Abstract
In this work, we examine the photoelectrochemical response of TiO2 layers prepared by reactive DC sputter deposition on conductive glass (FTO). We show that adequate conditioning of the FTO by a very thin (few nm thick) Ti interlayer and optimizing the sputter parameters, compact TiO2 anatase layers can be produced that reach incident photocurrent conversion efficiencies (IPCE) maxima peaking at 75%. This is outperforming many of the best titania photoanode structures (including high surface area 1D and 3D titania structures). The key role of the interlayer is to promote the crystallization of titania in the anatase form during the annealing process (as opposed to rutile in the interlayer-free case). Without this interlayer, an IPCE maxima of ≈43% is obtained for otherwise identically processed electrodes. The present work thus describes a most simple straightforward approach for fabricating compact, high-efficiency TiO2 (anatase) photoanodes.
Graphical abstract
![](http://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10853-022-07420-4/MediaObjects/10853_2022_7420_Figa_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Over the past decades, titanium dioxide has attracted wide interest for its use in photocatalysis and photoelectrochemistry (PEC), particularly to produce self-cleaning devices, for pollution degradation, or as electron conductor in various types of solar cells [1]. A most widely investigated photocatalytic application is water splitting without or with an applied electrochemical potential (i.e., in a PEC system) to produce di-hydrogen from water. The key element of a PEC system is a semiconductor, where upon super-band gap illumination, electron–hole pairs are generated on conduction and valence band, respectively. These charge carriers are then separated by the applied field and transferred to back contact and electrolyte, respectively. In a photoanode, electrons migrate to the back contact and holes react at the photoanode surface with the electrolyte in an oxidation reaction. Among various semiconductor materials for photoanodes, TiO2—the classic photocatalyst—still attracts wide attention due to its nearly unrivaled set of properties (especially a very high photocorrosion stability) [2, 3]. Back-contacted titania layers have been produced over the years by many different techniques. Frequently investigated electrodes were back contacted single crystals, anodic layers, and most commonly layers deposited on transparent electrodes—typical examples are layers produced by doctor blading or spray pyrolysis on transparent conducting glass (such as FTO) [4,5,6,7,8].
In more recent years, 1D or 3D geometries, such as tubes, wires, rods, flakes, etc. of TiO2 have become extensively investigated [3, 9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Compared to bulk or compact TiO2 layers, electrodes made of 3D assemblies of nanostructured TiO2 are widely considered more effective electrodes as they provide a higher surface area, a higher number of reaction sites, and the nanoscale geometries may allow for orthogonal (beneficial) electron/hole separation [22]. In photoelectrochemical investigations, these advantages of 3D morphologies have been extensively reported to provide a significantly higher solar-to-electricity conversion efficiencies than obtained for compact films [22]. This is frequently expressed quantities by the incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) [23,24,25] that may typically range from 5–60% for differently produced titania samples. Among different factors, the IPCE for titania photoanode depends strongly on the crystal structure of TiO2. Titanium dioxide is typically found in the crystalline forms of rutile, anatase or brookite. In general, the anatase polymorph (in spite of a higher band gap of ≈3.2 vs. Eg ≈ 3.0 eV of rutile) is the best photoanode, due to a better electron mobility and conductivity. In view of the electrode geometry, typical IPCE data (acquired under moderate anodic bias and in the UV range) are 5–20% for compact films [9, 21, 26]. For 3D structures, typical IPCE values are reported as 15–35% for nanotubes [9,10,11, 21], 40–65% for nanoflakes [18, 27], 15–30% for nanowires [1, 22], and 2–8% for compacted nanoparticle photoanodes [9, 29, 30]. The better IPCE performance for the 3D structures often is ascribed to the higher surface area of the corresponding geometries. Nevertheless, in this simple explanation, it is often overlooked that for anatase considerable photocurrent recombination via surface states has been reported [31]. In other words, in view of this recombination reaction, an enhancement of the surface area is detrimental and the benefit (larger charge carrier exchange area) versus the drawback (much higher number of surface states) should be properly evaluated. Here, we address exactly this point by examining different factors that may optimize compact anatase TiO2 layers on FTO—this then allows a (re)assessment of literature reports on the relative efficiency of different (anatase) photoanode geometries.
Over the years, different approaches have been developed for the production of compact TiO2 thin layers, such as wet chemical deposition methods (spin-coating, spray coating, dip-coating), chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and physical vapor deposition (PVD) (thermal evaporation, ion/electron beam evaporation and reactive sputtering) [32]. Among them, the reactive magnetron sputtering technique notably stands out for its defined features, a high packing density and a great deal of control over the intrinsic material properties, and the production of precise and uniform thickness layers [16, 17, 32]. Depending on the exact deposition parameters, layers of anatase, rutile or mixed phase crystal structures have been reported. The crystallinity and particularly the crystal phase of the sputtered titania layers is significantly influenced by the basic sputtering conditions such as total pressure, oxygen partial pressure, substrate negative bias, substrate temperature and discharge current [33,34,35].
In spite of numberous investigations [36], systematic investigations of sputter parameters and the resulting performance of titania photoanodes seem to be scarce. In the present work, we therefore investigate DC-sputtered anatase TiO2 layers in view of their annealing and their back contacting on the performance of photoanodes, with the goal to achieve a maximum IPCE.
Most notably, we introduce a conditioning approach of the FTO with a thin metallic Ti layer before titania sputtering that yields reliably to full anatase layers. For such layers, we find IPCE values of up to 75.8% in aqueous electrolytes (without any hole capture agent)—these are values that are similar or even superior to most advanced 3D nanostructured photoanodes.
Experimental
FTO substrate preparation
TiO2 compact layers were fabricated on fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO, 7 Ω/sq., Pilkington) by reactive DC magnetron sputtering (DC-MS). The FTO substrates were preliminarily cleaned by sonication in acetone, ethanol and deionized (DI) water in sequence for 15 min each, and then dried in a N2 stream. Subsequently, they were mounted in a load-lock (LL), whose pressure was then reduced until equal to that of the main sputter chamber (SC, Createc—SP-P-US-6 M-3Z). The cleaned substrates were afterwards transferred to the SC ready for the sputtering process.
Ti target cleaning
Prior to film deposition on FTO, a target (Ti, 5″, 99.995%, dia. 127 mm × 8 mm, HMW—Hauner GmbH & Co. KG) cleaning process was implemented under pure Ar to eliminate the passivating oxide layer mainly due to previous sputtering. Firstly, the base pressure (Pb) was adjusted to 1.5 × 10–7 mbar and the turbo-molecular pump speed reduced from 100 to 20%. With the low pump speed, Ar gas (4 sccm) was then introduced into the SC. As the working pressure (Pw) reached and stabilized at 1.4 × 10–3 mbar, DC power was applied from 50 to 500 W for 10 min with a closed shutter for the purpose of target cleaning.
Deposition of TiO2 and TiO2/Ti layers
TiO2 layers were deposited by reactive DC-MS method with the cleaned Ti target in SC. Ar gas (10 sccm) and O2 gas (5 sccm) were filled into the SC until Pw stabilized at 6.7 × 10–3 mbar. Oxygen partial pressure was set as 33.3%. The gases were precisely controlled by mass flow controllers (MFC, MKS Instruments, Inc.) and the distance between the target and the substrates was kept at 115 mm. Reactive sputtering was carried out at room temperature and with a circulating cooling water system for magnetron cooling. To grow uniformly thick TiO2 layers on top, the sputtering process was performed at 500 W for an optimized time, with the substrate holder rotating at 20 rpm.
For TiO2/Ti samples, a thin layer of Ti metal was deposited with the same target prior to TiO2 compact oxide layer deposition. The substrate holder was firstly set to rotate (50 rpm) for uniform deposition. Subsequently, 150 W of DC power was applied for 10 s to accomplish the deposition of a Ti interlayer on a FTO glass.
The deposited layers on FTO were then annealed, in a tubular furnace, at different temperatures for 1 h in air.
Characterization
The surface morphology and cross-sections of the prepared TiO2 layers were studied by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, Hitachi S-4800).
The crystal structure of the TiO2 layers was identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD, X ‘pert Philips MPD with a Panalytical X ‘celerator detector) using graphite monochromatized Cu Kα radiation (wavelength 1.5406 Å). The approximate size of TiO2 crystallites was calculated by the Scherrer equation [28, 37, 38].
For IPCE of the TiO2 layers, transient photocurrent response was recorded under chopped light illumination for each sample. The photocurrent measurements were performed in a 3-electrode cell comprising a TiO2 sample as a working electrode, Pt foil as a counter electrode, and an Ag/AgCl reference electrode. As an electrolyte an air-saturated solution of 0.1 M Na2SO4 in either pure DI water was used. During the measurements a potential of 0.5 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) was constantly applied to the working electrode.
IPCE spectra in the wavelength range of 300–600 nm were recorded using an Oriel 6365 150 W Xe-lamp as a light source. From the broad emission spectrum of the lamp, monochromatic radiation at specific wavelengths was produced by an Oriel Cornerstone 7400 1/8 m monochromator.
Voltage dependent photocurrent data were recorded in the range of −1 to 1 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) with potential steps of 100 mV at a constant wavelength of 325 nm using a Jaissle IMP 88 PC potentiostat.
Results and discussion
Figure 1a–c shows SEM images of a typical TiO2 layer sputtered on a SiO2 or an FTO substrate under mixed gas conditions (\(P_{{{\text{O}}_{{2}} }}\) = 33%) for 4 h. This sputter time results in a thickness of the TiO2 layers on FTO and SiO2 of approx. 200 nm. Then, a set of samples was prepared using different oxide sputter times to systematically vary the sample thickness. All layers are relatively flat with some structural features that become increasingly defined with oxide thickness. The SEM images in Fig. 1d show cross-sections of layers on FTO for different sputter times. Thickness variations from ≈50 to ≈400 nm were established by the different sputtering times from 1 to 8 h, respectively. As evident from Fig. 1d, with an increase in sputter time, a reasonably linear increase in film thickness is obtained.
a, b, c SEM images of sputtered TiO2 layer with a Ti interlayer. a Surface on SiO2, b cross-section on FTO, and c Cross-section on SiO2. d SEM images of sputtered TiO2 layers for various sputter times with Ti interlayer in different thickness and compilation of thickness vs. sputter time. e XRD patterns for different TiO2 layer thickness (+ Ti). f, g IPCE spectra (left) for different TiO2 thickness (+ Ti) on FTO in 0.1 M Na2SO4 aqueous electrolyte. Evaluation of the band gap energy from the IPCE spectra (right)
After annealing all the layers in air at 450 °C for 1 h, XRD diffraction patterns were acquired as shown in Fig. 1e. For the thinnest layer of ≈50 nm thickness only a very weak diffraction signal corresponding to TiO2 crystalline phases could be detected (so, average crystallite size is calculated as 7.8 nm). For the thicker layers, clearly the presence of anatase phase was evident. The average crystallite size estimated from the diffraction peaks using the Scherrer equation was 17.2–21.3 nm (as expected slightly increasing with increasing sputter-time).
IPCE spectra for the series of samples in Fig. 1f were then measured in 0.1 M Na2SO4. From the spectra, it is clear that the magnitude of the photocurrent maximum (at approx. 320 nm) increases with the layer thickness from IPCE ≈ 30% for the 50 nm thick layers to ≈75% for the 200 nm thick layers. I.e., for these layers the observed increase in IPCE can be ascribed tao an increasing total light absorption. For the sample of an even higher thickness of 400 nm, however, a drop in the IPCE magnitude occurs. This decrease at thicknesses > 200 nm may be due to an increasing transport path of charge carriers to the back contact. This transport path length is even more increased for shorter wavelength as the absorption coefficient in the deep UV is even higher. These aspects on IPCE maximum and absorption length are explained in previous work in more detail [9].
The spectra in Fig. 1g can be replotted to evaluate the indirect band gap (Eg) of the titania layers. Such an evaluation for an indirect band-gap yields for all samples with > 50 nm thickness Eg = 3.2 eV. This value is well in line with literature data reported for anatase. Evidently, in the case of the 50 nm thick oxide film, the determination of the optical band-gap yields Eg ≈3.0 eV which fits in fact to rutile [39]. Please note that the XRD peaks in Fig. 1e are very weak and do not allow for an unambiguous assessment of the crystalline form of this sample.
Most importantly, please note that an IPCE maximum of ≈75% for the 200 nm thick anatase layer is in the order of 3 times higher than commonly reported for compact titania layers and is in the same range of the best 3D structures.
In a next set of experiments, we kept the thickness of the sputtered layer constant at the optimized value of 200 nm and annealed the layers at different temperatures from 250 to 800 °C.
Figure 2a shows XRD diffraction spectra for the layers treated at different annealing temperatures. For all annealing temperatures from 250 to 800 °C, clear peaks of anatase (and tin oxide) can be seen. The crystallinity increased with increasing temperature up to 450 °C, as visible also from the average crystal size. From the Scherrer equation we obtain average crystallite size 18.6–21.2 nm (in general increasing with the annealing temperature). Importantly, for annealing temperature of 700 °C and higher, tin oxide peaks become clearly apparent because Sn of the FTO glass starts diffusing at a significant rate into the TiO2 layer [40].
Figure 2b shows IPCE spectra for the samples annealed at different temperatures. The magnitude of the IPCE increases with increasing annealing temperature up to 550 °C –; however, for 700 °C and higher, the magnitude of photocurrents drops significantly. In view of the XRD results, evidently the doping of the TiO2 with Sn species is detrimental for the efficiency of the photoanode. Please note that for the sputtered layers and higher annealing conditions, we do not observe a conversion of the anatase films to rutile—in the literature this conversion is often given as a reason for a decay of photoanodes annealed a T > 700 °C—based on our results this must however rather be ascribed to detrimental Sn-doping.
Figure 2c show a re-plot of the IPCE spectra for the evaluation of the band-gaps of the titania films. Evidently, for all our layers we obtain 3.2 eV, i.e., the typical band-gap of anatase (fully consistent with the XRD data). As mentioned, all data of this work were obtained using a Ti-interlayer (of a few nm thickness) sputtered on the FTO prior to reactive sputtering for the oxide layers. The use of this interlayer was based on some preliminary experiments in our lab regarding the conditioning FTO [41]. Without this thin interlayer, drastically different results are obtained. Not only the crystallinity of the layers after annealing are affected but also the IPCE is significantly reduced. This is illustrated in Fig. 3a and b. Figure 3a shows XRD data for 200 nm thick titania layers that were sputtered on FTO without the Ti-interlayer. In contrast to the data in Fig. 2a, the layer annealed at 550 °C contains significant amounts of rutile and the layer annealed at 800 °C is entirely converted to rutile. (If the layers are sputtered using the thin metallic interlayer, the oxide consists in both cases entirely of anatase (see Fig. 2a)). Figure 3b shows photocurrent spectra for the layers sputtered without the interlayer. The IPCE that can be obtained from the Ti-interlayer-free TiO2 sample after annealing at 550 °C is only 43% instead of 75% (with the interlayer). For the sample annealed at 800 °C, the IPCE drops from ≈30 to 23% without the interlayer. For both annealing temperatures (without the interlayer), the band-gap results as Eg ≈3.0 eV which corresponds to rutile instead of anatase.
a XRD patterns for 200 nm TiO2 layer on FTO (without a Ti interlayer) annealed at 550 °C (red) and 800 °C (black) in air. b, c IPCE spectra (left) for 200 nm TiO2 layers (without Ti) in 0.1 M Na2SO4 aqueous electrolyte at 550 °C (red) and 800 °C (black) in air. Evaluation of the band gap energy (right) from the IPCE spectra
Overall, it is clear that a main effect of the interlayer is that it leads to preferential anatase crystallization of the titania layers during the annealing process.
Finally, we examined the effect of the applied voltage on the photocurrent of the TiO2 layers of a different thickness. Figure 4 shows Iph at different voltages measured at a fixed light wavelength of 350 nm. Clearly, all layers show a behavior that is roughly in line with Iph α (U − Ufb)0.5 [24, 25]. If the data is replotted according to Iph2 vs. U (Fig. 4, inset), the straight lines provide Ufb of ≈ −0.2 V. This is well in line with data provided in the literature for flat band data of TiO2 in a neutral electrolyte [10, 42]. Evidently, the limiting photocurrent magnitude is provided by the layer thickness up to ≈200 nm. I.e., in this thickness range of layers the maximum photocurrent is limited by the physical thickness of the sputtered TiO2 layer rather than the depth of the space charge layer.
Overall, the most remarkable point of the present work is that the work shows that it is possible by optimizing the sputtering and annealing conditions to fabricate compact TiO2 (anatase) layers that are as efficient as photoanodes as most effective mesoporous layers or 1D or 3D structures used in literature as photoelectrodes. In other words, the present work shows that gain in surface area for anatase electrodes is not key to maximize the photocurrent. The reason for this is likely that for anatase surfaces recombination losses seriously limit the maximum photocurrent [31].
From the present work, it seems that the main practical limitation for compact layers is the quality of the anatase layers (phase purity and crystallinity) produced by reactive sputtering on FTO. Clearly, the use of a thin Ti interlayer drastically aids to overcome this drawback and this enables compact photoanodes of a quality similar to 3D electrodes.
Conclusions
In this work, we examine the photoresponse of TiO2 photoanodes prepared by reactive DC sputter deposition on conductive glass (FTO).
The results presented in this work show that by optimizing the sputter parameters as well as the annealing treatment of the compact sputtered TiO2 layers, incident IPCE values of 75% can be reached—this is comparable to the best 3D structures reported. This maximum efficiency is obtained for 200 nm thick anatase layers after annealing at 450–550 °C in air. For higher annealing temperatures, we find detrimental incorporation of Sn into anatase.
We also point out the importance of using a very thin (few nm thick) Ti interlayer on the FTO before depositing the oxide species by reactive sputtering. The interlayer promotes the crystallization of anatase in the annealing process (as opposed to rutile in the interlayer-free case). Or most directly, without the interlayer an IPCE of only 43% instead of 75% is obtained for otherwise identically processed electrodes.
Most remarkable is that an IPCE value of 75% is in the range of highest achieved photocurrent conversion efficiencies using 1D or 3D structures (such as nanowires, nanotubes, etc.). This shows the high potential for such sputter deposited layers fabricated under optimized conditions.
References
Yao T, An X, Han H, Chen JQ, Li C (2018) Photoelectrocatalytic materials for solar water splitting. Adv Energy Mater 8:1–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201800210
Ozkan S, Yoo J, Nguyen NT, Mohajernia S, Zazpe R, Prikryl J, Macak JM, Schmuki P (2018) Spaced TiO2 nanotubes enable optimized Pt atomic layer deposition for efficient photocatalytic H2 generation. ChemistryOpen 7:797–802. https://doi.org/10.1002/open.201800172
Mohajernia S, Hejazi S, Mazare A, Nguyen T, Schmuki P (2017) Photoelectrochemical H2 generation from suboxide TiO2 nanotubes: visible-light absorption versus conductivity. Chem Eur J 23:12406–12411. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201702245
Gebeyehu D, Brabec CJ, Sariciftci NS (2002) Solid-state organic/inorganic hybrid solar cells based on conjugated polymers and dye-sensitized TiO2 electrodes. Thin Solid Films 403–404:271–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(01)01580-2
Gebeyehu D, Brabec CJ, Sariciftci NS, Vangeneugden D, Kiebooms R, Vanderzande D, Kienberger F, Schindler H (2001) Hybrid solar cells based on dye-sensitized nanoporous TiO2 electrodes and conjugated polymers as hole transport materials. Synth Met 125(3):279–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-6779(01)00395-2
Murugadoss G, Mizuta G, Tanaka S, Nishino H, Umeyama T, Imahori H, Ito S (2014) Light stability tests of methylammonium and formamidinium Pb-halide perovskites for solar cell applications. APL Mater 2:081511. https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAP.54.08KF08
Roose B, Gödel KC, Pathak S, Sadhanala A, Baena JPC, Wilts BD, Snaith HJ, Wiesner U, Grätzel M, Steiner U, Abate A (2016) Enhanced efficiency and stability of perovskite solar cells through Nd-doping of mesostructured TiO2. Adv Energy Mater 6:1501868. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201501868
Huang X, Hu Z, Xu J, Wang P, Zhang J, Zhu Y (2017) Low-temperature processed ultrathin TiO2 for efficient planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells. Electrochim Acta 231(77–84):0013–4686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.02.028
Lynch RP, Ghicov A, Schmuki P (2010) A Photo-electrochemical investigation of self-organized TiO2 nanotubes. J Electrochem Soc 157:76–84. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3276455
Denisov N, Yoo J, Schmuki P (2019) Effect of different hole scavengers on the photoelectrochemical properties and photocatalytic hydrogen evolution performance of pristine and Pt-decorated TiO2 nanotubes. Electrochim Acta 319:61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.06.173
Denisov N, Qin S, Cha G, Yoo J, Schmuki P (2020) Photoelectrochemical properties of “increasingly dark” TiO2 nanotube arrays. J Electroanal Chem, 114098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114098.
Rani S, Suri P, Mehra RM (2011) Mechanism of charge recombination and IPCE in ZnO dye-sensitized solar cells having I−/I3- and Br−/Br3- redox couple. Prog Photovoltaics Res Appl 19:180–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.1011
Guo XZ, Luo YH, Zhang YD, Huang XC, Li DM, Meng QB (2010) Study on the effect of measuring methods on incident photon-to-electron conversion efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells by home-made setup. Rev Sci Instrum, 81. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3488456.
Trupke T, Würfel P, Uhlendorf I (2000) Dependence of the photocurrent conversion efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells on the incident light intensity. J Phys Chem B 104:11484–11488. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp001392z
Halme J, Boschloo G, Hagfeldt A, Lund P (2008) spectral characteristics of light harvesting, electron injection, and steady-state charge collection in pressed TiO2 dye solar cells. J Phys Chem C 112:5623–5637. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp711245f
Kruth A, Peglow S, Quade A, Pohl MM, Foest R, Brüser V, Weltmann KD (2014) Structural and Photoelectrochemical Properties of DC Magnetron-Sputtered TiO2 Layers on FTO. J Phys Chem C 118(43):25234–25244. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp507487c
He C, Li XZ, Graham N, Wang Y (2006) Preparation of TiO2/ITO and TiO2/Ti photoelectrodes by magnetron sputtering for photocatalytic application. Appl Catal A: Gen 305:54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2006.02.051
Shahvardanfard F, Cha G, Denisov N, Osuagwuaand B, Schmuk P (2021) Photoelectrochemical performance of facet-controlled TiO2 nanosheets grown hydrothermally on FTO. Nanoscale Adv 3:747–754. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NA01017K
Duan Y, Zhou S, Chen Z, Luo J, Zhang M, Wang F, Xu T, Wang C (2018) Hierarchical TiO2 nanowire/microflower photoanode modified with Au nanoparticles for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. Catal Sci Technol 8:1395–1403. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CY02641B
Cho I, Chen Z, Forman AJ, Kim D, Rao PM, Jaramillo TF, Zheng X (2011) Branched TiO2 nanorods for photoelectrochemical hydrogen production. Nano Lett 11(11):4978–4984. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl2029392
Denisov N, Zhou X, Cha G, Schmuki P (2021) Photocurrent conversion efficiency of TiO2 nanotube photoanodes in dependence of illumination intensity. Electrochim Acta 377:137988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2021.137988
Wang X, Li Z, Shi J, Yu Y (2014) Branched TiO2 nanorods for photoelectrochemical hydrogen production. Chem Rev 114(19):9346–9384. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl2029392
Chen Z, Dinh HN, Miller E (2013) Photoelectrochemical water splitting. standards, experimental methods, and protocols. Springer, New York.
Butler MA (1977) Photoelectrolysis and physical properties of the semiconducting electrode WO2. J Appl Phys 48:1914. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.323948
Gärtner WW (1959) Depletion-layer photoeffects in semiconductors. Phys Rev 116:84–87. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.116.84
Licklederer M, Mohammadi R, Nguyen NT, Park H, Hejazi S, Halik M, Vogel N, Altomare M, Schmuki P (2019) Dewetted Au Nanoparticles on TiO2 Surfaces: evidence of a size-independent plasmonic photoelectrochemical response. J Phys Chem C 123(27):16934–16942. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b02769
Zhou X, Denisov N, Cha G, Hwang I, Schmuki P (2021) Photoelectrochemical performance of TiO2 photoanodes: nanotube versus nanoflake electrodes. Electrochem Commun 124:106937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2021.106937.
Monshi A, Foroughi M, Monshi M (2012) Modified Scherrer equation to estimate more accurately nano-crystallite size using XRD. World J Nano Sci Eng 2(3):154–160. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjnse.2012.23020
Ng YH, Lightcap IV, Goodwin K, Matsumura M, Kamat PV (2010) To what extent do graphene scaffolds improve the photovoltaic and photocatalytic response of TiO2 nanostructured films? J Phys Chem 1(15):2222–2227. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz100728z
Ma J, Wang X, Zong X, Li L, Sun H, He P, Yang Y, Ding Y, Han Y, Fan X (2021) Photoelectrochemical properties of TiO2/g-C3N4 composited electrodes fabricated by a co-electrodeposited method. J Phys D Appl Phys 54:145104. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5679-7395.
Yang G, Yang B, Xiao T, Yan Z (2013) One-step solvothermal synthesis of hierarchically porous nanostructured CdS/TiO2 heterojunction with higher visible light photocatalytic activity. Appl Surf Sci 283:402–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.06.122
Vahl A, Veziroglu S, Henkel B, Strunskus T, Polonskyi O, Aktas OC, Faupel F (2019) Pathways to Tailor photocatalytic performance of Tio2 thin films deposited by reactive magnetron sputtering. Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 12(17):2840. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172840
Rafieian D, Ogieglo W, Savenije T, Lammertink RGH (2015) Controlled formation of anatase and rutile TiO2 thin films by reactive magnetron sputtering. AIP Adv 5:097168. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4931925
Wicaksana D, Tsujikawa T, Kobayashi A, Ono K, Kinbara A (1993) Ion bombardment effects on the growth of rutile phase of reactively sputtered TiO2 thin films. MRS Proc 311:233. https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-311-233
Wicaksana D, Kobayashi A, Kinbara A (1992) Process effects on structural properties of TiO2 thin films by reactive sputtering. J Vac Sci Technol 10:1479–1482. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.578269
Wang YH, Rahman KH, Wu CC, Chen KC (2020) A review on the pathways of the improved structural characteristics and photocatalytic performance of titanium dioxide (TiO2) thin films fabricated by the magnetron-sputtering technique. Catalysts 10:598. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10060598
Patterson AL (1939) The Scherrer formula for X-ray particle size determination. Phys Rev 56:978–982. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.56.978
Langford J, Wilson A (1978) Scherrer after sixty years: a survey and some new results in the determination of crystallite size. J Applied Crystallography 11:102–103. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889878012844
Hanaor DAH, Sorrell CC (2011) Review of the anatase to rutile phase transformation. J Mater Sci 46:855–874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-5113-0
Ahn H, Yoon K, Kwak M, Park J, Jang J (2018) Boron doping of metal-doped hematite for reduced surface recombination in water splitting. ACS Catal 8(12):11932–11939. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b03184
M. Licklederer (2019) Internal Report, LKO, FAU.
Gondane V, Bhargava P (2016) Tuning flat band potential of TiO2 using an electrolyte additive to enhance open circuit voltage and minimize current loss in dye sensitized solar cells. Electrochim Acta 209:293–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.079
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the DFG, the Operational program research, Development and education (European regional development Fund, Project No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000416 of the ministry of education, youth and sports of the Czech Republic) for financial support, and Dr-Ing Imgon Hwang for constructive advice.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling Editor: Christopher Blanford.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, H., Wang, Y., Denisov, N. et al. DC sputter deposited TiO2 layers on FTO: towards a maximum photoelectrochemical response of photoanodes. J Mater Sci 57, 12960–12970 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-07420-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-07420-4