Abstract
Services that exploit Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) are poised to revolutionise the service industry with a projected value of 71 BUSD by the end of the decade. A key enabler of this technology is the unlocking of autonomous Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS) operations. BVLOS operations will depend on a robust Detect and Avoid (D&A) capability. Yet, currently in the UK and EU, BVLOS operations are only allowed in specific cases and scenarios. As a result, the technological landscape for the development of robust D&A faces limitations, and there is little market incentive for development. Furthermore, while automated BVLOS is a future technology, a strong D&A capability is of importance now for all types of UAS operations. As the remote pilot has to deal with information overload from the controller device and the environment. These high-risk UAS operations are becoming more common. In this paper, we discuss the current legal framework in the UK making comparisons to EU countries. We make the case that even when an operation abides by the current framework the remote pilot is exposed to several legal liabilities. We review the roadmaps for UAS adoption (including certification processes for UAS-based products) and highlight that for software-intensive systems, key steps are missing to assure the quality of the product. Finally, we build on these findings to set forwards a path to complement future certification processes to enable autonomous based UAS operations to share the airspace with remotely piloted operations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
BIS Research: Global UAV market value in 2018 and 2029 (in billion U.S. dollars) [Graph]. (2019)
Zubin, I., van Arem, B., Wiegmans B., van Duin R.: Using drones in the last-mile logistics processes of medical product delivery. A feasibility case study in Rotterdam. In: 99th Annual Meeting Transportation Research Board. (2020)
Kitonsa, H., Kruglikov, S.V.: Significance of drone technology for achievement of the United Nations sustainable development goals. R-economy 4(3), 115–120 (2018)
SDG Knowledge Hub: “Drones for SDGs: Fast, Low-cost Delivery of Health Care Supplies for Remote Populations in Malawi,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://sdg.iisd.org/commentary/guest-articles/drones-for-sdgs-fast-low-cost-delivery-of-health-care-supplies-for-remote-populations-in-malawi/. [Accessed: 16-Jun-2021]
NATO - Applied Vehicle Technology panel: “considerations for the harmonisation of UAS regulations for common nato operations,” (2020)
UK CAA: Step forward for the drone industry as Civil Aviation Authority authorises trial of a concept for routine BVLOS operations. (2021). [Online]. Available: https://www.caa.co.uk/news/drone-trial-of-routine-bvlos-operations-concept-authorised/. [Accessed: 07-Mar-2022].
UK CAA: Flying in the specific category. (2020) [Online]. Available: https://www.caa.co.uk/Commercial-industry/Aircraft/Unmanned-aircraft/Small-drones/Flying-in-the-specific-category/. [Accessed: 06-May-2021]
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/947 of 24 May 2019 on the rules and procedures for the operation of unmanned aircraft (Text with EEA relevance.). 2019, p. C/2019/3824.
UK CAA: Regulatory Article 1200 - Air Safety Management.
Stewarts law: Getting the Deal Through’s guide to Drone Regulation 2020. 202AD. [Online]. Available: https://www.stewartslaw.com/news/guide-to-drone-regulation-2020-lexologys-getting-the-deal-through/. [Accessed: 30-Aug-2021]
SAE: J3016_202104. Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles. (2021)
Jiménez López, J.: RPAS certification. Where the challenges lie. Military Airworthiness Conference. Rome 2014 (2014)
Revolve Media: RAPID Website. (2022). [Online]. Available: https://rapid2020.eu/. [Accessed: 07-Mar-2022]
Riordan, J., Manduhu, M., Black, J., Dow, A., Dooly, G., Matalonga, S.: LiDAR simulation for performance evaluation of UAS detect and avoid. 2021 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), pp. 1355–1363. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUAS51884.2021.9476817
EASA.: EASA concept of operations for drones. (2015)
van Dam, C.: European tort law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013)
Oliphant, K.: The law of tort. LexisNexis, London (2013)
O’Neill A.: Rescuing the Law of Tort? The Decision of the Supreme Court in O’neill v Dunnes Stores. Irish Jurist (1966-). 45, 240–245 (2010)
Binchy, W.: Tort Law in Ireland: A Half-Century Review. Irish Jurist 56, 199–218 (2016)
Clerk, J.F.: Clerk & Lindsell on torts, 23rd edn. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2020)
Kelsen v Imperial Tobacco Co. 2 QB 334, 2 All ER 343. (1957)
Anchor Brewhouse Developments Ltd v Berkley House (Docklands Developments) Ltd 38 BLR 82. (1987)
Bernstein of Leigh v Skyviews & General Ltd QB 479. (1978)
Horsey, K.: Tort law. Oxford University Press: Oxford, United Kingdom New York, NY, (2019)
Barfield, W.: Advanced introduction to law and artificial intelligence. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK Northampton, Massachusetts (2020)
Matalonga, S., Rodrigues, F., Travassos, G.H.:. Characterizing testing methods for context-aware software systems: Results from a quasi-systematic literature review. J. Syst. Softw. 131, 1–21 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.048
Finn, R. de H. P. J. L. Wright David: “Study on privacy, data protection and ethical risks in civil remotely piloted aircraft final report,” Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry (European Commission), Luxembourg, (2014)
European Union: Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. (2012)
LuftVO [German Air Traffic Regulations]
Peck v the United Kingdom, No. 44647/98. (2003)
Köpke v Germany, No. 420/07. (2010)
UK CAA: CAA successful prosecutions: 1 April 2014 TO 31 March 2015. (2015)
Giesa A.: Judgment of April 24, 2019 - 9 Cs 926 Js 3044/19. (2019)
JARUS WG 6: “JARUS guidelines on Specific Operations Risk Assessment (SORA). (2017)
SESAR Joint Undertaking: U-Space Blueprint Brochure. (2017)
EASA: Design verification of UAS operated in the ‘specific’ category and classified in SAIL III and IV. (2021)
EASA: AMC 20–115D Airborne Software Development Assurance Using EUROCAE ED-12 and RTCA DO-178. (2017)
ISO 19011:2012 - Quality Management System Auditing
Rodríguez M., Piattini M.: Experiencias en la industria del software: Certificación del producto con ISO/IEC 25000. In: CIBSE 2015 - XVIII Ibero-American Conference on Software Engineering. (2015)
ISO/IEC 25040:2011 Systems and software engineering — Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) — Evaluation process
Wang, Y.K.N, Plataniotis, S., Kwong, H., Leung, S., Yanushkevich, F., Karray, M., Hou, et al.: On autonomous systems: From reflexive, imperative and adaptive intelligence to autonomous and cognitive intelligence. En 2019 IEEE 18th International Conference on Cognitive Informatics Cognitive Computing (ICCI*CC), 7-12, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCICC46617.2019.9146038
EASA: Artificial Intelligence roadmap: A human-centric approach to AI in aviation. 202AD
Arrieta, A.B., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., García, S. et al.: Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI, 22 de octubre de 2019. http://arxiv.org/abs/1910.10045
EASA: EASA Concept Paper: First usable guidance for Level 1 machine learning applications: A deliverable of the EASA AI Roadmap. (2021)
Fredericks, E.M., DeVries, B., Cheng, B.H.C.: Towards run-time adaptation of test cases for self-adaptive systems in the face of uncertainty. Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems - SEAMS 2014, 2014, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/2593929.2593937
Matalonga, S., Rodrigues, F., Travassos, G.H.: Challenges in testing context aware software systems. En Systematic and Automated Software Testing, Ed. SBQS. BelloHorizonte (2015)
Matalonga S., Amalfitano D., Doreste A., Fasolino, A.R., Travassos G.H.: Alternatives for Testing of Context-Aware Contemporary Software Systems in industrial settings: Results from a Rapid review. (2021)
Munappy, A.R., Mattos, D.I., Bosch, J., Olsson, H.H., Dakkak, A.: From Ad-Hoc Data Analytics to DataOps. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software and System Processes, pp. 165–174. (2020)
Matalonga, S., Rodrigues, F., Travassos, G.H.: Characterizing testing methods for context-aware software systems: Results from a quasi-systematic literature review. J. Syst. Softw. 131, 1–21 (2017)
Matalonga, S., Travassos G.H.: Testing Context-aware Software Systems: Unchain the Context, Set It Free!. In: Proceedings of the 31st Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering, pp. 250–254. (2017)
The Nilson Report.: Number of purchase transactions on payment cards worldwide in 2019, by brand (in billions). (2020)
Protti, M., Barzan, R.:UAV Autonomy-Which level is desirable?-which level is acceptable? Alenia Aeronautica Viewpoint. (2007)
NATO Standard: AEP-4671. Unmanned Aircraft Systems Airworthiness requirements. (2019)
Walter, B., Suchy N.: Concept of Use for the Airborne Collision Avoidance System Xu for Smaller UAS (ACAS sXu). (2020)
Funding
Authors are partially financed by the RAPID Project (www.rapid.eu), H2020-EU.3.4. Grant Agreement number 861211.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Santiago Matalonga and all authors (Santiago Matalonga, Samuel White, Jacques Hartmann and James Riordan) commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethics Appoval
Not applicable to the research described in this manuscript.
Consent to participate
Not applicable to the research described in this manuscript. No human participantes were involved in the the research described in this manuscript.
Consent to publish
Not applicable to the research described in this manuscript. No human participantes were involved in the the research described in this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Matalonga, S., White, S., Hartmann, J. et al. A Review of the Legal, Regulatory and Practical Aspects Needed to Unlock Autonomous Beyond Visual Line of Sight Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operations. J Intell Robot Syst 106, 10 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-022-01682-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-022-01682-5