Abstract
We developed PEDOT:PSS [poly (styrenesulfonate)-doped poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene] and tungsten oxide (WO3) based hybrid thin films by facile hydrothermal method. The solution processed WO3–PEDOT:PSS hybrid thin films are fully characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM), UV–Vis (UV), Raman, X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area analysis. XRD and SEM results suggest that WO3 has crystalline structure with monoclinic phase and spherical shaped nanoparticles (20–25 nm), which is uniformly decorated on the surface of PEDOT:PSS sheets. The value of Eg [calculated by linear extrapolating of (F(R ∞) hν)2 and hν] was evaluated to be 3.11 and 2.85 eV for pure WO3 and WO3/PEDOT:PSS, respectively. The PL intensity of WO3/PEDOT:PSS is maximum lower than the pristine WO3 and PEDOT:PSS, implying an improved interfacial contact quality at the WO3/PEDOT:PSS. Photovoltaic performance of WO3–PEDOT:PSS devices were measured under AM 1.5 G 1 sun light intensity of 100 mW/cm2. Organic solar cell devices with WO3–PEDOT:PSS layer give rise to a significant increase in JSC from 9.35 ± 0.03 to 16.2 ± 0.01 mA/cm2 respectively and in VOC from 0.28 V to 0.72 V respectively, resulting in a remarkable PCE increase from 0.592 ± 0.03 to 0.714 ± 0.02%. The WO3/PEDOT:PSS composite deliver a PCE of 7.81 ± 0.01%. The superior performance of WO3/PEDOT:PSS composite was attributed to the reduced current leakage, enhanced hole extraction characteristics, and less trap-assisted interfacial recombination via current density–voltage.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.
References
N. S. Sariciftci, L. Smilowitz, A. J. Heeger, and F. Wudl (1992). Science 258, 1474.
G. Yu, J. Gao, J. C. Hummelen, F. Wudl, and A. J. Heeger (1995). Science 270, 1789.
C. J. Brabec, N. S. Sariciftci, and J. C. Hummelen (2001). Adv. Funct. Mater. 11, 15.
G. Li, R. Zhu, and Y. Yang (2012). Nat. Photonics 6, 153.
W. Xu, X. Zhu, X. Ma, H. Zhou, X. Li, S. Y. Jeong, H. Y. Woo, and Z. Zhou (2022). J. Mater. Chem. A 10, 13492.
W. Wang, F. Qin, X. Jiang, X. Zhu, L. Hu, C. Xie, L. Sun, W. Zeng, and Y. Zhou (2022). Org. Electron. 87.
R. Hermi, M. Mahdouani, R. Bourguiga, and S. Mahato (2022). Micro–Nanostruct. 168.
W. Zeng, R. Ye, C. Yuan, Y. Shi, Q. Niu, W. Tan, J. Huang, R. Xia, and Y. Min (2022). Synth. Met. 290.
A. A. Lima, G. TaquesTractz, A. G. Macedo, F. Thomazi, P. R. P. Rodrigues, and C. A. Dartora (2022). Opt. Mater. 132.
Y. Wang, N. Li, M. Cui, Y. Li, X. Tian, X. Xu, Q. Rong, D. Yuan, G. Zhou, and L. Nian (2021). Org. Electron. 99.
D. Alemu, H.-Y. Wei, K.-C. Ho, and C.-W. Chu (2012). Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 9662.
J. Saghaei, A. Fallahzadeh, and T. Saghaei (2015). Org. Electron. 24, 188.
Y. Xia and J. Ouyang (2012). Org. Electron. 13, 1785.
S. De, T. M. Higgins, P. E. Lyons, E. M. Doherty, P. N. Nirmalraj, W. J. Blau, J. J. Boland, and J. N. Coleman (2009). ACS Nano 3, 1767.
H. Yuk, B. Lu, and X. Zhao (2019). Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 1642.
B. Lu, H. Yuk, S. Lin, N. Jian, K. Qu, J. Xu, and X. Zhao (2019). Nat. Commun. 10, 1043.
D.-W. Wang, F. Li, J. Zhao, W. Ren, Z.-G. Chen, J. Tan, Z.-S. Wu, I. Gentle, G. Q. Lu, and H.-M. Cheng (2009). ACS Nano 3, 1745.
G. A. Snook, P. Kao, and A. S. Best (2011). J. Power Sources 196, 1.
R. R. Søndergaard, M. Hösel, and F. C. Krebs (2013). J. Polym. Sci. B 51, 16.
S. J. Kwon, J. H. Kang, S. J. Kim, W.-G. Koh, H. J. Song, and S. Lee (2018). Macromol. Res. 26, 410.
W. Jang, S. Ahn, S. Park, J. H. Park, and D. H. Wang (2016). Nanoscale 8, 19557.
Y. Xia, K. Sun, and J. Ouyang (2012). Adv. Mater. 24, 2436.
J. J. Lee, S. H. Lee, F. S. Kim, H. H. Choi, and J. H. Kim (2015). Org. Electron. 26, 191.
A. W. Hains and T. J. Marks (2008). Appl. Phys. Lett. 92.
M. D. Irwin, D. B. Buchholz, A. W. Hains, R. P. H. Chang, and T. J. Marks (2008). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 2783.
V. Shrotriya, G. Li, Y. Yao, C.-W. Chu, and Y. Yang (2006). Appl. Phys. Lett. 88.
G. Li, C.-W. Chu, V. Shrotriya, J. Huang, and Y. Yang (2006). Appl. Phys. Lett. 88.
M. Y. Chan, C. S. Lee, S. L. Lai, M. K. Fung, F. L. Wong, H. Y. Sun, K. M. Lau, and S. T. Lee (2006). J. Appl. Phys. 100.
H. Choi, B. S. Kim, M. J. Ko, D.-K. Lee, H. Kim, S. H. Kim, and K. Kim (2012). Org. Electron. 13, 959.
C. Tao, S. Ruan, G. Xie, X. Kong, L. Shen, F. Meng, C. Liu, X. Zhang, W. Dong, and W. Chen (2009). Appl. Phys. Lett. 94.
Z. Hu, J. Zhang, X. Chen, S. Ren, Z. Hao, X. Geng, and Y. Zhao (2011). Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 95, 2173.
Y. Wang, Q. Luo, N. Wu, Q. Wang, H. Zhu, L. Chen, et al. (2015). ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 7170.
J. Ram, R. G. Singh, R. Gupta, V. Kumar, F. Singh, and R. Kumar (2019). J. Electron. Mater. 48, 1174.
J. Ram, R. G. Singh, F. Singh, V. Kumar, V. Chauhan, R. Gupta, U. Kumar, B. C. Yadav, and R. Kumar (2019). J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 30, 01728.
Y. G. Xu, H. Xu, L. Wang, J. Yan, H. M. Li, Y. H. Song, L. Y. Huang, and G. B. T. Cai (2013). Dalton Trans. 42, 7604.
H. Hwan Jung, D. Ho Kim, C. Su Kim, T.-S. Bae, K. Bum Chung, and S. Yoon Ryu (2013). Appl. Phys. Lett. 102.
M. L. Kaplan, S. R. Forrest, P. H. Schmidt, and T. Venkatesan (2012). J. Appl. Phys. 732, 120.
J. Di, J. X. Xia, Y. P. Ge, H. P. Li, H. Y. Ji, H. Xu, Q. Zhang, H. M. Li, and M. N. Li (2015). Appl. Catal. B 168, 51.
X. Xu, J. Shen, N. Li, and M. Ye (2014). J. Alloy Compd. 616, 58.
Y. Sun, Z. Yang, P. Gao, J. He, X. Yang, J. Sheng, S. Wu, Y. Xiang, and J. Ye (2016). Nanoscale Res. Lett. 11, 56.
Md. Maniruzzaman, M. A. Rahman, K. Jeong, and J. Lee (2014). Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 27, 114.
W. Zhang, W. Lan, M. H. Lee, J. Singh, F. Zhu, C. Dwivedi, T. Mohammad, V. Bharti, A. Patra, S. Pathak, and V. Dutta (2018). Sol. Energy 162, 78.
Q. A. Yousif, K. M. Mahdi, and H. A. Alshamsi (2020). Optik Int. J. Light Electron. 219.
A. A. Bortoti, A. de Freitas Gavanski, Y. R. Velazquez, A. Galli, and E. G. de Castro (2017). J. Solid State Chem. 252, 111.
Acknowledgements
The manuscript should not be submitted to more than one publication for simultaneous consideration. The submitted work should be original and should not have been published elsewhere in any form or language.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
PG and PV, study conceptualization and writing (original draft) the manuscript. TS, data curation, formal analysis and writing (review and editing), and funding acquisition and project administration.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gurudevi, P., Venkateswari, P., Sivakumar, T. et al. Solution Processed WO3 and PEDOT:PSS Composite for Hole Transport Layer in ITO-Free Organic Solar Cells. J Clust Sci 34, 2135–2145 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10876-022-02368-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10876-022-02368-6