Abstract
Researchers have continually sought to refine interventions targeting reading-related skills in an effort to improve their efficacy, efficiency, or social validity. Despite their prominence in early reading materials, pictures are often excluded from reading intervention procedures, likely because pictures have been shown to impede stimulus control by the textual stimuli when pictures and text are presented simultaneously. The current study describes the use of a novel prompt type, picture-text compound prompts, embedded in a strategic incremental rehearsal procedure to teach sight words to four children exhibiting reading challenges. Prompted opportunities resulted in the presentation of four picture-text compounds (e.g., the word dog appeared below a picture of a dog). To correctly respond, the participant was required to match the identical target textual stimulus to the element in the corresponding compound. Doing so then allowed the picture element of the compound stimulus to function as a tact prompt. Picture-text compound prompts produced mastery levels of responding in three or fewer instructional sessions and participants’ responses during generalization and maintenance probes were generally high. The current findings suggest that picture-text compounds prompts are efficacious, although additional research is needed to evaluate the relative efficiency and social validity of similar arrangements.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alonzo, J., & Tindal, G. (2010). Teacher’s manual for regular easyCBM: Getting the most out of the system. University of Oregon.
Broomfield, L., McHugh, L., & Reed, P. (2008). The effect of observing response procedures on the reduction of over-selectivity in a match to sample task: Immediate but not long term benefits. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 29(3), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2007.04.001
Broomfield, L., McHugh, L., & Reed, P. (2010). Factors impacting emergence of behavioral control by underselected stimuli in humans after reduction of control by overselected stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 94(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2010.94-125
Cariveau, T., Batchelder, S., Ball, S., & La Cruz Montilla, A. (2021). Review of methods to equate target sets in the adapted alternating treatments design. Behavior Modification, 45(5), 695–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445520903049
Cariveau, T., Helvey, C. I., Moseley, T. K., & Hester, J. (2022). Equating and assigning targets in the adapted alternating treatments design: Review of special education journals. Remedial and Special Education, 43(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932521996071
Carnine, D. W., Silbert, J., Kame’enui, E., Slocum, T. A., & Travers, P. A. (2017). Direct instruction reading (6th ed.). Pearson.
Coltheart, V., Laxon, V. J., & Keating, C. (1988). Effects of word imageability and age of acquisition on children’s reading. British Journal of Psychology, 79(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1988.tb02270.x
de Groot, A. M. (1989). Representational aspects of word imageability and word frequency as assessed through word association. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(5), 824–845. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.5.824
Deitz, S. M., & Malone, L. W. (1985). Stimulus control terminology. The Behavior Analyst, 8(2), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393157
Dube, W. V., & McIlvane, W. J. (1999). Reduction of stimulus overselectivity with nonverbal differential observing responses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1999.32-25
Farber, R. S., & Dickson, C. A. (2023). The classification and utility of the differential observing response. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, 23(3), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000272
Feng, H., Chou, W., & Lee, G. T. (2015). Effects of tact prompts on acquisition and maintenance of divergent intraverbal responses by a child with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 32(2), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357615610540
Fuchs, L. S., & Vaughn, S. (2012). Responsiveness-to-intervention: A decade later. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(3), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412442150
Gomes-Ng, S., Kim, P. B., Cowie, S., & Elliffe, D. (2023). Revaluation of overselected stimuli: Emergence of control by underselected stimuli depends on degree of overselectivity. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 120(1), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.850
Hathaway, K. L., Schietz, K. M., & Detrick, J. (2021). Evaluating the effects of instructional prompts and strategic incremental rehearsal on the letter identification mastery of two typically developing kindergarteners. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 14(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00456-5
Hodkinson, A. (2017). Constructing impairment and disability in school reading schemes. Education, 45(5), 572–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2016.1143520
January, S. A., Lovelace, M. E., Foster, T. E., & Ardoin, S. P. (2017). A comparison of two flashcard interventions for teaching sight words to early readers. Journal of Behavioral Education, 26(1), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-016-9263-2
Kennedy, T., & Cariveau, T. (2023). Picture-text compounds in early reading: A descriptive review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-023-00139-0
Kupzyk, S., Daly, E. J., III., & Andersen, M. N. (2011). A comparison of two flash-card methods for improving sight-word reading. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(4), 781–792. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-781
Lewis, T. K., Cariveau, T., Brown, A., Ellington, P., & Stocker, J. (2024). Efficacy of strategic incremental rehearsal in a word list [Manuscript submitted for publication]. University of North Carolina Wilmington.
Lozy, E. D., & Donaldson, J. M. (2019). A comparison of traditional drill and strategic incremental rehearsal flashcard methods to teach letter-sound correspondence. Behavioral Development, 24(2), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/bdb0000089
McFarland, J., Hussar, B., Zhang, J., Wang, X., Wang, K., Hein, S., Diliberti, M., Cataldi, E. F., Mann, F. B., Barmer, A., Nachazel, T., Barnett, M., & Purcell, S. (2019). The Condition of Education 2019 (NCES 2019–144). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED594978.pdf
McGhan, A. C., & Lerman, D. C. (2013). An assessment of error-correction procedures for learners with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46(3), 626–639. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.65
McIntosh, R., Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., Haager, D., & Lee, O. (1993). Observations of students with learning disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 60(3), 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299406000306
McKenna, J. W., Shin, M., & Ciullo, S. (2015). Evaluating reading and mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of observation research. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(4), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948714564576
National Assessment of Educational Progress [NAEP]. (2022). NAEP report card: Reading. National Center for Education Statistics. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading/nation/achievement/?grade=4
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). U.S. Government Printing Office.
O’Connor, R. E., Harty, K. R., & Fulmer, D. (2005). Tiers of intervention in kindergarten through third grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 532–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380060901
Phipps, L., Robinson, E. L., & Grebe, S. (2022). An evaluation of strategic incremental rehearsal on sight word acquisition among students with specific learning disabilities in reading. Journal of Behavioral Education, 31(1), 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-020-09398-y
Rahn, N. L., Wilson, J., Egan, A., Brandes, D., Kunkel, A., Peterson, M., & McComas, J. (2015). Using incremental rehearsal to teach letter sounds to English language learners. Education and Treatment of Children, 38(1), 71–91.
Reed, P., Reynolds, G., & Fermandel, L. (2012). Revaluation manipulations produce emergence of underselected stimuli following simultaneous discrimination in humans. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(7), 1345–1360. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.656663
Richardson, A. R., Lerman, D. C., Nissen, M. A., Luck, K. M., Neal, A. E., Bao, S., & Tsami, L. (2017). Can pictures promote the acquisition of sight-word reading? An evaluation of two potential instructional strategies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.354
Samuels, S. J. (1967). Attentional process in reading: The effect of pictures on the acquisition of reading responses. Journal of Educational Psychology, 58(6), 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0020045
Sindelar, P. T., Rosenberg, M. S., & Wilson, R. J. (1985). An adapted alternating treatments design for instructional research. Education & Treatment of Children, 8(1), 67–76.
Singh, N. N., & Solman, R. T. (1990). A stimulus control analysis of the picture-word problem in children who are mentally retarded: The blocking effect. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23(4), 525–532. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1990.23-525
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. National Academy Press.
Solman, R. T., Singh, N. N., & Kehoe, E. J. (1992). Pictures block the learning of sightwords. Educational Psychology, 12(2), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341920120205
Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(3), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00070
Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., Scammacca, N., Linan-Thompson, S., & Woodruff, A. L. (2009). Response to early reading intervention examining higher and lower responders. Exceptional Children, 75(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290907500203
Vedora, J., & Conant, E. (2015). A comparison of prompting tactics for teaching intraverbals to young adults with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 31(1), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-015-0030-6
Walpole, C. W., Roscoe, E. M., & Dube, W. V. (2007). Use of a differential observing response to expand restricted stimulus control. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40(4), 707–712. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2007.707-712
Wu, H., & Solman, R. T. (1993). Effective use of pictures as extra stimulus prompts. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(1), 144–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01047.x
Funding
This study was not funded.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Tom Cariveau currently serves as an Associate Editor for the Journal of Behavioral Education. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Caregiver permission and daily assent were obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lewis, T.K., Cariveau, T., Brown, A. et al. Efficacy of Picture-Text Compound Prompts During Sight-Word Instruction. J Behav Educ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-024-09549-5
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-024-09549-5