Abstract
Abnormally high γδ T cell numbers among individuals with atypical SCID have been reported but detailed immunophenotyping and functional characterization of these expanded γδ T cells are limited. We have previously reported atypical SCID phenotype caused by hypomorphic IL2RG (NM_000206.3) c.172C > T;p.(Pro58Ser) variant. Here, we have further investigated the index patient’s abnormally large γδ T cell population in terms of function and phenotype by studying IL2RG cell surface expression, STAT tyrosine phosphorylation and blast formation in response to interleukin stimulation, immunophenotyping, TCRvγ sequencing, and target cell killing. In contrast to his ⍺β T cells, the patient’s γδ T cells showed normal IL2RG cell surface expression and normal or enhanced IL2RG-mediated signaling. Vδ2 + population was proportionally increased with a preponderance of memory phenotypes and high overall tendency towards perforin expression. The patient’s γδ T cells showed enhanced cytotoxicity towards A549 cancer cells. His TCRvγ repertoire was versatile but sequencing of IL2RG revealed a novel c.534C > A; p.(Phe178Leu) somatic missense variant restricted to γδ T cells. Over time this variant became predominant in γδ T cells, though initially present only in part of them. IL2RG-Pro58Ser/Phe178Leu variant showed higher cell surface expression compared to IL2RG-Pro58Ser variant in stable HEK293 cell lines, suggesting that somatic p.(Phe178Leu) variant may at least partially rescue the pathogenic effect of germline p.(Pro58Ser) variant. In conclusion, our report indicates that expansion of γδ T cells associated with atypical SCID needs further studying and cannot exclusively be deemed as a homeostatic response to low numbers of conventional T cells.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Severe combined immunodeficiencies (SCID) are genetic disorders caused by disease-causing variants in genes regulating lymphocyte differentiation and proliferation [1]. Typical SCID is defined by very low or undetectable numbers of CD3 + T cells (< 300/μl) [2, 3] and, depending on the causative gene, functionally deficient or absent NK cells and/or B lymphocytes [1]. Without stem cell transplantation or gene therapy, SCID patients succumb to infections within the first 2 years of life [4, 5]. Recently, growing numbers of hypomorphic variants in genes causing SCID have been described [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. These present with milder clinical phenotype, with partially preserved T cell number and/or function. Thus, this condition is often coined as “leaky” or atypical SCID [3]. There are no universally accepted diagnostic criteria for atypical SCID. Phenotypically, these patients commonly display reduced or declining numbers of T cells and/or their subsets, and impaired T cell function [2, 3]. In some cases, increased proportions of γδ T cells may lead to normal absolute CD3 + T cell counts [17,18,19,20,21,22]. Lack of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in some patients, a known driver for γδ T cell expansion [20, 23], suggests yet undiscovered factors elevating γδ T cell counts [20].
γδ T cells are the first T cells to appear during thymic development [24] and normally comprise ca. 1–10% of peripheral blood CD3 + T lymphocytes [25, 26]. They are present at higher frequencies in epithelial barriers of the skin, intestines, and lungs, offering the first line of defense as rapid responders to various types of antigens and stimuli in a major histocompatibility complex (MHC) independent manner [24, 27]. γδ T cells act as early producers of cytokines like interferon (IFN)-γ and interleukin (IL)-4 [24] and as antigen presenting cells and thus have attributes of both the innate and adaptive immunity [27,28,29]. Most γδ T cells in the peripheral blood present Vγ9Vδ2 T cell receptor (TCR) [27, 30]. CMV infection, however, does not affect the major Vγ9Vδ2 + population but rather the Vδ1 + and Vδ3 + populations [31, 32]. In addition to host defense functions, γδ T cells play important roles in tissue homeostasis and tumorigenesis [31]. Though protumor roles have been reported, γδ T cells are mainly investigated for their potential in immunotherapeutic applications for cancer [33, 34].
We have previously described a patient with novel c.172C > T;p.(Pro58Ser) variant in IL-2 receptor gamma chain (IL2RG; NM_000206.3) associated with atypical X-SCID phenotype and abnormally large peripheral blood γδ T cell number comprising of up to 37.3% of CD3 + lymphocytes [17]. Here, we have further studied the phenotype and function of these γδ T cells presenting with normal IL2RG surface expression, IL2RG-dependent signaling, and normal or enhanced killing of in vitro target cells. In addition, we discovered a single base pair somatic c.534C > A; p.(Phe178Leu) IL2RG variant restricted to his γδ T cells. We studied the effect of this somatic variant with BioID proximity labeling in IL2RG expressing HEK293 cell lines and found that it altered protein–protein interactions of IL2RG-Pro58Ser. We also noted higher cell surface expression of IL2RG-Pro58Ser/Phe178Leu variant compared to IL2RG-Pro58Ser variant alone in these HEK293 cell lines, suggesting that the somatic variant may at least partially rescue the effect of Pro58Ser variant.
Materials and Methods
Genetic Analyses, Capillary Sequencing, and RT-PCR
Capillary sequencing methods have been described elsewhere [17]. Cell isolation is described in the Online Resource. TCRγ sequencing on complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions on genomic DNA (gDNA) isolated from γδ cells with TCRG immunoSEQ assay (Adaptive Biotechnologies), described in more detail in the Online Resource. RNA was isolated with Nucleospin RNA isolation kit (Macherey–Nagel) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All available RNA was used as template for cDNA synthesis (BioRAd iScript cDNA synthesis kit; according to the manufacturer’s instructions). Primer sequencies are listed in Table S1, Online Resource.
Flow Cytometry and Antibodies
Flow cytometry was performed on both whole blood and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Staining was performed with fluorescent-conjugated antibodies and is described in more detail in the Online Resource. To measure signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 5 tyrosine phosphorylation, isolated PBMCs were stimulated with IL-2 (10 U/ml and 320 U/ml, R&D Systems), IL-7 (50 ng/ml, Miltenyi Biotec), or IL-15 (6 ng/ml and 100 ng/ml, R&D Systems). For STAT3 and STAT6 tyrosine phosphorylation, PBMCs were stimulated with 50 ng/ml IL-21 (Peprotech) or with 100 ng/ml IL-4 (Biotechne), respectively. Blast formation of TCR αβ and γδ cells was determined by flow-cytometric assay for specific cell-mediated immune-responses in activated whole blood (FASCIA) [35]. To study CD25 and CD69 upregulation in response to TCR stimulation and intracellular cytokine expression, PBMCs were stimulated with plate bound anti-CD3/28 or Biolegend’s Activation cocktail (phorbol 12-myristate-13-acetate/ionomycin with Prefeldin A), respectively. For γδ T cell phenotyping, patient and healthy donor PBMCs were either directly stained to determine the baseline or cultured for 24 h in low glucose RPMI medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 100 IU/ml penicillin–streptomycin with three different stimuli: (1) 1 mg/ml of anti-CD3 and anti-CD28; (2) 5 mM Zoledronic acid (Sigma) and 1000 IU/ml of human IL-2 (R&D Systems); (3) 5 mM Zoledronic acid. Cells were then incubated with Fc-block (Biolegend) and labelled with fluorescent-conjugated antibodies for CdVd1, CdVd2, CD25, CD69, CD45RA, CD62L, CD3, CD4, CD8, Perforin, CD27, and FasL. Cells were analyzed with BD Fortessa flow cytometer and FlowJo (v.10.7.2) software. All monoclonal antibodies and their details are listed in Table S2, Online Resource. All the protocols are described in detail in the Online Resource.
LDH Release Assay
Killing assays are described in detail in the Online Resource. Briefly, target cells to determine effector cell–mediated cell lysis were A549 (human adenocarcinoma), MDA-MB-436 (human triple breast cancer), and Daudi cells (human Burkitt lymphoma). Freshly isolated PBMCs or γδ T cells were added at a 1:40 or 1:20 (target to effector) ratio, respectively, and incubated for 4 h at + 37 °C followed by supernatant collection. Cell lysis was determined by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) releases using the CyQUANT LDH Cytotoxicity assay kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
IL2RG Expressing Flp-In 293 T-REx Cell Lines and Proteomics
In silico computational analysis and plasmid mutagenesis are described in the Online Resource. Generation of the inducible HEK293 Flp-In Trex cell lines expressing C-terminally MAC-tagged IL2RG constructs and the sample preparation for mass spectrometry have been described elsewhere [36, 37] and in detail in the Online Resource together with proteomic analysis and mass spectrometry data processing. Cell surface and total cell-associated IL2RG expression levels in these HEK293 Flp-In Trex cell lines were analyzed by flow cytometry and are described in the Online Resource.
Results
Patient with Hypomorphic IL2RG p.(Pro58Ser) Variant Has Elevated Proportion of γδ T Cells in His Peripheral Blood
Our previously published index patient with novel hemizygous IL2RG c.172C > T;p.(Pro58Ser) missense variant [17] is currently 13-year-old male (Fig. 1a). At age 2, he started to suffer from recurrent respiratory tract infections and persistent bilateral purulent middle ear infections. He developed bronchiectasis by the age of 7. Despite normal total immunoglobulin levels, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) treatment was started due to specific antibody deficiency and recurrent respiratory tract infections. Thereafter, frequency of infections has markedly reduced and no progression of bronchiectasis has been observed. Before immunoglobulin substitution, our patient’s PCR test for CMV was negative. After the start of IVIG, our patient has repeatedly tested positive for CMV-specific IgG, likely due to IVIG, but has remained negative for IgM CMV antibodies. Currently, he suffers from molluscum contagiosum with occasional secondary bacterial skin infections. His detailed clinical phenotype and genetic analysis have been described earlier [17] and were updated in the Online Resource (text and Table S3). Since the age of 7, he has showed increased amounts of γδ T cells in his peripheral blood (20–40% of CD3 + T cells), unlike his family members (Fig. 1b, c, Fig. S1a, Online Resource), while the total amount of CD3 + T cells has remained within normal range (Fig. 1b, Table S3 Online Resource). The presence of c.172C > T p.(Pro58Ser) missense variant in γδ T cells was verified by Sanger sequencing, ruling out genetic reversion (Fig. S1b, Online Resource). Expression of IL2RG p.(Pro58Ser) variant was reduced on the surface of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells and NK cells, as well as on monocytes [17]. We studied the surface expression of IL2RG (CD132) on the patient’s γδ T cells and found it to be normal when compared to healthy donors’ cells while being clearly reduced on his ⍺β T cells (CD3 + TCRγδ- cells) (Fig. 1d, e). However, the total cell-associated IL2RG was significantly reduced also in his γδ T cells (34% less than in controls), but reduction of total IL2RG expression was even more pronounced in his TCRγδ-negative T cells (51% less than in controls, Fig. S2a-b, Online Resource). Taken together, IL2RG p.(Pro58Ser) variant leads to reduced IL2RG cell surface expression on conventional CD3 + T cells, while γδ T cells express normal surface level of IL2RG.
IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-15, and IL-21 Signaling Is Intact in Patient’s γδ T Cells, While Selectively Impaired in His ⍺β T Cells
To study IL2RG downstream signaling in T cells, we measured STAT5 tyrosine phosphorylation (pY-STAT5) in response to IL-2 stimulation by flow. We found that pY-STAT5 was significantly reduced in the patient’s TCRγδ-negative CD3 + T cells (representing ⍺β T cells), while it was normal in his TCRγδ-positive CD3 + T cells (Fig. 2a). Next, we evaluated pY-STAT5 in response to IL-15 stimulation and found that the patient’s γδ T cells showed slightly increased pY-STAT5 compared to healthy donors’ γδ T cells, while there was no difference observed in TCRγδ-negative T cells (Fig. 2b). Furthermore, we observed no clear difference in IL-4-induced STAT6 tyrosine phosphorylation, IL-21-induced STAT3 tyrosine phosphorylation, or IL-7-induced STAT5 tyrosine phosphorylation between healthy donors’ and the patient’s γδ or αβ T cells (Fig. S3a-c, Online Resource).
With FASCIA [35], the patient’s γδ T cells showed slightly reduced blast formation in response to low dose of IL-2 (10 U/ml) but with high dose of IL-2 (320 U/ml) it was comparable to controls, while blast formation of the patient’s ⍺β T cells remained low with both doses (Fig. 2c, d). Blast formation in response to IL-15 was comparable between patient and healthy donor γδ T cells, while it was reduced in response to high dose of IL-15 (100 ng/ml) in the patient’s ⍺β T cells (Fig. 2e, f). These data indicate that IL2RG-mediated signaling is intact in the patient’s γδ T cells, while selectively impaired in his ⍺β T cells.
Patient’s γδ T Cells Display Elevated Level of Memory Vδ2 + T Cells and Expresses Normal Level of IFN-γ Upon Stimulation
To further investigate the patient’s γδ T cells, we performed flow cytometric phenotyping and found that approximately 15% of the patient’s CD3 + T cells were Vδ1 + (Fig. 3a) and approximately 17% Vδ2 + (Fig. 3b). Especially the Vδ2 + population was relatively increased compared to healthy donors (1.1–8.5%). His Vδ1 + cells showed significantly higher proportion of T effector memory (TEM) cells (29% vs. 11.2–13.6%) and lower proportion of T central memory cells (TCM) (46.5% vs. 54–64.1%) while proportions of naïve and TEM re-expressing CD45RA (TEMRA) were comparable to controls (21% vs. 21–28.4% and 3.6% vs. 3–6.4%, respectively) (Fig. 3c). Essentially all patient’s Vδ2 + cells were memory T cells: 73.1% TEM (58.3–60.4% in controls) and 25.6% TCM (5.1–11.0% in controls) (Fig. 3d). In unstimulated condition, perforin expression was in Vδ1 + cells comparable to controls’ (Fig. 3e). However, approximately 53% of the patient’s Vδ2 + cells expressed perforin (vs. ca 15% in healthy controls), indicating activated state; however, the difference between patient and controls was not statistically significant (Fig. 3f). Upon stimulation, the patient’s Vδ1 + population showed somewhat lower increase in expression of perforin in response to stimulation with anti-CD3/28 but a significantly higher increase in response to zoledronic acid (Fig. 3e). The patient’s Vδ2 + cells showed an overall trend towards higher perforin expression with a significantly increased response to anti-CD3/28 and combination of zoledronic acid and IL-2 (Fig. 3f). In Fas-ligand expression, we noted a significant increase in the patient’s Vδ1 + cells and Vδ2 + cells with anti-CD3/28 and zoledronic acid stimulation, respectively (Fig. S4a-b, Online Resource). However, when the patient’s γδ T cells were activated with anti-CD3/28, the activation markers CD25 and CD69 remained lower than in healthy controls (Fig. S4c-d, Online Resource).
With PMA/ionomycin stimulation, the vast majority of the patient’s γδ T cells (approx. 95%) expressed high IFN-γ, which was comparable to healthy donors’ γδ T cells, while significantly lower proportion of his conventional CD3 + T cells became IFN-γ positive, when compared to controls (Fig. 3g). For IL-2 and IL-15, we detected no difference between the patient and controls (data not shown). Taken together, immunophenotyping of the patient’s γδ T cells shows increased memory phenotype and implies cytotoxic properties.
The Patient’s TCRvγ Repertoire Showed a Dominance of Certain Clones
To detect possible clonal expansion, we deep sequenced the patient’s TCRvγ repertoire. The top ten clones and their amino acid sequencies in the patient and healthy donors are listed in Table S4, Online Resource. On DNA level, our patient’s top ten rearrangements comprised 90.6% of all the rearrangements (controls 57.5% and 52.8%, Fig. 4a). Furthermore, the frequencies of top two clones in the patient were 29.2% and 27.2% (Fig. 4b). However, the total amount of productive rearrangements and the count of unique rearrangements were comparable to controls. These data indicate that the patient has a generally versatile TCRvγ repertoire (Table S5, Online Resource).
Patient’s γδ T Cells Are Hyperreactive Against Malignant Cells
To determine the patient’s γδ T cells’ cytotoxic properties, we conducted killing assays using Daudi, A549, and MDA-MB-436 tumor cell lines. The patient’s PBMCs were able to induce significant lysis of all studied cell lines (Fig. 5a). Next, we repeated the killing assays with equal amounts of freshly isolated γδ T cells from the patient and healthy controls. The healthy controls showed somewhat higher lysis of the Daudi cells, but the difference was not significant (Fig.S5, Online Resource). With A549, the patient’s γδ T cells showed significantly higher cytotoxicity than controls’ γδ T cells (Fig. 5b). This data implies that the patient has a functional γδ T cell population that is hyperreactive against certain malignant cells.
Sequencing of Patient’s IL2RG Revealed a Novel Somatic Variant from γδ T Cells
To detect alterations at mRNA level, we performed RT-PCR. The only alteration when compared to reference genome was a novel c.534C > A; p.(Phe178Leu) missense variant in part of the patient’s γδ T cells (Fig. 6a). This variant was not found from the GnomAD database and was not predicted to be deleterious or pathogenic by prediction tools used (SIFT, PolyPhen2, CADD Score, Mutation Taster; Table S6, Online Resource). The same variant was also detected in the majority of the gDNA isolated from the γδ T cells (gDNA used for TCRvγ repertoire sequencing; Fig. 6b) but absent in the ⍺β T cells (Fig. 6c., Fig. S6a, Online Resource) and B lymphocytes (Fig. S6b, Online Resource), suggesting a somatic change restricted to γδ T cells. When sequencing DNA from γδ T cells after 10-day in vitro expansion, wild-type (WT) sequence (i.e., base C) was no longer detected (Fig. S6c, Online Resource). The sequencing of γδ T cell DNA was repeated after 1 year with similar results (Fig. 6d) indicating that the clones with this somatic variant have growth or survival advantage as WT sequence is currently absent in the γδ T cells.
The Novel Somatic p.(Phe178Leu) Variant Affects the Stability, Protein–Protein Interaction Profile, and Plasma Membrane Targeting of IL2RG-Pro58Ser
To assess the effect of the new p.(Phe178Leu) variant on the stability of the IL2RG p.(Pro58Ser), we performed computational analysis with DynaMut2 tool [38]. The overall effect of Phe178Leu substitution for IL2RG was predicted to be stabilizing and IL2RG-Pro58Ser/Phe178Leu to be more stable than IL2RG-Pro58Ser variant alone (Table S7, Online Resource).
To study if Phe178Leu variant affects plasma membrane targeting or protein interactions of IL2RG, we performed BioID proximity labeling in inducible HEK293 cells expressing either wild-type IL2RG, IL2RG-Pro58Ser, IL2RG-Phe178Leu, or IL2RG-Pro58Ser/Phe178Leu variants [36]. According to our results, IL2RG-Pro58Ser and IL2RG-Pro58Ser/Phe178Leu displayed highly overlapping but not similar protein–protein interaction profiles whereas IL2RG-Phe178Leu had clearly more overlap with the wild-type IL2RG (Fig. 7a). However, L2RG-Pro58Ser displayed 15 significantly (≤ 0.01) increased interactions not shared by Pro58Ser/Phe178Leu or other variants. Some of these proteins were associated with endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi-mediated transport (Fig. 7a, b; Table S8, Online Resource). Furthermore, in terms of function, IL2RG-Pro58Ser/Phe178Leu had significantly lower amount of interaction with proteins associated with protein transport (GO0015031) when compared to all other IL2RG variants (p < 0.001, Fig. 7b). IL2RG-Pro58Ser/Phe178Leu showed significantly increased (≤ 0.01) interactions with four proteins (Table S8, Online Resource). These data suggest that the novel somatic Phe178Leu variant affects the protein–protein interaction profile of IL2RG with potential implications in cellular processes such as signaling or localization.
To assess the effect of Phe178Leu on plasma membrane targeting and protein stability, we studied the expression levels of each IL2RG variant in the abovementioned cell lines by flow cytometry. In line with the patient’s ⍺β cells, Pro58Ser variant showed significantly reduced cell surface expression when compared to wild-type IL2RG expressing cell line. However, the surface expression level of IL2RG-Pro58Ser/Phe178Leu variant was significantly increased when compared to Pro58Ser but remained lower than IL2RG wild-type (Fig. 7c). As expected, the total cell-associated amount of IL2RG-Pro58Ser was also significantly lower than in wild-type IL2RG cell line. The Pro58Ser/Phe178Leu variant showed a trend towards higher total protein expression level compared to Pro58Ser variant, but this did not reach statistical significance (Fig. 7d). This data suggests that somatic Phe178Leu variant partly rescues the maturation defect caused by Pro58Ser variant in stable HEK293 cell lines.
Discussion
Expansion of γδ T cells is a previously recognized phenomenon among patients with atypical SCID [20, 22, 39]. However, the studies on function and phenotype of such atypical SCID-related γδ T cell expansion are very limited. Some reports have focused on the TCRvγ usage or γδ T cell reactivity towards CMV [18, 19, 39]. One article describes phenotypic characteristics of γδ T cells in atypical CD3δ deficiency [22], but more detailed immunophenotyping and cytotoxic properties have not been described previously.
We previously reported two patients with this novel hypomorphic IL2RG c.172C > T;p.(Pro58Ser) variant [17]. The second patient has been lost to follow-up without knowledge of his current γδ T cell count, which was normal at the age of 36 days. Since no evident cause for our index patient’s abnormally large γδ T cell population was found, we wanted to determine whether these γδ T cells were functional or merely a reactive expansion, possibly in response to low counts of αβ T cells. Unexpectedly, his γδ T cells showed normal IL2RG cell surface expression (Fig. 1d), cytokine signaling (Fig. 2a, b), blast formation (Fig. 2c, e), and cytotoxic abilities even superior to controls (Fig. 5), despite harboring the germline IL2RG p.(Pro58Ser) variant (Fig. S1b, Online Resource).
In healthy individuals, circulating γδ T cells with higher IFN-γ production expand better and display higher proportions of TCM and TEM subtypes [40]. When compared to controls, our patient’s γδ T cells displayed preponderance of TEM in both Vδ1 and Vδ2 populations and TCM in Vδ2 population (Fig. 3c, d). Of note, the patient’s Vδ2 population seems cytotoxically potent as it presents with overall tendency towards increased perforin expression. Furthermore, IFN-γ production in response to PMA-ionomycin in his γδ T cells was comparable controls (Fig. 3g). High IFN-γ secretion in general might reflect readiness to expand and may potentiate antiviral activities of γδ T cells [41,42,43,44]. Interestingly, the patient’s γδ T cells showed lower expression of activation markers CD25 and CD69 upon anti-CD3/28 stimulation (Fig. S4c-d). Activation mechanisms for these cells might thus be at least partially non-conventional.
The sequencing of the patient’s TCRγ chain revealed an accumulation of certain clones; however, no true mono- or oligoclonality was detected. Among healthy donors, certain Vγ9Vδ2 + clonotypes seem to predominate in TCR deep sequencing. Up to 80% of Vγ9 repertoire is composed of these public clonotypes putatively caused by convergent recombination [25]. In a minority of healthy donors, the top clone can comprise 20–40% of all Vγ9 and Vδ2 CDR3s. Interestingly, the most prevalent public clonotype (CALWEVQELGKKIKVF) described in many previous studies [25, 45, 46] was discovered in both controls at productive frequency of 6% but only 0.2% in the patient. Of note, while the patient’s most prevalent clone is a known Vγ9 clonotype [47], none of the five most common public Vγ9 clones listed in [25] was found in his top ten Vγ9 repertoire (Table S4, Online Resource). This data indicates a versatile and unique TCRγ repertoire, which likely did not arise merely as a reactive expansion in response to low αβ T cell percentage.
γδ T cells have been described to have oncolytic properties and have been used as cell platforms for cancer therapy [48, 49]. As the patient had high levels of γδ T cells in his peripheral blood, we wanted to test if they possessed cytotoxic abilities against tumor cell lines. With killing assays conducted on PBMCs, significantly higher degree of cytotoxicity, further increased by addition of zoledronic acid which induces expression of isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP), a known target for γδ T cells [50, 51], was observed (Fig. 5a). To exclude the effect of higher proportion of γδ T cells in the patient’s PBMCs, the assay was repeated with freshly isolated γδ T cells. The results were similar but interestingly, with a less sensitive cell line A549, the patient’s γδ T cells showed significantly higher cytotoxicity compared to controls’ γδ T cells (Fig. 5b) indicating a highly reactive γδ T cell pool. However, this result might possibly reflect powerful anti-tumor properties of certain clones.
While expansion of γδ T cells among patients with atypical SCID has been reported, we found only one available larger cohort study on this. In a cohort of 76 atypical SCID patients, up to 60% of patients had elevated γδ T lymphocyte proportions in their peripheral blood. This γδ T cell expansion positively correlated with CMV infection and autoimmune cytopenia, suggesting that CMV infection may drive γδ T cell expansion and that such expansions might further be causing autoimmune cytopenia [20]. RAG1-associated SCID and atypical SCID with CMV-driven γδ T cell expansions have been reported [18, 19], and interestingly all patients with documented CMV infection in cohort of Tometten et al. had RAG deficiency [20]. Since not all atypical SCID patients with γδ T cell expansions harbor CMV infection, other yet undiscovered factors must contribute to such expansions and remain to be elucidated. There is no clear indication of CMV as the driver for γδ T cell expansion in our patient; when increased γδ T cell numbers were noted, the PCR test for CMV was negative.
In their cohort, Tometten et al. found elevated γδ T cell proportions among patients with all types of atypical SCID and the authors postulated these to be a general feature of atypical SCID and not a reflection for example of αβ T cell developmental defect. However, a trend towards DNA recombinase deficient patients displaying higher amounts of γδ T cells was noted [20]. One could also speculate that partial RAG1/2 deficiency could favor development of γδ T cells over αβ T cells, since commitment of double-negative (DN) T cells to γδ lineage takes place in DN2 stage before RAG1/2 expression is turned on in DN3 stage allowing efficient TCRβ rearrangement and further differentiation towards αβ T cells [52].
The surface expression of IL2RG was normal on our patient’s γδ T cells, while significantly reduced on his αβ T cells (Fig. 1d, e). As the levels of total cell-associated IL2RG were decreased in both αβ T and γδ T cells (Fig. S2, Online Resource), increased transcription is unlikely the mechanism behind normal cell surface expression in γδ T cells. We found a novel IL2RG c.534C > A; p.(Phe178Leu) variant in our patient’s γδ T cells (Fig. 6). This somatic variant was the only genomic alteration in addition to c.172C > T;p.(Pro58Ser) discovered in his γδ or αβ T cells and was not detected in the original exome sequencing performed at the age of 8. Somatic variants in lymphocytes are common in healthy individuals and patients with inborn errors of immunity [53]. However, they usually are restricted to a single or certain clones rather than whole lymphocyte subset (variant allele frequency is relatively low). As initially only part of the patient’s γδ T cells carried the p.(Phe178Leu) variant (Fig. 6) and the expansion was originally not monoclonal (Fig. 4a, b), the DNA change has occurred in a progenitor cell level either in bone marrow or thymus. Hypothetically, there could be a common precursor that produces exclusively γδ T cells, or double-negative (DN) T cells with IL2RG p.(Phe178Leu) variant may carry selective advantage to differentiate to TCRγδ +rather than TCRαβ + T cells in thymus. However, this most likely is not caused by increased IL-7R-mediated signaling as the patient’s TCRγδ+ cells did not display enhanced responsiveness to IL-7 (Fig. S3c, Online Resource). The majority of the patient’s γδ T cells were Vγ9Vδ2+ , a population known to be influenced by both pre- and postnatal events [25]. In conclusion, it can be hypothesized that at some point in the patient’s γδ T cell ontogeny p.(Phe178Leu) has conferred advantage in function and/or survival. This hypothesis is further strengthened by the observed enrichment of the γδ T cell population harboring IL2RG p.(Phe178Leu) variant after in vitro expansion and over time in the patient (Fig. S6c, d) and with predicted stabilizing effect of the p.(Phe178Leu) variant on IL2RG p.(Pro58Ser) (Table S7, Online Resource). The protein interaction profile of IL2RG-Pro58Ser/Phe178Leu variant was found to be slightly different to IL2RG-Pro58Ser or wild-type IL2RG (Fig. 7a, b). As shown before, IL2RG-Pro58Ser variant showed increased interactions with ER/Golgi and nuclear proteins (Fig. 7b) [17]. Our BioID analysis revealed 15 significantly increased protein interactions limited to IL2RG-Pro58Ser variant (Table S8, Online Resource). As these interactions — including the abovementioned ER/Golgi proteins — were not shared with the IL2RG-Pro58Ser/Phe178Leu, it is possible that they are contributing to the observed difference in plasma membrane targeting. Furthermore, IL2RG-Pro58Ser/Phe178Leu variant showed enhanced plasma membrane targeting compared to Pro58Ser variant alone in stable HEK293 cell lines (Fig. 7c). In silico, Phe178Leu is predicted to be stabilizing (Table S7, Online Resource) and possibly due to this stabilizing effect the total cell-associated levels of IL2RG-Pro58Ser/Phe178Leu are reduced to a lesser degree than IL2RG-Pro58Ser when compared to IL2RG WT in our HEK293 cell lines (Fig. 7d) as well as in the patient’s γδ T versus his ⍺β T cells (Fig. 1d, e).
However, the physiological meaning of these findings cannot be directly translated to in vivo conditions as numerous factors might contribute to plasma membrane targeting in cell type–specific manner. Furthermore, Phe178Leu change can also affect interactions with other receptor subunits associated with IL2RG signaling expressed in lymphocytes but not in HEK293 cells. These differences between cell types could explain why IL2RG-Pro58Ser/Phe178Leu cell surface levels are not equal to wild-typein our HEK293 cell model. However, since the patient’s γδ T cells with the somatic variant display normal cell surface expression levels CD132 and as the IL2RG-Pro58Ser/Phe178Leu variant displays higher cell surface levels than IL2RG-Pro58Ser in HEK293 cell lines, it can be concluded that Phe178Leu is at least partially rescuing the effect of Pro58Ser in terms of plasma membrane targeting. As Phe178Leu variant is in the extracellular domain of IL2RG, it could theoretically alter its cytokine binding abilities. However, as these γδ T cells are hyperreactive towards certain cancer cell lines (Fig. 5b), there might be other undiscovered factors explaining certain functional properties.
Since the IL2RG p.(Phe178Leu) second-site genetic alteration appears to — at least partially — abrogate the negative effect of the germline Pro58Ser variant in terms of localization, it can be considered as a second-site genetic reversion. To our knowledge, this is the first in-depth report of characterizing the functionality of expanded γδ T cell population in an individual with atypical SCID and describing positively affecting somatic second-site reversion restricted to γδ T cells. We sought for more atypical SCID patients with no success, probably due to the rareness of the disease. However, based on our findings, further investigation of the functional abilities of expanded γδ T cell populations in patients with atypical SCID will be needed.
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Tangye SG, Al-Herz W, Bousfiha A, Chatila T, Cunningham-Rundles C, Etzioni A, et al. Human inborn errors of immunity: 2019 update on the classification from the International Union of Immunological Societies Expert Committee. J Clin Immunol. 2020;40:24–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-019-00737-x.
Hannon WH, Abraham RS, Kobrynski L, Vogt RF, Adair O, Aznar C, et al. Newborn blood spot screening for severe combined immunodeficiency by measurement of T-cell receptor excision circles; approved guideline, CLSI document NBS06-A. CLSI 2013;33.
Shearer WT, Dunn E, Notarangelo LD, Dvorak CC, Puck JM, Logan BR, et al. Establishing diagnostic criteria for severe combined immunodeficiency disease (SCID), leaky SCID, and Omenn syndrome: the Primary Immune Deficiency Treatment Consortium experience. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133:1092–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2013.09.044.
Notarangelo LD. Primary immunodeficiencies. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010 Primer Allerg Immunol Dis 2010;125:S182–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2009.07.053.
Fischer A. Severe combined immunodeficiencies (SCID). Clin Exp Immunol. 2000;122:143–9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2249.2000.01359.x.
Brooks EG, Schmalstieg FC, Wirt DP, Rosenblatt HM, Adkins LT, Lookingbill DP, et al. A novel X-linked combined immunodeficiency disease. J Clin Invest. 1990;86:1623–31. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI114884.
Chandra A, Zhang F, Gilmour KC, Webster D, Plagnol V, Kumararatne DS, et al. Common variable immunodeficiency and natural killer cell lymphopenia caused by Ets-binding site mutation in the IL-2 receptor γ (IL2RG) gene promoter. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;137:940-942.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2015.08.049.
Fuchs S, Rensing-Ehl A, Erlacher M, Vraetz T, Hartjes L, Janda A, et al. Patients with T+/low NK+ IL-2 receptor γ chain deficiency have differentially-impaired cytokine signaling resulting in severe combined immunodeficiency. Eur J Immunol. 2014;44:3129–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201444689.
Mella P, Imberti L, Brugnoni D, Pirovano S, Candotti F, Mazzolari E, et al. Development of autologous T lymphocytes in two males with X-linked severe combined immune deficiency: molecular and cellular characterization. Clin Immunol. 2000;95:39–50. https://doi.org/10.1006/clim.2000.4842.
Neves JM Catarina Cordeiro, Ana I. Novel IL2RG mutation causes leaky TLOWB+NK+ SCID with nodular regenerative hyperplasia and normal IL-15 STAT5 phosphorylation. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2019.
Lim CK, Abolhassani H, Appelberg SK, Sundin M, Hammarström L. IL2RG hypomorphic mutation: identification of a novel pathogenic mutation in exon 8 and a review of the literature. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol Off J Can Soc Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;15(2):2–2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-018-0317-y.
Stepensky P, Keller B, Shamriz O, von Spee-Mayer C, Friedmann D, Shadur B, et al. T+ NK+ IL-2 receptor γ chain mutation: a challenging diagnosis of atypical severe combined immunodeficiency. J Clin Immunol. 2018;38:527–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-018-0514-y.
Somech R, Roifman CM. Mutation analysis should be performed to rule out γc deficiency in children with functional severe combined immune deficiency despite apparently normal immunologic tests. J Pediatr. 2005;147:555–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.05.010.
de Saint-Basile G, Deist FL, Caniglia M, Lebranchu Y, Griscelli C, Fischer A. Genetic study of a new X-linked recessive immunodeficiency syndrome. J Clin Invest. 1992;89:861–6. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI115665.
Disanto J.P. R-LF Dautry-Varsat A, Fischer A, de Saint Basile G. Defective human interleukin 2 receptor gamma chain in an atypical X chromosome linked severe combined immuonodeficiency with periferal T cells 1994;91:9466–70. https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.91.20.9466
Schmalstieg FC, Leonard WJ, Noguchi M, Berg M, Rudloff HE, Denney RM, et al. Missense mutation in exon 7 of the common gamma chain gene causes a moderate form of X-linked combined immunodeficiency. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:1169–73. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI117765.
Tuovinen EA, Grönholm J, Öhman T, Pöysti S, Toivonen R, Kreutzman A, et al. Novel hemizygous IL2RG p. (Pro58Ser) mutation impairs IL-2 receptor complex expression on lymphocytes causing X-linked combined immunodeficiency. J Clin Immunol. 2020;40:503–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-020-00745-2.
de Villartay J-P, Lim A, Al-Mousa H, Dupont S, Déchanet-Merville J, Coumau-Gatbois E, et al. A novel immunodeficiency associated with hypomorphic RAG1 mutations and CMV infection. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:3291–9. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI25178.
Ehl S, Schwarz K, Enders A, Duffner U, Pannicke U, Kühr J, et al. A variant of SCID with specific immune responses and predominance of γδ T cells. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:3140–8. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI25221.
Tometten I, Felgentreff K, Hönig M, Hauck F, Albert MH, Niehues T, et al. Increased proportions of γδ T lymphocytes in atypical SCID associate with disease manifestations. Clin Immunol. 2019;201:30–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2018.11.006.
Felgentreff K, Perez-Becker R, Speckmann C, Schwarz K, Kalwak K, Markelj G, et al. Clinical and immunological manifestations of patients with atypical severe combined immunodeficiency. Clin Immunol. 2011;141:73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2011.05.007.
Garcillán B, Mazariegos MS, Fisch P, Res PC, Muñoz-Ruiz M, Gil J, et al. Enrichment of the rare CD4+ γδ T-cell subset in patients with atypical CD3δ deficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133:1205-1208.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2013.10.002.
Hayday AC. γδ T cell update: adaptate orchestrators of immune surveillance. J Immunol. 2019;203:311. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1800934.
Chien Y, Meyer C, Bonneville M. γδ T cells: first line of defense and beyond. Annu Rev Immunol. 2014;32:121–55. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120216.
Willcox CR, Davey MS, Willcox BE. Development and selection of the human Vγ9Vδ2+ T-cell repertoire. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1501. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01501.
Garcillán B, Marin AVM, Jiménez-Reinoso A, Briones AC, Muñoz-Ruiz M, García-León MJ, et al. gd T lymphocytes in the diagnosis of human T cell receptor immunodeficiencies. Front Immunol. 2015;6:20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2015.00020.
Lawand M, Déchanet-Merville J, Dieu-Nosjean M. Key features of gamma-delta T-cell subsets in human diseases and their immunotherapeutic implications. Front Immunol. 2017;8:761.
Brandes M, Willimann K, Bioley G, Lévy N, Eberl M, Luo M, et al. Cross-presenting human gammadelta T cells induce robust CD8+ alphabeta T cell responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:2307–12. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0810059106.
Tyler CJ, McCarthy NE, Lindsay JO, Stagg AJ, Moser B, Eberl M. Antigen-presenting human γδ T cells promote intestinal CD4+ T cell expression of IL-22 and mucosal release of calprotectin. J Immunol. 2017;198:3417. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1700003.
Vantourout P, Hayday A. Six-of-the-best: unique contributions of γδ T cells to immunology. Nat Rev. 2013;13:88–100. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3384.
Ribot JC, Lopes N, Silva-Santos B. γδ T cells in tissue physiology and surveillance. Nat Rev Immunol. 2021;21:221–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-020-00452-4.
Khairallah C, Déchanet-Merville J, Capone M. γδ T cell-mediated immunity to cytomegalovirus infection. Front Immunol. 2017;8:105. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00105.
Sebestyen Z, Prinz I, Déchanet-Merville J, Silva-Santos B, Kuball J. Translating gammadelta (γδ) T cells and their receptors into cancer cell therapies. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020;19:169–84. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-019-0038-z.
Zhao Y, Niu C, Cui J. Gamma-delta (γδ) T cells: friend or foe in cancer development? J Transl Med. 2018;16:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-017-1378-2.
Marits P, Wikström A-C, Popadic D, Winqvist O, Thunberg S. Evaluation of T and B lymphocyte function in clinical practice using a flow cytometry based proliferation assay. Clin Immunol. 2014;153:332–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2014.05.010.
Liu X, Salokas K, Tamene F, Jiu Y, Weldatsadik RG, Öhman T, et al. An AP-MS- and BioID-compatible MAC-tag enables comprehensive mapping of protein interactions and subcellular localizations. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1188):1188–1188. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03523-2.
Liu X, Salokas K, Weldatsadik RG, Gawriyski L, Varjosalo M. Combined proximity labeling and affinity purification−mass spectrometry workflow for mapping and visualizing protein interaction networks. Nat Protoc. 2020;15:3182–211. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-020-0365-x.
Rodrigues CHM, Pires DEV, Ascher DB. DynaMut2: assessing changes in stability and flexibility upon single and multiple point missense mutations. Protein Sci. 2021;30:60–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3942.
Schmalstieg FC, Palkowetz KH, Rudloff HE, Goldman AS. Blood γδ T cells and γδ TCR V gene specificities in a single missense mutation (L→Q271) in the common gamma chain gene. Scand J Immunol. 2001;54:592–8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3083.2001.01007.x.
Ou L, Wang H, Liu Q, Zhang J, Lu H, Luo L, et al. Dichotomous and stable gamma delta T-cell number and function in healthy individuals. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9: e002274. https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-002274.
Agrati C, Alonzi T, De Santis R, Castilletti C, Abbate I, Capobianchi MR, et al. Activation of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells by non-peptidic antigens induces the inhibition of subgenomic HCV replication. Int Immunol. 2006;18:11–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/intimm/dxh337.
Conroy MJ, Mac Nicholas R, Taylor M, O’Dea S, Mulcahy F, Norris S, et al. Increased frequencies of circulating IFN-γ-producing Vδ1+ and Vδ2+ γδ T cells in patients with asymptomatic persistent hepatitis B virus infection. Viral Immunol. 2015;28:201–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/vim.2014.0133.
Barcy S, De Rosa SC, Vieira J, Diem K, Ikoma M, Casper C, et al. γδ+ T cells involvement in viral immune control of chronic human herpesvirus 8 infection. J Immunol. 2008;180:3417. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.180.5.3417.
Sant S, Jenkins MR, Dash P, Watson KA, Wang Z, Pizzolla A, et al. Human γδ T-cell receptor repertoire is shaped by influenza viruses, age and tissue compartmentalisation. Clin Transl Immunol. 2019;8: e1079. https://doi.org/10.1002/cti2.1079.
Sherwood Anna M., Desmarais Cindy, Livingston Robert J., Andriesen Jessica, Haussler Maximilian, Carlson Christopher S, et al. Deep sequencing of the human TCRγ and TCRβ repertoires suggests that TCRβ rearranges after αβ and γδ T cell commitment. Sci Transl Med 2011;3:90ra61–90ra61. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3002536.
Davey MS, Willcox CR, Hunter S, Kasatskaya SA, Remmerswaal EBM, Salim M, et al. The human Vδ2+ T-cell compartment comprises distinct innate-like Vγ9+ and adaptive Vγ9- subsets. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1760. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04076-0.
Davey MS, Willcox CR, Joyce SP, Ladell K, Kasatskaya SA, Mclaren JE, et al. Clonal selection in the human V[delta]1 T cell repertoire indicates [gamma][delta] TCR-dependent adaptive immune surveillance. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14760. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14760.
Kabelitz D, Serrano R, Kouakanou L, Peters C, Kalyan S. Cancer immunotherapy with γδ T cells: many paths ahead of us. Cell Mol Immunol. 2020;17:925–39. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41423-020-0504-x.
Park JH, Lee HK. Function of γδ T cells in tumor immunology and their application to cancer therapy. Exp Mol Med. 2021;53:318–27. https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-021-00576-0.
Lafont V, Liautard J, Sablé-Teychené M, Sainte-Marie Y, Favero J. Isopentenyl pyrophosphate, a mycobacterial non-peptidic antigen, triggers delayed and highly sustained signaling in human γδ T lymphocytes without inducing down-modulation of T cell antigen receptor *. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:15961–7. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M008684200.
Roelofs AJ, Jauhiainen M, Mönkkönen H, Rogers MJ, Mönkkönen J, Thompson K. Peripheral blood monocytes are responsible for γδ T cell activation induced by zoledronic acid through accumulation of IPP/DMAPP. Br J Haematol. 2009;144:245–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07435.x.
Parker ME, Ciofani M. Regulation of γδ T Cell Effector Diversification in the Thymus. Front Immunol 2020;11:42. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00042
Savola P, Martelius T, Kankainen M, Huuhtanen J, Lundgren S, Koski Y, et al. Somatic mutations and T-cell clonality in patients with immunodeficiency. Haematologica. 2019;105:2757–68. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2019.220889.
Acknowledgements
We thank all the participants for their support. We thank Noora Aarnio (Helsinki University, Biomedicum 1 flow cytometry unit) for sorting service, Eira Leinonen for help with sample collection, Auli Saarinen for PBMC and DNA isolation, and Dr. Tapio Kesti for assistance and advice with the experiments. We thank Meri Kaustio and prof. Janna Saarela for information regarding sequencing data and HUSLAB flow cytometry Unit for clinical data. Prof. James Verbsky is acknowledged for the information on the γδ T cell level of the second IL2RG p.(Pro58Ser) patient. Dr. Ravindra Daddali is acknowledged for excellent technical assistance. We thank Dr. Behdad Afzali (NIDDK/NIH/USA) for valuable comments on our manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding provided by University of Helsinki including Helsinki University Central Hospital. Funding was received by Emil Aaltonen Foundation (ET, SP, and JG), Biomedicum Foundation (ET), The Finnish Medical Foundation (ET and JG), University of Helsinki Research Foundation (FH), Sigrid Jusélius Foundation (JK and JG) and Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation (VC and JK), Academy of Finland (MV, VC and JG), Pediatric Research Center (JG and MS), Finnish Pediatric Research Foundation (MS), Novo Nordisk Foundation (AH), European Research Council (VC), Cancer Finnish foundation (VC), Magnus Ehrnrooth Foundation (VC), and from HiLIFE (VC).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AH, MS, MV, VC, JK, and JG planned and supervised the project. ET, SP, FH, KL, LM, NM, SK, TT, and JG conducted the experiments and analyzed the data. ET, SP, FH, KH, SK, MV, JK, MS, and JG drafted the manuscript. KH provided clinical data and patient samples. All authors critically reviewed and accepted the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
This study was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocols were approved by the Coordinating Ethics Committee of The Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa (HUS/182/2021) and the Ethics Committee for Gynaecology, Obstetrics, Pediatrics and Psychiatry (138/13/03/00/2013, HUS/2107/2020).
Consent to Participate
Signed informed consent was obtained from all the participants.
Consent for Publication
Included subjects or their representatives have consented to publication of their data.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tuovinen, E.A., Pöysti, S., Hamdan, F. et al. Characterization of Expanded Gamma Delta T Cells from Atypical X-SCID Patient Reveals Preserved Function and IL2RG-Mediated Signaling. J Clin Immunol 43, 358–370 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-022-01375-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-022-01375-6