Skip to main content
Log in

A new kind of water-based nanofluid with a low loading of three-dimensional porous graphene

  • Energy materials
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, stable water-based heat transfer nanofluid containing a kind of three-dimensional porous graphene (3D PG) has been prepared. For dispersion of 3D PG in water, it is hydrophilic treated by an alkaline method, which is a facile and effective approach in preparing water-soluble graphene by introducing the carboxyl groups (–COOH) as a mild oxidation process using potassium persulfate. The stability and thermal conductive performance of the nanofluid have been investigated with different loading at various temperatures. Experimental results show that the nanofluid can remain highly stability and its enhanced thermal conductivity up to 8–34% can be observed even at lower weight fraction of 0.01–0.07 wt% at room temperature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Scheme 1
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Branson BT, Beauchamp PS, Beam JC et al (2013) Nanodiamond nanofluids for enhanced thermal conductivity. ACS Nano 7:3183–3189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kasaeian A, Eshghi AT, Sameti M (2015) A review on the applications of nanofluids in solar energy systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 43:584–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sarkar J, Ghosh P, Adil A (2015) A review on hybrid nanofluids: recent research, development and applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 43:164–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shahrul IM, Mahbubul IM, Khaleduzzaman SS et al (2014) A comparative review on the specific heat of nanofluids for energy perspective. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 38:88–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ries HE (1970) Microelectrophoresis measurements on polymeric flocculants alone and in excess with model colloids. Nature 226:72–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Saidur R, Leong KY, Mohammad HA (2011) A review on applications and challenges of nanofluids. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:1646–1668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li C, Shi G (2012) Three-dimensional graphene architectures. Nanoscale 4:5549–5563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mehrali MM, Sadeghinezhad E, Tahan Latibari S et al (2014) Preparation, characterization, viscosity, and thermal conductivity of nitrogen-doped graphene aqueous nanofluids. J Mater Sci 49:7156–7171. doi:10.1007/s10853-014-8424-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sundar LS, Singh MK, Ramana EV et al (2014) Enhanced thermal conductivity and viscosity of nanodiamond-nickel nanocomposite nanofluids. Sci Rep 4:4039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yu W, Xie H, Bao D (2010) Enhanced thermal conductivities of nanofluids containing graphene oxide nanosheets. Nanotechnology 21:55705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sidik NAC, Mohammed HA, Alawi OA, Samion S (2014) A review on preparation methods and challenges of nanofluids. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 54:115–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Balandin AA (2011) Thermal properties of graphene and nanostructured carbon materials. Nat Mater 10:569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Balandin AA, Ghosh S, Bao W et al (2008) Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett 8:902–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kole M, Dey TK (2013) Investigation of thermal conductivity, viscosity, and electrical conductivity of graphene based nanofluids. J Appl Phys 113:084307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghozatloo A, Shariaty-Niasar M, Rashidi AM (2013) Preparation of nanofluids from functionalized Graphene by new alkaline method and study on the thermal conductivity and stability. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 42:89–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Baby TT, Ramaprabhu S (2011) Enhanced convective heat transfer using graphene dispersed nanofluids. Nanoscale Res Lett 6:289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li X, Chen Y, Cheng Z et al (2014) Ultrahigh specific surface area of graphene for eliminating subcooling of water. Appl Energy 130:824–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nika DL, Pokatilov EP, Askerov AS, Balandin AA (2009) Phonon thermal conduction in graphene: role of Umklapp and edge roughness scattering. Phys Rev B 79:155413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Savin AV, Kivshar YS, Hu B (2010) Suppression of thermal conductivity in graphene nanoribbons with rough edges. Phys Rev B 82:195422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li Y, Li Z, Shen PK et al (2013) Simultaneous formation of ultrahigh surface area and three-dimensional hierarchical porous graphene-like networks for fast and highly stable supercapacitors. Adv Mater 25:2474–2480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaniyoor A, Baby TT, Ramaprabhu S (2010) Graphene synthesis via hydrogen induced low temperature exfoliation of graphite oxide. J Mater Chem 20:8467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang G, Yang J, Park J et al (2008) Facile synthesis and characterization of graphene nanosheets. J Phys Chem C 112:8192–8195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang L, Ni QQ, Fu Y, Natsuki T (2009) One-step preparation of water-soluble single-walled carbon nanotubes. Appl Surf Sci 255:7095–7099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hontoria-Lucas C, López-Peinado AJ, López-González JDD et al (1995) Study of oxygen-containing groups in a series of graphite oxides: physical and Chemical. Carbon 33:1585–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Park O, Jeevananda T, Kim H et al (2009) Effects of surface modification on the dispersion and electrical conductivity of carbon nanotube/polyaniline composites. Scr Mater 60:551–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zeng Q, Leng X, Wu K-H et al (2015) Electroactive cellulose-supported graphene oxide interlayers for Li–S batteries. Carbon 93:611–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kronholm J, Jyske P, Riekkola M-L (2000) Oxidation efficiencies of potassium persulfate and hydrogen peroxide in pressurized hot water with and without preheating. Ind Eng Chem Res 39:2207–2213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Simms RW, Hoidas MD, Cunningham MF (2008) Nitroxide-mediated styrene surfactant-free emulsion polymerization. Macromolecules 41:1076–1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Erickson K, Erni R, Lee Z et al (2015) Determination of the local chemical structure of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide. Adv Mater 22:4467–4472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gómez-Navarro C, Meyer JC, Sundaram RS et al (2010) Atomic structure of reduced graphene oxide. Nano Lett 10:1144–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Klemens PG (2000) Theory of the a-plane thermal conductivity of graphite. J Wide Bandgap Mater 7:332–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ghadimi A, Saidur R, Metselaar HSC (2011) A review of nanofluid stability properties and characterization in stationary conditions. Int J Heat Mass Transf 54:4051–4068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Haddad Z, Abid C, Oztop HF, Mataoui A (2014) A review on how the researchers prepare their nanofluids. Int J Therm Sci 76:168–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Aravind SSJ, Ramaprabhu S (2013) Graphene-multiwalled carbon nanotube-based nanofluids for improved heat dissipation. RSC Adv 3:4199–4206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rao Y (2010) Nanofluids: stability, phase diagram, rheology and applications. Particuology 8:549–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Baby TT, Ramaprabhu S (2010) Investigation of thermal and electrical conductivity of graphene based nanofluids. J Appl Phys 108:124308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jose Jaime TT, Tharangattu Narayanan N, Chandra Sekhar T et al (2014) Nanodiamond-based thermal fluids. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:4778–4785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Taha-Tijerina JJ, Narayanan TN, Tiwary CS et al (2014) Nanodiamond based thermal fluids. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:4778–4785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shaker M, Birgersson E, Mujumdar AS (2014) Extended Maxwell model for the thermal conductivity of nanofluids that accounts for nonlocal heat transfer. Int J Therm Sci 84:260–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Buonomo B, Manca O, Marinelli L, Nardini S (2015) Effect of temperature and sonication time on nanofluid thermal conductivity measurements by nano-flash method. Appl Therm Eng 91:181–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Shi G, Zhang L (2011) Preparation of highly conductive graphene hydrogels for fabricating supercapacitors with high rate capability preparation of highly conductive graphene hydrogels for fabricating supercapacitors with high rate capability. J Phys Chem C 115:17206–17212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Fan Z, Liu Y, Yan J et al (2012) Template-directed synthesis of pillared-porous carbon nanosheet architectures: high-performance electrode materials for supercapacitors. Adv Energy Mater 2:419–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sundar LS, Farooky MH, Sarada SN, Singh MK (2013) Experimental thermal conductivity of ethylene glycol and water mixture based low volume concentration of Al2O3 and CuO nanofluids. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 41:41–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mahmoodi M, Esfe MH, Akbari M et al (2015) Experimental study on thermal conductivity of DWCNT-ZnO/water-EG nanofluids. Int Commu Heat Mass 68:248–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Karimi A, Sadatlu MAA, Saberi B et al (2015) Experimental investigation on thermal conductivity of water based nickel ferrite nanofluids. Adv Powder Technol 26:1529–1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hemmat Esfe M, Afrand M, Karimipour A et al (2015) An experimental study on thermal conductivity of MgO nanoparticles suspended in a binary mixture of water and ethylene glycol. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 67:173–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Xing M, Yu J, Wang R (2016) Experimental investigation and modelling on the thermal conductivity of CNTs based nanofluids. Int J Therm Sci 104:404–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Gupta SS, Siva MV, Krishnan S et al (2011) Thermal conductivity enhancement of nanofluids containing graphene nanosheets. J Appl Phys 110:84302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Baby TT, Sundara R (2011) Synthesis and transport properties of metal oxide decorated graphene dispersed nanofluids. J Phys Chem C 115:8527–8533

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China and Guangdong Province (No. U1401246), by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51276044) and by Science and Technology Program of Guangdong Province of China (Grant Nos. 2014B010106005, 2015B010135011, 2015A050502047, 2016A020221031), and by Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou City of China (Grant Nos. 201508030018, 2016201604030040), and by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51502043).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haiyan Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, Y., Zhang, H., He, C. et al. A new kind of water-based nanofluid with a low loading of three-dimensional porous graphene. J Mater Sci 52, 10485–10496 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1232-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1232-1

Keywords

Navigation