Generational Differences in Work-Related Attitudes: A Meta-analysis
- 8k Downloads
Differences among generations on a wide variety of outcomes are of increasing interest to organizations, practitioners, and researchers alike. The goal of this study was to quantitatively assess the research on generational differences in work-related attitudes and to provide guidance for future research and practice.
We conducted a meta-analysis of generational differences on three work-related criteria: job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and intent to turnover. Our review of published and unpublished research found 20 studies allowing for 18 generational pairwise comparisons across four generations (Traditionals, Baby Boomers, Generation Xers, and Millennials) on these outcomes using 19,961 total subjects.
Corrected mean differences for job satisfaction ranged from .02 to .25, for organizational commitment they ranged from −.22 to .46, and for intent to turnover the range was −.62 to .05. The pattern of results indicates that the relationships between generational membership and work-related outcomes are moderate to small, essentially zero in many cases.
The findings suggest that meaningful differences among generations probably do not exist on the work-related variables we examined and that the differences that appear to exist are likely attributable to factors other than generational membership. Given these results, targeted organizational interventions addressing generational differences may not be effective.
This is the first known quantitative review of research on generational differences in the workplace.
KeywordsGenerational differences Meta-analysis Job satisfaction Organizational commitment Intent to turnover
The authors wish to thank Michael McDaniel, Jose Cortina, Allison Brown, and the anonymous reviewers for their very helpful advice, guidance, and feedback on this manuscript.
References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analysis.
- Beutell, N. J., & Wittig-Berman, U. (2008). Work-family conflict and work-family synergy for Generation X, Baby Boomers, and Matures: Generational differences, predictors, and satisfaction outcomes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(5), 507–523. doi: 10.1108/02683940810884513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Burke, M. E. (2004). Generational differences survey report. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resources Management.Google Scholar
- *Carley, P. J. (2009). Generational perceptions of leadership behaviors and job satisfaction among healthcare professionals in Western New England. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 70(1), 245.Google Scholar
- *Chan, D. S. (2006). Relationship between generation-responsive leadership behaviors and job satisfaction of Generations X and Y professionals. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 66(10), 3712.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Coupland, D. (1991). Generation X: Tales for an accelerated culture. New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
- *Curry, C. J. (2008). Predicting the effects of extrinsic and intrinsic job factors on overall job satisfaction for Generation X and Baby Boomers in a regional healthcare organization. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B. Sciences and Engineering, 68(12), 8435.Google Scholar
- *Daboval, J. M. (1998). A comparison between baby boomer and generation × employees’ bases and foci of commitment. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 59(2), 543.Google Scholar
- *Davis, J. B., Pawlowski, S. D., & Houston, A. (2006). Work commitments of Baby Boomers and Gen-Xers in the IT profession: Generational differences or myth? The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46(3), 43–49.Google Scholar
- *Dudley, C. M., Burnfield-Geimer, J., & Erdheim, J. (2009, April). Generational differences in federal government employee attitudes and perceptions. Paper presented at the 24th annual conference of the Society for Industrial & Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
- *Eaton, D. E. (2009). An investigation of generational differences in job satisfaction in a bureaucratic environment. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 69(11), 4403.Google Scholar
- *Faulk, M. A. (1997). Personal and generational correlates of work outcomes: An inter-generational exploration. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 58(4), 1360.Google Scholar
- Gade, P. A. (2009). The human dimension: Life course theory and research. Arlington, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral Sciences.Google Scholar
- Giancola, F. (2006). The generation gap: more myth than reality. Human Resource Planning, 29(4), 32–37.Google Scholar
- Hamblett, C., & Deverson, J. (1965). Generation X. London: Tandem Books.Google Scholar
- *Hess, J. & Jepsen, D. M. (2009). Career stage and generational differences in psychological contracts. Career Development International, 14(3), 261–283. doi: 10.1108/13620430910966433.
- *Hollman, P. J. (2009). Generational membership and organizational commitment in a Fortune 100 firm. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 69(8), 3212.Google Scholar
- Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
- Huffcutt, A. I., Roth, P. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (1996). A meta-analytic investigation of cognitive ability in employment interview evaluations: Moderating characteristics and implications for incremental validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 459–473. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
- International Labour Organization. (2010). LABORSTA [Database]. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/global/What_we_do/Statistics/lang-en/index.htm.
- Jurkiewicz, C. L. (2000). Generation X and the public employee. Public Personnel Management, 29(1), 55–74.Google Scholar
- Landry, D. J. (2009). Effects of generational and gender differences on the use of influence tactics. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 70(2), 613.Google Scholar
- *Macky, K., Forsyth, S., & Boxall, P. (2010) Generational differences at work: The impact of cohort on work attitudes and outcomes. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
- Mannheim, K. (1952). The problem of generations. In K. Mannheim (Ed.), Essays on the sociology of knowledge (pp. 276–322). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- *Miller, E. J. (2007). The effect of rewards, commitment, organizational climate and work values on intentions to leave: Is there a difference among generations? Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 68(1), 259.Google Scholar
- *Moody, A. (2008). Examining and exploring generational differences by understanding commitment, employee satisfaction, and motivation. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 69(1), 286.Google Scholar
- Murphy, E. F., Gordon, J. D., & Anderson, T. L. (2004). Cross-cultural, cross-cultural age and cross-cultural generational differences in values between the United States and Japan. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 9, 21–47.Google Scholar
- *Patalano, C. (2008). A study of the relationship between generational group identification and organizational commitment: Generation X vs. Generation Y. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 69(2), 671.Google Scholar
- Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias as a threat to validity. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Sackett, P. R. (2002). Letter report. Washington, DC: The National Academies, Division of Behavioural and Social Sciences and Education.Google Scholar
- Schmidt, F. L., & Le, H. (2004). Software for the Hunter–Schmidt meta-analysis methods. Iowa City: University of Iowa, Department of Management & Organizations.Google Scholar
- Shapira, I. (2009). Speaking to Generation Nexus: Guru explains Gens X, Y, Boomer to one another. The Washington Post, July 9, C1.Google Scholar
- Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. New York: William Morrow & Co.Google Scholar
- *Sujdak, E. J. (2003). An investigation of the correlation of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, perceived job opportunity, organizational communications, job search behavior, and the intent to turnover in IT professionals. Dissertation Abstracts International, Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 63(8), 2940.Google Scholar
- TIME. (1951). The younger generation. TIME, LVIII. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,856950-1,00.html.
- Trzesniewski, K., H., Donnellan, M. B., & Robins, R. W. (2008). Do today’s young people really think they are so extraordinary? An examination of secular trends in narcissism and self-enhancement. Psychological Science, 19(2), 181–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02065.x.
- *Wieck, K. L., Dols, J., & Northam, S. (2009). What nurses want: The nurse incentives project. Nursing Economics, 27(3), 169–177.Google Scholar