Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Modular-based gradient scaffold design and experimental studies for tissue engineering: enabling customized structures and mechanical properties

  • Materials for life sciences
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In tissue engineering, scaffolds must be designed or tailored with the structures and mechanical behavior appropriate for repairing the defective tissue, which, however, remains unachievable. In this paper, we present a modular scaffold design method and illustrate its effectiveness by using three basic units with different structures and porosities and then rigorously stacking them into six scaffold designs of varying porosities or gradients and thus mechanical behaviors. Samples of designed scaffolds were prepared by the selective laser melting (SLM) technique using Al-Si10-Mg powder and the mechanical properties were examined by compressive testing. In parallel, the mechanical behavior of scaffolds was simulated based on the Johnson–Cook model. Furthermore, a performance optimization strategy was developed based on genetic algorithm, which allows one to design scaffolds from basic units with tailored mechanical properties and porosity. Our results show that among the examined six scaffolds, the triangular modular design has strong load-bearing capacity and energy absorption capacity, and the hexagonal modular design has a good deformation capacity with high energy absorption efficiency. The deformation behavior of the modular design with a radial gradient of porosity and the one with a local-varying porosity show that shear fracture occurs at 45° to the loading direction. Also, the elastic modulus and porosity of the scaffolds designed using the developed optimization strategy are close.

to the targeted values. Taken together, the present study illustrates the modular design method allows one to design scaffolds with tailored structures and mechanical properties, representing a big advance for developing scaffolds in tissue engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Entezari A, Roohani I, Li G, Dunstan CR, Rognon P, Li Q, Jiang X, Zreiqat H (2019) Architectural design of 3D printed scaffolds controls the volume and functionality of newly formed bone. Adv Healthc Mater 8(1):e1801353. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201801353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ning L, Zhu N, Smith A, Rajaram A, Hou H, Srinivasan S, Mohabatpour F, He L, Mclnnes A, Serpooshan V, Papagerakis P, Chen X (2021) Noninvasive three-dimensional in situ and in vivo characterization of bioprinted hydrogel scaffolds using the X-ray Propagation-Based Imaging Technique. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13(22):25611–25623. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c02297

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zimmerling A, Yazdanpanah Z, Cooper DM, Johnston JD, Chen X (2021) 3D printing PCL/nHA bone scaffolds: exploring the influence of material synthesis techniques. Biomater Res 25(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-021-00204-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sadeghianmaryan A, Naghieh S, Sardroud HA, Yazdanpanah Z, Soltani YA, Sernaglia J, Chen X (2020) Extrusion-based printing of chitosan scaffolds and their in vitro characterization for cartilage tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 164:3179–3192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. You F, Wu X, Kelly M, Chen X (2020) Bioprinting and in vitro characterization of alginate dialdehyde–gelatin hydrogel bio-ink. Bio-Des Manuf 3(1):48–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-020-00058-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Naghieh S, Sarker M, Sharma N, Barhoumi Z, Chen X (2020) Printability of 3D printed hydrogel scaffolds: influence of hydrogel composition and printing parameters. Appl Sci 10(1):292. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10010292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu Y, Yang L (2021) Modeling and analysis of material anisotropy-topology effects of 3D cellular structures fabricated by powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Inter J Mech Sci 197:106325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Soufivand AA, Abolfathi N, Hashemi SA, Lee SJ (2019) Prediction of mechanical behavior of 3D bioprinted tissue-engineered scaffolds using finite element method (FEM) analysis. SSRN Electronic J 33:101181. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3431851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liang X, Gao J, Weike Xu, Wang X, Shen Y, Tang J, Cui S, Yang X, Liu Q, Lin Yu, Ding J (2019) Structural mechanics of 3D-printed poly(lactic acid) scaffolds with tetragonal, hexagonal and wheel-like designs. Biofabrication 11(3):035009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab0f59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Little CJ, Bawolin NK, Chen X (2011) Mechanical properties of natural cartilage and tissue-engineered constructs. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 17(4):213–227. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2010.0572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ali D, Sen S (2017) Finite element analysis of mechanical behavior, permeability and fluid induced wall shear stress of high porosity scaffolds with gyroid and lattice-based architectures. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 75:262–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.07.035

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Li Z, Chen Z, Chen X, Zhao R (2021) Effect of unit configurations and parameters on the properties of Ti–6Al–4V unit-stacked scaffolds: a trade-off between mechanical and permeable performance. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 116:104332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Montazerian H, Zhianmanesh M, Davoodi E, Milani AS, Hoorfar M (2017) Longitudinal and radial permeability analysis of additively manufactured porous scaffolds: effect of pore shape and porosity. Mater Des 122(MAY15):146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pei X, Wu L, Zhou C, Fan H, Zhang X (2020) 3D printed titanium scaffolds with homogeneous diamond-like structures mimicking that of the osteocyte microenvironment and its bone regeneration study. Biofabrication 13(1):015008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/abc060

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang XY, Gang F, Leeflang S, Zadpoor AA, Zhou J (2019) Topological design, permeability and mechanical behavior of additively manufactured functionally graded porous metallic biomaterials. Acta Biomater 84(437):452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Montazerian H, Mohamed MGA, Mohaghegh Montazeri M, Kheiri S, Milani AS, Kim K, Hoorfar M (2019) Permeability and mechanical properties of gradient porous PDMS scaffolds fabricated by 3D-printed sacrificial templates designed with minimal surfaces. Acta Biomater 96:149–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.040

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Olubamiji AD, Izadifar Z, Si JL, Cooper DM, Eames BF, Chen DX (2016) Modulating mechanical behaviour of 3D-printed cartilage-mimetic PCL scaffolds: influence of molecular weight and pore geometry. Biofabrication 8(2):025020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/2/025020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kelly CN, Francovich J, Julmi S, Safranski D, Gall K (2019) Fatigue behavior of as-built selective laser melted titanium scaffolds with sheet-based gyroid microarchitecture for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 94:610–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.046

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Maskery I, Aremu AO, Parry L, Wildman RD, Tuck CJ, Ashcroft IA (2018) design, Effective design and simulation of surface-based lattice structures featuring volume fraction and cell type grading. Mater Des 155:220–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Al-Saedi DS, Masood S, Faizan-Ur-Rab M, Alomarah A, Ponnusamy P (2018) Mechanical properties and energy absorption capability of functionally graded F2BCC lattice fabricated by SLM. Mater Des 144:32–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.059

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ning L, Xu Y, Chen X, Schreyer DJ (2016) Influence of mechanical properties of alginate-based substrates on the performance of Schwann cells in culture. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 27(9):898–915. https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2016.1170415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen DXB (2019) Extrusion bioprinting of scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 117–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03460-3

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Pahlevanzadeh F, Bakhsheshi-Rad HR, Ismail AF, Aziz M, Chen XB (2019) Development of PMMA-Mon-CNT bone cement with superior mechanical properties and favorable biological properties for use in bone-defect treatment. Mater Letters 240:9–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.12.049

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bobbert F, Lietaert K, Eftekhari AA, Pouran B, Ahmadi SM, Weinans H, Zadpoor AA (2017) Additively manufactured metallic porous biomaterials based on minimal surfaces: a unique combination of topological, mechanical, and mass transport properties. Acta Biomater 53:572–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Li Y, Jahr H, Pavanram P, Bobbert FSL, Puggi U, Zhang X-Y, Pouran B, Leeflang MA, Weinans H, Zhou J, Zadpoor AA (2019) Additively manufactured functionally graded biodegradable porous iron. Acta Biomater 96:646–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bawolin KN (2010) Modeling material-degradation-induced elastic property of tissue engineering scaffolds. J Biomech Eng 132(11):111001–111007. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yu G, Li Z, Li S, Zhang Q, Wang X (2020) The select of internal architecture for porous Ti alloy scaffold: a compromise between mechanical properties and permeability. Mater Des 192:108754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108754

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang XY, Fang G, Xing LL, Liu W, Zhou J (2018) Effect of porosity variation strategy on the performance of functionally graded Ti-6Al-4V scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Des 157:523–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.07.064

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fan X, Tang Q, Feng Q, Ma S, Song J, Jin M, Guo F, Jin P (2021) Design, mechanical properties and energy absorption capability of graded-thickness triply periodic minimal surface structures fabricated by selective laser melting. Int J Mech Sci 204:106586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang C, Jiang Z, Zhao Li, Guo W, Jiang Z, Li X, Chen G (2021) Mechanical characteristics and deformation mechanism of functionally graded triply periodic minimal surface structures fabricated using stereolithography. Int J Mech Sci 208:106679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bohara RP, Linforth S, Nguyen T, Ghazlan A, Ngo T (2021) Novel lightweight high-energy absorbing auxetic structures guided by topology optimisation. Inter J Mech Sci 211:106793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mahbod M, Asgari M (2019) Elastic and plastic characterization of a new developed additively manufactured functionally graded porous lattice structure: Analytical and numerical models. Inter J Mech Sci 155:248–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.02.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yan C, Hao L, Hussein A, Bubb SL, Young P, Raymont D (2014) Evaluation of light-weight AlSi10Mg periodic cellular lattice structures fabricated via direct metal laser sintering. J Mater Process Technol 214(4):856–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.12.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Yan C, Hao L, Hussein A, Young P, Huang J, Zhu W (2015) Microstructure and mechanical properties of aluminium alloy cellular lattice structures manufactured by direct metal laser sintering. Mater Sci Eng A 628:238–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.01.063

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Yan C, Hao L, Hussein A, Young P (2015) Ti–6Al–4V triply periodic minimal surface structures for bone implants fabricated via selective laser melting. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 51:61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.06.024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang L, Song Bo, Choi S-K, Shi Y (2021) A topology strategy to reduce stress shielding of additively manufactured porous metallic biomaterials. Inter J Mech Sci 197:106331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hipfinger C, Subbiah R, Tahayeri A, Athirasala A, Bertassoni LE (2020) 3D printing of microgel-loaded modular LEGO-like cages as instructive scaffolds for tissue engineering. Adv Mater. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.02.974204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Van Bael S, Chai YC, Truscello S, Moesen M, Kerckhofs G, Van Oosterwyck H, Kruth J-P, Schrooten J (2012) The effect of pore geometry on the in vitro biological behavior of human periosteum-derived cells seeded on selective laser-melted Ti6Al4V bone scaffolds. Acta Biomater 8(7):2824–2834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.04.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Maskery I, Aboulkhair NT, Aremu AO, Tuck CJ, Ashcroft IA, Wildman RD, Hague R (2016) A mechanical property evaluation of graded density Al-Si10-Mg lattice structures manufactured by selective laser melting. Mater Sci Eng: A 670:264–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.06.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Li Z-H, Nie Y-F, Liu B, Kuai Z-Z, Zhao M, Liu F (2020) Mechanical properties of AlSi10Mg lattice structures fabricated by selective laser melting. Mater Des 192:108709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108709

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Biswas N, Ding JL (2015) Numerical study of the deformation and fracture behavior of porous Ti6Al4V alloy under static and dynamic loading. Inter J Impact Eng 82:89–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sobolev AV, Radchenko MV (2016) Use of Johnson–Cook plasticity model for numerical simulations of the SNF shipping cask drop tests. Nuclear Energy Technol 2(4):272–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucet.2016.11.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Banerjee A, Dhar S, Acharyya S, Datta D, Nayak N (2015) Determination of Johnson cook material and failure model constants and numerical modelling of Charpy impact test of armour steel. Mater Sci Eng: A 640:200–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.05.073

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Nirmal RR, Patnaik BSV, Jayaganthan R (2020) Numerical simulation on deformation behaviour of additively manufactured AlSi10Mg alloy. Inter J Mech Mater Eng 14:505–510

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wang Y, Liu F, Zhang X, Zhang K, Wang X, Gan D, Yang B (2021) Cell-size graded sandwich enhances additive manufacturing fidelity and energy absorption. Inter J Mech Sci 211:106798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Fan X, Tang Q, Feng Q, Ma S, Song J, Jin M, Guo F, Jin P (2021) Design, mechanical properties and energy absorption capability of graded-thickness triply periodic minimal surface structures fabricated by selective laser melting. Inter J Mech Sci 204:106586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ashraf AA, Zebarjad SM, Hadianfard MJ (2019) The cross-linked polyvinyl alcohol/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite foam. J Mater Res Technol 8(3):3149–3157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.02.024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Bawolin NK, Dolovich AT, Chen DX, Zhang CW (2015) Characterization of mechanical properties of tissue scaffolds by phase contrast imaging and finite element modeling. J Biomech Eng 137(8):081004. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Afshar M, Anaraki AP, Montazerian H, Kadkhodapour J (2016) Additive manufacturing and mechanical characterization of graded porosity scaffolds designed based on triply periodic minimal surface architectures. J Mech Behavior Biomed Mater 62:481–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.05.027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Chunze Y, Liang H, Ahmed H, David R (2012) Evaluations of cellular lattice structures manufactured using selective laser melting. Inter J Mach Tools Manufacture 62:32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yang E, Leary M, Lozanovski B, David Downing MM (2019) Effect of geometry on the mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V Gyroid structures fabricated via SLM: a numerical study. Mater Des 184:108165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Wu S, Liu X, Yeung KWK, Liu C, Yang X (2014) Biomimetic porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng: R 80:1–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2014.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Choy SY, Sun CN, Leong KF, Wei J (2017) Compressive properties of functionally graded lattice structures manufactured by selective laser melting. Mater Des 131:112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. William VG, Everth HN, Gwendolen R, Russell G (2014) Fabrication and mechanical characterisation of titanium lattices with graded porosity. Metals 4(3):401–409. https://doi.org/10.3390/met4030401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhao S, Li SJ, Wang SG, Hou WT, Li Y, Zhang LC, Hao YL, Yang R, Misra RDK, Murr LE (2018) Compressive and fatigue behavior of functionally graded Ti-6Al-4V meshes fabricated by electron beam melting. Acta Mater 150:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.02.060

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Liu D, Nie W, Li D, Wang W, Zheng L, Zhang J, Zhang J, Peng C, Mo X, He C (2019) 3D printed PCL/SrHA scaffold for enhanced bone regeneration. Chem Eng J 362:269–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Analytical and Testing Center of HIT for the help and support for the compression test.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechatronics Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150000, Heilongjiang, China

    Zhitong Li, Zhaobo Chen & Runchao Zhao

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, S7N5A9, Canada

    Xiongbiao Chen

Authors
  1. Zhitong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhaobo Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiongbiao Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Runchao Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhaobo Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest statement

No conflict of interest exsits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Annela M. Seddon.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Z., Chen, Z., Chen, X. et al. Modular-based gradient scaffold design and experimental studies for tissue engineering: enabling customized structures and mechanical properties. J Mater Sci 57, 17398–17415 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-07682-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-07682-y

Search

Navigation