Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to examine the differences across three generational cohorts (Millennials, Generation X, and Baby Boomers) on dimensions of the work ethic construct using the multidimensional work ethic profile (MWEP).
Design/Methodology/Approach
Data were collected from multiple samples and combined into a large database (N = 1860). Measurement equivalence was examined using Raju et al.’s (1995) differential functioning of items and tests (DFIT) procedure.
Findings
Several dimensions of the MWEP were not equivalent across cohorts, indicating that item content may not operate in the same manner across groups. When equivalent, several significant mean differences were detected across cohorts, indicating that respondents do differ in important work-related attitudes and behaviors.
Implications
Despite several reviews of generational differences across cohorts, relatively few empirical examinations have been undertaken, and no studies have yet examined the measurement equivalence of constructs across generational cohorts. These findings provide evidence that differences do exist across cohorts on dimensions of work ethic, and some differences may be a result of respondents interpreting content in different ways. Managers of multigenerational employees should consider these differences in managing employees and conflict that may arise as a result.
Originality/Value
This is one of the first studies to provide empirical evidence of generational differences in the work ethic construct. In addition, this is the first study to evaluate the measurement equivalence of a work ethic inventory or any other work related individual difference construct across generational cohorts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker, F. (1995). EQUATE 2.1: Computer program for equating two metrics in item response theory (version 2.1). Madison: Laboratory of Experimental Design, University of Wisconsin.
Cennamo, L., & Gardner, D. (2008). Generational differences in work values, outcomes, and person-organization values fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 891–906.
Cherrington, D. J., Condie, S. J., & England, J. L. (1979). Age and work values. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 617–623.
Dries, N., Pepermans, R., & De Kerpel, E. (2008). Exploring four generations’ beliefs about career: Is “satisfied” the new “successful”? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 907–928.
Duchscher, J. E. B., & Cowin, L. (2004). Multigenerational nurses in the workplace. Journal of Nursing Administration, 34, 493–501.
Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
Erickson, T. (2008, August 25). Don’t treat them like baby boomers. Business Week, p. 64.
Flowers, C. P., Oshima, T. C., & Raju, N. S. (1999). A description and demonstration of the polytomous-DFIT framework. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 309–326.
Kupperschmidt, B. (2000). Multigeneration employees: Strategies for effective management. Health Care Manager, 19, 65–76.
Lancaster, L. C., & Stillman, D. (2002). When generations collide: Who they are. Why they clash. How to solve the generational puzzle at work. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.
Macky, K., Gardner, D., & Forsyth, S. (2008). Generational differences at work: Introduction and overview. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 857–861.
Meade, A. W., & Lautenschlager, G. J. (2004). A comparison of item response theory and confirmatory factor analytic methodologies for establishing measurement equivalence/invariance. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 361–388.
Meriac, J. P., Poling, T. L., & Woehr, D. J. (2009). Are there gender differences in work ethic?: An examination of the measurement equivalence of the multidimensional work ethic profile. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 209–213.
Miller, M. J., Woehr, D. J., & Hudspeth, N. (2002). The meaning and measurement of work ethic: Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional inventory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 451–489.
O’Connell, P. O. (2008, August 25). What’s eating gen X. Business Week, pp. 61–62.
Pham, V. H., Case, J., Miyake, L., & Gil, S. (2008). The gen Y perceptions study. Retrieved from Cal State Fullerton Career Center website http://campusapps2.fullerton.edu/career/pdf/Gen_Y.pdf.
Pogson, C., Cober, A., Doverspike, D., & Rogers, J. (2003). Differences in self-reported work ethic across three career stages. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62, 189–201.
Raju, N. S. (1999). DFITPS6: A Fortran program for calculating polytomous DIF/DTF [Computer program]. Chicago: Illinois Institute of Technology.
Raju, N. S., van der Linden, W., & Fleer, P. (1995). An IRT-based internal measure of test bias with implications for differential item functioning. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 353–368.
Reckase, M. D. (1979). Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: Results and implications. Journal of Educational Statistics, 4, 207–230.
Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a pattern of graded scores [Monograph]. Psychometrika Supplement No. 17.
Smola, K. W., & Sutton, C. D. (2002). Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 363–382.
Stocking, M. L., & Lord, F. M. (1983). Developing a common metric in item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 201–210.
ter Bogt, T., Raaijmakers, Q., & van Wel, F. (2005). Socialization and development of the work ethic among adolescents and young adults. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 420–437.
Thissen, D. (2003). MULTILOG 7.03: A computer program for multiple, categorical item analysis and test scoring using item response theory. Chicago: Scientific Software, Inc.
Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, S. M. (2008). Generational differences in psychological traits and their impact on the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 862–877.
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–69.
Weber, M. (1958). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (T. Parsons, Trans.). New York, NY: Scribners. (Original work published 1904–1905).
Woehr, D. J., Archinega, L., & Lim, D. (2007). Examining work ethic across populations: A comparison of the multidimensional work ethic profile across three diverse cultures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 154–168.
Wong, M., Gardiner, E., Lang, W., & Coulon, L. (2008). Generational differences in personality and motivation: Do they exist and what are the implications for the workplace? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 878–890.
Zemke, R., Raines, C., & Filipczak, B. (1999). Generations at work: Managing the clash of veterans, boomers, xers and nexters in your workplace. New York, NY: Amacom.
Zickar, M., & Broadfoot, A. (2009). The partial revival of a dead horse? Comparing classical test theory and item response theory. In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 37–59). New York, NY: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Tables 5, 6, 7 include all DFIT results. Indices reported are based on all items in each MWEP subscale.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meriac, J.P., Woehr, D.J. & Banister, C. Generational Differences in Work Ethic: An Examination of Measurement Equivalence Across Three Cohorts. J Bus Psychol 25, 315–324 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9164-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9164-7