Abstract
Chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) is a complex and high-accuracy polishing process that creates a smooth and planar material surface. One of the key challenges of CMP is to predict the material removal rate (MRR) accurately. With the development of artificial intelligence techniques, numerous data-driven models have been developed to predict the MRR in the CMP process. However, these methods are not capable of considering surface topography in MRR predictions because it is difficult to observe and measure the surface topography. To address this issue, we propose a graphical model and a conditional variational autoencoder to extract the features of surface topography in the CMP process. Moreover, process variables and the extracted features of surface topography are fed into an ensemble learning-based predictive model to predict the MRR. Experimental results have shown that the proposed method can predict the MRR accurately with a root mean squared error of 6.12 nm/min, and it outperforms physics-based machine learning and data-driven methods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Airoldi, E. M. (2007). Getting started in probabilistic graphical models. PLoS Computational Biology, 3(12), e252.
Awano, Y. (2006). Carbon nanotube (cnt) via interconnect technologies: Low temperature cvd growth and chemical mechanical planarization for vertically aligned cnts. In Proc. 2006 ICPT (Vol. 10).
Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32.
Chen, H., Teng, Z., Guo, Z., & Zhao, P. (2020). An integrated target acquisition approach and graphical user interface tool for parallel manipulator assembly. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 20(2), 021006.
Deng, J., Zhang, Q., Lu, J., Yan, Q., Pan, J., & Chen, R. (2021). Prediction of the surface roughness and material removal rate in chemical mechanical polishing of single-crystal sic via a back-propagation neural network. Precision Engineering, 72, 102–110.
Evans, C., Paul, E., Dornfeld, D., Lucca, D., Byrne, G., Tricard, M., et al. (2003). Material removal mechanisms in lapping and polishing. CIRP Annals, 52(2), 611–633.
Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 29, 1189–1232.
Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2000). Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting (with discussion and a rejoinder by the authors). The Annals of Statistics, 28(2), 337–407.
Greenwood, J. A., & Williamson, J. P. (1966). Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proceedings of the royal society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 295(1442), 300–319.
Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., & White, H. (1989). Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks, 2(5), 359–366.
Jia, X., Di, Y., Feng, J., Yang, Q., Dai, H., & Lee, J. (2018). Adaptive virtual metrology for semiconductor chemical mechanical planarization process using gmdh-type polynomial neural networks. Journal of Process Control, 62, 44–54.
Johnson, K. L., & Johnson, K. L. (1987). Contact mechanics. Cambridge University Press.
Kégl, B. (2013). The return of adaboost. mh: multi-class hamming trees. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6086.
Kong, Z., Oztekin, A., Beyca, O. F., Phatak, U., Bukkapatnam, S. T., & Komanduri, R. (2010). Process performance prediction for chemical mechanical planarization (cmp) by integration of nonlinear bayesian analysis and statistical modeling. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 23(2), 316–327.
Krishnan, M., Nalaskowski, J. W., & Cook, L. M. (2010). Chemical mechanical planarization: Slurry chemistry, materials, and mechanisms. Chemical Reviews, 110(1), 178–204.
Lee, D., Lee, H., & Jeong, H. (2016). Slurry components in metal chemical mechanical planarization (cmp) process: A review. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 17(12), 1751–1762.
Lee, H., & Jeong, H. (2011). A wafer-scale material removal rate profile model for copper chemical mechanical planarization. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 51(5), 395–403.
Lee, H., Jeong, H., & Dornfeld, D. (2013). Semi-empirical material removal rate distribution model for sio2 chemical mechanical polishing (cmp) processes. Precision Engineering, 37(2), 483–490.
Lee, K. B., & Kim, C. O. (2020). Recurrent feature-incorporated convolutional neural network for virtual metrology of the chemical mechanical planarization process. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 31(1), 73–86.
Leon, J. I., Vazquez, S., & Franquelo, L. G. (2017). Multilevel converters: Control and modulation techniques for their operation and industrial applications. Proceedings of the IEEE, 105(11), 2066–2081.
Li, Z., Wu, D., & Yu, T. (2019). Prediction of material removal rate for chemical mechanical planarization using decision tree-based ensemble learning. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 141(3), 031003.
Luo, J., & Dornfeld, D. A. (2001). Material removal mechanism in chemical mechanical polishing: theory and modeling. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 14(2), 112–133.
Luo, Q., Ramarajan, S., & Babu, S. (1998). Modification of the Preston equation for the chemical-mechanical polishing of copper. Thin Solid Films, 335(1–2), 160–167.
Nguyen, N., Zhong, Z., & Tian, Y. (2015). An analytical investigation of pad wear caused by the conditioner in fixed abrasive chemical-mechanical polishing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 77(5), 897–905.
Oh, S., & Seok, J. (2009). An integrated material removal model for silicon dioxide layers in chemical mechanical polishing processes. Wear, 266(7–8), 839–849.
Pandey, G., & Dukkipati, A. (2017). Variational methods for conditional multimodal deep learning. In 2017 international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN) (pp. 308-315). IEEE.
Park, B., Lee, H., Park, K., Kim, H., & Jeong, H. (2008). Pad roughness variation and its effect on material removal profile in ceria-based cmp slurry. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 203(1–3), 287–292.
Polikar, R. (2006). Ensemble based systems in decision making. IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine, 6(3), 21–45.
Sheu, D. D., Chen, C.-H., & Yu, P.-Y. (2012). Invention principles and contradiction matrix for semiconductor manufacturing industry: chemical mechanical polishing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(5), 1637–1648.
Shi, J., Yu, T., Goebel, K., & Wu, D. (2021). Remaining useful life prediction of bearings using ensemble learning: The impact of diversity in base learners and features. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 21(2).
Steigerwald, J. M., Murarka, S. P., & Gutmann, R. J. (1997). Chemical mechanical planarization of microelectronic materials. Wiley.
Wang, P., Gao, R. X., & Yan, R. (2017). A deep learning-based approach to material removal rate prediction in polishing. CIRP Annals, 66(1), 429–432.
Wei, Y., Wu, D., & Terpenny, J. (2021). Learning the health index of complex systems using dynamic conditional variational autoencoders. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 216, 108004.
Wu, D., Wei, Y., & Terpenny, J. (2019). Predictive modelling of surface roughness in fused deposition modelling using data fusion. International Journal of Production Research, 57(12), 3992–4006.
Xia, L., Zheng, P., Huang, X., & Liu, C. (2021). A novel hypergraph convolution network-based approach for predicting the material removal rate in chemical mechanical planarization. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-021-01784-1
Yin, S., Rodriguez-Andina, J. J., & Jiang, Y. (2019). Real-time monitoring and control of industrial cyberphysical systems: With integrated plant-wide monitoring and control framework. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 13(4), 38–47.
Yu, T., Asplund, D. T., Bastawros, A. F., & Chandra, A. (2016). Performance and modeling of paired polishing process. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 109, 49–57.
Yu, T., Li, Z., & Wu, D. (2019). Predictive modeling of material removal rate in chemical mechanical planarization with physics-informed machine learning. Wear, 426, 1430–1438.
Zantye, P. B., Kumar, A., & Sikder, A. (2004). Chemical mechanical planarization for microelectronics applications. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports, 45(3–6), 89–220.
Zhao, T., Zhao, R., & Eskenazi, M. (2017). Learning discourse-level diversity for neural dialog models using conditional variational autoencoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.10960.
Zhao, Y., & Chang, L. (2002). A micro-contact and wear model for chemical-mechanical polishing of silicon wafers. Wear, 252(3–4), 220–226.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest in the research work presented.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wei, Y., Wu, D. Material removal rate prediction in chemical mechanical planarization with conditional probabilistic autoencoder and stacking ensemble learning. J Intell Manuf 35, 115–127 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-02040-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-02040-w