Skip to main content
Log in

Poly(vinyl alcohol co-vinyl acetate) as a novel scaffold for mammalian cell culture and controlled drug release

  • Materials for life sciences
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tissue engineering requires novel smart materials to sustain cell growth, tissue regeneration and in situ drug release in a controlled mode. Also, biocompatible synthesis methods are needed to immobilize biologically active compounds. Poly(vinyl alcohol co-vinyl acetate) (PAcVA) was synthesized at 37 °C using glutaraldehyde (GA) as a crosslinking agent. The mechanical characteristics of the polymer were manipulated by varying crosslinking degrees using different GA concentrations. Materials with Young’s modules similar to soft tissues, adequate for tissue engineering, were obtained. PAcVA was a pH-responsive material with maximum swelling at pH 5.8. When hydrated, PAcVA was electro-responsive. Fluorescein was used as a model molecule to characterize the releasing properties of the polymer. Effective diffusivities were a function of the crosslinking degree. Release rates were proportional to temperature and were faster at lower GA contents. According to a fit to the Korsmeyer–Peppas’ model, diffusion at 5 and 10% GA was Fickian, but at 20% GA, diffusion was abnormal. To promote cell attachment and neutralize free aldehyde groups, PAcVA hydrogels were covered with poly-l-lysine and laminin, which supported growth of lung carcinoma and mouse hypothalamic cells without signs of cytotoxicity or oxidative stress. An intelligent low-cost hydrogel with properties that can be easily modulated was synthesized and fully characterized. Its properties make it suitable for tissue engineering applications, as they mimic the mechanical properties of natural tissues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhu J, Marchant RE (2011) Design properties of hydrogel tissue-engineering scaffolds. Exp Rev Med Dev 8:607–626. https://doi.org/10.1586/erd.11.27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. El-Sherbiny I, Yacoub M (2013) Hydrogel scaffolds for tissue engineering: progress and challenges. Glob Cardiol Sci Pract 2013:316–342. https://doi.org/10.5339/gcsp.2013.38

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kohane DS, Langer R (2008) Polymeric biomaterials in tissue engineering. Pediatr Res 63:487–491. https://doi.org/10.1203/01.pdr.0000305937.26105.e7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Balint R, Cassidy NJ, Cartmell SH (2014) Conductive polymers: towards a smart biomaterial for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 10:2341–2353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Khan F, Tanaka M (2017) Designing smart biomaterials for tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci 19:17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19010017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Furth ME, Atala A, Van Dyke ME (2007) Smart biomaterials design for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Biomaterials 28:5068–5073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar A, Han SS (2017) PVA-based hydrogels for tissue engineering: a review. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater 66:159–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/00914037.2016.1190930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rudra R, Kumar V, Kundu PP (2015) Acid catalysed cross-linking of poly vinyl alcohol (PVA) by glutaraldehyde: effect of crosslink density on the characteristics of PVA membranes used in single chambered microbial fuel cells. RSC Adv 5:83436–83447. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA16068E

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Figueiredo KCS, Alves TLM, Borges CP (2009) Poly(vinyl alcohol) Films crosslinked by glutaraldehyde under mild conditions. J Appl Polym Sci 111:3074–3080. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.29263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mansur HS, Sadahira CM, Souza AN, Mansur AAP (2008) FTIR spectroscopy characterization of poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogel with different hydrolysis degree and chemically crosslinked with glutaraldehyde. Mater Sci Eng, C 28:539–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2007.10.088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fumio U, Hiroshi Y, Kumiko N et al (1990) Swelling and mechanical properties of poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels. Int J Pharm 58:135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5173(90)90251-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gohil JM, Bhattacharya A, Ray P (2006) Studies on the crosslinking of poly(vinyl alcohol). J Polym Res 13:161–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-005-9023-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang Y, Zhu PC, Edgren D (2010) Crosslinking reaction of poly(vinyl alcohol) with glyoxal. J Polym Res 17:725–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-009-9362-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Teramoto N, Saitoh M, Kuroiwa J et al (2001) Morphology and mechanical properties of pullulan/poly(vinyl alcohol) blends crosslinked with glyoxal. J Appl Polym Sci 82:2273–2280. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.2075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen CT, Chang YJ, Chen MC, Tobolsky AV (1973) Formalized poly(vinyl alcohol) membranes for reverse osmosis. J Appl Polym Sci 17:789–796. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1973.070170311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jian S, Xiao Ming S (1987) Crosslinked PVA-PS thin-film composite membrane for reverse osmosis. Desalination 62:395–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-9164(87)87040-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Burshe MC, Sawant SB, Joshi JB, Pangarkar VG (1997) Sorption and permeation of binary water-alcohol systems through PVA membranes crosslinked with multifunctional crosslinking agents. Sep Purif Technol 12:145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5866(97)00042-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Araujo AM, Neves MT Jr, Azevedo WM et al (1997) Polyvinyl alcohol-glutaraldehyde network as a support for protein immobilisation. Biotechnol Tech 11:67–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Migneault I, Dartiguenave C, Bertrand MJ, Waldron KC (2004) Glutaraldehyde: behavior in aqueous solution, reaction with proteins, and application to enzyme crosslinking. Biotechniques 37:790–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim KJ, Lee SB, Han NW (1994) Kinetics of crosslinking reaction of PVA membrane with glutaraldehyde. Korean J Chem Eng 11:41–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02697513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hassan CM, Peppas NA (2000) Structure and applications of poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels produced by conventional crosslinking or by freezing/thawing methods. In: BT—biopolymers · PVA hydrogels, anionic polymerisation nanocomposites. Springer, Berlin, pp 37–65

  22. Antonietti M, Caruso RA, Göltner CG, Weissenberger MC (1999) Morphology variation of porous polymer gels by polymerization in lyotropic surfactant phases. Macromolecules 32:1383–1389. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma9812478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ahearne M, Yang Y, El Haj AJ et al (2005) Characterizing the viscoelastic properties of thin hydrogel-based constructs for tissue engineering applications. J R Soc Interface 2:455–463. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2005.0065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liebschner M, Bucklen B, Wettergreen M (2005) Mechanical aspects of tissue engineering. Semin Plast Surg 19:217–228. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-919717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xia T, Liu W, Yang L (2017) A review of gradient stiffness hydrogels used in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A 105:1799–1812. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bas O, Catelas I, De-Juan-Pardo EM, Hutmacher DW (2018) The quest for mechanically and biologically functional soft biomaterials via soft network composites. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 132:214–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sonker AK, Rathore K, Nagarale RK, Verma V (2018) Crosslinking of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and effect of crosslinker shape (aliphatic and aromatic) thereof. J Polym Environ 26:1782–1794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-017-1077-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Peng Z, Li Z, Zhang F, Peng X (2012) Preparation and properties of polyvinyl alcohol/collagen hydrogel. J Macromol Sci Part B 51:1934–1941. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222348.2012.660060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liang XLX, Boppart SA (2010) Biomechanical properties of in vivo human skin from dynamic optical coherence elastography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 57:953–959. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2009.2033464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. van Dommelen JAW, van der Sande TPJ, Hrapko M, Peters GWM (2010) Mechanical properties of brain tissue by indentation: Interregional variation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 3:158–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2009.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Soza G, Grosso R, Nimsky C et al (2005) Determination of the elasticity parameters of brain tissue with combined simulation and registration. Int J Med Robot 1:87–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wadhwa R, Lagenaur CF, Cui XT (2006) Electrochemically controlled release of dexamethasone from conducting polymer polypyrrole coated electrode. J Control Release 110:531–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.10.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kato Y, Ozawa S, Miyamoto C et al (2013) Acidic extracellular microenvironment and cancer. Cancer Cell Int 13:89. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2867-13-89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Muthukumar M, Edwards SF (1982) Screening concepts in polymer solution dynamics. Polymer (Guildf) 23:345–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(82)90333-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rusling JF, Suib SL (1994) Characterizing materials with cyclic voltammetry. Adv Mater 6:922–930. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.19940061204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Daubinger P, Kieninger J, Unmüssig T, Urban G (2014) Electrochemical characteristics of nanostructured platinum electrodes—a cyclic voltammetry study. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:8392–8399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hille B (2001) Ion channel excitable membranes, 3rd edn. Sinauer Associates Inc, Sunderland, MA, pp 1–37

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mawad D, Odell R, Poole-Warren LA (2009) Network structure and macromolecular drug release from poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels fabricated via two crosslinking strategies. Int J Pharm 366:31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.08.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Renkin EM (1954) Filtration, diffusion and molecular sieving through porous cellulose membranes. J Gen Physiol 38:225–243

    Google Scholar 

  40. Dash S, Murthy PN, Nath L, Chowdhury P (2010) Kinetic modeling on drug release from controlled drug delivery systems. Acta Pol Pharm 67:217–223

    Google Scholar 

  41. Siepmann J, Siepmann F (2008) Mathematical modeling of drug delivery. Int J Pharm 364:328–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Higuchi T (1963) Mechanism of sustained-action medication. Theoretical analysis of rate of release of solid drugs dispersed in solid matrices. J Pharm Sci 52:1145–1149. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600521210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Korsmeyer RW, Gurny R, Doelker E et al (1983) Mechanisms of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers. Int J Pharm 15:25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5173(83)90064-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Shamaeli E, Alizadeh N (2014) Nanostructured biocompatible thermal/electrical stimuli-responsive biopolymer-doped polypyrrole for controlled release of chlorpromazine: kinetics studies. Int J Pharm 472:327–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.06.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ritger PL, Peppas NA (1987) A simple equation for description of solute release I. Fickian and non-Fickian release from non-swellable devices in the form of slabs, spheres, cylinders or discs. J Control Release 5:23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-3659(87)90034-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Varshosaz J, Hajian M (2004) Characterization of drug release and diffusion mechanism through hydroxyethylmethacrylate/methacrylic acid pH-sensitive hydrogel. Drug Deliv 11:53–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/10717540490265298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. LoPachin RM, Gavin T (2014) Molecular mechanisms of aldehyde toxicity: a chemical perspective. Chem Res Toxicol 27:1081–1091. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx5001046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Esterbauer H, Schaur RJ, Zollner H (1991) Chemistry and biochemistry of 4-hydroxynonenal, malonaldehyde and related aldehydes. Free Radic Biol Med 11:81–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-5849(91)90192-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kehrer JP, Biswal SS (2000) The molecular effects of acrolein. Toxicol Sci 57:6–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Gough JE, Scotchford CA, Downes S (2002) Cytotoxicity of glutaraldehyde crosslinked collagen/poly(vinyl alcohol) films is by the mechanism of apoptosis. J Biomed Mater Res 61:121–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10145

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research performed thanks to the financial support of the Programa UNAM-DGAPA-PAPIIT IT-200416. F. Villanueva received a scholarship from CONACyT during her graduate studies. We thank Mariana Ramírez Gilly (Facultad de Química UNAM), Melina Tapia Tapia (Instituto de Química UNAM), Manuel Aguilar Franco (Laboratorio Central de Microscopía UNAM), Martha A. Contreras, Ruth Pastor, Vanessa Hernández, Guadalupe Zavala Padilla, Arturo Pimentel Cabrera and the National Laboratory of Advanced Microscopy (LNMA-IBT-UNAM) for technical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura A. Palomares.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

10853_2019_3402_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Supplementary information (S): File S1. Detailed procedure to obtain Eq. 6, used to determine effective diffusivities of fluorescein across PAcVA films (DOCX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Villanueva-Flores, F., Miranda-Hernández, M., Flores-Flores, J.O. et al. Poly(vinyl alcohol co-vinyl acetate) as a novel scaffold for mammalian cell culture and controlled drug release. J Mater Sci 54, 7867–7882 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03402-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03402-1

Navigation