Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Effect of Choice on Student Performance in Online Graduate Classes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There has been a steady growth in the use of online instruction in higher education. The COVID-19 pandemic has increased both the need for and the use of this technology when schools were shut down, further establishing online learning as a viable educational platform for higher education. Many online higher education courses rely heavily on reading textbooks, articles, or both, where students complete assignments and quizzes to demonstrate their knowledge of the presented material. Instructors often require students to complete activities to provide evidence that they have read the assigned materials. There is limited research on the extent to which assignments lead to the best student performance. The current study examined quiz scores after students completed either study questions or reading summaries. Instructors provided students with choices on which assignments to complete during some weeks and quiz scores were compared with weeks when students were not given a choice of assignments. Results showed that there were higher quiz scores in the weeks when students were given a choice of assignments. There was no difference in quiz scores across the types of assignments. Results are discussed in terms of embedding more choice into graduate-level online classes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acolatse, T. W. (2016). Enhancing the online classroom: Transitioning from discussion to engagement online. Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 19(3)

  • Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group. http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/grade-change-2013

  • Ayu, M. (2020). Online learning: Leading e-learning at higher education. The Journal of English Literacy Education, 7(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.36706/jele.v7i1.11515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaudoin, M. (2016). Issues in distance education: A primer for higher education decision makers. New Directions for Higher Education, 173, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, T., Cook, L., Hill, N., & Stevens, K. (2010). An exploratory analysis of textbook usage and study habits: Misperceptions and barriers to success. College Teaching, 59(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2010.509376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, Z., & Chase, P. N. (2021). Student pacing in a master’s level course: Procrastination, preference, and performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 54(3), 1220–1234. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, T. E., & Hineline, P. N. (2002). InterTeaching: A strategy for enhancing the user-friendliness of behavioral arrangements in the college classroom. The Behavior Analyst, 25, 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392059

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, M. D. B., & Tumibay, G. M. (2021). A literature review: Efficacy of online learning courses for higher education institutions using meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1367–1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10027-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, J. A., & Houmanfar, R. (2009). The differential effects of elaborate feedback and basic feedback on student performance in a modified, personalized system of instruction course. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18(3), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-009-9089-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cracolice, M. S., & Roth, S. M. (1996). Keller’s “old” personalized system of instruction: A “new” solution for today’s college chemistry students. The Chemical Educator, 1(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00897960004a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Macêdo Morais, L. A., Figueiredo, J. C. A., Guerrero, D. D. S. (2014). Students satisfaction with mastery learning in an introductory programming course. In Brazilian Symposium on Computers in Education (Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação-SBIE) (Vol. 25, p. 1048). https://doi.org/10.5753/cbie.sbie.2014.1048

  • Du, J., & Xu, J. (2010). The quality of online discussion reported by graduate students. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 11(1), 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018). Online learning in higher education: Exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30, 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9179-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fell, J. P. (1989). The Keller plan in nurse education. The Vocational Aspect of Education, 41(109), 65–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, K. A., Foss, S. K., Paynton, S., & Hahn, L. (2014). Increasing college retention with a personalized system of instruction: A case study. Journal of Case Studies in Education, 5.

  • Hanewicz, C., Platt, A., & Arendt, A. (2017). Creating a learner-centered teaching environment using student choice in assignments. Distance Education, 38(3), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/105879179.2017.1369349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado-Parrado, C., Pfaller-Sadovsky, N., Medina, L., Gayman, C. M., Rost, K. A., & Schofill, D. (2022). A systematic review and quantitative analysis of InterTeaching. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1–29

  • Johnson, S. (2019). The rise—and fall—of reading. Chronicle of Higher Education, 65(31).

  • Kang, X., & Zhang, W. (2023). An experimental case study on forum-based online teaching to improve student’s engagement and motivation in higher education. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 1029–1040. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1817758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, F. S., Sherman, J. G., & Bori, C. M. (1974). PSI: The Keller plan handbook. Benjamin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, M. M., & Frese, K. M. (2017). Reading to learn or learning to read? Engaging college students in course readings. College Teaching, 65(1), 28–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2016.1222577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S. A., Arif, M. H., & Yousuf, M. I. (2019). A study of the relationship between learning preferences and academic achievement. Bulletin of Education and Research, 41(1), 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei, S. A., Bartlett, K. A., Gorney, S. E., & Herschbach, T. R. (2010). Resistance to reading compliance among college students. Instructors’ perspectives. College Student Journal, 44(2), 219–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockart, K. A., Sexton, J., & Lea, C. (1975). The Findley procedure: A method for examining choice-making behavior in academic settings. Behavior Research and Technical in HIgher Education, 46(3), 456–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinoni, G., Van’t Land, H., & Jensen, T. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 on higher education around the world. IAU Global Survey Report, 23. https://www.uniss.it/sites/default/files/news/iau_covid19_and_he_survey_report_final_may_2020.pdf

  • Metzler, M., & Sebolt, D. (1994). Instructor’s manual for the personalized sport instruction series. Dubuque: Kendall Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (2001). Learning styles: The multimedia of the mind. ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED451140. (Abstract) Retrieved from http://www.edrs.com/ Members/ebsco.cfm?ED=ED451140.

  • Nist, S. L., & Simpson, M. L. (2000). College studying. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 645–666). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, G., Grenha Teixeira, J., Torres, A., & Morais, C. (2021). An exploratory study on the emergency remote education experience of higher education students and teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic. British Journal of Educational Technology: Journal of the Council for Educational Technology, 52(4), 1357–1376. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, B. J., & Phillips, F. (2007). Sink or skim: Textbook reading behaviors of introductory accounting students. Issues in Accounting Education, 22(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2007.22.1.21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prewitt, S. L., Hannon, J. C., Colquitt, G., Brusseau, T. A., Newton, M., & Shaw, J. (2015). Effect of personalized system of instruction on health-related fitness knowledge and class time physical activity. The Physical Educator, 72(5), 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, T. (2006). Motivating novice students to read their textbooks. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33(2), 135–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • San Millan Maurino, P. (2007). Looking for critical thinking in online threaded discussions. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35(3), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.2190/P4W3-8117-K32G-R34M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sappington, J., Kinsey, K., & Munsayac, K. (2002). Two studies of reading compliance among college students. Teaching of Psychology, 29(4), 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP2904_02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group.

  • Solomon, P. (1979). The two-point system: A method for encouraging students to read assigned material before class. Teaching of Psychology, 6(2), 77–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Education. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Retrieved from https://ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf.

  • Warden, J. A., & Brandi, B. D. (1981). Development and evaluation of individualized clothing construction modules. Home Economics Research Journal, 9(4), 347–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolery, M., Gast, D. L., & Ledford, J. R. (2018). Comparative designs. In J. R. Ledford & D. L. Gast (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Milton Park: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, D., & Xu, Y. (2019). The promises and limits of online higher education: Understanding how distance education affects access, cost, and quality. American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeivots, S. (2021). Up to 80% of uni students don’t read their assigned readings. Here are 6 helpful tips for teachers. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/bitstream/handle/2123/29554/Zeivots%20Up%20to%2080%20percent%20of%20uni%20students%20dont%20read.pdf?sequence=1

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Applied Behavioral Science, Endicott College, 360 Hale Street, Beverly, MA, 01915, USA

    Lisa M. Tereshko & Mary Jane Weiss

  2. Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA

    Thomas Zane

Authors
  1. Lisa M. Tereshko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Zane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mary Jane Weiss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa M. Tereshko.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this article.

Ethical approval

Study-specific approval was granted from an ethics committee due to research involving humans and informed consent to participate in the research was received.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tereshko, L.M., Zane, T. & Weiss, M.J. The Effect of Choice on Student Performance in Online Graduate Classes. J Behav Educ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-024-09543-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-024-09543-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation