Skip to main content
Log in

The Content of the Threat Matters: the Differential Effects of Quantitative and Qualitative Job Insecurity on Different Types of Employee Motivation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given the conceptual differences between different types of job insecurity, it is important to distinguish qualitative job insecurity from quantitative job insecurity when examining their motivational consequences. Building on the approach and avoidance framework, we expect that quantitative job insecurity influences avoid-performance goal orientation (avoidance form of motivation) via psychological safety, whereas qualitative job insecurity influences learning goal orientation (approach form of motivation) via psychological meaningfulness. We also examine the moderating role of organizational justice in such effects. Using two-wave data collected from 281 employees in China, we found that quantitative job insecurity had a positive indirect effect on employee avoid-performance goal orientation via decreased psychological safety, whereas qualitative job insecurity had a negative indirect effect on employee learning goal orientation via decreased psychological meaningfulness. In addition, organizational justice buffered the direct effect of quantitative job insecurity on employee psychological safety and the subsequent indirect effect on employee avoid-performance goal orientation. However, organizational justice did not moderate the influence of qualitative job insecurity on employee outcomes. Our findings provide new insights into the motivational implications of job insecurity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. We focus on the individual-level relationships among our variables (level 1 models). The level 2 models were specified and estimated for statistical controls only. There are different strategies to analyze a multilevel model, among which the unconflated multilevel model is recommended (Zhang et al., 2009). In the unconflated multilevel model, the predictors at level 1 are centered at the group mean; the subtracted group means and their relationships with other variables are modeled at level 2 (the same as level 1 model specification).

References

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 71772072; 71701074; 71832004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: Li-Rong Long, Yan Tu, Hai-Jiang Wang, Lixin Jiang. Methodology: Yan Tu, Hai-Jiang Wang. Formal analysis and investigation: Yan Tu. Writing—original draft preparation: Yan Tu. Writing—review and editing: Yan Tu, Li-Rong Long, Hai-Jiang Wang, Lixin Jiang. Funding acquisition: Li-Rong Long, Hai-Jiang Wang. Resources: Li-Rong Long. Supervision: Li-Rong Long.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hai-Jiang Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This study was from a large research project that had received ethics approval from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 71772072).

Consent to Participate

Verbal informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Long, LR., Tu, Y., Wang, HJ. et al. The Content of the Threat Matters: the Differential Effects of Quantitative and Qualitative Job Insecurity on Different Types of Employee Motivation. J Bus Psychol 37, 297–310 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-021-09746-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-021-09746-3

Keywords

Navigation