Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The observation of compliance change in the transition from hydrogen to air environment during the fatigue test

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A compliance change was observed during fatigue testing of ASTM A710 HSLA steel using constant “K” CDCB specimen. The compliance decreased from 1.296 × 10−5 mm/N to 1.235× 10−5 mm/N when the environment was changed from hydrogen to air under the fatigue test conditions of f = 0.2 Hz, R = 0.1 and Δ K = 10 MPa✓m. The compliance change was observed in all fatigue testing while changing the environment from hydrogen to air. This compliance change can be explained numerically using the differential method for the design factors of the CDCB specimen. It was found from the calculation that the compliance change corresponded to a 6.3% change in Young’s modulus. It is proposed that the increased compliance resulted from the decreased Young’s modulus, the reduced Young’s modulus resulted from the increased lattice dilation which in turn resulted from a significantly increased hydrogen concentration at the crack tip region. The increased hydrogen concentration at the crack tip resulted from stress-induced hydrogen diffusion at the crack tip region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. A. Wriedt and R. A. Oriani, Scripta Metall. 8 (1974) 203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. E. S. Fisher, D. G. Westlake and S. T. Ockers, Phys. Status Solidi 28A (1975) 591.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Bastien and P. Azou, Compt. Rend. 231 (1950) 147.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. Y. Zhang, F. X. Jiang, W. Y. Chu and C. M. Hsiao, Metall. Trans. A 16A (1985) 1655.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Ortiz and J. Ovejero-Garcia, J. Mater. Sci. 26 (1992) 6777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Asano and R. Otsuka, Scripta Metall. 10 (1976) 1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. C. D. Beachman, Metall. Trans. 3 (1972) 437.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. X. Xie and J. P. Hirth, Corrosion 38(9) (1982) 486.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Matsui, H. Kimura and S. Moriya, Mater. Sci. Eng. 40 (1979) 207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Bastien and P. Azou, in Proc. Of the First World Metallurgical Conf., ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Lynch and N. E. Ryan, in Proc. 2nd Int. Conf., paper 3D12, Oxford, Pergamon Press (on behalf of the International Association for Hydrogen Energy), 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. A. Hippsley, Mat. Sci. Tech. 3 (1987) 912.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. D. Fransden and H. L. Marcus, Scripta Metall. 9 (1975) 1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J. D. Fransden and H. L. Marcus, Metall. Trans. A 8A (1977) 265.

    Google Scholar 

  15. T. Tabata and H. K. Birnbaum, Scripta Metall. 18 (1984) 231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. H. K. Birnbaum, to be published.

  17. A. R. Troiano, Trans. ASM 52 (1960) 54.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. A. Oriani, Edgar C. Bain Laboratory for Fundamental Research, United States Steel, Monroeville, PA, Dec. 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. Liu-Nash, Ph.D. Thesis, “Accelerated Test Method for Collecting Near-Threshold Fatigue Data”, Illinois Institute of Technology, May 1998.

  20. S. Mostovoy, P. B. Crosley and E. J. Ripling, J. Mater. 2(3) (1967) 661.

    Google Scholar 

  21. W. S. Gorsky, Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 8 (1935) 457.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Liu-Nash.

Additional information

This work was conducted at Illinois institute of Technology (IIT).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu-Nash, G. The observation of compliance change in the transition from hydrogen to air environment during the fatigue test. J Mater Sci 40, 4319–4323 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-2816-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-2816-8

Keywords

Navigation