Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exporting barriers: Insights from Portuguese small- and medium-sized exporters and non-exporters

  • Published:
Journal of International Entrepreneurship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to identify some of the major barriers that may hinder potential exporters and non-exporters from exporting their operations. Both parametric and semi-parametric binary choice models were used to analyze the data with the aim of assessing which of the major barriers detected can better explain the surveyed SMEs' decision to export or not. Six out of the 23 distinct barriers defined initially in the survey were found as statistically significant determiners of the probability that a surveyed SME firm would be a non-exporter. If public agents are interested in promoting and implementing the most effective mechanisms to stimulate exporting of domestic firms, several policy measures are advisable in order to minimize or alleviate the perceived inhibiting impact of barriers on SME firms' exporting decisions. In summary, results from the study revealed that non-exporters consider the lack of knowledge of potential markets, lack of qualified export personnel, lack of technical suitability, degree of competition in the sector, lack of financial assistance (governmental and financial institutions), and lack of qualified human resources as the main export barriers. By comparison, exporters perceived warehousing and control of the physical product flow in the target market to be the biggest barrier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Cameron and Trivedi (2005) for details.

  2. A revision of the advantages and disadvantages of parametric models when compared to semi-parametric models can be found in Bult (1993). This author defines MSCORE procedures and compares its performance with some parametric models.

References

  • Albaum G, Strandskov J, Derr E (2002) International marketing and export management, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley, Harlow, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong J, Overton T (1977) Estimating non-response bias in mail-surveys. J Mark Res XIV:396–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayyagari M, Beck T, Demirguc-Kunt A (2007) Small and medium enterprises across globe. Small Bus Econ 29:415–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilkey W, Tesar G (1977) The export behaviour of small-sized Wisconsin manufacturing firms. J Int Bus Stud 8:93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilkey W (1978) An attempted integration of the literature on the export behavior of firms. J Int Bus Stud, Spring/Summer, 33–46

  • Bult J (1993) Semiparametric versus parametric classification models: an application to direct marketing. J Mark Res 30:380–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgel C, Murray G (2000) The international market entry choices of start-up companies in high-technology industries. J Int Mark 8(2):33–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron A, Trivedi P (2005) Microeconometrics methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmines E, Zeller R (1979) Reliability and validity assessment. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavusgil S, Zou S (1994) Marketing strategy performance relationship: an investigation of the empirical link in export market ventures. J Mark 58:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cateora P, Graham J (2001) International marketing. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook V (1983) Marketing strategy and differential advantage. J Market 47:64–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Czinkota M, Ronkainen I (2001) International marketing. The Dryden Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006) Small and medium enterprises and the European economy. Retrieved October, 2007. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/smes/index.eu.htm

  • Fletcher R, Bell J, McNaughton R (2004) Int e-Bus Mark. Thompson Learning, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin R, Pustay M (1996) International business: a managerial perspective. Addison-Wesley, Harlow, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook R, Czinkota M (1988) Export activities and prospects of Hawaiian firms. Int Mark Rev 5(4):51–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson J, Vahlne J (1977) The internationalization process of the firm-A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. J Int Bus Stud 8(Spring/Summer):23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson J, Vahlne J (1990) The mechanism of internationalization. Int Mark Rev 7(4):11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsikeas E, Morgan R (1994) Differences in perceptions of exporting problems based on firm size and export market experience. Eur J Mark 28(5):17–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsikeas E, Skarmeas D (2003) Organisational and managerial drivers of effective export sales organisations. Eur J Mark 37(11/12):1723–1745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kedia B, Chhokar J (1986) Factors inhibiting export performance of firms: an empirical investigation. Manag Int Rev 26(4):33–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Lages L, Montgomery D (2004) Export performance as an antecedent of export commitment and marketing strategy adaptation. Eur J Mark 38(9/10):1186–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonidou L (1994) Empirical research of export stimuli: review and synthesis, working paper, Department of Public and Business Administration, School of Economics and Management, University of Cyprus, Nicosia

  • Leonidou L (1995) Export barriers: non-exporters’ perceptions. Int Mark Rev 12(1):4–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonidou L (2004) An analysis of the barriers hindering small business export development. J Small Bus Manag 24(3):279–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonidou L, Katsikeas C (1996) The export development process: a review of empirical models. J Int Bus Stud 27(3):545–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonidou L, Katsikeas C, Piercy N (1998) Identifying managerial influences on exporting: past research and future directions. J Int Mark 6(2):74–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu J, Beamish P (2001) The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strat Manag J 2(6–7):565–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manski CF, Thompson T (1986) Operational characteristics of maximum score estimation. J Econ 32:85–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan R (1997) Export stimuli and export barriers: evidence from empirical research studies. Eur Bus Rev 97(2):68–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan R, Katsikeas C (1998) Exporting problems of industrial manufacturers. Ind Mark Manag 27:161–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon J, Lee H (1990) On the internal correlates of export stage development: an empirical investigation in the Korean electronics industry. Int Mark Rev 7(5):16–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabino S (1980) An examination of barriers to exporting encountered by small manufacturing companies. Manag Int Rev 20(1):67–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson R, Pearce J (1988) Planned patterns of strategic behaviour and their relationships to business-unit performance. Strateg Manag J 9:43–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocha A, Freitas Y, Silva J (2008) Do perceived barriers change over time? A longitudinal study of Brazilian exporters of manufactured goods. Lat Am Bus Rev 9(1):102–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samiee S, Walters P (2002) Export education: perceptions of sporadic and regular exporting firms. Int Mark Rev 19(1):80–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharf F, Bell J, Loane S, Fletcher R (2004) The export problems of internationalizing SMEs: some empirical evidence using a “critical incident” technique. In: Jones M, Dimitratos P (eds) Emerging paradigms in international entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar, Chetenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey T, Lim J, Kim K (1989) Export development and perceived export barriers: an empirical analysis of small firms. Manag Int Rev 29(2):33–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw V, Darroch J (2004) Barriers to internationalisation: a study of entrepreneurial new ventures in New Zealand. J Int Entrep 2:327–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlegelmilch B, Crook J (1988) Firm-level determinants of export intensity. Manag Decis Econ 9:291–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra V, Sarathy R (2000) International marketing. Dryden Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesfom G, Lutz C (2006) A classification of export marketing problems of small and medium sized manufacturing firms in developing countries. Int J Emerg Mark 1(3):262–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young S, Hamill J, Wheeler C, Davies R (1989) International market entry and development. Englewood Cliffs, Pretince-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou S, Stan S (1998) The determinants of export performance: a review of the empirical literature between 1987 and 1997. Int Mark Rev 15(5):333–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Carlos Pinho.

Additional information

The authors are grateful to the Editor (Prof. Hamid Etemad) and the three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and valuable ideas on earlier versions of the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pinho, J.C., Martins, L. Exporting barriers: Insights from Portuguese small- and medium-sized exporters and non-exporters. J Int Entrep 8, 254–272 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-010-0046-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-010-0046-x

Keywords

Navigation