Skip to main content
Log in

Differences between transient photoconductivity in a-Se sandwich(bulk) and co-planar(interface) structures

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the development of a novel photoconductive digital medical X-ray imaging device, we performed transient photoconductive measurements of both electrons and holes in a-Se structures that were either of a sandwich or co-planar structure. In sandwich type measurements, carriers move through the bulk away from interfaces. In co-planar structures, carriers move near an interface. The photoconductive properties of a-Se have been extensively characterised, using photoconductive time-of-flight (TOF) methods. These measurements have been performed using sandwich structures consisting of a-Se deposited on a bottom conducting substrate and a top thin semi-transparent biasing electrode. A weak, brief (compared to transit times) light pulse is applied to the semi-transparent electrode and the resulting photoconductive transient current pulse is used to determine carrier properties. In a-Se medical X-ray applications, the a-Se layer is quite thick (150–500 \(\upmu\)m) causing long carrier transit times. We were interested in reducing these long photoconductive transit (readout) times by instead moving the collected image charges comparatively short distances (10–20 \(\upmu\)m) laterally between co-planar image pixel electrodes and neighbouring readout electrodes. In the exploration of this concept, we studied experimentally the transient photoconductivity of co-planar a-Se structures. We found, unexpectedly, the transient photoconductivity measurements of the co-planar structures to be quite different from those of the sandwich (bulk) type. We concluded that the co-planar a-Se photoconductivity was totally dominated by a high density of interface trapping states. It is recommended that the measurement of bulk carrier properties via TOF using co-planar structures carefully take into account interface states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H.K. Kim, I.A. Cunningham, Z. Yin, G. Cho, On the development of digital radiography detectors: a review. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 9(4), 86–100 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. D.M. Hunter, Digital radiography by laser scanned readout of amorphous selenium. Master’s thesis, University of Toronto (1996)

  3. N. Reznik, P.T. Komljenovic, S. Germann, J.A. Rowlands, Digital radiography using amorphous selenium: photoconductively activated switch (PAS) readout system. Med. Phys. 35, 1039–1050 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. J.W. Boag, Xeroradiography. Phys. Med. Biol. 18, 3–37 (1973)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. J.R. Haynes, W. Shockley, The mobility and life of injected holes and electrons in germanium. Phys. Rev. 81, 835 (1951)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. E. Hecht, Optics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1987)

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Griot, Introduction to Gaussian Beam Optics (1995/1996)

  8. H.A. Haus, J.R. Melcher, Electromagnetic Fields and Energy (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  9. R.F. Harrington, Field Computation by Moment Methods (MacMillan, New York, 1968)

    Google Scholar 

  10. C.A. Brebbia, J. Dominguez, Boundary Elements (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  11. N.F. Mott, E.A. Davis, Electronic Processes in Non-crystalline Materials, 2nd edn. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ig VonTamm, Uber eine mogliche art der electronenbindung an kristalloberflachen. Z. Phys. Sowjetunion 1, 733–746 (1932)

    Google Scholar 

  13. W. Shockley, On the surface states associated with a periodic potential. Phys. Rev. 56, 317–323 (1939)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. B.M. Bolotovskii, V.Y. Frenkel. I.E. Tamm Selected Papers. (Springer, Berlin, 1991)

  15. R.M. Schaffert, Electrophotography, 2nd edn. (Focal Press Ltd., London, 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  16. D.M. Pai, R.C. Enck, Onsager mechanisms of photogeneration in amorphous selenium. Phys. Rev. B 11, 5163–5174 (1975)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. W.F. Ames, Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, 3rd edn. (Academic Press, New York, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  18. W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling, B.P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C, 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  19. S.M. Sze, Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 2nd edn. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1981)

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.A. Rowlands, D.M. Hunter, N. Araj, X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: a photoinduced discharge readout method for digital mammography. Med. Phys. 18, 421–431 (1991)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. J.A. Rowlands, D.M. Hunter, X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: photoinduced discharge (PID) readout for digital radiography. Med. Phys. 22, 1983–1996 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. S.O. Kasap, Transient photoconductivity measurements on halogenated a-Se\(_{1-x}\)T\(_{x}\) photoconductors. Can. J. Phys. 67, 1053 (1989)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. S.O. Kasap, C. Juhasz, Time of flight drift mobility measurements on chlorine-doped amorphous selenium films. J. Phys. D. 18, 703–720 (1985)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. T. Yoshikawa, T. Nagase, T. Kobayashi, S. Murakami, H. Naito, Analysis of time-of-flight transient photocurrent in organic semiconductors with coplanar-blocking-electrodes configuration. Thin Film Solid Films 516, 2595–2599 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. G. Bratin, E. Pavlica, Characterisation of charge carrier transport in thin organic semiconductor layers by time-of-flight photocurrent measurements. Org. Electron. 64, 117–130 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. N. Qamhieh, M.L. Benkhedir, M. Brinza, G.J. Adriaenssens, Low-temperature steady-state photoconductivity in amorphous selenium films. J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 7(4), 1781–1784 (2005)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. F. Serdouk, M. Benkhedir, Density of states in pure and as doped amorphous selenium determined from transient photoconductivity using Laplace-transform method. Physica B 459, 122–128 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. S. Kasap, C. Koughia, J. Berashevich, R. Johanson, A. Reznik, Charge transport in pure and stablized amorphous selenium: re-examination of the density of states distribution in the mobility gap and the role of defects. J. Mater. Sci. 26, 4644–4658 (2015)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M. Hunter.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hunter, D.M., Rowlands, J.A. Differences between transient photoconductivity in a-Se sandwich(bulk) and co-planar(interface) structures. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 31, 9114–9125 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-020-03441-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-020-03441-4

Navigation