Abstract
The straightforward interpretation of solution state residual dipolar couplings (RDCs) in terms of internuclear vector orientations generally requires prior knowledge of the alignment tensor, which in turn is normally estimated using a structural model. We have developed a protocol which allows the requirement for prior structural knowledge to be dispensed with as long as RDC measurements can be made in three independent alignment media. This approach, called Rigid Structure from Dipolar Couplings (RSDC), allows vector orientations and alignment tensors to be determined de novo from just three independent sets of RDCs. It is shown that complications arising from the existence of multiple solutions can be overcome by careful consideration of alignment tensor magnitudes in addition to the agreement between measured and calculated RDCs. Extensive simulations as well applications to the proteins ubiquitin and Staphylococcal protein GB1 demonstrate that this method can provide robust determinations of alignment tensors and amide N–H bond orientations often with better than 10° accuracy, even in the presence of modest levels of internal dynamics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albert A (1972) Regression and the Moore–Penrose pseudoinverse. Academic Press, New York
Al-Hashimi HM, Valafar H, Terrell M, Zartler ER, Eidsness MK, Prestegard JH (2000) Variation of molecular alignment as a means of resolving orientational ambiguities in protein structures from dipolar couplings. J Magn Reson 143(2):402–406
Barrientos LG, Dolan C, Gronenborn AM (2000) Characterization of surfactant liquid crystal phases suitable for molecular alignment and measurement of dipolar couplings. J Biomol NMR 16(4):329–337
Bax A (2003) Weak alignment offers new NMR opportunities to study protein structure and dynamics. Protein Sci 12(1):1–16
Bernado P, Blackledge M (2004) Anisotropic small amplitude peptide plane dynamics in proteins from residual dipolar couplings. J Am Chem Soc 126(15):4907–4920
Blackledge M (2005) Recent progress in the study of biomolecular structure and dynamics in solution from residual dipolar couplings. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 46(1):23–61
Bouvignies G, Bernado P, Blackledge M (2005) Protein backbone dynamics from N–HN dipolar couplings in partially aligned systems: a comparison of motional models in the presence of structural noise. J Magn Reson 173(2):328–338
Bouvignies G, Markwick PRL, Blackledge M (2007) Simultaneous definition of high resolution protein structure and backbone conformational dynamics using NMR residual dipolar couplings. Chem Phys Chem 8(13):1901–1909
Bouvignies G, Markwick Phineus RL, Blackledge M (2008) Characterization of protein dynamics from residual dipolar couplings using the three dimensional Gaussian axial fluctuation model. Proteins 71(1):353–363
Briggman KB, Tolman JR (2003) De novo determination of bond orientations and order parameters from residual dipolar couplings with high accuracy. J Am Chem Soc 125:10164–10165
Chattopadhyaya R, Meador WE, Means AR, Quiocho FA (1992) Calmodulin structure refined at 1.7.ANG. resolution. J Mol Biol 228(4):1177–1192
Chen K, Tjandra N (2007) Top-down approach in protein RDC data analysis: de novo estimation of the alignment tensor. J Biomol NMR 38(4):303–313
Clore GM, Schwieters CD (2004) How much backbone motion in ubiquitin is required to account for dipolar coupling data measured in multiple alignment media as assessed by independent cross-validation? J Am Chem Soc 126(9):2923–2938
Clore GM, Gronenborn AM, Bar A (1998) A robust method for determining the magnitude of the fully asymmetric alignment tensor of oriented macromolecules in the absence of structural information. J Magn Reson 133(1):216–221
Cornilescu G, Marquardt JL, Ottiger M, Bax A (1998) Validation of protein structure from anisotropic carbonyl chemical shifts in a dilute liquide crystalline phase. J Am Chem Soc 120(27):6836–6837
Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW, Zhu G, Pfeifer J, Bax A (1995) NMRpipe—a multidimensional spectral processing system based on unix pipes. J Biomol NMR 6(3):277–293
Delaglio F, Kontaxis G, Bax A (2000) Protein structure determination using molecular fragment replacement and NMR dipolar couplings. J Am Chem Soc 122(9):2142–2143
Fowler CA, Tian F, Al-Hashimi HM, Prestegard JH (2000) Rapid determination of protein folds using residual dipolar couplings. J Mol Biol 304:447–460
Gallagher T, Alexander P, Bryan P, Gilliland GL (1994) Two crystal structures of the B1 immumoglobulin-binding domain of streptococcal protein G and comparison with NMR. Biochemistry 33:4721–4729
Garrett DS, Gronenborn AM, Clore GM (1995) Automated and interactive tools for assigning 3D and 4D NMR—spectra of proteins—capp, stapp and pipp. J Cell Biochem 71
Gebel EB, Ruan K, Tolman JR, Shortle D (2006) Multiple alignment tensors from a denatured protein. J Am Chem Soc 128:9310–9311
Giesen AW, Homans SW, Brown JM (2003) Determination of protein global folds using backbone residual dipolar coupling and long-range NOE restraints. J Biomol NMR 25(1):63–71
Griesinger C, Peti W, Meiler J, Bruschweiler R (2004) Projection angle restraints for studying structure and dynamics of biomolecules. Methods Mol Biol (Totawa, N.J.) 278:107–121
Hansen MR, Hanson P, Pardi A (2000) Filamentous bacteriophage for aligning RNA, DNA, and proteins for measurement of nuclear magnetic resonance dipolar coupling interactions. Method Enzymol 317:220–240
Hus JC, Bruschweiler R (2002) Reconstruction of interatomic vectors by principle component analysis of nuclear magnetic resonance data in multiple alignments. J Chem Phys 117(3):1166–1172
Hus JC, Marion D, Blackledge M (2000) De novo determination of protein structure by NMR using orientational and long-range order restraints. J Mol Biol 298(5):927–936
Hus JC, Marion D, Blackledge M (2001) Determination of protein backbone structure using only residual dipolar couplings. J Am Chem Soc 123(7):1541–1542
Kuszewski J, Gronenborn AM, Clore GM (1999) Improving the packing and accuracy of NMR structures with a pseudopotential for the radius of gyration. J Am Chem Soc 121(10):2337–2338
Lakomek NA, Carlomagno T, Becker S, Griesinger C, Meiler J (2006) A thorough dynamic interpretation of residual dipolar couplings in ubiquitin. J Biomol NMR 34(2):101–115
Losonczi JA, Prestegard JH (1998) Improved dilute bicelle solutions for high-resolution NMR of biological macromolecules. J Biomol NMR 12(3):447–451
Meiler J, Prompers JJ, Peti W, Griesinger C, Bruschweiler R (2001) Model-free approach to the dynamic interpretation of residual dipolar couplings in globular proteins. J Am Chem Soc 123(25):6098–6107
Mesleh MF, Opella SJ (2003) Dipolar Waves as NMR maps of helices in proteins. J Magn Reson 163(2):288–299
Mesleh MF, Lee S, Veglia G, Thiriot DS, Marassi FM, Opella SJ (2003) Dipolar waves map the structure and topology of helices in membrane proteins. J Am Chem Soc 125(29):8928–8935
Ottiger M, Bax A (1998) Determination of relative N–H–NN–C′, C-alpha-C′, and C(alpha)–H-alpha effective bond lengths in a protein by NMR in a dilute liquid crystalline phase. J Am Chem Soc 120(47):12334–12341
Ottiger M, Bax A (1999) Bicelle-based liquid crystals for NMR measurement of dipolar couplings at acidic and basic pH values. J Biomol NMR 13(2):187–191
Ottiger M, Delaglio F, Bax A (1998) Measurement of J and dipolar couplings from simplified two-dimensional NMR spectra. J Magn Reson 131(2):373–378
Peti W, Meiler J, Bruschweiler R, Griesinger C (2002) Model-free analysis of protein backbone motion from residual dipolar couplings. J Am Chem Soc 124:5822–5833
Press WHT SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (1992) Numerical recipes in C. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Prestegard JH, Bougault CM, Kishore AI (2004) Residual dipolar couplings in structure determination of biomolecules. Chem Rev 104(8):3519–3540
Prosser RS, Hunt SA, DiNatale JA, Vold RR (1996) Magnetically aligned membrane model systems with positive order parameter: Switching the sign of Szz with paramagnetic ions. J Am Chem Soc 118:269–270
Ramirez BE, Bax A (1998) Modulation of the alignment tensor of macromolecules dissolved in a dilute liquid crystalline medium. J Am Chem Soc 120(35):9106–9107
Ruan K, Tolman JR (2005) Composite alignment media for the measurement of independent sets of NMR residual dipolar couplings. J Am Chem Soc 127:15032–15033
Ruckert M, Otting G (2000) Alignment of biological macromolecules in novel nonionic liquid crystalline media for NMR experiments. J Am Chem Soc 122(32):7793–7797
Skrynnikov NR (2004) Orienting molecular fragments and molecules with residual dipolar couplings. Comptes Rendus Physique 5(3):359–375
Skrynnikov NR, Goto NK, Yang DW, Choy WY, Tolman JR, Mueller GA, Kay LE (2000) Orienting domains in proteins using dipolar couplings measured by liquid-state NMR: differences in solution and crystal forms of maltodextrin binding protein loaded with beta-cyclodextrin. J Mol Biol 295(5):1265–1273
Tjandra N, Bax A (1997) Direct measurement of distances and angles in biomolecules by NMR in a dilute liquid crystalline medium. Science 278(5340):1111–1114
Tolman JR (2002) A novel approach to the retrieval of structural and dynamic information from residual dipolar couplings using several oriented media in biomolecular NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 124:12020–12030
Tolman JR, Ruan K (2006) NMR residual dipolar couplings as probes of biomolecular dynamics. Chem Rev 106:1720–1736
Tolman JR, Al-Hashimi HM, Kay LE, Prestegard JH (2001) Structural and dynamic analysis of residual dipolar coupling data for proteins. J Am Chem Soc 123(7):1416–1424
Ulmer TS, Ramirez BE, Delaglio F, Bax A (2003) Evaluation of backbone proton positions and dynamics in a small protein by liquid crystal NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 125(30):9179–9191
Vijaykumar S, Bugg CE, Cook WJ (1987) Structure of ubiquitin refined at 1.8 a resolution. J Mol Biol 194(3):531–544
Wang L, Donald BR (2004) Exact solutions for internuclear vectors and backbone dihedral angles from NH residual dipolar couplings in two media, and their application in a systematic search algorithm for determining protein backbone structure. J Biomol NMR 29(3):223–242
Wang J, Walsh JD, Kuszewski J, Wang Y-X (2007) Periodicity, planarity, and pixel (3P): a program using the intrinsic residual dipolar coupling periodicity-to-peptide plane correlation and phi/psi angles to derive protein backbone structures. J Magn Reson 189(1):90–103
Weaver JL, Prestegard JH (1998) Nuclear magnetic resonance structural and ligand binding studies of BLBC, a two-domain fragment of barley lectin. Biochemistry 37(1):116–128
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge support from the NIH (GM075310) and NSF (MCB-0615786).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendix
Appendix
Separation of the Q value into components arising from structural quality and noise
The Q value is used to assess the level of agreement between a structural model and a single RDC dataset. It can be written as follows:
where \({\vert}{\vert}\quad {\vert}{\vert}\) denotes the norm and \(\vec{{\mathbf{d}}}\) is a column vector consisting of the RDC measurements. The matrix B is of dimension N × 5 where N is the number of dipolar interactions for which RDC measurements have been made and the matrix B + is its Moore-Penrose pseudoinverse. Each row of the matrix B contains the irreducible tensorial description of the specific dipolar interaction tensor. Contributions to a computed Q value can arise from errors in the measured RDCs themselves or structural and dynamic deviations from the coordinates embodied in B. To distinguish, we write the set of measured couplings \(\vec{{\mathbf{d}}}=\vec{{\mathbf{d}}}^{\prime}+\varvec{\varepsilon},\) in which \(\vec{{\mathbf{d}}}^{{\prime}}\) is the set of true couplings and \(\varvec{\varepsilon}\) is a vector containing the experimental errors. Substitution into Eq. A1 leads to,
in which I is the identity matrix. Note that if there are no experimental errors, \(\varvec{\varepsilon}={\mathbf{0}},\) then the Q value depends only on the first term in the numerator and is solely an assessment of structural quality. On the other hand if the structural model B is perfect then only the second term will be non-zero and it will be solely related to the magnitude of experimental errors. From Eq. A2, one can arrive at the following relationship under the assumption that experimental errors are uncorrelated with the structural model B,
with
It is the value of Qstruct that is normally desired and thus it would be useful if Qnoise could be estimated. We start by writing the error vector \(\varvec{\varepsilon}\) in terms of a normalized vector \(\varvec{\varepsilon}_{0}\) and the estimated random error specified by σ D . Given a normalized N-dimensional vector, its elements form a distribution with \(\sigma=1/\hbox{sqrt}(\hbox{N}).\) This leads to the following expression for \(\varvec{\varepsilon}.\)
Considering that B is rank 5 and that \({\mathbf{BB}}^{+}\) represents an orthogonal projector (Albert 1972) which projects an N dimensional vector onto a 5 dimensional subspace, the following relationships can be derived,
given that \(\varvec{\varepsilon}_{0}^\prime\) and \(\varvec{\varepsilon}_{0}^{\prime\prime}\) are both normalized N-dimensional vectors. This leads to the desired expression for Q noise .
Errors in estimation of alignment tensor magnitudes based on observed dmin and dmax
Recalling the expression for the estimated generalized degree of order (GDO) from the observed values of dmin and dmax,
we note that in the absence of experimental errors, φ est represents an absolute lower bound for the actual value of φ. In the presence of experimental errors, the lower bound, φ lower , will be reduced below that of φ est according to the propagated uncertainty in φ from the measurements dmin and dmax. The expression for σφ is obtained by evaluation of,
under the assumption of axial symmetry (η = 0), which produces the maximum propagation of error into φ. Finally, one obtains the desired expression for σφ,
Recalling the expression for φ est in Eq. A8, this allows a lower bound for φ to be established as follows,
Establishing an upper bound requires an additional piece of information. Namely, the upper limit on the extent to which φ est underestimates the actual value of φ due to noncoincidence of internuclear vectors with the Z and Y principal axes of alignment corresponding to Azz and Ayy. To do this a uniform distribution of internuclear vector orientations will be assumed. Under this assumption, the extent of solid angle on the unit sphere occupied by one of a set of N internuclear vectors is equal to 4π/N and the semiangle for a cone spanning that solid angle can be described by the angle λ, which satisfies the following equation,
This leads to the following result for λ,
Thus one can say that each internuclear vector inhabits its own cone on the surface of the unit sphere with a semi-angle given by λ. While it is not geometrically possible to cut a sphere up into perfect cones, the deviation from this simplified picture is expected to be very small. For a uniform distribution of vectors, each vector can thus be considered to lie at the center of its respective cone and choice of a random vector on the sphere cannot deviate from one of the preexisting N vectors by more than the angle λ. Within this framework, the maximum possible underestimation of Azz and Ayy occurs for vectors which have spherical coordinates (λ, 90) and (90-λ, 90), respectively, relative to the true principal axes,
From the above expressions, it is apparent that the largest possible underestimation occurs for cases of highest asymmetry (η = 1). As estimation of the asymmetry is subject to greater uncertainty than for Azz, we derive an expression for the maximum possible underestimation in the GDO for the case of η = 1,
This leads to the following expression for the maximum difference between the estimated and true values of the GDO assuming a uniform distribution of internuclear vectors and the absence of dynamic averaging,
An estimate for the upper bound in the magnitude of alignment can then be obtained after some algebraic simplification utilizing results shown in Eqs. A10, A15, and A16,
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ruan, K., Briggman, K.B. & Tolman, J.R. De novo determination of internuclear vector orientations from residual dipolar couplings measured in three independent alignment media. J Biomol NMR 41, 61–76 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-008-9240-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-008-9240-8