Development of a Brief Version of the Social Anxiety – Acceptance and Action Questionnaire
The Social Anxiety – Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (SA-AAQ; MacKenzie and Kocovski 2010) is a 19-item self-report measure designed to assess acceptance and action specific to social anxiety symptoms. The present research was designed to evaluate an abbreviated version of the SA-AAQ. This abbreviated scale was confirmed using an undergraduate sample (N = 148) in Study 1 and a clinical sample of individuals with social anxiety disorder in Study 2 (N = 137). Results indicated that an eight-item, two-factor model (acceptance and action) provided a good fit for the Brief SA-AAQ in both samples. Finally, we also found preliminary evidence in support of the convergent, discriminant/divergent, and incremental validity of the shortened scale. The Brief SA-AAQ shows promise as a useful and brief tool for the measurement of acceptance of social anxiety symptoms in socially anxious populations.
KeywordsSocial anxiety Social phobia AAQ Acceptance Experiential avoidance
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support awarded to the second author from the Ontario Mental Health Foundation (grant number 1–51-54,320) and the Ministry of Research and Innovation (grant number ER09–06-227).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Meagan B. MacKenzie declares that she has no conflict of interest. Nancy L. Kocovski declares that she has no conflict of interest. Rebecca A. Blackie declares that she has no conflict of interest. Lauren C. Carrique declares that she has no conflict of interest. Jan. E. Fleming declares that she has no conflict of interest. Martin M. Antony declares that he has no conflict of interest.
This research was approved by the appropriate institutional review committees and met the guidelines of responsible government agencies. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- Antony, M. M., Orsillo, S. M., & Roemer, L. (2002). Practitioner’s Guide to Empirically-Based Measures of Anxiety. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Arbuckle, J. L. (2013). Amos (version 22.0) [computer program]. Chicago, IL: IBM-SPSS.Google Scholar
- Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck depression inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Pearson Assessment.Google Scholar
- Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. A. (1992). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 205–229.Google Scholar
- Bond, F. W., & Bunce, D. (2003). The role of acceptance and job control in mental health, job satisfaction, and work performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 1057–1067.Google Scholar
- Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K., et al. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the acceptance and action questionnaire-II: a revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 42, 676–688. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bond, F. W., Lloyd, J., & Guenole, N. (2013). The work-related acceptance and action questionnaire: initial psychometric findings and their implications for measuring psychological flexibility in specific contexts. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86, 331–347. doi: 10.1111/joop.12001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Carleton, R. N., Collimore, K. C., Asmundson, G. J. G., McCabe, R. E., Rowa, K., & Antony, M. M. (2009). Refining and validating the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale. Depression and Anxiety, 26, E71–E81. doi: 10.1002/da.20480.
- Ciarrochi, J., Bilich, L., & Godsell, C. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a mechanism of change in acceptance and commitment therapy. In R. A. Baer (Ed.), Assessing mindfulness and acceptance processes in clients: illuminating the theory and practice of change (pp. 51–75). Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.Google Scholar
- Eifert, G. H., & Forsyth, J. P. (2005). Acceptance and commitment therapy for anxiety disorders. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.Google Scholar
- Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Gregg, J. A., Callaghan, G. M., Hayes, S. C., & Glenn-Lawson, J. L. (2007). Improving diabetes self-management through acceptance, mindfulness, and values: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 336–343. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.75.2.336.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black (1995). Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2011a). Acceptance and commitment therapy: the process and practice of mindful change (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., Wilson, K. G., Bissett, R. T., Pistorello, J., Toarmino, D., et al. (2004). Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model. The Psychological Record, 54, 553–578.Google Scholar
- Heimberg, R. G., Mueller, G. P., Holt, C. S., Hope, D. A., & Liebowitz, M. R. (1992). Assessment of anxiety in social interaction and being observed by others: the social interaction anxiety scale and the social phobia scale. Behavior Therapy, 23, 53–73. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80308-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Herbert, J. D., & Cardaciotto, L. (2005). An acceptance and mindfulness-based perspective on social anxiety disorder. In S. M. Orsillo & L. Roemer (Eds.), Acceptance and mindfulness-based approaches to anxiety: conceptualization and treatment (pp. 189–212). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R., Merikangas, K. R., & Walters, E. E. (2005). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 593–602. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim, K. W., & Kwon, S. M. (2013). Validation of the Korean version of the social anxiety-acceptance and action questionnaire. Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Korea, 13, 489–510.Google Scholar
- Kocovski, N. L., Fleming, J. E., Hawley, L. L., Huta, V., & Antony, M. M. (2013). Mindfulness and acceptance-based group therapy versus traditional cognitive behavioral group therapy for social anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 51, 889–898. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2013.10.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kocovski, N. L., Fleming, J. E., Hawley, L. L., Ho, M. H. R., & Antony, M. M. (2015). Mindfulness and acceptance-based group therapy and traditional cognitive behavioral group therapy for social anxiety disorder: mechanisms of change. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 70, 11–22. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.04.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koszycki, D., Benger, M., Shlik, J., & Bradwejn, J. (2007). Randomized trial of a meditation-based stress reduction program and cognitive behavior therapy in generalized social anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 2518–2526. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.04.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- MacKenzie, M. B., & Kocovski, N. L. (2010). Self-reported acceptance of social anxiety symptoms: development and validation of the social anxiety—acceptance and action questionnaire. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 6, 214–232. doi: 10.1037/h0100909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McNeil, D. W., Ries, B. J., & Turk, C. L. (1995). Behavioral assessment: Self-report, physiology, and overt behavior. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment (pp. 202–231). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Ossman, W. A., Wilson, K. G., Storaasli, R. D., & McNeill, J. W. (2006). A preliminary investigation of the use of acceptance and commitment therapy in a group treatment for social phobia. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 6, 397–416.Google Scholar
- Purdon, C., Antony, M., Monteiro, S., & Swinson, R. P. (2001). Social anxiety in college students. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 15, 203–215.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Vieira, S., Martins, M. J., Salvador, M. C., MacKenzie, M. B., & Kocovski, N. L. (2016). The Social Anxiety – Acceptance and Action Questionnaire for Adolescents (SA-AAQ-A): Study of the psychometric properties in a Portuguese sample. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues and applications (pp. 56–75). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar