Kanai H, Kawamura N. An improved method of blood pressure measurement by catheter insertion. Jpn J Med Electron Biol Eng. 1974;12:291–300. doi:10.11239/jsmbe1963.12.291.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by intradepartmental funds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shigeki Fujiwara.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Basic parameters of sine wave

Generally, the sine wave shown in Fig. 7 can be expressed mathematically by the following expression [17].

$${\text{y}} = {\text{Y}}_{\text{m}} \sin \, \left( {\omega {\text{t}} - \theta } \right)$$
(6)

where y is the amplitude at any time. Ym is maximum amplitude. T is the wavelength period. In addition, the sine wave function has a relationship defined by Eq. (7).

$$\sin \,{\text{x}} = \sin \, \left( {{\text{x}} + 2\pi } \right)$$
(7)
Fig. 7
figure 7

Sinusoidal curve

Therefore, Eq. (8) must be because the plane angle has a period of 2π (rad).

$$\omega {\text{T}} = 2\pi$$
(8)
$${\text{i}} . {\text{e}} . \quad \omega = 2\pi /{\text{T}}$$
(9)

ω is the angular velocity (or angular frequency). The frequency (f) is expressed as follows;

$$f = 1/{\text{T }}\left[ {\text{Hz}} \right]$$
(10)

The relationship between the frequency (f) and wavelength period are expressed as follows;

$$\omega = 2\pi f$$
(11)

When a sine wave progresses as an undulation, the relationship between the traveling wave (v; m/s) and wavelength (λ; m) is expressed as follows;

$$\lambda = v/f$$
(12)

Appendix 2: Propagation of a pressure wave in the catheter

It is convenient to apply electric circuit theory to the transmission of pressure in a catheter [13, 18]. The electrical equivalent circuit of a catheter filled with a saline solution becomes the distributed constant line shown in Fig. 8.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Electrical equivalent circuit. Lc [kg/m4] and Rc [kg/m4 s] are the liquid inertia and viscous resistance of the catheter per unit length, respectively. Cc [m5/Newton] is the compliance of the catheter per unit length. e i and e 0 are the entrance to and exit from the electric equivalent circuit

Lc and Rc can be approximated as follows.

$$Lc \,\fallingdotseq \,\rho_{c} /\pi r_{c}^{2} \left[ {{\text{kg}}/{\text{m}}^{4} } \right]$$
(13)
$$Rc\, \fallingdotseq \,8\mu_{c} /\pi r_{c}^{4} \left[ {{\text{kg}}/{\text{m}}^{4} \,{\text{S}}} \right]$$
(14)

The distributed constant line shown in Fig. 8 indicates that the blood pressure pushes the saline for 1 min, and reaches the length corresponding to the next minute.

Therefore, the blood pressure at the catheter tip section end (entry) is transmitted towards the exit while gradually being temporally delayed. At the same time, the blood pressure wave is attenuated by the viscous resistance of the catheter. These phenomena could be indicated by introducing a propagation coefficient (γ) into the following Eq. (15), (16), or (17) [17, 19].

$$\gamma = \alpha + j\beta$$
(15)
$$\alpha \left( {{\text{Nep}}/{\text{m}}} \right) = \left[\sqrt {({\text{Rc}}^{2} + \omega^{2} Lc^{2} )\omega^{2} \,Cc^{2} } {-}\omega^{2} {\text{Lc}}^{2} {\text{Cc}}/2\right]^{1/2}$$
(16)
$$\beta \left( {{\text{rad}}/{\text{m}}} \right) = \left[ {\left( {{\text{Rc}}^{2} + \omega^{2} \,{\text{Lc}}^{2} } \right)\omega^{2} \,{\text{Cc}}^{2} + \omega^{2}\, {\text{LcCc}}/2} \right]^{1/2}$$
(17)

In Eq. (16), α is the decay constant for which the pressure wave attenuates only e−α. β is the phase constant.

Regarding the voltage phase of the circuit shown in Fig. 8 at an optional point in time, the voltage vector (V) could indicate the following;

$$V = Ae^{{{-}\gamma x}}$$
(18)
$${\text{i}} . {\text{e}} .\quad {\text{V}} = {\text{Ae}}^{{{-} \, (\alpha + j\beta )x}}$$
(19)

The instantaneous values of the above-mentioned Eq. (19) are expressed as follows;

$$v = \sqrt 2 \left| {\text{A}} \right|{\text{e}}^{{{-}\alpha x}} { \sin }\left( {\omega {\text{t}}{-}\beta x{-}\theta_{0} } \right)$$
(20)

A is an integral constant. Figure 9 shows the instantaneous values of the voltage at an optional point in time. Therefore, the wavelength (λ) is expressed as follows;

$$\beta \lambda = 2\pi$$
(21)
$$\therefore \quad \lambda = 2\pi /\beta$$
(22)
Fig. 9
figure 9

Instantaneous values of voltage at an optional point in time. λ is the wavelength

Because the density of the saline and the viscosity coefficient are 103 and 10−3 kg/m s, respectively, it becomes Rc 2 ≪ ω2 Lc 2. Thus, for a practical catheter, α, β and v are approximated as follows;

$$\alpha \,\fallingdotseq \,Rc\sqrt {Cc/ Lc } /2$$
(23)
$$\beta \,\fallingdotseq\, \omega \sqrt {LcCc }$$
(24)
$$v \, \fallingdotseq \, 1/\sqrt {Cc/ Lc }$$
(25)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fujiwara, S., Mori, S., Tachihara, K. et al. Frequency characteristics of pressure transducer kits with inserted pressure-resistant extension tubes. J Clin Monit Comput 31, 371–380 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-016-9854-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-016-9854-4

Keywords

Navigation