Abstract
The present study summarizes the effects of processing conditions and substrate cleaning procedures on the structure, chemistry and bonding of Cu/(0001)Al2O3 interfaces as determined by advanced transmission electron microscopy techniques. The Cu/(0001)Al2O3 samples were prepared by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) and solid-state diffusion bonding. Investigations of the MBE samples showed that the Al2O3 cleaning procedure alters the interfacial bonding. Metallic bonds occurred for an Ar+ ion sputtering and subsequent ultra-high vacuum (UHV) annealing treatment. Strongly ionic–covalent bonds were found for a wet chemical cleaning process followed by UHV annealing. The interfacial electronic structure did not reveal any significant changes compared to the bulk electronic structure for samples where the substrate surface was annealed in an oxygen-containing atmosphere after Ar+ ion pre-sputtering and UHV annealing. The results obtained at the solid-state diffusion-bonded Cu/Al2O3 samples indicated that the processing parameters such as temperature and load do not change the bonding behavior. Post-annealing of the solid-state diffusion-bonded Cu/Al2O3 samples in a well-defined oxygen partial pressure led to the formation of CuAlO2 at the interface between Cu and Al2O3, which improved the adhesion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mulder C, Klomp JT (1985) J Phys C4:111
Kasowski RV, Ohuchi FS, French RH (1988) Physica B 150:44
Beraud C, Courbiere M, Esnouf C, Juve D, Treheux D (1989) J Mat Sci 24:4545
Mellul S, Chevalier JP (1991) Phil Mag A 64:561
Guo Q, Moller PJ (1991) Surf Sci 244:228
Ernst F, Pirouz P, Heuer AH (1991) Phil Mag A 63:259
Dehm G, Rühle M, Ding G, Raj R (1995) Phil Mag B 71:1111
Scheu C, Dehm G, Rühle M, Brydson R (1998) Phil Mag A 78(2):439
Dehm G, Scheu C, Möbus G, Brydson R, Rühle M (1997) Ultramicroscopy 67:207
Kleber JA, Niu C, Shepherd K, Jennison DR, Bogicevic A (2000) Sur Sci 446:76
Niu C, Shepherd K, Martini D, Tong J, Kleber JA, Jennison DR, Bogicevic A (2000) Surf Sci 465:163
Johnson KH, Pepper SV (1982) J Appl Phys 53:6634
Zhao GL, Smith JR, Raynolds J, Srolovitz DJ (1996) Interface Sci 3(4):289
Batyrev I, Kleinman L (2001) Phys Rev B 64:033410
Wang XG, Smith JR, Scheffler M (2002) Phys Rev B 66:073411
Zhang W, Smith JR, Evans AG (2002) Acta Mater 50(15):3803
Schwartz B (1984) Am Ceram Soc Bulletin 63(4):577
Yoshino Y, Ohtsu H, Shibita T (1992) J Am Ceram Soc 75(12):3353
Proceedings of the 15th international congress on electron microscopy (2002) Engelbrecht J, Sewell T, Witcomb M, Cross R, Richards P (eds) vol 1 and 2, The Microscopy Society of Southern Africa, Durban
Williams DB, Carter CB (1996) Transmission electron microscopy: a textbook for materials science. Plenum Press, New York
Fultz B, Howe JM (2000) Transmission electron microscopy and diffractometry of materials. Springer, Berlin
Egerton RF (1996) Electron energy-loss spectroscopy in the electron microscope. 2 Plenum Press, New York
Applications of transmission electron energy-loss spectroscopy in materials science (1992) Disko MM, Ahn CC, Fultz B (eds) Warrendale, The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, Pennsylvania
Gao M, Scheu C, Wagner T, Kurtz W, Rühle M (2002) Metallkunde Z 93(5):438
Scheu C, Gao M, Rühle M (2002) J Mat Sci Technol 18(2):117
Scheu C (2004) Interface Sci 12:127–134
Scheu C, Klein S, Tomsia A, Rühle M (2002) J Microscopy 208:11
Stein W (2001) PhD thesis, University of Stuttgart, Germany
Akatsu T, Scheu C, Wagner T, Gemming T, Hosoda N, Suga T, Rühle M (2000) Appl Surf Sci 165:159
Klein S (2001) PhD thesis, University of Stuttgart, Germany
Kurtz W (2002) Z Metallkunde 93(5):432
Strecker A, Salzberger U, Mayer J (1993) Prakt Metallogr 30:482
S. H. Oh, private communication
Müllejans H, Bruley J (1995) J Microscopy 180:12
Scheu C (2002) J Microscopy 205:52
Chang CC (1971) J Vac Sci Technol 8:500
Varga P, Taglauer E (1982) J Nucl Mater 111/112:726
Batyrev I, Alavi A, Finnis M (1999) Faraday Discuss 114:33
Wang XG, Chaka A, Scheffler M (2000) Phys Rev Lett 84:3650
Ahn J, Rabalais JW (1997) Surf Sci 388:121
Hass KC, Schneider WF, Curioni AC, Andreoni W (1998) Science 282:265
Eng PJ, Trainor TP, Brown GE, Waychunas GA, Newville M, Sutton SR, Rivers ML (2000) Science 288:1029
Oh SH, Scheu C, Wagner T, Tchernychova E, Rühle M (2006) Acta Materialia 54:2685
Hashibon A, Elsässer C, Rühle M (2005) Acta Materialia 53:5323
Dehm G, Edongue H, Wagner T, Oh SH, Arzt E (2005) Z Metallkunde 96(3):249
Liedtke A, Klein S, private communication
Gallois B, Lupis CHP (1981) Metall Trans 12B(3):549
Saiz E, Tomsia AP, Cannon RM (1998) In: Tomsia AP, Glaeser AM (eds) Ceramic microstructures, control at the atomic level, Plenum Publishing Corp., p 65
Diemer M, Neubrand A, Trumble KP (1999) J Rödel Am Ceram Soc 82(10):2825
Trumble KP (1992) Acta Metall Mater 40:S105
Rogers KA, Trumble KP, Dalgleish BJ, Reimanis IE (1994) J Am Ceram Soc 77(8):2036
Susnitzky DW, Carter CB (1991) J Mater Res 6(9):1958
Gonzalez EJ, Trumble KP (1996) J Am Ceram Soc 79(1):114
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Dr. Thomas Wagner, Dr. Wilhelm Stein, Dr. Gunther Richter and Dr. Wolfgang Kurtz for providing several of the Cu/Al2O3 samples and for helpful discussions. Thanks to Ute Salzberger and Maria Sycha for their excellent TEM specimen preparation, and to Dr. John Bruley and Prof. Hui Gu for providing the CuAl2 and copper oxide spectra. Part of this work was supported by the German Science Foundation through the Graduiertenkolleg “Innere Grenzflächen in kristallinen Materialien” (GRK 285). M. G. wishes to thank the Alexander von Humboldt Society for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scheu, C., Gao, M., Oh, S.H. et al. Bonding at copper–alumina interfaces established by different surface treatments: a critical review. J Mater Sci 41, 5161–5168 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0073-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0073-0