Skip to main content
Log in

Material removal rate prediction in chemical mechanical planarization with conditional probabilistic autoencoder and stacking ensemble learning

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) is a complex and high-accuracy polishing process that creates a smooth and planar material surface. One of the key challenges of CMP is to predict the material removal rate (MRR) accurately. With the development of artificial intelligence techniques, numerous data-driven models have been developed to predict the MRR in the CMP process. However, these methods are not capable of considering surface topography in MRR predictions because it is difficult to observe and measure the surface topography. To address this issue, we propose a graphical model and a conditional variational autoencoder to extract the features of surface topography in the CMP process. Moreover, process variables and the extracted features of surface topography are fed into an ensemble learning-based predictive model to predict the MRR. Experimental results have shown that the proposed method can predict the MRR accurately with a root mean squared error of 6.12 nm/min, and it outperforms physics-based machine learning and data-driven methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Airoldi, E. M. (2007). Getting started in probabilistic graphical models. PLoS Computational Biology, 3(12), e252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awano, Y. (2006). Carbon nanotube (cnt) via interconnect technologies: Low temperature cvd growth and chemical mechanical planarization for vertically aligned cnts. In Proc. 2006 ICPT (Vol. 10).

  • Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., Teng, Z., Guo, Z., & Zhao, P. (2020). An integrated target acquisition approach and graphical user interface tool for parallel manipulator assembly. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 20(2), 021006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, J., Zhang, Q., Lu, J., Yan, Q., Pan, J., & Chen, R. (2021). Prediction of the surface roughness and material removal rate in chemical mechanical polishing of single-crystal sic via a back-propagation neural network. Precision Engineering, 72, 102–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C., Paul, E., Dornfeld, D., Lucca, D., Byrne, G., Tricard, M., et al. (2003). Material removal mechanisms in lapping and polishing. CIRP Annals, 52(2), 611–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 29, 1189–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2000). Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting (with discussion and a rejoinder by the authors). The Annals of Statistics, 28(2), 337–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J. A., & Williamson, J. P. (1966). Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proceedings of the royal society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 295(1442), 300–319.

  • Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., & White, H. (1989). Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks, 2(5), 359–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, X., Di, Y., Feng, J., Yang, Q., Dai, H., & Lee, J. (2018). Adaptive virtual metrology for semiconductor chemical mechanical planarization process using gmdh-type polynomial neural networks. Journal of Process Control, 62, 44–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. L., & Johnson, K. L. (1987). Contact mechanics. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kégl, B. (2013). The return of adaboost. mh: multi-class hamming trees. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6086.

  • Kong, Z., Oztekin, A., Beyca, O. F., Phatak, U., Bukkapatnam, S. T., & Komanduri, R. (2010). Process performance prediction for chemical mechanical planarization (cmp) by integration of nonlinear bayesian analysis and statistical modeling. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 23(2), 316–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, M., Nalaskowski, J. W., & Cook, L. M. (2010). Chemical mechanical planarization: Slurry chemistry, materials, and mechanisms. Chemical Reviews, 110(1), 178–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D., Lee, H., & Jeong, H. (2016). Slurry components in metal chemical mechanical planarization (cmp) process: A review. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 17(12), 1751–1762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., & Jeong, H. (2011). A wafer-scale material removal rate profile model for copper chemical mechanical planarization. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 51(5), 395–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., Jeong, H., & Dornfeld, D. (2013). Semi-empirical material removal rate distribution model for sio2 chemical mechanical polishing (cmp) processes. Precision Engineering, 37(2), 483–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. B., & Kim, C. O. (2020). Recurrent feature-incorporated convolutional neural network for virtual metrology of the chemical mechanical planarization process. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 31(1), 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leon, J. I., Vazquez, S., & Franquelo, L. G. (2017). Multilevel converters: Control and modulation techniques for their operation and industrial applications. Proceedings of the IEEE, 105(11), 2066–2081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., Wu, D., & Yu, T. (2019). Prediction of material removal rate for chemical mechanical planarization using decision tree-based ensemble learning. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 141(3), 031003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, J., & Dornfeld, D. A. (2001). Material removal mechanism in chemical mechanical polishing: theory and modeling. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 14(2), 112–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Q., Ramarajan, S., & Babu, S. (1998). Modification of the Preston equation for the chemical-mechanical polishing of copper. Thin Solid Films, 335(1–2), 160–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, N., Zhong, Z., & Tian, Y. (2015). An analytical investigation of pad wear caused by the conditioner in fixed abrasive chemical-mechanical polishing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 77(5), 897–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, S., & Seok, J. (2009). An integrated material removal model for silicon dioxide layers in chemical mechanical polishing processes. Wear, 266(7–8), 839–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, G., & Dukkipati, A. (2017). Variational methods for conditional multimodal deep learning. In 2017 international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN) (pp. 308-315). IEEE.

  • Park, B., Lee, H., Park, K., Kim, H., & Jeong, H. (2008). Pad roughness variation and its effect on material removal profile in ceria-based cmp slurry. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 203(1–3), 287–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polikar, R. (2006). Ensemble based systems in decision making. IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine, 6(3), 21–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheu, D. D., Chen, C.-H., & Yu, P.-Y. (2012). Invention principles and contradiction matrix for semiconductor manufacturing industry: chemical mechanical polishing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(5), 1637–1648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, J., Yu, T., Goebel, K., & Wu, D. (2021). Remaining useful life prediction of bearings using ensemble learning: The impact of diversity in base learners and features. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 21(2).

  • Steigerwald, J. M., Murarka, S. P., & Gutmann, R. J. (1997). Chemical mechanical planarization of microelectronic materials. Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, P., Gao, R. X., & Yan, R. (2017). A deep learning-based approach to material removal rate prediction in polishing. CIRP Annals, 66(1), 429–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Y., Wu, D., & Terpenny, J. (2021). Learning the health index of complex systems using dynamic conditional variational autoencoders. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 216, 108004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, D., Wei, Y., & Terpenny, J. (2019). Predictive modelling of surface roughness in fused deposition modelling using data fusion. International Journal of Production Research, 57(12), 3992–4006.

  • Xia, L., Zheng, P., Huang, X., & Liu, C. (2021). A novel hypergraph convolution network-based approach for predicting the material removal rate in chemical mechanical planarization. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-021-01784-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, S., Rodriguez-Andina, J. J., & Jiang, Y. (2019). Real-time monitoring and control of industrial cyberphysical systems: With integrated plant-wide monitoring and control framework. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 13(4), 38–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, T., Asplund, D. T., Bastawros, A. F., & Chandra, A. (2016). Performance and modeling of paired polishing process. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 109, 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, T., Li, Z., & Wu, D. (2019). Predictive modeling of material removal rate in chemical mechanical planarization with physics-informed machine learning. Wear, 426, 1430–1438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zantye, P. B., Kumar, A., & Sikder, A. (2004). Chemical mechanical planarization for microelectronics applications. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports, 45(3–6), 89–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, T., Zhao, R., & Eskenazi, M. (2017). Learning discourse-level diversity for neural dialog models using conditional variational autoencoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.10960.

  • Zhao, Y., & Chang, L. (2002). A micro-contact and wear model for chemical-mechanical polishing of silicon wafers. Wear, 252(3–4), 220–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yupeng Wei.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest in the research work presented.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, Y., Wu, D. Material removal rate prediction in chemical mechanical planarization with conditional probabilistic autoencoder and stacking ensemble learning. J Intell Manuf 35, 115–127 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-02040-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-02040-w

Keywords

Navigation