Skip to main content
Log in

Interteaching: A strategy for enhancing the user-friendliness of behavioral arrangements in the college classroom

  • Published:
The Behavior Analyst Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

“Interteaching” is an arrangement for college classroom instruction that departs from the standard lecture format and offers an answer to criticisms commonly directed at behavioral teaching techniques. This approach evolved from exploratory use of small-group arrangements and Ferster and Perrott’s (1968) “interview technique,” leading ultimately to a format that is organized around focused dyadic discussion. Specific suggestions are offered that might enable both seasoned and novice instructors to incorporate this or similar arrangements into their classrooms. This approach retains some key characteristics of Keller’s personalized system of instruction and precision teaching, but offers greater flexibility for strategies that are based on behavioral principles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Binder, C. (1996). Behavioral fluency: Evolution of a new paradigm. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 163–197.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Born, D. G., Gledhill, S. M., & Davis, M. L. (1972). Examination performance in lecture-discussion and personalized instruction courses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 33–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, J. F. (1976). The combination of elements in the personalized system of instruction. Teaching of Psychology, 3, 73–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. C. (1998). Learning (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, M. J. (1972). Improving the undergraduate lecture class by use of student-led discussion groups. American Psychologist, 27, 978–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferster, C. B., & Perrott, M. C. (1968). Behavior principles. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg-Block, M., & Fantuzzo, J. (1997). Reciprocal peer tutoring: An analysis of ‘‘teacher’’ and ‘‘student’’ interactions as a function of training and experience. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 134–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, C. (1997). Classwide peer tutoring. Behavior and Social Issues, 7, 53–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, M. M., & Griffin, B. W. (1998). An investigation of the effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on achievement, self-efficacy, and test anxiety. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 298–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, G. F., Mallette, B., Maheady, L., Bentley, A. E., & Moore, J. (1995). Retention and treatment failure in classwide peer tutoring: Implications for further research. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 399–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hineline, P. N. (1974a). An experimental approach to learning: Introduction for students. In R. Ulrich, T. Stachnik, & J. Mabry (Eds.), Control of human behavior: Vol. 3. Behavior modification in education (pp. 153–160). Scott Foresman.

  • Hineline, P. N. (1974b). An experimental approach to learning: Introduction for teachers. In R. Ulrich, T. Stachnik, & J. Mabry (Eds.), Control of human behavior: Vol. 3. Behavior modification in education. Scott Foresman.

  • Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. V. J. (1992). Breaking the structuralist barrier literacy and numeracy with fluency. American Psychologist, 47, 1475–1489.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, F. S. (1968). Good-bye teacher … Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 79–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C. C., & Cohen, P. A. (1979). A meta-analysis of outcome studies of Keller’s personalized system of instruction. American Psychologist, 34, 307–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley, O. R. (1964). Direct measurement and prosthesis of retarded behavior. Journal of Education, 147, 62–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, K. E., Garlington, W. K., Lowry, D., Burgess, H., Euler, H. A., & Knowlton, W. R. (1972). A note on some reinforcing properties of university lectures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 151–155.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Machado, A., & Silva, F. J. (1998). Greatness and misery in the teaching of the psychology of learning. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 70, 215–234.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, J. S., & Corey, J. R. (1969). Contingency management in an introductory psychology course produces better learning. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 79–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pear, J. J., & Crone-Todd, D. E. (1999). Personalized system of instruction in cyberspace. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 205–209.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pennypacker, H. S., Koenig, C. H., & Lindsley, O. R. (1972). Handbook of the standard behavior chart. Kansas City, KS: Precision Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittschof, K. A., & Griffin, B. W. (2001). Reciprocal peer tutoring: Re-examining the value of a co-operative learning technique to college students and instructors. Educational Psychology, 21, 313–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Thomas E. Boyce or Philip N. Hineline.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boyce, T.E., Hineline, P.N. Interteaching: A strategy for enhancing the user-friendliness of behavioral arrangements in the college classroom. BEHAV ANALYST 25, 215–226 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392059

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392059

Key words

Navigation