Abstract
Purpose
The profile of central (=TCM) and effector (=TEM) memory CD4+ T cell subsets and the possible role as surrogate markers of protection is studied in the volunteers with history of cutaneous leishmaniasis (HCL).
Methods
Profile of T cell subsets based on CCR7/CD45RA expressions and phenotypic changes after soluble Leishmania antigen (SLA) stimulation were analyzed. Then, sorted CD4+CD45RO−CD45RA+ naïve T, CD4+CD45RO+CD45RA−CCR7− TEM, CD4+CD45RO+CD45RA−CCR7+ TCM subsets were cultured with SLA for proliferation, cytokine production and intracellular cytokine assays.
Results
In the HCL and control volunteers, the mean frequencies of CD4+CD45RA+CCR7+ naïve T cells and CD4+CD45RA−CCR7− TEM cells were higher than the other subsets before culture. Frequency of naïve T cells and CD4+CD45RA−CCR7+ TCM cells was significantly decreased (P = 0.01 for naïve T and P < 0.05 for TCM cells) and frequency of TEM cells was significantly increased after SLA stimulation compared to before culture (P < 0.001). By CFSE labeling, CD4+CD45RO+CD45RA−CCR7+ TCM cells showed more proliferation potential than CD4+CD45RO+CD45RA−CCR7− TEM cells. Stimulation of the TEM cells in HCL volunteers induced a significantly higher IFN-γ production (P = 0.04) with higher number of intracellular IFN-γ positive cells (P = 0.032) than the same cells from controls. A significantly higher number of TCM cells produced IL-2 in HCL volunteers compared with controls (P < 0.05). Most of the intracellular IFN-γ positive TEM cells were proliferating CFSE-dim populations (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
A combination of Leishmania-reactive IFN-γ producing CD4+CD45RO+CD45RA−CCR7− TEM and Leishmania-reactive IL-2 producing CD4+CD45RO+CD45RA−CCR7+ TCM are identified in individuals with history of CL which might play a role in protective recall immune response against Leishmania infection.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Leishmania spp are intracellular protozoan parasites of the kinetoplastida family which cause a spectrum of human diseases. It is estimated that in 98 countries mostly developing ones approximately 350 million people are at risk of acquiring leishmaniasis [1]. Two most common clinical forms of the disease, Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL) and Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL), are mainly seen in 14 of the 22 countries of EMRO (Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office) region including Iran [2]. Cutaneous leishmaniasis is usually a self healing lesion but rarely the lesion does not heal during expected time period and might not even respond to multiple courses of therapy. Management of the disease including chemotherapy, vector and reservoir control are not fully successful in most of the endemic areas [1, 3] and to date there is no vaccine available against any form of human leishmaniasis [4–6].
The development of effector T-cell response to L. major infection is explored in mouse model but how memory T cells are generated and maintained in human leishmaniasis is not fully understood [7, 8]. Memory T cells rapidly initiate effector functions and kill infected cells and/or secrete Th1/Th2 cytokines [9], Heterogeneous populations of memory T lymphocytes are distinguished based on the surface markers and effector functions including cytokine secretion and proliferation capacity [10]. Human memory T cells are characterized by surface markers, including CD45RO/RA, CD27, chemokine receptors like CCR7 and adhesion molecules such as CD62L [11, 12]. Recently, central memory T cell (TCM = CD45RO+CCR7+) and effector memory T cell (TEM = CD45RO+CCR7−) subsets are distinguished based on the expression of CCR7 [13]. CD45RA+CCR7+ naïve T and TCM cells display a high capacity of proliferation without immediate effector functions. TCM cells home to T cell areas of secondary lymphoid organs, whereas TEM cells upon activation migrate to the inflamed peripheral tissues and produce Th1/Th2 cytokines. Although memory T cell subsets are studied in mouse L. major infection [14, 15], but the process of TCM/TEM cells generation and maintenance and their roles in protection against human leishmaniasis remain unclear [16]. One of the challenges in leishmaniasis vaccine development is to identify the surrogate marker(s) of protection. Several first generation vaccines reached to human pragmatically but now a day development of vaccines must be done through systematic approach which requires identification of surrogate markers of protection. An appropriate population to study possible role of memory T cells in protective immunity against leishmaniasis is the individuals with history of CL (HCL) who are protected against further infection. The current study focused on this model to detect Leishmania-reactive memory CD4+ T cells in peripheral blood samples and to investigate if these memory T cells play a major role in protective immunity.
Methods
Study Population and Ethical Considerations
The proposal was reviewed by the Ethical Committees of the Center for Research and Training in Skin Diseases and Leprosy (CRTSDL) and Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS).
Potential candidates were informed about the study objectives and the procedure and the volunteers who were willing to sign an informed consent and donate blood samples were recruited.
In this study, 21 volunteers with history of CL (HCL) caused by either L. major or L. tropica and as control 18 healthy volunteers from non-endemic area were included. The identity of Leishmania species was confirmed using PCR method. Prior to blood collection, every volunteer was skin tested with leishmanin (Pasteur Institute of Iran).
Parasite and Soluble Leishmania Antigen Preparation
Leishmania major (MRHO/IR/75/ER) was used in this study, promastigotes were harvested at day 5 of culture from RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10 % fetal calf serum (FCS), washed 3 times with PBS, pH 7.2, and used for preparation of soluble Leishmania antigen (SLA) as previously described [17]. Briefly, 100 μl of protease inhibitor cocktail enzyme (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to 1 × 109 promastigotes, the parasites were freeze-thawed 10 times followed by sonication at 4 °C with two 20-sec blasts. The parasite suspension was centrifuged at 30,000 × g for 20 min, the supernatant was collected and re-centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 4 h. Protein concentration of SLA was measured using Bradford method. Finally the supernatant was sterilized using 0.22 μm membrane filter, aliquoted and stored at −20 °C until use.
Total CD4+ T Cells Purification
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from blood samples using Ficoll-Hypaque (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) density gradient centrifugation. Total CD4+ T lymphocytes were isolated by using magnetic beads system (StemCell Technologies Inc., Vancouver, BC, Canada) by positive selection using anti-CD4 coated nanoparticles. Briefly, cell suspension was prepared at a concentration of 1 × 106 cells/ml in a 5 ml tube in isolation buffer containing PBS plus 2 % (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1 mM EDTA. EasySep CD4 cocktail Abs was added at 10 μl/ml, mixed well and incubated at room temperature (RT) for 15 min. Magnetic nanoparticles were added at 5 μl/ml cells and incubated at RT for 10 min. The tube was placed into the magnet 3 times, 5 min each time, the supernatant was then discarded while the desired cells were remained bounded inside the tube. Purified CD4+ T cells were cultured for phenotype study.
The purity of the yielded lymphocytes was more than 97 % using flow cytometry analysis and specific conjugated mAbs.
Naïve/Memory T Cell Subsets Purification (MACS Method)
CD4+CD45RO−CD45RA+ naïve T cells were purified from PBMC in a negative selection procedure with depletion of non-T helper cells and memory CD4+ T cells. Briefly, about 5–10 × 106 cells were resuspended in a buffer of PBS, pH 7.2, 0.5 % bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 2 mM EDTA. Then 10 μL of biotin-conjugated mAb cocktail (Miltnyi Biotec, Germany) (against CD8, CD14, CD15, CD16, CD19, CD25, CD34, CD36, CD45RO, CD56, CD123, TCR γδ, HLA-DR, and CD235a markers) was added per 107 cells and incubated at 4 °C for 10 min. The cells were washed with buffer and then 20 μL of anti-biotin microbeads was added per 107 cells and incubated at 4 °C for 15 min. The cells were washed and applied into MS column in a MiniMACS separator (Miltenyi Biotec), and flow-through containing unlabeled cells was collected as CD4+CD45RO−CD45RA+ naïve T cells fraction.
CD4+CD45RO+CD45RA−CCR7− effector memory T cells were purified from PBMC in a negative selection procedure by depletion of non-CD4+ T cells, naïve and central memory CD4+ T cells. The same procedure as naïve T cells was followed, except that biotin-conjugated mAb cocktail (Miltnyi Biotec) (against CD8, CD14, CD15, CD16, CD19, CD34, CD36, CD45RA, CD56, CD123, CD235a, TCR γδ markers) and APC-conjugated mAb (against CD197 [CCR7]) were used and TEM microbeads were conjugated to anti-biotin and anti-APC antibodies. The cells were applied into LD column in a MidiMACS separator (Miltenyi Biotec) and unlabeled cells were collected as CD4+CD45RO+CD45RA−CCR7− effector memory T cells.
CD4+CD45RO+CD45RA−CCR7+ central memory T cells were purified from PBMC in a two-step procedure including depletion of non-CD4+ T cells and CD4+ naïve T cells and the subsequent positive selection of CCR7+ TCM cells. Briefly, 2 × 107 cells were resuspended in a buffer of PBS, pH 7.2, 0.5 % BSA and 2 mM EDTA. Then, 10 μL of biotin-conjugated mAb cocktail (Miltenyi Biotec) (against CD8, CD14, CD15, CD16, CD19, CD25, CD36, CD45RA, CD56, CD123, CD235a, TCR γδ) was added per 107 cells and incubated at 4 °C for 10 min. Next, 20 μL of anti-biotin microbeads was added per 107 cells in the cold buffer and incubated at 4 °C for 15 min. The cells were washed and applied onto LS column in a MidiMACS separator, and then the unlabeled cells which passed through were collected and resuspended in the buffer, and 5 μL of PE-labeled anti CD197 (CCR7) mAb (Miltenyi Biotec) was added and incubated at 4 °C for 10 min. After washing the cells, 50 μL of anti-PE microbeads was added and incubated for additional 15 min at 4 °C. The cells were washed and applied onto MS column in a MiniMACS separator. The magnetically labeled cells containing CD4+CD45RO+CD45RA−CCR7+ central memory T cells were flushed out and collected.
The purity of the yielded lymphocytes was more than 98 % using flow cytometry analysis and specific conjugated mAbs.
CD14+ Cell Isolation and Monocyte Derived Macrophage (MDM) Production
Autologous CD14+CD16− monocytes were isolated from PBMC by negative selection according to the manufacturer’s instruction (StemCell Technologies Inc., Vancouver, BC, Canada). Briefly, the cell suspension was prepared at a concentration of 5 × 106 cells/ml in PBS plus 2 % (v/v) FBS and 1 mM EDTA. EasySep monocyte enrichment cocktail Abs was added at 5 μl/ml and the cells were incubated at 4 °C for 10 min. Magnetic microparticles were added at 5 μl/ml and the cells were incubated at 4 °C for 5 min. The tube was placed into the magnet at RT for 2.5 min. The desired unbounded fraction was transferred into a new tube. The purity of the yielded monocytes was more than 96 % using flow cytometry analysis and specific conjugated mAbs. MDM was produced by resuspention of CD14+CD16− monocytes in 10 ml of cRPMI 1640 in 75 cm2 flask (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark). After 1 h of incubation at 37 °C in 5 % CO2, non-adherent cells were discarded by with pre-warmed medium. Then 10 ml of new medium supplemented with 10 % FCS was added to the flask and incubated at 37 °C in 5 % CO2 for 6 days and the medium was replaced every 2 days. The adherent macrophages were removed gently by scraper and washed and used as antigen presenting cells.
CFSE Labeling and Proliferation Assay
For proliferation assay, part of the isolated CD4+ T cell subsets were labeled using Carboxy Fluorescein Diacetate Succinimidyl Ester (CFSE), as previously described [18]. Briefly, cells were resuspended in pre warmed PBS plus 0.1 % BSA at a final concentration of 1 × 106 cells/ml, and 2 μl of 5 mM stock CellTrace CFSE solution (Molecular Probes, USA) was added per 1 mL of the cells (final concentration: 10 μM). Tubes were incubated at 37 °C for 10 min. Staining was quenched by adding 5 ml of ice-cold RPMI 1640 plus 10 % FBS for 5 min on ice. The cells were washed 3 times at 300 × g, 7 min. and in vitro cell culture with autologous monocytes was done (see below). At day 5 of culture the cells were harvested, washed and resuspended in PBS plus 0.5 mM EDTA. The cells were incubated at 37 °C for 5 min and then centrifuged for 5 min, 300 × g, 20 °C. The cells were resuspended in PBS and analyzed using flow cytometry with excitation and emission filter appropriate for fluorescein. The data was analyzed using ModFit LT software (Verity Software House, USA). The daughter cell generations yielded from the parent cells were obtained from the fluorescent intensity by using the software. The numerical values for proportions of the cells at each cell generation were calculated for each sample.
T Lymphocyte Culture
The purified total CD4+ T cells, CD4+CD45RO−CD45RA+ naïve T, CD4+CD45RO+CD45RA−CCR7− TEM, and CD4+CD45RO+CD45RA−CCR7+ TCM cells, with or without CFSE labeling, were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10 % heat-inactivated human AB Rh+ serum, 10 mM/L Hepes, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin G and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Gibco Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). T lymphocytes were adjusted at 0.5-1 × 106 cells/ml, mixed with 1:10 of autologous MDM, and cultured in U bottomed 96-well plates (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) in the presence of either 10 μg/ml PHA (Sigma, St. Louis, MO. USA) or 50 μg/ml SLA in a final volume of 200 μl. The cells were incubated at 37 °C with 5 % CO2 in humidified atmosphere, 72 h for cytokine assay or 5 days for CFSE proliferation assay. Total CD4+ T cells were incubated for 5 days for phenotypic analysis.
ICS Assay
A portion of the purified T cell subsets was used for intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assay after SLA stimulation. The cells were stimulated with PMA (Sigma, St. Louis, MO. USA) 50 ng/ml plus ionomycin calcium (Sigma) 500 ng/ml and incubated at 37 °C, 5 % C02 for 5–6 h. For blocking, 25 μM/ml monensin (Sigma) was added during the last 4–5 h of culture. The cells were harvested and washed 2 times using PBS, pH 7.2, plus 0.1 % BSA. The cells were permeabilized using BD Cytofix/Cytoperm kit according to the manufacturer's instruction (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) and then the cells were stained using anti-human IFN-γ or IL-2 antibodies (BD Biosciences). Finally, the cells were washed 2 times with Perm/wash buffer and resuspended in PBS, pH 7.2, plus 1 % BSA and analyzed using flow cytometry while isotype matched negative controls were used. A minimum of 50,000 events were acquired for each sample.
In part of the experiment, purified CFSE-labeled TEM cells were harvested from SLA culture and restimulated with PMA plus ionomycin and stained for the presence of intracellular IFN-γ. Proliferating and non-proliferating populations of TEM cells were gated based on fluorescence intensity of FL1.
Monoclonal Antibodies and Flow Cytometry
For flow cytometry analysis the following monoclonal antibodies and isotype matched controls were used: FITC- or PE-conjugated mouse anti-human IFN-γ, PE-conjugated rat anti-human IL-2, PE-Cy5-conjugated mouse anti-human CD45RA, PE-conjugated rat anti-human CD197 (CCR7) PECy5-conjugated mouse IgG2b, PE-conjugated rat IgG2α, and PE-conjugated mouse IgG1 (BD Biosciences, Pharmingen, USA), FITC-conjugated mouse IgG1 (DakoCytomation, Denmark) and FITC-conjugated mouse anti-human CD4 (IQ Products, Netherlands). The cells were stained using 10 μl of antibodies per 1 × 105 cells at 4 °C for 30 min in the dark and washed 2 times by centrifugation at 300 × g for 7 min. In surface staining the cells were resuspended in 1–2 ml of 1 % paraformaldehyde before running on the flow cytometer. A minimum of 50,000 events were acquired for each sample. The cells were analyzed using Partec flow cytometer (DAKO cytomation) while isotype matched negative controls were used to set the threshold of autofluorescence. FACS data analysis was performed using FloMax software (DAKO cytomation).
ELISA Cytokine Assay
The culture supernatants of PBMC and CD4+ T cell subsets were collected at 72 h and the level of IL-5, IL-10, IL-13 and IFN-γ were titrated using ELISA method (Mabtech, Stockholm, Sweden). Briefly, the plates were coated with 100 μl of anti-IFN-γ/IL-5/IL-10/IL-13 mAb in PBS, pH 7.4, and incubated at 4 °C for overnight. After blocking the wells using 200 μl of PBS plus 0.05 % (v/v) Tween 20 and 0.1 % (w/v) BSA for 2 h at RT, 100 μl of culture supernatants were added and the plates were incubated for 2 h at RT. Next, 100 μl of biotin labeled mAb was added to each well and incubated at RT for 1 h and as enzyme 100 μl of streptavidin-horse reddish peroxidase (-HRP) was added and the plates were incubated for additional 1 h at RT. The reaction was developed using 100 μl of 3,3´,5,5´-tetramethyl benzidine (TMB) substrate by incubation of the plate at RT for 30 min. The reaction was stopped using 100 μl of 0.5 M H2SO4 solution per well. The plates were washed 5 times after each step of incubation using PBS plus 0.05 % (v/v) Tween 20. The plates were read at 450 nm using a microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA). The mean optical densities (ODs) of the wells were compared with the standard curves prepared using recombinant IL-5, IL-10, IL-13 and IFN-γ. The cytokine levels represent the differences between the ODs of the tests and the background wells. The detection limit of the assays was 4 pg/ml for IL-5, 0.5 pg/ml for IL-10, 5 pg/ml for IL-13 and 2 pg/ml for IFN-γ.
Statistical Analysis
Non-parametric tests of Mann–Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post-test for paired comparisons were used for statistical analysis of the data using SPSS version 16 (SPSS Inc., USA) and GraphPad Prism version 5.01 (GraphPad Software Inc., USA) softwares. Nonparametric tests were used because the samples did not follow a Gaussian distribution. P value of <0.05 was considered significant.
Results
LST Results
Basic demographic information of the volunteers and leishmanin skin test (LST) results are presented in Table I. The mean diameter of LST was 9.0 ± 3.81 mm in the volunteers with HCL; healthy controls showed no response to LST (0 mm).
Frequencies of CD4+ T Cell Subsets and Alterations after ag Re-stimulation
CD4+CD45RO−CD45RA+ naïve T, CD4+CD45RO+CD45RA−CCR7− TEM and CD4+CD45RO+CD45RA−CCR7+ TCM cells were purified from PBMC by MACS system using mAbs. The mean (±SD) percentages of T cell subsets retrieved from volunteer’s PBMC are shown in Fig. 1. Frequency of retrieved naïve T and TEM cells was significantly more than TCM subset in both HCL volunteers and controls (P < 0.05).
Following total CD4+ T cell isolation, frequency of different T cell subsets based on CCR7 and CD45RA expression before and after in vitro SLA stimulation was analyzed for each sample by using flow cytometry. Data of the volunteers with HCL and healthy controls were pooled separately and are outlined in Table II. In the volunteers with HCL and healthy controls, the mean frequencies of CD4+CD45RA+CCR7+ naïve T cells and CD4+CD45RA−CCR7− TEM cells were higher than other subsets before culture. Frequency of CD4+CD45RA+CCR7+ naïve T cells and CD4+CD45RA−CCR7+ TCM cells in the volunteers with HCL and control volunteers was significantly decreased at day 5 of culture with SLA (P = 0.01 for naïve T and P < 0.05 for TCM cells, respectively). In both HCL and control volunteers, frequency of CD4+CD45RA−CCR7− TEM cells was significantly increased after stimulation with SLA compared with the frequency of the same cells before culture (P < 0.001). However, the alterations of the frequencies of CD4+ T cell subsets after culture were similar between the volunteers with HCL and healthy controls.
Proliferation Assay of CD4+ T Cell Subsets
Purified CD4+ T cell subsets were labeled with CFSE and cultured in the presence of SLA or PHA for 5 days and analyzed using flow cytometry. The proportions of the cells at each cell division in the proliferation process were calculated. Data of the volunteers with HCL and healthy controls were pooled separately and are presented in Fig. 2. Based on the results, significant difference was found between the mean number of TCM cells in g3 and g4 of proliferation process between HCL volunteers and healthy controls (P < 0.05). A significantly higher (P < 0.05) number of TEM cells reached g2 of proliferation process in HCL volunteers than in healthy controls.
Cytokine Productions of Purified CD4+ T Cell Subsets
PBMCs and purified CD4+ T cell subsets were co-cultured with 1:10 of autologous MDM in cRPMI 1640. The cytokine levels were titrated on the supernatant collected at 72 h of SLA stimulation using ELISA method. Figure 3 shows the mean concentration of cytokines IFN-γ, IL-10 and IL-13 in volunteers’ PBMC, CD4+CD45RO−CD45RA+ naïve T, CD4+CD45RO+CD45RA−CCR7− TEM and CD4+CD45RO+CD45RA−CCR7+ TCM cells cultures.
As it is shown in Fig. 3, stimulation of PBMC from HCL volunteers induced a significantly (P < 0.05) higher IFN-γ production compared with the cells of healthy controls. Stimulation of the CD4+ TEM cells from HCL volunteers induced a significantly (P = 0.04) higher IFN-γ production compared with the cells of healthy controls. No significant difference was seen between TCM cells of HCL volunteers and healthy controls in IFN-γ production. No significant difference was seen between the naive T cells of HCL volunteers and healthy controls in IFN-γ production.
No significant difference was seen in IL-10 production of different T cell subsets between HCL volunteers and healthy controls. No significant difference was seen in IL-13 production of different T cell subsets between HCL volunteers and healthy controls (Fig. 3). The level of IL-5 was not detectable in T cell culture supernatants.
Intracellular Cytokine Staining of CD4+ T Cell Subsets
A portion of SLA stimulated CD4+ T cell subsets was harvested at 72 h and stimulated with PMA plus ionomycin, and stained for intracellular IFN-γ and IL-2 and the frequency of positive cells was analyzed using flow cytometry (Fig. 4a). Results of analysis of the cells from HCL volunteers and healthy controls were pooled separately and are presented as mean number of intracellular IFN-γ and IL-2 positive CD4+ T cell subsets (Fig. 4b). About 15–17 % of CD4+CD45RO−CD45RA+ naïve T cells and 5–6 % of CD4+CD45RO+CD45RA−CCR7− TEM cells produced IL-2 intracellularly and no significant difference was seen between sorted T cells of HCL volunteers and healthy controls in the production of IL-2. About 5–12 % of CD4+CD45RO+CD45RA−CCR7+ TCM cells produced IL-2 intracellularly. Significantly (P < 0.05) higher number of TCM cells produced IL-2 in HCL volunteers compared to TCM cells of healthy controls.
No significant difference was seen between sorted T cells of HCL and healthy controls in the intracellular production of IFN-γ. About 5–15 % of TEM cells produced IFN-γ and significantly (P = 0.032) higher numbers of TEM cells from HCL volunteers were positive for intracellular IFN-γ than the same cells from healthy controls.
For simultaneous analysis of proliferation and intracellular cytokine assay, purified TEM cells were labeled with CFSE and cultured in the presence of SLA, then the cells were harvested and stimulated with PMA plus ionomycin and stained for intracellular IFN-γ. On flow cytometry analysis, histograms were divided to CFSEdim proliferating and CFSEbright non-proliferating fractions (Fig. 5). For each sample, the frequency of intracellular IFN-γ positive TEM cells was determined and then the data of all HCL volunteers were pooled and the mean percentage of IFN-γ positive TEM cells was calculated. When TEM cells were gated on CFSEdim populations, more than 35 % of the cells were positive for intracellular IFN-γ, while when the cells were gated on CFSEbright populations around 5 % of the cells were positive for intracellular IFN-γ. The difference in the frequency of IFN-γ positive TEM cells between CFSEdim and CFSEbright was statistically significant (P < 0.05).
Discussion
It is generally accepted that CD4+ Th1 cells are mainly involved in protective immune response against Leishmania infection [19]. In the current study, CD4+ memory T cell compartment in HCL volunteers who are assumed to be protected against further infection is studied. To our knowledge there is no report on the phenotype of memory T cell subsets based on CCR7 expression in human leishmaniasis.
Memory CD4+ T cell subsets were detected on blood samples collected from volunteers whose lesions had been healed 1 month to 11 years prior to sampling. HCL volunteers were resident of endemic area with constant exposure and strong LST response (mean LST = 9.0 ± 3.81 mm) and IFN-γ production are indications of protective immune response. It is well established that memory persists for long time after initial exposure [20]. Different combinations of TEM/TCM are shown to be important in inducing protection against secondary infections [21–25]. In malaria, it seems that TEM rather than TCM cells protect against further infection, but CD4+ memory T cells are short lived and a sterile immunity is not developed [26, 27]. In viral infections, over time, TEM phenotype is replaced by TCM, leading to loss of protection. In the current study in individuals with history of CL, CD4+CD45RO+CD45RA−CCR7− TEM cells with significant IFN-γ secretion are detected which induce Th1 type of response with immediate effector functions. We believe continuous exposure to Leishmania Ags through sand fly bites in residence of endemic area act as natural boosters and contributes to maintain the protection by effector population of T cells. On the other hand, IL-2 producing CD4+CD45RO+CD45RA−CCR7+ TCM cells with high proliferation potential are detected which might serve as a pool to rapidly differentiate to CD4+CD45RO+CD45RA−CCR7− TEM in case of reinfection. Increasing evidences are suggesting that TCM cells have a greater capacity than TEM cells to persist in vivo and mediate protection [20, 28].
T cell subsets in peripheral blood of the volunteers were classified by a combination of CD45RA and CCR7 markers. The phenotyping data generated by flow cytometry showed that the most frequent cell population is CD45RA+CCR7+ naïve T cells with more than half of the total CD4+ T cells; similar to findings of others in healthy individuals or other infectious diseases [13, 19, 29]. The second most frequent subsets were related to CD45RA−CCR7− TEM and CD45RA−CCR7+ TCM composing about 20–25 % of total CD4+ T cells. The lower proportion of TCM seen in this study compared to other reports in human peripheral blood may be due to the sensitivity of chemokine receptors to physical conditions and internalization of CCR7 marker during cell preparation [30]. Variable ratios of antigen-specific memory subsets were reported in other parasitic diseases [31, 32]. In chronic Chagas disease, a relatively lower percentage of CD45RA+ naive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells was seen than non-infected controls [31]. In P. vivax infection, an increase in the count of CD4+ memory T cells was seen in acute infection [27]. This variability in the frequencies might be partly due to the nature of Chagas/malaria, since systemic infections are not similar to a local infection such as CL in view of availability and distribution of the antigens in host immune system.
In the present study, the proportions of CD4+ T cell subsets were not significantly different between HCL volunteers and healthy controls. People continuously expose to different antigens during the lifetime and because of the burden of different pathogens that are encountered, it is not economically reasonable for the immune system to maintain a huge pool of resident memory T cells for every single antigen; Hence, total memory repertoire does not significantly increase by the age [33, 34]. In this experiment, after 5 days of SLA stimulation, purified total CD4+ T cells were again analyzed for surface maker phenotypes using flow cytometry. Stimulation of CD4+ T cells caused expression of CCR7 marker to fall off so that the proportions of CD45RA+CCR7+ naive T and CD45RA−CCR7+ TCM cells were significantly decreased and the proportion of CD45RA−CCR7− TEM increased after culture. It is shown that CCR7 is rapidly lost upon antige stimulation concomitant with the differentiation of TCM to effector phenotype and production of effector cytokines [35].
Owing to similar frequency of the memory T cell subsets in HCL volunteers and healthy controls, in the next step CD4+ T cell subsets were purified using MACS system and the functions of sorted cells were studied in vitro by proliferation analysis and cytokine assay. In MACS method, different frequencies of CD4+ T cell subsets were retrieved depending on the initial cell population count and the complexity of the method. As it is expected, CD4+ naïve T cells were the most frequent and CD4+ TCM cells were the least frequent T cell subsets in total PBMC.
Data that obtained from flow cytometric analyses of CFSE labeled cells indicate that CD4+ T cells from volunteers with HCL showed a high response to SLA. Both CD4+ TCM and CD4+ TEM subsets showed a high proliferation, but number of divisions and frequency of proliferated CD4+ TCM was higher than CD4+ TEM cells. Several other studies showed higher expansion potential of TCM in comparison with TEM as an in vitro characteristic of TCM subsets [36, 37]. It is supposed that the higher proliferation potential of TCM favors rapid differentiation of TCM pool to TEM cells in the case of in vivo antigenic exposure [37]. Cytokines such as IL-7 and IL-15 involve in proliferation and survival of memory CD8+ T cells [38] and in memory CD4+ T cells homeostasis a role for IL-7 is suggested [39, 40].
In this study, each of CD4+ T cell subsets showed a different cytokine profile after stimulation with SLA. IL-10 and IL-13 as Th2 type cytokines were produced with different amounts by sorted CD4+ T cell subsets but no significant difference was seen between HCL volunteers and healthy controls. IFN-γ was the most prominent cytokine with production variations. IFN-γ production by PBMC and CD4+ TEM cells, and the frequency of IFN-γ positive CD4+ TEM cells were significantly higher in HCL volunteers compared with the healthy controls. The study of intracellular cytokine secretion of CFSE labeled cells showed that CFSEdim sub-population which was the proliferating portion of the TEM cells produces intracellular IFN-γ. CD4+ TEM cells are present in the blood and migrate to the infection sites and upon restimulation produce either Th1 or Th2 effector cytokines [37]. In human leishmaniasis, several studies in Old and New world suggested that CD4+ Th1 cells are the main source of IFN-γ production while the phenotype of T cells were not determined [41–43]. The role of IFN-γ as a hallmark of CD4+ Th1 response or as a production of CD8+ T cells in protection against Leishmania infection is documented in mouse model [44, 45] but not in human leishmaniasis [46]. In two sequential studies, we have reported that CD8+ T cells [47] with memory phenotype (Microbes and Infection, 2012, in press) contribute as accessory cells to the production of IFN-γ in CL.
Study of ICS indicates that around 10–12 % of the total TCM cells produced IL-2 intracellularly and the mean frequency of IL-2 positive TCM cells in HCL volunteers was significantly more than that of healthy controls. About 15–17 % of naive CD4+ T cells also showed to be positive for IL-2 production in both HCL volunteers and healthy controls. IL-2 is the main production of naïve and TCM cells in human T cell repertoire and the role of IL-2 in T cell survival is known [48], IL-2 producing TCM might serve as a memory pool for generating TEM cells in new Leishmania infection.
In a recent publication, different T cell types including memory T cells (without subset indication) were investigated in VL due to L. donovani and the results showed a significantly reduced number of memory T cells in VL patients compared to the treated VL or asymptomatic individuals [19]. In animal model it is shown that two distinct sub-populations of CD4+ memory T cells are present: TCM cells mediate long term immunity to Leishmania infection independent of parasite and TEM cells which are parasite-dependent [49] . In another study, immune cells were characterized in the liver and spleen of symptomatic/asymptomatic dogs naturally infected with Leishmania [50]. In the liver of asymptomatic dogs an effective immunity with granulomas around the parasites and CD44low, CD45ROhi central memory and CD44hi, CD45ROhi effector T cells were observed. CD4+ memory T cells are studied in other infectious diseases of mouse model [51] and human [27, 29, 31, 52]. In Plasmodium vivax infection a significant increase in the number of CD4+ memory T cells was observed in acute infection which was maintained up to 60 days post treatment [27]. Two phenotypically distinct subsets of CD4+ memory T cells (CD45RA−CD62L+CD11adim and CD45RA−CD62L−CD11abright) were reported in chronic leprosy associated with polarized Th1/Th2 immune responses [29]. In patients with intracellular fungal infection, paracoccidioidomycosis, CD4+CD45RO+ memory T cells was shown to increase compared to non-infected controls [52].
In the current study due to the limitations systemic immune response was studied by using peripheral blood while a different response might be seen at the site of infection and around the lesions. So, current data may not completely reflect the actual resident memory status around the lesion, particularly in regard of the expression of some specific surface receptors on the circulating memory T cells which are employed during migration into the skin [53].
Conclusions
Based on the data presented here, similar pattern of CD4+ memory T cell subsets are exist in peripheral blood of individuals with history of CL and healthy controls. However, CD4+CD45RO+CD45RA−CCR7− TEM cells which showed the specific response to SLA stimulation by simultaneous proliferation and IFN-γ secretion and CD4+CD45RO+CD45RA−CCR7+ TCM cells which showed the specific response to SLA stimulation by proliferation and IL-2 secretion are identified in individuals with history of CL. Both of these Leishmania-reactive TEM and TCM cells seem to play roles in protective immune response against Leishmania infection. The current data support experimental findings in murine model suggesting that a combination of short lived pathogen-dependent CD4+ TEM and long-lived pathogen-independent CD4+ TCM cells contributes to the immune response against Leishmania infection [49].
Several questions remained to be answered concerning TEM/CM cells in leishmaniasis, but the present data might be used as a basis for further investigations of memory T cells in human leishmaniasis which is necessary information for vaccine development.
References
WHO. Working to overcome the global impact of neglected diseases: First WHO report on neglected tropical diseases. WHO/HTM/NTD/2010. 2010.
Postigo JA. Leishmaniasis in the World Health Organization Eastern Mediterranean Region. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010;36 Suppl 1:S62–5.
Croft SL, Olliaro P. Leishmaniasis chemotherapy–challenges and opportunities. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17(10):1478–83.
Modabber F. Leishmaniasis vaccines: past, present and future. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010;36 Suppl 1:S58–61.
Khamesipour A, Rafati S, Davoudi N, Maboudi F, Modabber F. Leishmaniasis vaccine candidates for development: a global overview. Indian J Med Res. 2006;123(3):423–38.
Noazin S, Modabber F, Khamesipour A, Smith PG, Moulton LH, Nasseri K, et al. First generation leishmaniasis vaccines: a review of field efficacy trials. Vaccine. 2008;26(52):6759–67.
Liew FY. Induction, regulation and function of T-cell subsets in leishmaniasis. Chem Immunol. 1992;54:117–35.
Nateghi Rostami M, Keshavarz Valian H, Eskandari SE, Miramin Mohammadi A, Shahrestani ST, SarrafNejad A, et al. Differential in vitro CD4+/CD8+ T-cell response to live vs. killed Leishmania major. Parasite Immunol. 2010;32(2):101–10.
Seder RA, Ahmed R. Similarities and differences in CD4+ and CD8+ effector and memory T cell generation. Nat Immunol. 2003;4(9):835–42.
Farber DL. T cell memory: heterogeneity and mechanisms. Clin Immunol. 2000;95(3):173–81.
Schwendemann J, Choi C, Schirrmacher V, Beckhove P. Dynamic differentiation of activated human peripheral blood CD8+ and CD4+ effector memory T cells. J Immunol. 2005;175(3):1433–9.
Sallusto F, Langenkamp A, Geginat J, Lanzavecchia A. Functional subsets of memory T cells identified by CCR7 expression. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2000;251:167–71.
Sallusto F, Lenig D, Forster R, Lipp M, Lanzavecchia A. Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions. Nature. 1999;401(6754):708–12.
Liew FY, Hale C, Howard JG. Immunologic regulation of experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis. V. Characterization of effector and specific suppressor T cells. J Immunol. 1982;128(4):1917–22.
Locksley RM, Heinzel FP, Sadick MD, Holaday BJ, Gardner Jr KD. Murine cutaneous leishmaniasis: susceptibility correlates with differential expansion of helper T-cell subsets. Ann Inst Pasteur Immunol. 1987;138(5):744–9.
Scott P, Artis D, Uzonna J, Zaph C. The development of effector and memory T cells in cutaneous leishmaniasis: the implications for vaccine development. Immunol Rev. 2004;201:318–38.
Nateghi Rostami M, Keshavarz H, Khamesipour A. Immune response of BALB/c mice against an experimental vaccine of Alum precipitated autoclaved Leishmania major (Alum-ALM) mixed with BCG or Mycobacterium vaccae. Trop Biomed. 2010;27(1):89–102.
Nateghi Rostami M, Khamesipour A, Eskandari SE, Miramin Mohammadi A, Sarraf-Nejad A. Flow cytometric analysis of Leishmania reactive CD4+/CD8+ lymphocyte proliferation in cutaneous leishmaniasis. Iranian J Parasitol. 2008;3:9–18.
Hailu A, van Baarle D, Knol GJ, Berhe N, Miedema F, Kager PA. T cell subset and cytokine profiles in human visceral leishmaniasis during active and asymptomatic or sub-clinical infection with Leishmania donovani. Clin Immunol. 2005;117(2):182–91.
Rivino L, Messi M, Jarrossay D, Lanzavecchia A, Sallusto F, Geginat J. Chemokine receptor expression identifies Pre-T helper (Th)1, Pre-Th2, and nonpolarized cells among human CD4+ central memory T cells. J Exp Med. 2004;200(6):725–35.
Appay V, Dunbar PR, Callan M, Klenerman P, Gillespie GMA, Papagno L, et al. Memory CD8+ T cells vary in differentiation phenotype in different persistent virus infections. Nat Med. 2002;8(4):379–85.
Van Lier RAW, Ten Berge IJM, Gamadia LE. Human CD8+ T-cell differentiation in response to viruses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3(12):931–8.
Roberts AD, Woodland DL. Cutting edge: effector memory CD8+ T cells play a prominent role in recall responses to secondary viral infection in the lung. J Immunol. 2004;172(11):6533–7.
Zanetti M, Franchini G. T cell memory and protective immunity by vaccination: is more better? Trends Immunol. 2006;27(11):511–7.
Klebanoff CA, Gattinoni L, Torabi-Parizi P, Kerstann K, Cardones AR, Finkelstein SE, et al. Central memory self/tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells confer superior antitumor immunity compared with effector memory T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(27):9571–6.
Cockburn IA, Zavala F. T cell memory in malaria. Curr Opin Immunol. 2007;19(4):424–9.
Jangpatarapongsa K, Sirichaisinthop J, Sattabongkot J, Cui L, Montgomery SM, Looareesuwan S, et al. Memory T cells protect against Plasmodium vivax infection. Microb Infect. 2006;8(3):680–6.
Lanzavecchia A, Sallusto F. Understanding the generation and function of memory T cell subsets. Curr Opin Immunol. 2005;17(3):326–32.
Mitra DK, De Rosa SC, Luke A, Balamurugan A, Khaitan BK, Tung J, et al. Differential representations of memory T cell subsets are characteristic of polarized immunity in leprosy and atopic diseases. Int Immunol. 1999;11(11):1801–10.
Berhanu D, Mortari F, De Rosa SC, Roederer M. Optimized lymphocyte isolation methods for analysis of chemokine receptor expression. J Immunol Methods. 2003;279(1–2):199–207.
Fiuza JA, Fujiwara RT, Gomes JAS, Rocha MODC, Chaves AT, De Araأ؛jo FF, et al. Profile of central and effector memory T cells in the progression of chronic human Chagas disease. PLoS Neg Trop Dis. 2009;3(9).
Champagne P, Ogg GS, King AS, Knabenhans C, Ellefsen K, Nobile M, et al. Skewed maturation of memory HIV-specific CD8 T lymphocytes. Nature. 2001;410(6824):106–11.
Saule P, Trauet J, Dutriez V, Lekeux V, Dessaint JP, Labalette M. Accumulation of memory T cells from childhood to old age: central and effector memory cells in CD4+ versus effector memory and terminally differentiated memory cells in CD8+ compartment. Mech Ageing Dev. 2006;127(3):274–81.
Sallusto F, Geginat J, Lanzavecchia A. Central memory and effector memory T cell subsets: function, generation, and maintenance. Annu Rev Immunol. 2004;22:745–63.
Campbell JJ, Murphy KE, Kunkel EJ, Brightling CE, Soler D, Shen Z, et al. CCR7 expression and memory T cell diversity in humans. J Immunol. 2001;166(2):877–84.
Reinhardt RL, Khoruts A, Merica R, Zell T, Jenkins MK. Visualizing the generation of memory CD4 T cells in the whole body. Nature. 2001;410(6824):101–5.
Sallusto F, Lanzavecchia A. Heterogeneity of CD4+ memory T cells: functional modules for tailored immunity. Eur J Immunol. 2009;39(8):2076–82.
Ku CC, Murakami M, Sakamoto A, Kappler J, Marrack P. Control of homeostasis of CD8+ memory T cells by opposing cytokines. Science. 2000;288(5466):675–8.
Surh CD, Boyman O, Purton JF, Sprent J. Homeostasis of memory T cells. Immunol Rev. 2006;211:154–63.
Taylor JJ, Jenkins MK. CD4+ memory T cell survival. Curr Opin Immunol. 2011;23(3):319–23.
Kemp K, Theander TG, Hviid L, Garfar A, Kharazmi A, Kemp M. Interferon-gamma- and tumour necrosis factor-alpha-producing cells in humans who are immune to cutaneous leishmaniasis. Scand J Immunol. 1999;49(6):655–9.
Bittar RC, Nogueira RS, Vieira-Goncalves R, Pinho-Ribeiro V, Mattos MS, Oliveira-Neto MP, et al. T-cell responses associated with resistance to Leishmania infection in individuals from endemic areas for Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2007;102(5):625–30.
Habibi GR, Khamesipour A, McMaster WR, Mahboudi F. Cytokine gene expression in healing and non-healing cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis in response to in vitro stimulation with recombinant gp63 using semi-quantitative RT-PCR. Scand J Immunol. 2001;54(4):414–20.
Muller I, Kropf P, Etges RJ, Louis JA. Gamma interferon response in secondary Leishmania major infection: role of CD8+ T cells. Infect Immun. 1993;61(9):3730–8.
Sacks D, Noben-Trauth N. The immunology of susceptibility and resistance to Leishmania major in mice. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2(11):845–58.
Mahmoodi M, Khamesipour A, Dowlati Y, Rafati S, Momeni AZ, Emamjomeh M, et al. Immune response measured in human volunteers vaccinated with autoclaved Leishmania major vaccine mixed with low dose of BCG. Clin Exp Immunol. 2003;134(2):303–8.
Nateghi Rostami M, Keshavarz H, Edalat R, Sarrafnejad A, Shahrestani T, Mahboudi F, et al. CD8+ T cells as a source of IFN-gamma production in human cutaneous leishmaniasis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4(10):e845.
Kaech SM, Wherry EJ, Ahmed R. Effector and memory T-cell differentiation: implications for vaccine development. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2(4):251–62.
Zaph C, Uzonna J, Beverley SM, Scott P. Central memory T cells mediate long-term immunity to Leishmania major in the absence of persistent parasites. Nat Med. 2004;10(10):1104–10.
Sanchez MA, Diaz NL, Zerpa O, Negron E, Convit J, Tapia FJ. Organ-specific immunity in canine visceral leishmaniasis: analysis of symptomatic and asymptomatic dogs naturally infected with Leishmania chagasi. AmJTrop Med Hyg. 2004;70(6):618–24.
Andersen H, Dempsey D, Chervenak R, Jennings SR. Expression of intracellular IFN-g in HSV-1-specific CD8+ T cells identifies distinct responding subpopulations during the primary response to infection. J Immunol. 2000;165(4):2101–7.
Bozzi A, Reis BS, Goulart MI, Pereira MCN, Pedroso EP, Goes AM. Analysis of memory T cells in the human paracoccidioidomycosis before and during chemotherapy treatment. Immunol Lett. 2007;114(1):23–30.
Woodland DL, Kohlmeier JE. Migration, maintenance and recall of memory T cells in peripheral tissues. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9(3):153–61.
Acknowledgment
The study was funded by Center for Research and Training in Skin Diseases and Leprosy, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, and National Science Foundation of Iran.
The authors would like to express their appreciation to Dr. David Sacks (NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, USA) and Dr. Philip Scott (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA) for help in the development of the protocol.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keshavarz Valian, H., Nateghi Rostami, M., Tasbihi, M. et al. CCR7+ Central and CCR7− Effector Memory CD4+ T Cells in Human Cutaneous Leishmaniasis. J Clin Immunol 33, 220–234 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-012-9788-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-012-9788-7