Skip to main content
Log in

The UWBQ-I: An Adaption and Validation of a Measure of Instigated Incivility

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this research was to adapt and validate a multidimensional instigated incivility scale. Previously, instigated incivility research has used unidimensional scales, measures designed for specific occupations (e.g., nursing), item subsets of larger scales, or scales designed for experienced incivility that assumes a change of referent will not impact the scale. This research formally validates the change of referent from experienced incivility to instigated incivility, and offers a scale designed for wide range of occupations with demonstrated advantages over a popular unidimensional scale.

Design

Study 1 proposes a second-order factor structure of the measure. Surveying a sample of 472 individuals, the study confirms the measure’s ability to predict additional variance in interpersonal deviance over a previous measure of instigated incivility, as well as provide greater detail relating to a multi-faceted personality dimension (narcissism). Study 2 uses a unique sample of 642 participants and expands the nomological network of the scale by demonstrating the correlational and predictive relationships to a network of related constructs identified by past research.

Findings

The results of Study 1 identify that the multidimensional factor structure of UWBQ-I remains intact when changed from an experienced incivility scale. Regression and dominance analyses demonstrate that the UWBQ-I provides additional variance accounted for over Blau and Andersson’s (2005) scale, capturing a larger portion of the instigated incivility construct domain. Additionally, the advantages of a multidimensional framework are identified by relating the scale sub-facets to equally specific dimensions of narcissism. Study 2 further supported the validation of the UWBQ-I by replicating a large network of relationships that have been previously identified in incivility research.

Implications

Considerably less research has been dedicated to instigated than to experienced incivility research. The present studies offer a scale that may contribute to increased research by providing more specific relationships between facets of incivility and constructs such as personality. Greater understanding of the detailed relationships may help researchers further identify antecedents and consequences and aid practitioners in developing interventions to understand and quell instigated incivility in the workplace.

Originality

Although research has used a scale such as this, the validity of the scale has never been demonstrated. This research establishes the appropriateness of the past use of such scales and also offers researchers a standard, validated measure to incorporate in a broad range of occupations for future incivility research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 452–471. doi:10.5465/AMR.1999.2202131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azen, R., & Budescu, D. V. (2003). The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Methods, 8(2), 129–148. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.8.2.129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baughman, H. M., Dearing, S., Giammarco, E., & Vernon, P. A. (2012). Relationships between bullying behaviours and the Dark Triad: A study with adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(5), 571–575. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Catanese, K. R., & Wallace, H. M. (2002). Conquest by force: A narcissistic reactance theory of rape and sexual coercion. Review of General Psychology, 6(1), 92–135. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.6.1.92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349–360. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, C. M., Ones, D. S., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 410–424. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.410.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bing, M. N., Stewart, S. M., Davison, H. K., Green, P. D., McIntyre, M. D., & James, L. R. (2007). An integrative typology of personality assessment for aggression: Implications for predicting counterproductive workplace behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 722. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, C. A., Hoffman, B. J., & Helland, K. R. (2008). Narcissism in organizations: A multisource appraisal reflects different perspectives. Human Performance, 21(3), 254–276. doi:10.1080/08959280802137705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, G. (2007). Partially testing a process model for understanding victim responses to an anticipated worksite closure. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71(3), 401–428. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2007.08.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, G., & Andersson, L. M. (2005). Testing a measure of instigated workplace incivility. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 78(4), 595–614. doi:10.1348/096317905X26822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, N. A., & Eschleman, K. J. (2010). Employee personality as a moderator of the relationships between work stressors and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(1), 91. doi:10.1037/a0017326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D. J., & Geer, J. G. (2007). Beyond negativity: The effects of incivility on the electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 1–16. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00233.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruursema, K., Kessler, S. R., & Spector, P. E. (2011). Bored employees misbehaving: The relationship between boredom and counterproductive work behaviour. Work & Stress, 25(2), 93–107. doi:10.1080/02678373.2011.596670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budescu, D. V. (1993). Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 542–551. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnfield, J. L., Clark, O. L., Devendorf, S., & Jex, S. M. (2004). Understanding workplace incivility: Scale development and validation. Paper presented at the Society for Industrial Organizational Psychology, Chicago.

  • Bushman, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 219–229. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 452–459. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. M., Farnsworth, J., & Landrum, R. E. (2009). Development and description of the incivility in nursing education (INE) survey. Journal of Theory Construction & Testing, 13(1), 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cortina, L. M. (2008). Unseen injustice: Incivility as modern discrimination in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 55–75. doi:10.5465/AMR.2008.27745097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2009). Patterns and profiles of response to incivility in the workplace. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(3), 272–288. doi:10.1037/a0014934.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H., & Langhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6(1), 64–80. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.6.1.64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K. W., Evers, A., Beersma, B., Kluwer, E. S., & Nauta, A. (2001). A theory-based measure of conflict management strategies in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(6), 645–668. doi:10.1002/job.107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, B. M., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 192–203. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Estes, B., & Wang, J. (2008). Integrative literature review: Workplace incivility: Impacts on individual and organizational performance. Human Resource Development Review, 7(2), 218–240. doi:10.1177/1534484308315565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, R., & Sundberg, N. D. (1986). Boredom proneness—The development and correlates of a new scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50(1), 4. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5001_2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., & Rauter, K. A. (2004). Organizational citizenship behaviours in relation to job status, job insecurity, organizational commitment and identification, job satisfaction and work values. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 81–94. doi:10.1348/096317904322915928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, L. D., Brown, D. J., Berry, J. W., & Lian, H. (2008). The development and validation of the Workplace Ostracism Scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1348–1366. doi:10.1037/a0012743.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallus, J. A., Bunk, J. A., Matthews, R. A., Barnes-Farrell, J. L., & Magley, V. J. (2014). An eye for an eye? Exploring the relationship between workplace incivility experiences and perpetration. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(2), 143–154. doi:10.1037/a0035931.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, R., Dierkes, S., & Falletta, S. (2011). Incivility spiral in mentoring relationships: Reconceptualizing negative mentoring as deviant workplace behavior. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13(1), 22–39. doi:10.1177/1523422311410639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco, L. M., O’Boyle, E. H., & Walter, S. L. (2015). Absence of malice: A meta-analysis of nonresponse bias in counterproductive work behavior research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 75–97. doi:10.1037/a0037495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hershcovis, M. S. (2011). “Incivility, social undermining, bullying… oh my!”: A call to reconcile constructs within workplace aggression research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(3), 499–519. doi:10.1002/job.689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershcovis, M. S., Turner, N., Barling, J., Arnold, K. A., Dupré, K. S., Inness, M., & Sivanathan, N. (2007). Predicting workplace aggression: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 228. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karasek, R., Brisson, C., Kawakami, N., Houtman, I., Bongers, P., & Amick, B. (1998). The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): An instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3(4), 322–355. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.3.4.322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, B. A., Schutte, N. S., & Hine, D. W. (2009). The role of emotional self-efficacy, emotional intelligence, and affect in workplace incivility and workplace satisfaction. In C. E. J. Hartel, N. M. Ashkanasy, & W. J. Zerbe (Eds.), Research on emotion in organizations: Emotions in groups, organizations and cultures (Vol. 5, pp. 211–225). United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, B. A., Schutte, N. S., & Hine, D. W. (2011). The effect of an expressive-writing intervention for employees on emotional self-efficacy, emotional intelligence, affect, and workplace incivility. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(1), 179–195. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00708.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, L. E., Shann, H. S., Griffith, L., Haines, T., Cortina, L. M., & Geldart, S. (2007). The effects of workplace incivility on psychological distress and health. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 64(12), 24–30. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.6.1.64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, M. T., & Hughes, S. (2015). Malicious mouths? The Dark Triad and motivations for gossip. Personality and Individual Differences, 78, 1–4. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, B., & Schuler, H. (2004). Antecedents of counterproductive behavior at work: A general perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 647–660. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.647.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. J., & Hine, D. W. (2005). Development and validation of the Uncivil Workplace Behavior Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10(4), 477–490. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.10.4.477.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McAndrew, F. T., Bell, E. K., & Garcia, C. M. (2007). Who do we tell and whom do we tell on? Gossip as a strategy for status enhancement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(7), 1562–1577. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00227.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, L. L., & Semmer, N. K. (2013). Lack of reciprocity, narcissism, anger, and instigated workplace incivility: A moderated mediation model. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(4), 461–475. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2012.654605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milam, A. C., Spitzmueller, C., & Penney, L. M. (2009). Investigating individual differences among targets of workplace incivility. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(1), 58–69. doi:10.1037/a0012683.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miner-Rubino, K., & Cortina, L. M. (2006). Observed incivility toward women at work: The role of organizational justice. Paper presented at the APA/NIOSH Work, Stress and Health Conference, Miami.

  • Miner-Rubino, K., & Cortina, L. M. (2007). Beyond targets: Consequences of vicarious exposure to misogyny at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1254. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12(4), 177. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1204_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mount, M., Ilies, R., & Johnson, E. (2006). Relationship of personality traits and counterproductive work behaviors: The mediating effects of job satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 591–622. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00048.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordstrom, C. R., Bartels, L. K., & Bucy, J. (2009). Predicting and curbing classroom incivility in higher education. College Student Journal, 43(1), 74–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Boyle, E. H., Jr, Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557–579. doi:10.1037/a0025679.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C. M., Andersson, L. M., & Porath, C. L. (2000). Assessing and attacking workplace incivility. Organizational Dynamics, 29(2), 123–137. doi:10.1016/S0090-2616(00)00019-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C. M., Andersson, L. M., & Porath, C. L. (2005). Workplace Incivility. In S. Fox & P. E. Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 177–200). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C. M., Andersson, L. M., & Wegner, J. W. (2001). When workers flout convention: A study of workplace incivility. Human Relations, 54(11), 1387–1419. doi:10.1177/00187267015411001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C. M., & Porath, C. L. (2004). On incivility, its impact, and directions for future research. In R. W. Griffin & A. M. O’Leary-Kelly (Eds.), The dark side of organizational behavior (Vol. 16, pp. 403–425). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penney, L. M., & Spector, P. E. (2002). Narcissism and counterproductive work behavior: Do bigger egos mean bigger problems? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(1–2), 126–134. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penney, L. M., & Spector, P. E. (2005). Job stress, incivility, and counterproductive work behavior (CWB): The moderating role of negative affectivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(7), 777–796. doi:10.1002/job.336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porath, C. L., & Pearson, C. M. (2013). The price of incivility. Harvard Business Review, 91(1–2), 114–121, 146.

  • Raskin, R. N., & Hall, C. S. (1979). A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 45(2), 590. doi:10.2466/pr0.1979.45.2.590.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, R. N., & Hall, C. S. (1981). The narcissistic personality inventory: Alternative form reliability and further evidence of construct validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45(2), 890–902. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4502_10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. (2000). The development of psychological contract breach and violation: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(5), 525–546. doi:10.2307/3100447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S. S., Spitzmüller, C., Lin, L. F., Stanton, J. M., Smith, P. C., & Ironson, G. H. (2004). Shorter can also be better: The abridged job in general scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(5), 878–893. doi:10.1177/0013164404264841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salgado, J. F. (2002). The big five personality dimensions and counterproductive behaviors. International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 10(1/2), 117. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilpzand, P., De Pater, I. E., & Erez, A. (2014). Workplace incivility: A review of the literature and agenda for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior,. doi:10.1002/job.1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, K. L., Restubog, S. L. D., & Zagenczyk, T. J. (2013). A social exchange-based model of the antecedents of workplace exclusion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(1), 37–48. doi:10.1037/a0030135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sears, K. L., & Humiston, G. S. (2015). The role of emotion in workplace incivility. Journal of Managerial Psychology,. doi:10.1108/JMP-11-2012-0373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, J., & Numerof, R. E. (1988). Supervisory leadership and subordinate burnout. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 439–446. doi:10.2307/256559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E. (2011). The relationship of personality to counterproductive work behavior (CWB): An integration of perspectives. Human Resource Management Review, 21(4), 342–352. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.10.002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E., Fox, S., Penney, L. M., Bruursema, K., Goh, A., & Kessler, S. (2006). The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 446–460. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2005.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. G., & Kluemper, D. H. (2012). Linking perceptions of role stress and incivility to workplace aggression: The moderating role of personality. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(3), 316–329. doi:10.1037/a0028211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trudel, J., & Reio, T. G. (2011). Managing workplace incivility: The role of conflict management styles-antecedent or antidote? Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(4), 395–423. doi:10.1002/hrdq.20081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Jaarsveld, D. D., Walker, D. D., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2010). The role of job demands and emotional exhaustion in the relationship between customer and employee incivility. Journal of Management, 36(6), 1486–1504. doi:10.1177/0149206310368998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D. D. (2009). Predicting service employee incivility toward custoemrs: The roles of employee boredom, emotional exhaustion, and organization identification. Unpublished Manuscript.

  • Wu, J., & Lebreton, J. M. (2011). Reconsidering the dispositional basis of counterproductive work behavior: The role of aberrant personality. Personnel Psychology, 64(3), 593–626. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01220.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zickar, M. J., Cortina, J., & Carter, N. T. (2010). Evaluation of measures: Sources of sufficiency, error, and contamination. In J. L. Farr & N. T. Tippins (Eds.), Handbook of Employee Selection (pp. 399–416). New York: Psychology Press (Taylor & Francis Group).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cavan J. Gray.

Appendix

Appendix

Full Items for the UWBQ-I

Please indicate how often in the past year, you have engaged in each of the following activities while at work…

Hostility

Raised your voice while speaking to another.

Used an inappropriate tone when speaking to others.

Spoke to another in an aggressive tone of voice.

Rolled your eyes at another.

Privacy Invasion

Took stationary from another’s desk without later returning it.

Took items from another’s desk without prior permission.

Interrupted another while they were speaking on the telephone.

Read communications addressed to another, such as emails or faxes.

Opened another’s desk drawers without permission.

Exclusionary Behavior

Did not consult another in reference to a decision that should have involved them.

Gave unreasonably short notice when canceling or scheduling events another was required to be present for.

Failed to inform another of a meeting they should have been informed about.

Avoided consulting with another when you would normally be expected to do so.

Was excessively slow in returning another’s phone message or email without good reason for the delay.

Intentionally failed to pass on information which another should have been made aware of.

Were unreasonably slow in seeing to matters on which they were reliant on you for, without good reason.

Gossiping

Publicly discussed another’s confidential personal information.

Made snide remarks about another.

Talked about another behind his/her back.

Gossiped behind another’s back.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gray, C.J., Carter, N.T. & Sears, K.L. The UWBQ-I: An Adaption and Validation of a Measure of Instigated Incivility. J Bus Psychol 32, 21–39 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-015-9433-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-015-9433-6

Keywords

Navigation