On mathematical understanding: perspectives of experienced Chinese mathematics teachers
Researchers have long debated the meaning of mathematical understanding and ways to achieve mathematical understanding. This study investigated experienced Chinese mathematics teachers’ views about mathematical understanding. It was found that these mathematics teachers embrace the view that understanding is a web of connections, which is a result of continuous connection making. However, in contrast to the popular view which separates understanding into conceptual and procedural, Chinese teachers prefer to view understanding in terms of concepts and procedures. They place more stress on the process of concept development, which is viewed as a source of students’ failures in transfer. To achieve mathematical understanding, the Chinese teachers emphasize strategies such as reinventing a concept, verbalizing a concept, and using examples and comparisons for analogical reasoning. These findings draw on the perspective of classroom practitioners to inform the long-debated issue of the meaning of mathematical understanding and ways to achieve mathematical understanding.
KeywordsMathematical understanding Achieving mathematical understanding Experienced teachers Chinese teachers Perspective of classroom practitioners
The research reported in this paper was supported by a grant from the Spencer Foundation and a grant from the University of Delaware’s Center for Global and Area Studies and the Center for the Study of Diversity. Any opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Spencer Foundation and the University of Delaware. We gratefully acknowledge the feedback and editorial assistance from Stephen Hwang, Margaret Walshaw, and reviewers, which contributed to the paper’s improvement. Of course, any errors remain solely the responsibility of the authors.
- Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (2000). Applications and misapplications of cognitive psychology to mathematics education. Texas Educational Review. http://actr.psy.cmu.edu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/146Applic.MisApp.pdf.
- Baroody, J. (1987). Children’s mathematical thinking: A developmental framework for preschool, primary, and special education teachers. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Baroody, A. J., Feil, Y., & Johnson, A. R. (2007). An alternative reconceptualization of procedural and conceptual knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 115–131.Google Scholar
- Bills, L., Dreyfus, T., Mason, J., Tsamir, P., Watson, A., & Zaslavsky, O. (2006). Exemplification in mathematics education. In J. Novotna (Ed.), Proceedings of the 30th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education. Prague, Czech Republic: PME.Google Scholar
- Brownell, W. A. (1935). Psychological considerations in the learning and the teaching of arithmetic. In W. D. Reeve (Ed.), The teaching of arithmetic (Tenth Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics) (pp. 1–31). New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
- Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Cai, J. (2004). Why do U.S. and Chinese students think differently in mathematical problem solving? Exploring the impact of early algebra learning and teachers’ beliefs. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23, 135–167.Google Scholar
- Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439–477.Google Scholar
- Davis, R. B. (1992). Understanding of “Understanding”. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 11(3), 225–242.Google Scholar
- Ding, M., Li, Y., Li., X, & Gu, J. (2013). Knowing and understanding instructional mathematics content through intensive studies of textbooks. In Y. Li, & R. Huang (Eds.), How Chinese teach mathematics and improve teaching (pp. 66–82). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education. China lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2000). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Merrill.Google Scholar
- Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. Utrecht: CD Beta Press.Google Scholar
- Greeno, J., & Riley, M. (1987). Processes and development of understanding. In R. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 289–313). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65–97). New York: Mcmillan.Google Scholar
- Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K. C., Wearne, D., Murray, H., et al. (1997). Making sense: Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1–27). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Lester, F. A. (2003). Research and issues in teaching mathematics through problem solving. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
- Lobato, J., Clarke, D., & Ellis, A. B. (2005). Initiating and eliciting in teaching: A reformulation of telling. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36, 101–136.Google Scholar
- Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Marton, F., Tse, L. K., & dall’Alba, G. (1996). Memorizing and understanding: The keys to the paradox? In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp. 69–83). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre.Google Scholar
- Mason, J. (1989). Mathematical abstraction seen as a delicate shift of attention. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(2), 2–8.Google Scholar
- Meel, D. E. (2003). Models and theories of mathematical understanding: Comparing Pirie and Kieren’s model of the growth of mathematical understanding and APOS theory. In A. Selden, E. Dubinsky, G. Harel & F. Hitt (Eds.) Research in collegiate mathematics education. V. Issues in mathematics education (pp. 132-181). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: Author.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Piaget, J. (1952). The child’s conception of number. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77(1), 20–26.Google Scholar
- Star, J. (2005). Reconceptualizing procedural knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36, 404–411.Google Scholar
- Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (2003). Highlights from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2003. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/2005005.pdf.
- Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (2007). Highlights from TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and Science Achievement of US Fourth and Eighth-Grade Students in an International Context. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009001.pdf.
- Weiss, I. R., Smith, S., & O’Kelley, S. K. (2009). The Presidential award for excellence in mathematics teaching: Setting the standard. In J. Cai, G. Kaiser, R. Perry, & N.-Y. Wong (Eds.), Effective mathematics teaching from teachers’ perspectives: National and international studies (pp. 281–304). Rotterdam: Sense Publisher.Google Scholar
- Wertheimer, M. (1959). Productive thinking (Enlarged ed.). New York: Harper and Row (Original work published 1945).Google Scholar