Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Title: production planning and control in industry 4.0 environment: a morphological analysis of literature and research agenda

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rapid industrial changes triggered by the fourth industrial revolution or I4.0 have ensued a dynamic and integrative perspective in production planning and control (PPC) decisions. Prior research on PPC transformation in I4.0 environment is in the form of computational experiments to solve sector-specific issues, with little emphasis on how PPC is influenced by the evolving digital capabilities, and how it operates in the new manufacturing paradigm? This study aims to develop an analytical framework to consolidate the prevailing research on PPC in I4.0 and identify future research possibilities. We used morphological analysis (MA) approach for reviewing 104 studies identified through a systematic review protocol. The MA framework is created with five dimensions (i.e., study setting, PPC functions, enabling technologies, digital capabilities, and core performance outcomes) defined based on input-process-outcome (IPO) approach of system analysis. This study is possibly the first to use MA for reviewing the PPC literature, presenting practitioner and theoretical contributions. The MA framework acts as a ready reckoner of the literature and its modular representation has the flexibility to be modified or augmented as the literature evolves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arbix, G., Salerno, M. S., Zancul, E., Amaral, G., & Lins, L. M. (2017). Advanced manufacturing: What is to be learnt from Germany, the U.S., and China. Novos Estudos CEBRAP, 36, 29–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, J., & Jonsson, P. (2018). Big data in spare parts supply chains: The potential of using product-in-use data in aftermarket demand planning. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 48(5), 524–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baliga, A. J., Chawla, V., Sunder, M., Ganesh, V., L.S., & Sivakumaran, B. (2021). Service Failure and Recovery in B2B Markets – A Morphological Analysis. Journal of Business Research, 131(C), 763–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendul, J. C., & Blunck, H. (2019). The design space of production planning and control for industry 4.0. Computers in Industry, 105, 260–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogataj, D., Bogataj, M., & Hudoklin, D. (2017). Mitigating risks of perishable products in the cyber-physical systems based on the extended MRP model. International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 51–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bueno, A., Godinho Filho, M., & Frank, A. G. (2020). Smart production planning and control in the industry 4.0 context: A systematic literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 149, 106774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadavid, J. P. U., Lamouri, S., Grabot, B., Pellerin, R., & Fortin, A. (2020). Machine learning applied in production planning and control: a state-of-the-art in the era of industry 4.0.Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing,1–28

  • Chapman, S. N. (2006). The fundamentals of production planning and control. Pearson Prentice Hall

  • Chergui, A., Hadj-Hamou, K., & Vignat, F. (2018). Production scheduling and nesting in additive manufacturing. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 126, 292–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chien, C. F., Dou, R., & Fu, W. (2018). Strategic capacity planning for smart production: Decision modeling under demand uncertainty. Applied Soft Computing, 68, 900–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, T. M., Wallace, S. W., & Wang, Y. (2018). Big data analytics in operations management. Production and Operations Management, 27(10), 1868–1883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dallasega, P., Rojas, R. A., Bruno, G., & Rauch, E. (2019). An agile scheduling and control approach in ETO construction supply chains. Computers in Industry 112,103122

  • Dallasega, P., Rojas, R. A., Rauch, E., & Matt, D. T. (2017). Simulation based validation of supply chain effects through ICT enabled real-time-capability in ETO production planning. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 846–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darvish, K., Wanderlingh, F., Bruno, B., Simetti, E., Mastrogiovanni, F., & Casalino, G. (2018). Flexible human–robot cooperation models for assisted shop-floor tasks. Mechatronics, 51, 97–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalenogare, L. S., Benitez, G. B., Ayala, N. F., & Frank, A. G. (2018). The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 204, 383–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engels (1845). The Condition of the Working Class in England. London: Penguin Classics

    Google Scholar 

  • Fera, M., Macchiaroli, R., Fruggiero, F., & Lambiase, A. (2020). A modified tabu search algorithm for the single-machine scheduling problem using additive manufacturing technology. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 11, 401–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. G., Dalenogare, L. S., & Ayala, N. F. (2019). Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 210, 15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gräßlera, I., & Pöhlera, A. (2018). Intelligent devices in a decentralized production system concept. Procedia CIRP, 67, 116–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel, A., Ganesh, L. S., & Kaur, A. (2019). Sustainability integration in the management of construction projects: A morphological analysis of over two decades’ research literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236, 117676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gölzer, P., & Fritzsche, A. (2017). Data-driven operations management: organisational implications of the digital transformation in industrial practice. Production planning and Control, 28(16), 1332–1343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grundstein, S., Freitag, M., & Scholz-Reiter, B. (2017). A new method for autonomous control of complex job shops–Integrating order release, sequencing and capacity control to meet due dates. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 42, 11–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huo, J., Chan, F. T. S., Lee, C. K. M., Strandhagen, J. O., & Niu, B. (2020). Smart control of the assembly process with a fuzzy control system in the context of Industry 4.0. Advanced Engineering Informatics

  • Helo, P., & Hao, Y. (2017). Cloud manufacturing system for sheet metal processing. Production Planning & Control, 28(6–8), 524–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao, Y., Helo, P., & Angappa, G. (2019). Cloud platforms for remote monitoring system: a comparative case study. Production Planning and Control, 31(2–3), 186–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosahalli, D., & Srinivas, K. G. (2020). Enhanced reinforcement learning assisted dynamic power management model for internet-of‐things centric wireless sensor network. IET Communications, 14(21), 3748–3760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horstkemper, D., & Hellingrath, B. (2016). Employing Order Allocation Flexibility in Cyber-physical Production Systems. Procedia CIRP, 57, 345–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D., Tsipoulanidis, A., & Schönberger, J. (2018). Digital Supply Chain, Smart Operations and Industry 4.0. In Universitext; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Berlin, Germany

  • Jacobs, F. R., Berry, W. L., Whybark, D. C., & Vollmann, T. E. (2018). Manufacturing planning and control for supply chain management: The CPIM Reference (2nd ed.).). McGraw-Hill Education

  • Jiang, Z., Jin, Y., Mingcheng, E., & Li, Q. (2017). Distributed Dynamic Scheduling for Cyber-Physical Production Systems Based on a Multi-Agent System. IEEE ACCESS, 6, 1855–1869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi, S., Kwon, S., & Ning, F. (2021). Energy-aware production scheduling for additive manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ke, G., Chen, R. S., Chen, Y. C., Wang, S., & Zhang, X. (2020). Using ant colony optimisation for improving the execution of material requirements planning for smart manufacturing.Enterprise Information Systems, pp.1–23

  • Kagermann, H., Helbig, J., & Hellinger, A. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0: Securing the future of German manufacturing industry. Final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. In Acatech.

  • Kim, H., Lim, D. E., & Lee, S. (2020). Deep learning-based dynamic scheduling for semiconductor manufacturing with high uncertainty of automated material handling system capability. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 33, 13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. W., & Kim, S. K. (2020). Interactive job sequencing system for small make-to-order manufacturers under smart manufacturing environment. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 13, 524–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, X. T. R., Fang, J., Luo, H., & Huang, G. Q. (2015). Cloud-enabled real-time platform for adaptive planning and control in auction logistics centre. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 84, 79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ku, C. C., Chien, C. F., & Ma, K. T. (2020). Digital transformation to empower smart production for Industry 3.5 and an empirical study for textile dyeing. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 142, 106297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S., Purohit, B. S., Manjrekar, V., Singh, V., & Lad, B. K. (2018). Investigating the value of integrated operations planning: A case-based approach from automotive industry. International Journal of Production Research, 56(22), 6971–6992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laili, Y., Lin, S., & Tang, D. (2020). Multi-phase integrated scheduling of hybrid tasks in cloud manufacturing environment. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 61, 101850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, D., Meng, X., Li, M., & Tian, Y. (2016). An ACO-based intercell scheduling approach for job shop cells with multiple single processing machines and one batch processing machine. Journal of Intelligent manufacturing, 27(2), 283–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q., Kucukkoc, I., & Zhang, D. Z. (2017). Production planning in additive manufacturing and 3D printing. Computers & Operations Research, 83, 157–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, P., Li, M., Kong, X., Chen, J., Huang, G. Q., & Wang, M. (2018). Synchronisation for smart factory-towards IoT-enabled mechanisms. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 31(7), 624–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik, S., & Kim, D. (2020). A Hybrid Scheduling Mechanism Based on Agent Cooperation Mechanism and Fair Emergency First in Smart Factory. Ieee Access : Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 8, 227064–227075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, G. G., Wortmann, J. C., & Szirbik, N. B. (2011). Production monitoring and control with intelligent products. International Journal of Production Research, 49(5), 1303–1317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeuf, A., Pellerin, R., Lamouri, S., Tamayo-Giraldo, S., & Barbaray, R. (2018). The industrial management of SMEs in the era of Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research, 56(3), 1118–1136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mourtzis, D., & Vlachou, K. (2019). A cloud-based cyber-physical system for adaptive shop-floor scheduling and condition-based maintenance. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 47, 79–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Nia, A. R., Awasthi, A., & Bhuiyan, N. (2021). Industry 4.0 and demand forecasting of the energy supply chain. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 154, 107128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nind, M. (2006). Conducting systematic review in education: a reflexive narrative. London Review of Education, 4, 183–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nouiri, M., Trentesaux, D., & Bekrar, A. (2019). Towards energy efficient scheduling of manufacturing systems through collaboration between cyber physical production and energy systems. Energies, 12(23), 4448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, T. L., & Tomlin, B. (2020). Industry 4.0: Opportunities and Challenges for Operations Management. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 22(1), 113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Occupational Safety and Health Administration (2021). Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Manual.” Accessed July 11, 2021. https://www.osha.gov/data/sic-manual

  • Oluyisola, O. E., Bhalla, S., Fabio Sgarbossa, Jan, O., & Strandhagen (2022). Designing and developing smart production planning and control systems in the industry 4.0 era: a methodology and case study. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 33, 311–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oluyisola, O. E., Sgarbossa, F., Jan, O., & Strandhagen (2020). Smart Production Planning and Control: Concept, Use-Cases and Sustainability Implications. Sustainability, 12(9), 3791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okpoti, E. S., & Jeong, I. J. (2021). A reactive decentralized coordination algorithm for event-driven production planning and control: A cyber-physical production system prototype case study. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 58, 143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pei, W., Ma, X., Deng, W., Chen, X., Sun, H., & Li, D. (2019). Industrial multi-energy and production management scheme in cyber‐physical environments: a case study in a battery manufacturing plant. IET Cyber‐Physical Systems: Theory & Applications, 4(1), 13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiao, F., Liu, J., & Ma, Y. (2020). Industrial big-data-driven and CPS-based adaptive production scheduling for smart manufacturing.International Journal of Production Research,1–21

  • Rauch, E., Dallasega, P., & Matt, D. T. (2018). Complexity reduction in engineer-to-order industry through real-time capable production planning and control. Production Engineering, 12(3), 341–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchey, T. (2011). Wicked problems–social messes: Decision support modelling with morphological analysis. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rossit, D. A., Tohme, F., & Frutos, M. (2019). Production planning and scheduling in Cyber-Physical Production Systems: a review. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 32(4–5), 385–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, P. M., & Blackhurst, J. (2020). Industry 4.0 and resilience in the supply chain: a driver of capability enhancement or capability loss? International Journal of Production Research, 58, 1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlegel, A., Birkel, H. S., & Hartmann, E. (2020). Enabling integrated business planning through big data analytics: a case study on sales and operations planning. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 51(6), 656–682

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, R. W., & Saldanha, I. J. (2019). How should systematic reviewers handle conference abstracts? A view from the trenches. Systematic Reviews, 8, 1–6

  • Sunder, M. V., Ganesh, L. S., & Marathe, R. R. (2018). A morphological analysis of research literature on Lean Six Sigma for services. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38, 149–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunder, M. V., Ganesh, L. S., & Marathe, R. R. (2019). Dynamic capabilities: A morphological analysis framework and agenda for future research. European Business Review, 31, 25–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudhindra, S., Ganesh, L. S., & Arshinder, K. (2014). Classification of supply chain knowledge: a morphological approach. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18, 812–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, W. H., & Lu, Y. H. (2018). A framework of production planning and control with carbon tax under industry 4.0. Sustainability, 10(9), 3221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaccari, M., di Capaci, R. B., Brunazzi, E., Tognotti, L., Pierno, P., Vagheggi, R., & Pannocchia, G. (2020). Implementation of an Industry 4.0 system to optimally manage chemical plant operation. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 53(2), 11545–11550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valizadeh, S., Valilai, F., O., & Houshmand, M. (2020). Flexible flow line scheduling considering machine eligibility in a digital dental laboratory. International Journal of Production Research, 58(21), 6513–6531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y., & Chen, M. (2018). An internet of things-based framework to enhance just-in-time manufacturing. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 232(13): 2353–2363

  • Yang, W., Li, W., Cao, Y., Luo, Y., & He, L. (2020). An Information Theory Inspired Real-Time Self-Adaptive Scheduling for Production-Logistics Resources: Framework, Principle, and Implementation. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 20, 7007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, Y., Stecke, K., & Li, D. (2018). The Evolution of Production Systems from Industry 2.0 Through Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 848–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, C., Zhang, W., Xu, X., Ji, Y., & Yu, S. (2018). Data mining based multi-level aggregate service planning for cloud manufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 29(6), 1351–1361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Liu, S., Liu, Y., Yang, H., Li, M., Huisingh, D., & Wang, L. (2018). The ‘Internet of Things’ enabled real-time scheduling for remanufacturing of automobile engines. Journal of Cleaner Production, 185, 562–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, M., & Wu, K. (2017). Smart spare parts management systems in semiconductor manufacturing. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(4), 754–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky, F. (1969). Discovery, invention, research through the morphological approach. New York: Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Management Development Institute Gurgaon, Gurgaon, India

    Anupama Prashar

Authors
  1. Anupama Prashar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anupama Prashar.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prashar, A. Title: production planning and control in industry 4.0 environment: a morphological analysis of literature and research agenda. J Intell Manuf 34, 2513–2528 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-01958-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-01958-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation