Abstract
A critical role of mathematics teacher education is to equip teachers with understandings and ambitious practices that support effective mathematics teaching for students from diverse backgrounds, specifically connecting to children’s mathematical thinking (CMT) and children’s linguistic, cultural, and family funds of knowledge (CFoK). Drawing on data from a larger research project, TEACH Math, this longitudinal case study uses the lens of authority to examine one teacher’s, Sena’s, understandings and practices related to CMT and CFoK over a 4-year period, i.e., through mathematics methods, student teaching, and early career teaching. Findings identify changes made in understandings and practices related to CMT and CFoK, with a focus on the development of recognition and realization rules. Emphasis is placed on how authority was shared in the classroom and how this may have impacted one teacher’s development of two very different learning-to-teach trajectories for connecting to CMT and CFoK. Implications for teacher educators focused on supporting novice teachers in developing ambitious mathematics teaching practices are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Here, and in the remainder of the paper, the order of first CMT and then CFoK is not indicative of prioritizing one component of ambitious and equitable teaching over another.
This and all other names are pseudonyms.
This is a general descriptor to protect the identity of our participant.
For more information, see the project Web site: Teachmath.info.
All data sources are from the designated period of time (i.e., Methods), unless otherwise noted.
In this model, the teacher demonstrates a problem, the class does a problem together, and then the students work on their own.
enVision is a K-8 mathematics curriculum published by Pearson (enVision Math Common Core 2012).
References
Aguirre, J. M., Turner, E. E., Bartell, T. G., Kalinec-Craig, C., Foote, M. Q., Roth McDuffie, A., & Drake, C. (2013). Making connections in practice: How prospective elementary teachers connect to children’s mathematical thinking and community funds of knowledge in mathematics instruction. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(2), 178–192.
Amit, M., & Fried, M. N. (2005). Authority and authority relations in mathematics education: A view from an 8th grade classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics,58(2), 145–168.
Anderson, L. M., & Stillman, J. A. (2013). Student teaching’s contribution to preservice teacher development a review of research focused on the preparation of teachers for urban and high-needs contexts. Review of Educational Research,83(1), 3–69.
Bartell, T. G., Turner, E., Aguirre, J., Drake, C., Foote, M. Q., & McDuffie, A. R. (2017). Connecting children's mathematical thinking with family and community knowledge in mathematics instruction. Teaching Children Mathematics, 23(6), 326–328.
Blanton, M. L., Berenson, S. B., & Norwood, K. S. (2001). Using classroom discourse to understand a prospective mathematics teacher’s developing practice. Teaching and Teacher Education,17(2), 227–242.
Bleicher, E. (2011). Parsing the language of racism and relief: Effects of a short-term urban field placement on teacher candidates’ perceptions of culturally diverse classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education,27(8), 1170–1178.
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (2003). Research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Brenner, M. E. (1998). Adding cognition to the formula for culturally relevant instruction in mathematics. Anthropology & Education Quarterly,29(2), 214–244.
Burant, T. J., & Kirby, D. (2002). Beyond classroom-based early field experiences: Understanding an “educative practicum” in an urban school and community. Teaching and Teacher Education,18(5), 561–575.
Campbel, P. F. (1996). Empowering children and teachers in the elementary mathematics classrooms of urban schools. Urban Education,30(4), 449–475.
Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1996). Cognitively guided instruction: A knowledge base for reform in primary mathematics instruction. The Elementary School Journal,97(1), 3–20.
Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., & Empson, S. B. (1999). Children’s mathematics: Cognitively guided instruction. Portsmouth: ERIC.
Civil, M. (1994). Connecting the home and school: Funds of knowledge for mathematics teaching and learning. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans.
Civil, M. (2002). Chapter 4: Everyday mathematics, mathematicians’ mathematics, and school mathematics: Can we bring them together? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph, 11, 40–62.
Cook-Sather, A. (2002). Authorizing students’ perspectives: Toward trust, dialogue, and change in education. Educational Researcher,31(4), 3–14.
Downey, J. A., & Cobbs, G. A. (2007). “I actually learned a lot from this”: A field assignment to prepare future preservice math teachers for culturally diverse classrooms. School Science and Mathematics,107(1), 391–403.
Drake, C., & Sherin, M. G. (2006). Practicing change: Curriculum adaptation and teacher narrative in the context of mathematics education reform. Curriculum Inquiry,36(2), 153–187.
Ensor, P. (2001). From preservice mathematics teacher education to beginning teaching: A study in recontextualizing. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(3), 296–320.
enVision Math Common Core. (2012). New York, NY: Pearson/Scott Foresman-Addison Wesley.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record,103(6), 1013–1055.
Feiman-Nemser, S., & Buchmann, M. (1985). Pitfalls of experience in teacher preparation. The Teachers College Record,87(1), 53–65.
Fennema, E., Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., & Carey, D. A. (1993). Using children’s mathematical knowledge in instruction. American Educational Research Journal,30(3), 555–583.
Foote, M. Q., McDuffie, A. R., Turner, E. E., Aguirre, J. M., Bartell, T. G., & Drake, C. (2013). Orientations of prospective teachers toward students’ family and community. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 126–136.
Franke, M. L., & Kazemi, E. (2001). Teaching as learning within a community of practice: Characterizing generative growth. In T. Wood, B. Nelson, & J. Warfield (Eds.), Beyond classical pedagogy in elementary mathematics: The nature of facilitative change (pp. 47–74). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gerson, H., & Bateman, E. (2010). Authority in an agency-centered, inquiry-based university calculus classroom. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior,29(4), 195–206.
González, N., Andrade, R., Civil, M., & Moll, L. (2001). Bridging funds of distributed knowledge: Creating zones of practices in mathematics. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk,6(1&2), 115–132.
Hamm, J. V., & Perry, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in first-grade classrooms: On whose authority? Journal of Educational Psychology,94(1), 126.
Hand, V. (2012). Seeing culture and power in mathematical learning: Toward a model of equitable instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1–2), 233–247.
Hirsch, E., Jr. (1995). Core knowledge sequence. Charlottesville, VA: Core Knowledge Foundation.
Jackson, K., & Cobb, P. (2010). Refining a vision of ambitious mathematics instruction to address issues of equity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO.
Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169–202.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2009). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. Hoboken: Wiley.
Leonard, J., Brooks, W., Barnes-Johnson, J., & Berry, R. Q. (2010). The nuances and complexities of teaching mathematics for cultural relevance and social justice. Journal of Teacher Education,61(3), 261–270.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2010). Designing qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
McDonald, M., Kazemi, E., & Kavanagh, S. S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education a call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education,64(5), 378–386.
McDuffie, A. R., Foote, M. Q., Bolson, C., Turner, E. E., Aguirre, J. M., Bartell, T. G., Drake, C., & Land, T. (2014). Using video analysis to support prospective K-8 teachers’ noticing of students’ multiple mathematical knowledge bases. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(3), 245–270.
Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice,31(2), 132–141.
Nicol, C. C., & Crespo, S. M. (2006). Learning to teach with mathematics textbooks: How preservice teachers interpret and use curriculum materials. Educational studies in mathematics, 62(3), 331–355.
Oldfather, P. (1995). Songs “come back most to them”: Students’ experiences as researchers. Theory Into Practice,34(2), 131–137.
Philipp, R. A., Ambrose, R., Lamb, L. L., Sowder, J. T., Schappelle, B. P., Sowder, L., et al. (2007). Effects of early field experiences on the mathematical content knowledge and beliefs of prospective elementary school teachers: An experimental study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(5), 438–476.
Planas, N., & Civil, M. (2009). Working with mathematics teachers and immigrant students: An empowerment perspective. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,12(6), 391–409.
Presmeg, N. C. (1998). Ethnomathematics in teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,1(3), 317–339.
Rodgers, C. R. (2006). Attending to student voice: The impact of descriptive feedback on learning and teaching. Curriculum Inquiry,36(2), 209–237.
Schultz, K., Jones-Walker, C., & Chikkatur, A. P. (2008). Listening to students, negotiating beliefs: Preparing teachers for urban classrooms. Curriculum Inquiry,38(2), 155–187.
Silverman, S. K. (2010). What is diversity? An inquiry into preservice teacher beliefs. American Educational Research Journal,47(2), 292–329.
Sleep, L., & Boerst, T. A. (2012). Preparing beginning teachers to elicit and interpret students’ mathematical thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education,28(7), 1038–1048.
Sleeter, C. E. (2001). Preparing teachers for culturally diverse schools research and the overwhelming presence of whiteness. Journal of Teacher Education,52(2), 94–106.
Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (2011). Five practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Solorzano, D. G., & Yosso, T. J. (2001). From racial stereotyping and deficit discourse toward a critical race theory in teacher education. Multicultural education,9(1), 2.
Stake, R. E. (2013). Multiple case study analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research (Vol. 15). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Tate, W. F. (1995). Returning to the root: A culturally relevant approach to mathematics pedagogy. Theory Into Practice,34(3), 166–173.
Taylor, S., & Sobel, D. (2001). Addressing th discontinuity of students’ and teachers’ diversity: A preliminary study of preservice teachers’ beliefs and perceived skills. Teacher and Teacher Education,17, 487–503.
TERC. (2008). Investigations in number, data, and space (2nd ed.). Glenview, IL: Pearson.
Thompson, J., Windschitl, M., & Braaten, M. (2013). Developing a theory of ambitious early-career teacher practice. American Educational Research Journal,50(3), 574–615.
Turner, E. E., & Celedón-Pattichis, S. (2011). Mathematical problem solving among Latina/o kindergartners: An analysis of opportunities to learn. Journal of Latinos and Education, 10(2), 146–169.
Turner, E. E., & Drake, C. (2016). A review of research on prospective teachers’ learning about children’s mathematical thinking and cultural funds of knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(1), 32–46.
Turner, E. E., Drake, C., McDuffie, A. R., Aguirre, J., Bartell, T. G., & Foote, M. Q. (2012). Promoting equity in mathematics teacher preparation: A framework for advancing teacher learning of children’s multiple mathematics knowledge bases. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(1), 67–82.
Turner, E. E., Foote, M. Q., Stoehr, K. J., McDuffie, A. R., Aguirre, J. M., Bartell, T. G., & Drake, C. (2016). Learning to leverage children’s multiple mathematical knowledge bases in mathematics instruction. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 9(1), 48–78.
Vacc, N. N., & Bright, G. W. (1999). Elementary preservice teachers’ changing beliefs and instructional use of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 89–110.
Wagner, D., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2014). Identifying authority structures in mathematics classroom discourse: A case of a teacher’s early experience in a new context. ZDM Mathematics Education,46(6), 871–882.
Warfield, J., Wood, T., & Lehman, J. D. (2005). Autonomy, beliefs and the learning of elementary mathematics teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education,21(4), 439–456.
Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization (A. R. Henderson & T. Parsons, Trans.). London: William Hodge and Company Limited.
Wood, T., & McNeal, B. (2003). Complexity in teaching and children. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education,4, 435–441.
Xenotos, C. (2015). Immigrant pupils in elementary classrooms of Cyprus: How teachers view them as learners of mathematics. Cambridge journal of education,45(4), 475–488.
Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college-and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 89–99.
Acknowledgements
National Science Foundation Award DRL #1228034.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Example of coded data from phase 1 and phase 2
Appendix: Example of coded data from phase 1 and phase 2
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kinser-Traut, J.Y., Turner, E.E. Shared authority in the mathematics classroom: successes and challenges throughout one teacher’s trajectory implementing ambitious practices. J Math Teacher Educ 23, 5–34 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-018-9410-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-018-9410-x