Bangerter, A., & Clark, H. H. (2003). Navigating joint projects with dialogue. Cognitive Science, 27(2), 195–225.
Bavelas, J. B., Coates, L., Johnson, T., et al. (2000). Listeners as co-narrators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 941–952.
Bavelas, J. B., De Jong, P., Korman, H., & Jordan, S. S. (2012). Beyond back-channels: A three-step model of grounding in face-to-face dialogue. In: Proceedings of Interdisciplinary Workshop on Feedback Behaviors in Dialog (pp. 5–6).
Blackburn, P., & Meyer-Viol, W. (1994). Linguistics, logic and finite trees. Logic Journal of the Interest Group of Pure and Applied Logics, 2(1), 3–29.
Bolden, G. B., Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2019). Subversive completions: Turn-taking resources for commandeering the recipient’s action in progress. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(2), 144–158.
Bouzouita, M. (2008). At the syntax-pragmatics interface: Clitics in the history of Spanish, In R. Cooper & R. Kempson (Eds.), Language in Flux: Dialogue Coordination (pp. 221–264). London: Language Variation, Change and Evolution, College Publications.
Burnard, L. (2000). Reference guide for the British National Corpus (World ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Computing Services.
Cann, R., Kempson, R., & Marten, L. (2005). The Dynamics of Language. Oxford: Elsevier.
Cann, R., Kempson, R., & Purver, M. (2007). Context and well-formedness: The dynamics of ellipsis. Research on Language and Computation, 5(3), 333–358.
Chatzikyriakidis, S., & Kempson, R. (2011). Standard Modern and Pontic Greek person restrictions: A feature-free dynamic account. Journal of Greek Linguistics, 11, 127–166.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H. H. (1997). Dogmas of understanding. Discourse Processes, 23(3), 567–598.
Cooper, R. (2005). Records and record types in semantic theory. Journal of Logic and Computation, 15(2), 99–112.
Cooper, R. (2012). Type theory and semantics in flux. In R. Kempson, N. Asher, & T. Fernando (Eds.), Philosophy of Linguistics, Handbook of the Philosophy of Science (Vol. 14, pp. 271–323). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North Holland.
Cooper, R., & Ginzburg, J. (2015). Type Theory with Records for natural language semantics (Vol. 12, pp. 375–407). New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118882139.ch12.
de Ruiter, J. P., Mitterer, H., & Enfield, N. (2006). Projecting the end of a speaker’s turn: A cognitive cornerstone of conversation. Language, 82(3), 515–535.
Dobnik, S., Cooper, R., & Larsson, S. (2012). Modelling language, action, and perception in Type Theory with Records. In Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Constraint Solving and Language Processing (pp. 51–63).
Drew, P. (1991). Asymmetries of knowledge in conversational interactions. In K. Foppa & I. Markova (Eds.), Asymmetries in Dialogue (pp. 29–48). Hemel Hempstead: Wheatsheaf.
Duncan, S. (1972). Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23(2), 283–292.
Duncan, S. (1974). On the structure of speaker–auditor interaction during speaking turns. Language in Society, 3(2), 161–180.
Eshghi, A. (2009). Uncommon ground: The distribution of dialogue contexts. Ph.d thesis, Queen Mary University of London.
Eshghi, A. (2015). DS-TTR: An incremental, semantic, contextual parser for dialogue. In Proceedings of the 19th SemDial Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (goDial) (pp. 172–173).
Eshghi, A., & Healey, P. G. T. (2015). Collective contexts in conversation: Grounding by proxy. Cognitive Science, 40, 229–324.
Eshghi, A., & Lemon, O. (2014). How domain-general can we be? Learning incremental dialogue systems without dialogue acts. In Proceedings of the 18th SemDial Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (DialWatt) (pp. 53–61).
Eshghi, A., Healey, P. G. T., Purver, M., Howes, C., Gregoromichelaki, E., & Kempson, R. (2010). Incremental turn processing in dialogue. In Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing, York, UK.
Eshghi, A., Purver, M., & Hough, J. (2011). DyLan: Parser for Dynamic Syntax. Technical report, Queen Mary University of London, EECSRR-11-05
Eshghi, A., Hough, J., Purver, M., Kempson, R., & Gregoromichelaki, E. (2012). Conversational interactions: Capturing dialogue dynamics. In S. Larsson & L. Borin (Eds.), From Quantification to Conversation: Festschrift for Robin Cooper on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday, Tributes (Vol. 19, pp. 325–349). London: College Publications.
Eshghi, A., Hough, J., & Purver, M. (2013a). Incremental grammar induction from child-directed dialogue utterances. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics (CMCL) (pp. 94–103). ACL.
Eshghi, A., Purver, M., Hough, J., & Sato, Y. (2013b). Probabilistic grammar induction in an incremental semantic framework. In D. Duchier, Y. Parmentier (Eds.), Constraint Solving, and Language Processing. CSLP. (2012). Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 8114, pp. 92–107). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Eshghi, A., Howes, C., Gregoromichelaki, E., Hough, J., & Purver, M. (2015). Feedback in conversation as incremental semantic update. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS) (pp. 261–271). London: ACL.
Eshghi, A., Shalyminov, I., & Lemon, O. (2017). Bootstrapping incremental dialogue systems from minimal data: Linguistic knowledge or machine learning? In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (pp. 2220–2230).
Fernández, R. (2006). Non-sentential utterances in dialogue: Classification, resolution and use. Ph.d. thesis, King’s College London, University of London.
Fujimoto, D. T. (2007). Listener responses in interaction: A case for abandoning the term, backchannel. Journal of Osaka Jogakuin College, 37, 35–54.
Gargett, A., Gregoromichelaki, E., Kempson, R., Purver, M., & Sato, Y. (2009). Grammar resources for modelling dialogue dynamically. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 3(4), 347–363.
Gibson, E. A. F. (1991). A computational theory of human linguistic processing: Memory limitations and processing breakdown. Ph.d. thesis, Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA.
Ginzburg, J. (2012). The Interactive Stance: Meaning for Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ginzburg, J., & Cooper, R. (2004). Clarification, ellipsis, and the nature of contextual updates in dialogue. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27(3), 297–365.
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Gregoromichelaki, E., Kempson, R., Purver, M., Mills, G. J., Cann, R., Meyer-Viol, W., et al. (2011). Incrementality and intention-recognition in utterance processing. Dialogue and Discourse, 2(1), 199–233.
Gregoromichelaki, E., Howes, C., & Kempson, R. (2020). Actionism in syntax and semantics. In Dialogue and Perception-Extended Papers from DaP2018, CLASP Papers in Computational Linguistics (Vol. 2, pp. 12–27). Gothenburg: GUPEA.
Healey, P. G. T., & Mills, G. J. (2006). Participation, precedence and co-ordination in dialogue. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1470–1475).
Healey, P. G. T., Colman, M., & Thirlwell, M. (2005). Analysing multi-modal communication: Repair-based measures of human communicative co-ordination. In J. van Kuppevelt, L. Dybkjaer, & N. Bernsen (Eds.), Natural, Intelligent and Effective Interaction in Multimodal Dialogue Systems, Text, Speech and Language Technology (Vol. 30, pp. 113–129). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Healey, P. G. T., Eshghi, A., Howes, C., & Purver, M. (2011). Making a contribution: Processing clarification requests in dialogue. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, Poitiers.
Healey, P. G. T., Mills, G. J., Eshghi, A., & Howes, C. (2018). Running repairs: Co-ordinating meaning in dialogue. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(2), 367–388.
Heldner, M., Hjalmarsson, A., & Edlund, J. (2013). Backchannel relevance spaces. Nordic Prosody: Proceedings of XIth Conference, Tartu, 2012, 137–146.
Hough, J. (2015). Modelling incremental self-repair processing in dialogue. Ph.d thesis, Queen Mary University of London.
Hough, J., Purver, M. (2012). Processing self-repairs in an incremental type-theoretic dialogue system. In Proceedings of the 16th SemDial Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (SeineDial), Paris, France (pp. 136–144).
Howes, C. (2012). Coordination in dialogue: Using compound contributions to join a party. Ph.d. thesis, Queen Mary University of London.
Howes, C., Eshghi, A. (2017). Feedback relevance spaces: The organisation of increments in conversation. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS 2017). Association for Computational Linguisitics.
Howes, C., Purver, M., Healey, P. G. T., Mills, G. J., & Gregoromichelaki, E. (2011). On incrementality in dialogue: Evidence from compound contributions. Dialogue and Discourse, 2(1), 279–311.
Howes, C., Healey, P. G. T., & Purver, M. (2012a). Whose turn is it anyway? Same- and cross-person compound contributions in dialogue. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Sapporo, Japan (pp. 1697–1702).
Howes, C., Healey, P. G. T., Purver, M., & Eshghi, A. (2012b). Finishing each other’s ... responding to incomplete contributions in dialogue. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Sapporo, Japan (pp. 479–484).
Kalatzis, D., Eshghi, A., & Lemon, O. (2016). Bootstrapping incremental dialogue systems: Using linguistic knowledge to learn from minimal data. In Proceedings of the NIPS 2016 Workshop on Learning Methods for Dialogue, Barcelona.
Kawahara, T., Yamaguchi, T., Inoue, K., Takanashi, K., & Ward, N. (2016). Prediction and generation of backchannel form for attentive listening systems. In Proceedings of INTERSPEECH (pp. 2890–2894).
Kempson, R., & Kiaer, J. (2008). Japanese scrambling and the grammar-parser correspondence. In H. Hoshi (Ed.), Language, Mind and Brain: Perspectives from Linguistics and Cognitive Neuroscience. Kuroshio: Tokyo.
Kempson, R., Meyer-Viol, W., & Gabbay, D. (2001). Dynamic Syntax: The Flow of Language Understanding. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kempson, R., Cann, R., Eshghi, A., Gregoromichelaki, E., & Purver, M. (2015). Ellipsis. In S. Lappin & C. Fox (Eds.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Kempson, R., Cann, R., Gregoromichelaki, E., & Chatzikiriakidis, S. (2016). Language as mechanisms for interaction. Theoretical Linguistics, 42(3–4), 203–275.
Kita, S., & Ide, S. (2007). Nodding, aizuchi, and final particles in japanese conversation: How conversation reflects the ideology of communication and social relationships. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(7), 1242–1254.
Kjellmer, G. (2009). Where do we backchannel? On the use of mm, mhm, uh huh and such like. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(1), 81–112.
Larsson, S. (2015). Formal semantics for perceptual classification. Journal of Logic and Computation, 25(2), 335–369.
Lawler, I., Hahn, F., & Rieser, H. (2017). Gesture meaning needs speech meaning to denote—A case of speech-gesture meaning interaction. Proceedings of the Workshop on Formal Approaches to the Dynamics of Linguistic Interaction, ESSLLI, 2017, 42–46.
Mills, G., Healey, P. G. T. (2006). Clarifying spatial descriptions: Local and global effects on semantic co-ordination. In Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (SEMDIAL), Potsdam, Germany.
Mills, G. J. (2007). Semantic co-ordination in dialogue: The role of direct interaction. Ph.d thesis, Queen Mary University of London.
Park, H. W., Gelsomini, M., Lee, J. J., & Breazeal, C. (2017). Telling stories to robots: The effect of backchanneling on a child’s storytelling. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction (pp. 100–108). ACM.
Poppe, R., Truong, K. P., & Heylen, D. (2011). Backchannels: Quantity, type and timing matters. In International workshop on intelligent virtual agents (pp. 228–239). Springer.
Purver, M. (2004). The theory and use of clarification requests in dialogue. Ph.D. thesis, University of London.
Purver, M., Cann, R., & Kempson, R. (2006). Grammars as parsers: Meeting the dialogue challenge. Research on Language and Computation, 4(2–3), 289–326.
Purver, M., Howes, C., Gregoromichelaki, E., & Healey, P. G. T. (2009). Split utterances in dialogue: A corpus study. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue (SIGDIAL), London, UK (pp. 262–271).
Purver, M., Gregoromichelaki, E., Meyer-Viol, W., & Cann, R. (2010). Splitting the ‘I’s and crossing the ‘you’s: context, speech acts and grammar. In Proceedings of the 14th SemDial Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (pp. 43–50).
Purver, M., Eshghi, A., & Hough, J. (2011). Incremental semantic construction in a dialogue system. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS), Oxford, UK (pp. 365–369).
Rühlemann, C. (2007). Conversation in Context: A Corpus-Driven Approach. London, New York: Continuum.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
Sato, Y. (2011). Local ambiguity, search strategies and parsing in Dynamic Syntax. In E. Gregoromichelaki, R. Kempson, & C. Howes (Eds.), The Dynamics of Lexical Interfaces. Stanford CA: CSLI Publications.
Schegloff, E. (1995). Parties and talking together: Two ways in which numbers are significant for talk-in-interaction (pp. 31–42). Situated Order: Studies in the Social Organization of Talk and Embodied Activities.
Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382.
Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, 71, 93.
Tolins, J., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2014). Addressee backchannels steer narrative development. Journal of Pragmatics, 70, 152–164.
Yngve, V. H. (1970). On getting a word in edgewise. In Papers from the 6th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 567–578).
Yu, Y., Eshghi, A., & Lemon, O. (2016). Training an adaptive dialogue policy for interactive learning of visually grounded word meanings. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue (SIGDIAL), Los Angeles (pp. 339–349).