Abstract
The glass transition temperature was studied via differential thermal analysis of glasses in the system (100 − x)TeO2–5Bi2O3–xZnO and (100 − x)TeO2–10Bi2O3–xZnO where x = 15, 20, 25 in mol%. The crystallization behavior and microstructure development of the 0.7TeO2/0.1Bi2O3/0.2ZnO glass during annealing were investigated by non-isothermal differential thermal analysis (DTA), X-ray diffractometry, and transmission electron microscopy. The glass transition temperature, crystallization temperature, and the nature of crystalline phases formed were determined. From the heating rate dependence of the glass transition temperature, the glass transition activation energy was derived. From variation of DTA peak maximum temperature with heating rate, the activation energies of crystallization were calculated to be 305.8 and 197 kJ mol−1 for first and second crystallization exotherms, respectively. Moreover, synthesized crystalline Bi3.2Te0.8O6.4, Bi2Te4O11, and Zn2Te3O8 were investigated. In addition, the change in particle size with increasing annealing time was observed by high-polarized optical microscope.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Nano-materials are considered as key technologies for this century. During the last 15 years, TeO2-based glasses have attracted much attention due to their linear and nonlinear refractive indices, excellent infrared transmittance. On the basis that, tellurium has an electronegativity in the range of other good glass forming oxide cations (Si, B, P, Ge, As, and Sb) [1–3]. Considerable interest has been generated by glass-ceramics that demonstrate optical second harmonic generation [4–6]. Kim et al. [7] proposed transparent TeO2-based glasses containing ferroelectrics crystals as a new type of nonlinear optical glass; he had been tried to fabrication transparent TeO2–Li2O–Nb2O5 glasses containing ferroelectrics LiNbO3 crystals, always accompanied by another phase, which was considered to be a metastable pyrochlore-type compound. Kazuhide et al. [8] described a new cubic crystalline phase formed in TeO2–K2O–Nb2O5 glasses and glass-ceramic consisting of the phase that exhibits good optical at the wavelength of visible light. Komatsu et al. [9] obtained the crystalline phases in glass-ceramics of the TeO2–Nb2O5–KTe2O depend on the valence of Te ions in the glassy state. The valence of Te4+ is easily oxidized to Te6+ ions and it retained for heat treatments at temperatures ≤600 °C [1]. Tromel et al. [10] obtained cubic face centered non-stochiometric tellurites of lanthanides such as Ln2Te6O15 and Ln4Te7O15, in which Te ions are only Te4+, by quenching homogeneous liquids at room temperature (i.e., the valence of Te in TeO2-based glasses is Te4+ affects the crystallization). Sato et al. [11] obtained the crystalline phases in glass-ceramics of the TeO2–RO–Ln2O3 where R = Mg, Ba, Zn, and Ln = Sm, Eu, Er. Formed by laser irradiation are oriented at the surface. In our knowledge, few author have been fabricated TeO2– based glasses to volume glass-ceramic because it is difficult to get transparent TeO2− based glass-ceramic. Recently, Senthil Murugan et al. [12] found that the study of vitreous phases obtained in the (100 − 2x)TeO2–xBi2O3–xZnO, where x = 5, 10, and 15 system resulted in nonlinear optical application. They found these glasses exhibit SHG, which is about one-order of magnitude higher than that obtained for the fused silica glass. The objective of our article is to determine the preparation of transparent glasses and transparent glass-ceramics with a new composition 70TeO2/10Bi2O3/20ZnO, to characterize it by polarized optical microscope, TEM, DTA, and XRD, and finally to calculate the kinetic parameter, aiming to find the possible applications of this glass ceramics in optical devices.
Theoretical background
The theoretical basis for interpreting DTA results is provided by the formal theory of transformation kinetics as developed by Johnson and Mehl [13] and Avrami [14]. This theory describes the evolution with time, t, of the volume fraction crystallized, χ, in terms of the crystal growth rate u;
where N 0 is the number of pre-existing nuclei per unit volume, n and m are kinetic exponents, which depends on the dimensionality of the crystal growth. In the considered case, “site saturation” [15], the kinetic exponent is n = m. Assuming an Arrhenian temperature dependence for \( u = u_{0} {\text{e}}^{{E/RT^{\prime}}} \), and a heating rate, \( \beta = {\frac{{{\text{d}}T}}{{{\text{d}}t}}} \), Eq. 1 becomes:
where E is the effective activation energy for crystal growth. By using the substitution \( y^{\prime} = {\frac{E}{{RT^{\prime}}}} \), the integral, I, can be represented, according to the literature [16], by the sum of the alternating series:
Considering that in this type of series the error produced is less than the first term neglected and bearing in mind that in most crystallization reactions \( y^{\prime} = \frac{E}{RT} \gg 1 \) [usually \( {\frac{E}{{RT^{\prime}}}} \ge 25 \)], it is possible to use the first term of this series, without making any appreciable error, and the above-mentioned integral becomes:
if T 0 = T (where T 0 is the starting temperature) so that y 0 is infinite. This assumption is justifiable for any thermal treatment that begins at a temperature where crystal growth is negligible, i.e., below the glass transition temperature, T g [17].
Substituting Eq. 3 into Eq. 2, the volume fraction crystallized in a non-isothermal process is expressed as:
where \( Q = g \cdot N_{0} \cdot \left( {\frac{R}{E}} \right)^{n} , \) a general expression for all values of the parameter n, which, as it is well known, in the case of “site saturation” depends on the mechanism of the crystal growth.
With the aim of calculating the kinetic parameters, the crystallization rate has been obtained by deriving Eq. 4 with respect to time, yielding:
which has been assumed that the reaction rate constant is a time function through its Arrhenian temperature dependence. The maximum crystallization rate is found by making \( {\frac{{{\text{d}}^{2} x}}{{{\text{d}}t^{2} }}} = 0 \), thus the relationship:
where the subscript, P, denotes the magnitude values corresponding to the maximum crystallization rate. Assuming the above-mentioned hypothesis \( {\frac{E}{{RT_{P} }}} \gg 1 \); the logarithmic form of Eq. 7 is written as:
which is the equation of a straight line, whose slope and intercept give the activation energy, E, and the pre-exponential factor, \( q = Q^{{\frac{1}{n}}} \cdot K_{R} , \) respectively.
On the other hand, the quoted assumption, \( {\frac{E}{{RT_{P} }}} \gg 1, \) according to Eq. 4–6, allows us to express the maximum crystallization rate by the relationship:
which makes it possible to obtain for each heating rate a value of the kinetic exponent, n. The corresponding mean value may be taken as the most probable value of the quoted exponent.
Experimental work
Glasses in the system (100 − x)TeO2–5Bi2O3–xZnO and (100 − x)TeO2–10Bi2O3–xZnO where x = 15, 20, 25 in mol% were prepared by mixing specified weights of raw material. Mixed batches were melted in gold crucible at 850 °C for ~30 min. The melt, which had a high viscosity, was cast at 700 °C in a graphite mold. Subsequently, the sample was transferred to an annealing furnace and kept for 2 h at 300 °C. Then, the furnace was switched off and the glass sample was allowed to cool. Samples for measurements of optical properties using DTA (Shimadzu DTA 50) curve of powdered specimen of about 30 mg were recorded in air at heating rate 3, 5, and 10 K min−1, respectively, in Pt-crucible and using the same amount of Al2O3 as reference material in the range between 20 and 650 °C. The glass transition temperatures (T g) is a selected as mid-point between the onset and the minimum temperature, where T c is measured at the onset of crystallization, the T p is measured at the peak of crystallization.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) investigation were carried out in Siemens D 5000 using (CuKα radiation) diffractometer at 40 kV and 40 mV setting in 2θ range from 10° to 90°. The crystallized phases were identified by comparing the peak position and intensities with those in the JCPDS (Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards) date files. The volume crystallized sample was studied by TEM (Hitachi H8100) using 200 kV and optical sample was coated with carbon for TEM study. Optical microscopy (OM) investigation were performed in Zeiss Optimas equipped with Nikon Coolpix 4.0 MP digital camera.
Results and discussion
Homogeneous and transparent glasses were prepared in the system (100 − x)TeO2–5Bi2O3–xZnO and (100 − x)TeO2–10Bi2O3–xZnO, where x = 15, 20, 25 in mol%. Differential thermal analysis (DTA) investigation was conducted on the as-cast prepared glasses. Figure 1 shows that, the glass transition temperature increase with increasing ZnO content, and also it increases with increasing Bi2O3 content in the glass matrix. T g as a function of composition can reveal a transformation of the glass structure. We expect that, ZnO and Bi2O3 break down the TeO4 network structure creating TeO3+1 and TeO3 phase built in the glass matrix that results in the structural rearrangements of the glasses due to the transfer of the bridging oxygen into elongate bridging oxygen and non-bridging oxygen. The values of bond Te–O have four different kinds; Te–NBOax, Te–NBOeq, Te–BOax, and Te–BOeq, which is due to NBO with axial position, NBO with equatorial position, BO with axial position, and BO with equatorial position. This explains why, the glass transition temperature increase with both increasing ZnO and Bi2O3 content in the network glass TeO2/Bi2O3/ZnO. Figure 2a illustrates the respective DTA thermograms of as-cast 70TeO2–10Bi2O3–20ZnO glass sample scanned at heating rate of 10 °C/min. The glass transition (T g), the two peaks crystallization temperature (T p1 and T p2), and melting temperature (T m) are marked on the thermograms. As seen in Fig. 1, DTA scan exhibits a small exothermic peak corresponding to the glass transition (T g), and two exothermic peaks corresponds to the formation and/or transformation of crystalline phase. Onset crystallization temperature (T c) and peak temperature of crystallization (T P) is given in Table 1. Figure 1b depicts the DTA traces for the first crystallized peak of 70TeO2/10Bi2O3/20ZnO at β = 10 K/min, besides the fraction, χ (crystallized at a given temperature T) given by χ = A T/A, where A is the total area of the exothermic peak between the temperatures, T i (the onset of crystallization) and T f (the full crystallization). A T is the area between T i and T. The graphical representation of the crystallized volume fraction shows the typical sigmoid curve as a function of temperature for different heating rates for the first crystallization curve 70TeO2/10Bi2O3/20ZnO (Fig. 2a, b) based on mentioned work elsewhere [18, 19]. Figure 3 shows the plots \( \ln \left( {{\frac{{T_{\text{g}}^{2} }}{\beta }}} \right) \) versus \( \left( {{\frac{1}{{T_{\text{g}} }}}} \right) \) for the glass powder displaying the linearity of the equations used. The values of the activation energy obtained for the glass transition are 460.7 kJ mol−1. The crystallization maximum temperature is observed to increase with the increase in heating rate (see Table 1). The crystallization maximum in DTA scans corresponds to the temperature at which the rate of transformation of the viscous liquid into crystals becomes maximum. This means that, the number of nucleation site is increased by using slower heating rates and the peak maximum will occur at a temperature which the melt viscosity is higher at lower temperature.
The ratio between the ordinates of the DTA curve and the total area of the peak gives the corresponding crystallization rates, which makes it possible to build the curves of the exothermal peaks depicted in Fig. 4a, b. It was observed that, the values of (dx/dt)p increase with the increase in the heating rate. From the experimental values of the (dx/dt)p, one can calculate the kinetic exponent n from Eq. 9 . The value of kinetic exponent, n, for both the phases at each of the experimental heating rates is given in Table 1. The value of n depends on the mechanism of the transformation reaction.
Plot \( \ln \left( {{\frac{{T_{P}^{2} }}{\beta }}} \right) \) versus \( \left( {{\frac{1}{{T_{P} }}}} \right) \) for crystallization of the glass is shown in Fig. 5. A linear plot indicates the validity of Kissinger method [17]. The activation energy for crystallization of first phase is 305.8 kJ mol−1, and second phase is 197 kJ mol−1 (see Table 2).
In order to fabricate 70TeO2–10Bi2O3–20ZnO glass-ceramic, we applied heat treatment condition which led to the precipitation of crystalline phases. On the basis of DTA results, X-ray diffractometry scans were carried out to verify the nature of crystallizing phases in the glass network at temperature above T g for prepared glasses. The XRD patterns for this sample at different heating temperature are shown in Figs. 6, 7. First, the 70TeO2–10Bi2O3–20ZnO glass tempered at 350 °C for 3 h [see Fig. 6 (chart a)] and 350 °C for 4 h [see Fig. 6 (chart b)], it has one crystalline phase Bi3.2Te0.8O6.4 (ICDD card: 00-049-1761). The important Bi3.2Te0.8O6.4 was of the best solid-state oxygen ion conductors. Also, the X-ray diffractogram estimates that the same crystalline phase appears in our prepared glass tempered at 375 °C for 1.5 h [see Fig. 7 (chart a)]. When the prepared glass tempered at 375 °C for 3 h, two phases Bi3.2Te0.8O6.4 and Zn2Te3O8 were obtained as shown in Fig. 7 (chart b), and three crystalline phases Bi3.2Te0.8O6.4, Zn2Te3O8 (ICDD card: 20-1270), Bi2Te4O11 (ICDD card: 01-081-1330), respectively, were obtained, when it tempered 375 °C for 4.5 h as shown in Fig. 8 (chart c). Furthermore, heat treatment at higher temperature leads to the complete reaction of Bi2O3 with TeO2 to form the stoichiometric compound Bi2Te4O11. Senthil Murugan et al. [12] estimated the primary phase Bi3.2Te0.8O6.4 which belongs to the cubic (centro symmetric) phase along with traces of Bi2TeO5 in the 70TeO2–15Bi2O3–15ZnO glass heat treated at 350 °C/6 h. Also, they were found only major phase Bi2Te4O11 in the same sample heat treated at 500 °C/6 h. Kozhukharov et al. [20] estimated the phase of α-TeO2 at the temperature 435 °C and Te3Zn2O8 at 479 °C for 80 mol% TeO2 and 20 mol% ZnO composition and concluded the crystallizing Zn2Te3O8 phase only at 432 ° in the 60 mol% TeO2 and 40 mol% ZnO, which corresponds to single crystallization peak. It is well known that in the Zn2Te3O8 structure \( _{\infty }^{1} \left[ {{\text{Te}}(4){\text{Te}}_{2} (3 + 1){\text{O}}_{8} } \right] \) chains are formed where for one TeO4 polyhedron, there are two TeO3 trigonal pyramids. Popple et al. [21] detected Bi2Te4O11 phase in the Bi2O3–TeO2. Moreover, the TeO2 evaporates onto the Bi2O3 grains producing TeO2 layer, and hence this TeO2 layer reacts with the Bi2O3 by bulk diffusion forming Bi2Te4O11 reactions. From the previous reported data, we conclude that, Bi3.2Te0.8O6.4, Zn2Te3O8, and Bi2Te4O11reactions also are taking place by bulk diffusion in our glasses, not new crystalline phases appeared in prepared glass. Furthermore the activation energy of obtained crystalline phases in the prepared glass are 305.8 and 197 kJ mol−1 and the kinetic parameter, n, for both crystallization exotherms closed to 1.0 (i.e., one dimensional growth from surface to inside).
The prepared glasses are high homogeneity transparent glass-ceramics depending on the heat treatment condition. Therefore, it is easy to take the photos of crossed polarized transmission microscope for the 70TeO2–10Bi2O3–20ZnO glass at different heating temperature are shown in Fig. 9a–e. It has high-nucleation density of crystallites when tempered at 350 °C at different times 1, 2, 3, and 4 h. (see Fig 9a–e). Also, the grain size of crystallites increases with increasing the time of sample thermally treated. The prepared sample was examined under transmission electron microscope (TEM) after sputtering a thin carbon film on the prepared glass for conduction. The TEM micrographs for this sample were shown in Fig. 10a–d, which indicate that the scattered crystallites are uniform size in range 5 μm in the prepared sample tempered at 350 °C/4 h. Also, Fig. 10a revealed centrosymmetric tridymite crystal in the matrix of the prepared glass. Figure 10b is TEM micrograph of the sample 70TeO2–10Bi2O3–20ZnO heated 400 °C for 0.5 h, which reveals crystalline phase, droplet-free halos and amorphous glassy regions in the microstructure. When Bi2O3 is added in tellurite glasses, it contributes the following effects: (i) incorporation of holes and defects between two chains, (ii) formation of strong Te–O–M ion covalent bonds, and (iii) strong influence on the Te–axOeq–Te angle between two polyhedra and distorted in TeO3±1 unit followed by a creation of regular TeO3 trigonal pyramid units leaving non-bridging oxygen atoms and due to the formation of Te–O–Bi kingies in the glass matrix [22–25]. So, we are suggest that when addition of Bi2O3 to the TeO2–ZnO glasses causes splitting of O–Te–O and Zn–O–Zn bonds and hence, the bridging oxygens (BO) are converted into non-bridging oxygens (NBO) and the electronic shell of O2− ion is affected by polarizing action of modifying ions, since Bi3+ ions are highly polarizing with Te4+. This is due to droplet holes formed in the glass-ceramic matrix of present sample.
At temperature 375 °C for 3 h, the matrix of glass has high dense needle shaped crystal is shown in Fig. 10c. Finally, we found that, Bi3+ played an important role to get crystallization in the tellurite glass-ceramic by using mapping TEM of glassy ceramic matrix of 70TeO2–10Bi2O3–20ZnO.
Conclusion
From the present study of TeO2/ Bi2O3/ZnO glasses, it is observed that the glass transition increase with increasing ZnO and Bi2O3 content. A highly transparent glass-ceramics can be successfully obtained by controlling the heat treatment precisely. The phase separation and crystallization kinetics in 70TeO2–10Bi2O3–20ZnO were investigated. It was found that the phase separation in the present glass occurs at 400 °C/0.5 h. The activation energies of crystallization were calculated to be 305.8 and 197 kJ mol−1 for first and second crystallization exotherms, respectively. Moreover, synthesized crystalline phases Bi3.2Te0.8O6.4, Bi2Te4O11, Zn2Te3O8, respectively, were investigated.
References
El-Mallawany R (2002) Tellurite glasses handbook: physical properties and data. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Lenher V, Wolesensky E (1913) J Am Chem Soc 35:718
Stanworth J (1952) J Soc Glass Technol 36:217
Sigaev VN, Sarkisov PD, Kupriyanova MV, Spiridonov YA, Lopatina EV, Stefanovich SY, Molev VI, Pernice P, Aronne A (2001) Glass Phys Chem 27:497
Hoppe U, Yousef E, Russel C, Neuefeind J, Hannon AC (2004) J Phys Condens Matter 16:1654
Sigaev VN, Pernice P, Aronne A, Akimova OV, Stefanovich SY, Scaglione A (2001) J Non-Cryst Solids 292:59
Kim HG, Komatsu T, Sato R, Matusita K (1993) J Non-Cryst Solids 162:201
Kazuhide S, Komatsu T, Kim HG, Sato R, Matusita K (1995) J Non-Cryst Solids 189:16
Komatsu T, Shioya K (1997) J Non-Cryst Solids 209:305
Tromel M, Munch E (1985) J Less-Common Met 110:421
Sato R, Benino Y, Fujiwara T, Komatsu T (2001) J Non-Cryst Solids 289:228
Senthil Murugan G, Fargin E, Rodriguez V, Adamietz F, Couzi M, Buffeteau T, Le Coustumer P (2004) J Non-Cryst Solids 344:158
Johnson WA, Mehl RF (1939) Trans AIME 135:419
Avrami M (1939) J Chem Phys 7:1103
Khan SA, Zulfequar M, Husain M (2002) J Phys Chem Solids 123:463
Goel MA, Shaaban ER, Melo FCL, Ribeiro MJ, Ferreiraa JMF (2007) J Non-Cryst Solids 353:2383
Kissinger HE (1957) Anal Chem 29:1702
Shaaban ER, Ishu Kansal M, Shapaan JM, Ferreira F (2009) J Thermal Anal Calorim 98:354
Shaaban ER, Dessouky MT, Abousehly AM (2008) J Philos Mag 88(7):1099
Kozhukharov V, Burger H, Neov S (1986) J Polyhedron 5(3):771
Popple L, Zsuzsanna S (2003) J Thermal Anal Calorim 74:375
Neov S, Kozhukharov V, Gerasimove I, Krezhov K, Sidzhimov B (1979) J Phys Solid State 12:2475
Rajendran V, Palanicelv N, Chaudhuri BK, Goswami K (2003) J Non-Cryst Solids 320:195
Reddy RR, Nazeer Ahmmed Y, Abdul Azeem P, Rama K (2001) J Non-Cryst Solids 286:169
Hanke K (1967) Naturwissenschaften 54:199
Acknowledgements
E. Yousef wishes to thank Professor C. Russel Otto Schott Institute, Friedrich Schiller University Jena Germany for interest in this work and helpful.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Yousef, E.S., Al-salami, A.E. & Shaaban, E.R. A TEM study and non-isothermal crystallization kinetic of tellurite glass-ceramics. J Mater Sci 45, 5929–5936 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-4677-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-4677-z