Abstract
This comment is on errors involved in the evaluation of lattice parameters in the paper by B. Pati et al., J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 24, 1608 (2013). The correct values of the trigonal lattice parameters of Ba3(VO4)2 (≡ Ba3V2O8) should be a = 5.778(2) and c = 21.27(2) Å.
Data availability
There is no data available.
References
B. Pati, B.C. Sutar, B.N. Parida, P.R. Das, R.N.P. Choudhury, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 524, 1608 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-012-0983-3
M. Azdouz, B. Manoun, R. Essehli, M. Azrour, L. Bih, S. Benmokhtar, A. Ait Hou, P. Lazor, J. Alloys Compd. 498, 42 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.03.066
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All content of this paper is of my own studies. Author declares that the work is original and not be submitted anywhere.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tomaszewski, P.E. Comments on the erroneous calculations presented in the paper on “Dielectric and impedance spectroscopy of barium orthovanadate ceramics, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 24, 1608 (2013)”. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 35, 986 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-024-12759-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-024-12759-2