Skip to main content
Log in

Quantifying the dispersion of carbon nanotubes in thermoplastic-toughened epoxy polymers

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The distribution of particles within modern materials must be defined to understand the change in properties attained by their addition. Two methods of analysis, which use different size scales, are presented here. These methods are applied to characterise the dispersion of multi-walled carbon nanotubes in a thermoplastic-toughened epoxy polymer. First, the greyscale method uses transmission optical micrographs, and calculates the ratio of the variance/mean of the greyscale values. Higher values indicate a greater degree of clustering; lower values may be described as showing a ‘better’ distribution of nanotubes, hence allowing the results to be ranked. This method is relatively easier to carry out, but care must be taken to use a consistent small thickness of sample. Secondly, the quadrat analysis uses transmission electron micrographs of the same materials, after identifying the centre of each nanotube observed. This defines the distribution on the scale of the nanotubes. Peaks in the relationship between the ratio of the variance/mean and cell size are related to microstructural features such as agglomeration. This scale is expected to be related to the scale of microstructural deformation mechanisms which determine global material properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Iijima S (1991) Nature 354:56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Xie X-L, Mai Y-W, Zhou X-P (2005) Mater Sci Eng R 49:89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hsiao K-T, Alms J, Advani SG (2003) Nanotechnology 14:791

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ganguli S, Bhuyan M, Allie L, Aglan H (2005) J Mater Sci 40:3593. doi:10.1007/s10853-005-2891-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu L-Q, Wagner HD (2007) Compos Interfaces 14:285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hernández-Pérez A, Avilés F, May-Pat A, Valadez-González A, Herrera-Franco PJ, Bartolo-Pérez P (2008) Compos Sci Technol 68:1422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Z, Liang ZY, Wang B, Zhang C, Kramer L (2004) Composites A 35:1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Song YS, Youn JR (2005) Carbon 43:1378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lau K-T, Shi S-Q, Cheng H-M (2003) Compos Sci Technol 63:1161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fiedler B, Gojny FH, Wichmann MHG, Nolte MCM, Schulte K (2006) Compos Sci Technol 66:3115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gershon A, Cole D, Kota A, Bruck H (2010) J Mater Sci 45:6353. doi:10.1007/s10853-010-4597-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gong X, Liu J, Baskaran S, Voise RD, Young JS (2000) Chem Mater 12:1049

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Guild FJ, Summerscales J (1998) In: Summerscales J (ed) Microstructural characterisation of fibre-reinforced composites. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chatfield C (1983) Statistics for technology: a course in applied statistics. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thomas Swan (2006) Technical Data Sheet, Elicarb MW (Dry). Thomas Swan & Co., Consett

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brooker RD (2009) PhD Thesis, Imperial College London, London

  17. Brooker RD, Kinloch AJ, Taylor AC (2010) J Adhesion 86:726. doi:10.1080/00218464.2010.482415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Guild FJ, Silverman BW (1978) J Microsc Oxf 114:131

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Held G (2009) Introduction to light emitting diode technology and applications. Auerbach Publications, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sawyer LC, Grubb DT, Meyers GF (2008) Polymer microscopy. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Masania K (2010) PhD Thesis, Imperial College London, London

  22. Hsieh TH, Kinloch AJ, Masania K, Taylor AC, Sprenger S (2010) Polymer 51:6284. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2010.10.048

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the EPSRC and Cytec Engineered Materials for funding the project, and the Royal Society for the Mercer Award which provided funding for some of the equipment used. The authors would like to thank Prof. S.G. Gilmour (Queen Mary, University of London) for his help with the statistical analysis, also Tsung-Han Hsieh and Huang Ming Chong for their help with some of the microscopy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. C. Taylor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brooker, R.D., Guild, F.J. & Taylor, A.C. Quantifying the dispersion of carbon nanotubes in thermoplastic-toughened epoxy polymers. J Mater Sci 46, 3108–3118 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-5190-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-5190-0

Keywords

Navigation