Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Microstructure and mechanical properties of fluorcanasite glass-ceramics for biomedical applications

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four fluorcanasite glass-ceramics were fabricated by controlled heat-treatment of as-cast Glasses A–D. These compositions have been reported previously but essentially, Glass A had the stoichiometric composition (Ca5Na4K2Si12O30F4) and Glasses B–D were modified by reducing the Na2O concentration (B), adding excess CaO (C) and P2O5 (D). The latter two compositions have been shown to have promising bioactive response in cell culture and simulated body fluid experiments. Devitrification of the stoichiometric composition resulted in poor mechanical properties with crumbling often observed on machining. As a result, no mechanical data could be obtained. In all modified compositions, heat-treatment between 780 °C and 900 °C resulted in measurable indentation fracture toughness (IFT) and biaxial flexural strength (BFS). IFT was optimised in Glass C at 800 °C (2.53 ± 0.02 MPa m½), but the biaxial flexural strength (BFS) was low, 167 ± 17 MPa, compared to other compositions. For heat- treated Glass D optimum mechanical properties were obtained at 800 °C with BFS and IFT, 249 ± 23 MPa and 1.95 ± 0.01 MPa m½, respectively. The relationship between the mechanical properties and microstructure is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jarcho M, Bolen CH, Thomas MB, Bobick J, Kay JF, Doremus RH (1976) Hydroxylapatite synthesis and characterization in dense polycrystalline Form. J Mater Sci 11:2027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hench LL (1998) Bioceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 81:1705

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hench LL, Etheridge EC (1982) Biomaterials: an interfacial approach. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kokubo T (1993) A–W glass-ceramic: processing and properties. In: Hench LL, Wilson J (eds) An introduction to bioceramics. World Scientific, London, pp 75–88

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beall GH (1991) Chain silicate glass-ceramics. J Non-Cryst Solids 129:163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mirsaneh M, Reaney IM, Hatton PV, James PF (2004) Characterisation of high fgracture toughness k-fluorrichterite fluorapatite glass-ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 87(2):240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. da Rocha Barros VM, Salata LA, Sverzut CE, Xavier SP, van Noort R, Johnson A, Hatton PV (2002) In vivo bone tissue response to a canasite glass-ceramic. Biomaterials 23:2895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller CA, Kokubo T, Reaney IM, Hatton PV, James PF (2000) Nucleation and crystallization of canasite-fluorapatite glass ceramics. Int Symp On Crystallization in Glasses & Liquids, Glastech Ber Glass Sci Technol 73(C1):154

    Google Scholar 

  9. Miller CA, Reaney IM, James PF, Hatton PV, Kokubo T (2001) Glass ceramics for bone tissue repair. Proc Int Congr Glass 2:601

    Google Scholar 

  10. Miller CA, Kokubo T, Reaney IM, Hatton PV, James PF (2002) Formation of apatite layers on modified canasite glass-ceramics in simulated body fluid. J Biomed Mater Res 59:473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Miller CA, Reaney IM, Hatton PV, James PF (2004) Crystallization of canasite/frankamenite-based glass-ceramics. Chem Mater 16:5736

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bandyopadhyay-Ghosh S, Reaney IM, Hurrell-Gillingham K, Brook IM, Hatton PV (2005) Evaluation of modified flurocanasite glass-ceramics for bone tissue augmentation. Key Eng Mater 284–286:557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bandyopadhyay-Ghosh S, Reaney IM, Brook IM, Hurrell-Gillingham K, Johnson A, Hatton PV (2007) In vitro biocompatibility of fluorcanasite glass-ceramics for bone tissue repair. J Biomed Mater Res: Part A 80A(1):175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kanchanarat N, Miller CA, Hatton PV, James PF, Reaney IM (2005) Early stages of crystallization in canasite-based glass ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 88:3198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ponton CB, Rawlings RD (1989) Vickers indentation fracture toughness test: part 2 application and critical evaluation of standardized indentation toughness equations. Mater Sci Tech 5:961

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Matsumoto RLK (1987) Evaluation of fracture toughness determination methods as applied to ceria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal. J Am Ceram Soc 70(12):C366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Morrell R (1998) Biaxial flexural strength testing of ceramic materials. National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, UK

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shetty DK, Rosenfield AR, McGuire PA, Bansal GK, Duckworth WH (1980) Biaxial flexure tests for ceramics. Ceram Bull 59:1193

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wolcott CC (1994) Canasite apatite glass-ceramics. US Patent 5, 336, 642

    Google Scholar 

  20. Beall GH, Chyung K, Stewart RL (1986) Effect of test method and crack size on the fracture toughness of a chain-silicate glass ceramics. J Mater Sci 21:2365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanchita Bandyopadhyay-Ghosh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kanchanarat, N., Bandyopadhyay-Ghosh, S., Reaney, I.M. et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of fluorcanasite glass-ceramics for biomedical applications. J Mater Sci 43, 759–765 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-2180-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-2180-y

Keywords

Navigation