Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mechanical behavior of multiple-layered gradient cellular scaffolds with constant density: experimental, analytical, and numerical investigation

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multiple-layered scaffolds with diverse three-dimensional architectures have been successfully fabricated using additive manufacturing (AM) and can be used in tissue engineering.

Regarding the regular scaffolds that consist of a connected lattice of solid beams, various researches have been carried out, but multilayered scaffolds with this structure have been less studied. This research tries to investigate the factors affecting the mechanical properties by keeping the percentage of porosity constant. This study aimed to investigate the effect of unit cell shape, struts diameter, and number of layers on the mechanical properties of multiple-layered scaffolds with constant porosity. All the lattice scaffolds were designed in cylindrical form (outer diameter of 30 mm and length of 60 mm) and fabricated from 18 various types with 70% porosity, in single, double, and triple layers using the selective laser sintering (SLS) method. In all the samples, the outer layers had a higher density compared to the inner layers. The mechanical properties of the scaffolds were determined through uniform compression tests. The stress–strain curves of the samples revealed that as the struts diameter increases, the yield strength increases due to the reduction of manufacturing defects. This improvement in yield strength was greater in homogeneous scaffolds than in other scaffolds. Additionally, numerical simulations showed that the maximum strength occurred in the two-layer scaffolds. Furthermore, the position of the maximum radial displacement shifted from the middle region to the top and bottom regions of the scaffold with the increase in the number of layers. Based on the findings of this study, in scaffolds with constant porosity, increasing the number of layers and the diameter of the struts, without changing the Young’s modulus, can increase the yield strength of the scaffolds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vaezi M, Seitz H, Yang S (2013) A review on 3D micro-additive manufacturing technologies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67(5–8):1721–1754

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahn S, Chun D, Kim C (2011) Nanoscale hybrid manufacturing process by nano particle deposition system (NPDS) and focused ion beam (FIB). CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60(1):583–586

    Google Scholar 

  3. Petrochenko PE, Torgersen J, Gruber P, Hicks LA, Zheng J, Kumar G, Narayan RJ, Goering PL, Liska R, Stampfl J (2015) Laser 3D printing with sub-microscale resolution of porous elastomeric scaffolds for supporting human bone stem cells. Adv Healthc Mater 4(5):739–747

    Google Scholar 

  4. Maskery I, Sturm L, Aremu AO, Panesar A, Williams CB, Tuck CJ, Wildman RD, Ashcroft IA, Hague RJM (2018) Insights into the mechanical properties of several triply periodic minimal surface lattice structures made by polymer additive manufacturing. Polymer 152:62–71

    Google Scholar 

  5. Refai K, Montemurro M, Brugger C, Saintier N (2019) Determination of the effective elastic properties of titanium lattice structures. Mech Adv Mater Struct 27:1966–1982

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pasquale GD, Montemurro M, Catapano A, Bertolino G, Revelli L (2018) Cellularstructures from additive processes: design, homogenization and experimental validation. Proc Struct Integr 8:75–82

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2001) Collapse of truss core sandwich beams in 3-point bending. Int J Solid Struct 38(36–37):6275–6305

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang J, Evans AG, Dharmasena K, Wadley HNG (2003) On the performance of truss panels with Kagome cores. Int J Solid Struct 40(25):6981–6988

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kooistra GW, Deshpande VS, Wadley HNG (2004) Compressive behavior of age hardenable tetrahedral lattice truss structures made from aluminium. Acta Mater 52(14):4229–4237

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rathbun HJ, Wei Z, He MY, Zok FW, Evans AG, Sypeck DJ, Wadley HNG (2004) Measurement and simulation of the performance of a lightweight metallic sandwich structure with a tetrahedral truss core. J Appl Mech 71(3):368–374

    Google Scholar 

  11. Queheillalt DT, Wadley HNG (2005) Cellular metal lattices with hollow trusses. Acta Mater 53(2):303–313

    Google Scholar 

  12. Queheillalt DT, Wadley HNG (2005) Pyramidal lattice truss structures with hollow trusses. Mater Sci Eng A 397(1–2):132–137

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1997) Cellular solids: structure and properties. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  14. Luxner MH, Woesz A, Stampfl J, Fratzl P, Pettermann HE (2009) A finite element study on the effects of disorder in cellular structures. Acta Biomater 5(1):381–390

    Google Scholar 

  15. Parthasarathy J, Starly B, Raman S, Christensen A (2010) Mechanical evaluation of porous titanium (Ti6Al4V) structures with electron beam melting (EBM). J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 3(3):249–259

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hedayati R, Sadighi M, Mohammadi-Aghdam M, Zadpoor AA (2016) Mechanical properties of regular porous biomaterials made from truncated cube repeating unit cells: analytical solutions and computational models. Mater Sci Eng C 60:163–183

    Google Scholar 

  17. Campoli G, Borleffs M, Yavari SA, Wauthle R, Weinans H, Zadpoor AA (2013) Mechanical properties of open-cell metallic biomaterials manufactured using additive manufacturing. Mater Des 49:957–965

    Google Scholar 

  18. Babaee S, Jahromi BH, Ajdari A, Nayeb-Hashemi H, Vaziri A (2012) Mechanical properties of open-cell rhombic dodecahedron cellular structures. Acta Mater 60(6):2873–2885

    Google Scholar 

  19. Borleffs M (2012) Finite element modeling to predict bulk mechanical properties of 3D printed metal foams. Delft University of Technology, TU Delft

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shulmeister V, Van der Burg M, Van der Giessen E, Marissen R (1998) A numerical study of large deformations of low-density elastomeric open-cell foams. Mech Mater 30(2):125–140

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hedayati R, Hosseini-Toudeshky H, Sadighi M, Mohammadi-Aghdam M, Zadpoor AA (2016) Computational prediction of the fatigue behavior of additively manufactured porous metallic biomaterials. Int J Fatigue 84:67–79

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hedayati R, Sadighi M, Mohammadi-Aghdam M, Zadpoor AA (2016) Mechanical behavior of additively manufactured porous biomaterials made from truncated cuboctahedron unit cells. Int J Mech Sci 106:19–38

    Google Scholar 

  23. Warren W, Kraynik A (1997) Linear elastic behavior of a low-density Kelvin foam with open cells. J Appl Mech 64:787–794

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zheng X, Lee H, Weisgraber TH, Shusteff M, DeOtte J, Duoss EB, Kuntz JD, Biener MM, Ge Q, Jackson JA (2014) Ultralight, ultrastiff mechanical metamaterials. Science 344(6190):1373–1377

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hedayati R, Sadighi M, Mohammadi-Aghdam M, Zadpoor AA (2016) Mechanics of additively manufactured porous biomaterials based on the rhombicuboctahedron unit cell. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 53:272–294

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ptochos E, Labeas G (2012) Elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio determination of microlattice cellular structures by analytical, numerical and homogenisation methods. J Sandw Struct Mater 14(5):597–626

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ptochos E, Labeas G (2012) Shear modulus determination of cuboid metallic open-lattice cellular structures by analytical, numerical and homogenisation methods. J Strain 48(5):415–429

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ahmadi S, Campoli G, Amin YS, Sajadi B, Wauthle R, Schrooten J, Weinans H, Zadpoor AA (2014) Mechanical behavior of regular open-cell porous biomaterials made of diamond lattice unit cells. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 34:106–115

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hedayati R, Sadighi M, Mohammadi-Aghdam M, Zadpoor AA (2016) Effect of massmultiple counting on the elastic properties of opencell regular porous biomaterials. Mater Des 89:9–20

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bitsche R, Daxner T, B¨ohm HJ (2005) Space-Filling Polyhedra as Mechanical Models for Solidified Dry Foams. Technische Universit¨at Wien

  31. Buffel B, Desplentere F, Bracke K, Verpoest I (2014) Modelling open cell-foams based on the Weaire–Phelan unit cell with a minimal surface energy approach. Int J Solids Struct 51(19–20):3461–3470

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kraynik AM, Reinelt DA (1996) Linear elastic behavior of dry soap foams. J Colloid Interface Sci 181(2):511–520

    Google Scholar 

  33. Feng YF, Wang L, Li X, Ma ZS, Zhang Y, Zhang ZY, Lei W (2012) Influence of architecture of β-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds on biological performance in repairing segmental bone defects. PLoS ONE 7(11):e49955

    Google Scholar 

  34. Das A, Botchwey E (2011) Evaluation of angiogenesis and osteogenesis. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 17(6):403–414

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gérard C, Doillon CJ (2010) Facilitating tissue infiltration and angiogenesis in a tubular collagen scaffold. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 93(2):615–624

    Google Scholar 

  36. Surmeneva M, Surmenev R, Chudinova E, Koptioug A, Tkachev M, Gorodzha S, Rannar LE (2017) Fabrication of multiple-layered gradient cellular metal scaffold via electron beam melting for segmental bone reconstruction. Mater Des 133:195–204

    Google Scholar 

  37. Khanaki HR, Rahmati S, Nikkhoo M, Haghpanahi M, Akbari J (2020) Numerical and analytical simulation of multilayer cellular scaffolds. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 42(5):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  38. Eryildiz M (2023) Fabrication of drug-loaded 3D-printed bone scaffolds with radial gradient porosity. J Mater Eng Perform 32:4249–4257

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zadpoor AA, Hedayati R (2016) Analytical relationships for prediction of the mechanical properties of additively manufactured porous biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 104A:3164–3174

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ouyang P, Dong H, He X, Cai X, Wang Y, Li J, Li H, Jin Z (2019) Hydromechanical mechanism behind the effect of pore size of porous titanium scaffolds on osteoblast response and bone ingrowth. Mater Des 183:108151

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ran Q, Yang W, Hu Y, She X, Yu Y, Xiang Y, Cai K (2018) Osteogenesis of 3D printed porous Ti6Al4V implants with different pore sizes. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 84:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  42. Taniguchi N, Fujibayashi S, Takemoto M, Sasaki K, Otsuki B, Nakamura T, Matsushita T, Kokubo T, Matsuda S (2016) Effect of pore size on bone ingrowth into porous titanium implants fabricated by additive manufacturing: an in vivo experiment. Mat Sci Eng C-Mater Biol Appl 59:690–701

    Google Scholar 

  43. Deng F, Liu L, Li Z et al (2021) 3D printed Ti6Al4V bone scaffolds with different pore structure effects on bone ingrowth. J Biol Eng 15:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13036-021-00255-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Shahrzadi M, Davazdah Emami M, Akbarzadeh AH (2022) Heat transfer in BCC lattice materials: conduction, convection, and radiation. Compos Struct 284:115–159

    Google Scholar 

  45. Box GE, Hunter WG, Hunter JS (2005) Statistics for experimenters: design, innovation, and discovery, 2nd edn. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wieding J, Souffrant R, Mittelmeier W, Bader R (2013) Finite element analysis on the biomechanical stability of open porous titanium scaffolds for large segmental bone defects under physiological load conditions. Med Eng Phys 35(4):422–432

    Google Scholar 

  47. Daxner T (2010) Finite element modeling of cellular materials. In: Altenbach H, Öchsner A (eds) Cellular and porous materials in structures and processes. Springer, Vienna, pp 47–106

    Google Scholar 

  48. Khanaki HR, Rahmati S, Nikkhoo M, Haghpanahi M, Akbari J (2020) Numerical simulation of multilayer cellular scaffolds with 3D and 1D elements. Adv Des Manuf Technol 13(6):39–47

    Google Scholar 

  49. Yavari SA, Wauthlé R, Van der Stok J, Riemslag AC, Janssen M, Mulier M, Kruth JP, Schrooten J, Weinans H, Zadpoor AA (2013) Fatigue behavior of porous biomaterials manufactured using selective laser melting. Mater Sci Eng C 33(8):4849–4858

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ushijima K, Cantwell WJ, Mines RAW, Tsopanos S, Smith M (2011) An investigation into the compressive properties of stainless steel micro-lattice structures. J Sandwich Struct Mater 13(3):303–329

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zhou WY, Lee SH, Wang M, Cheung WL, Ip WY (2008) Selective laser sintering of porous tissue engineering scaffolds from poly(Llactide)/carbonated hydroxyapatite nanocomposite microspheres. J Mater Sci Mater Med 19(7):2535–2540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-007-3089-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Yeong WY, Chua CK, Leong KF, Chandrasekaran M (2004) Rapid prototyping in tissue engineering: challenges and potential. Trends Biotechnol 22(12):643–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TIBTECH.2004.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Wen CE, Yamada Y, Nouri A, Hodgson PD (2007) Porous titanium with porosity gradients for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Forum 539–543:720–725

    Google Scholar 

  54. Li S, Zhao S, Hou W, Teng C, Hao Y, Li Y, Yang R, Misra RDK (2016) Functionally graded Ti6Al4V meshes with high strength and energy absorption. Adv Eng Mater 18(1):34–38

    Google Scholar 

  55. Li Y, Yang C, Zhao H, Qu S, Li X, Li Y (2014) New developments of Ti-based alloys for biomedical applications. Materials 7:1709–1800

    Google Scholar 

  56. Zhang W, Soman P, Meggs K, Qu X, Chen S (2013) Tuning the poisson’s ratio of biomaterials for investigating cellular response. Acta Biomater 23(25):3226–3232

    Google Scholar 

  57. Adhikari J, Roy A, Chanda A, Gouripriya D, Thomas S, Ghosh M, Kim J, Saha P (2023) Effects of surface patterning and topography on cellular functions of tissue engineered scaffolds with special reference to 3D bioprinting. Biomater Sci 11:1236–1269. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2BM01499H

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yadegar-E-Imam Khomeini (RAH) Shahre Rey Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

    H. R. Khanaki

  2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

    M. Nikkhoo & S. Rahmati

  3. School of Physical Therapy and Graduate Institute of Rehabilitation Science, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

    M. Nikkhoo

  4. Biomechanics Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science & Technology, Tehran, Iran

    M. Haghpanahi

  5. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

    J. Akbari

Authors
  1. H. R. Khanaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Nikkhoo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Rahmati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Haghpanahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. Akbari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. R. Khanaki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or nonfinancial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge, or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in their manuscript.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Marcelo Areias Trindade.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khanaki, H.R., Nikkhoo, M., Rahmati, S. et al. Mechanical behavior of multiple-layered gradient cellular scaffolds with constant density: experimental, analytical, and numerical investigation. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 46, 275 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-024-04741-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-024-04741-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation