Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Global Trends and World Order: Implications for New Industrial Policies in Developing Countries

  • Published:
Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we take stock of recent debates in scholarly work and actual policymaking practice on industrial policy. Moreover, the paper identifies how developing countries are responding to structural trends such as digitalization, decarbonization and recalibration of global production, which are shaping the future of industrial development, and the scope of industrial policy. These trends are compounded with short-term effects from post-pandemic recovery, international conflict, and macroeconomic instability. Furthermore, the paper examines trends in industrialized countries towards the explicit use of industrial policies to promote and safeguard strategic national interests. All these factors result in an increasingly complex environment around industrial development which should open opportunities and challenges for developing countries. We offer some recommendations for industrial policy in developing countries, in ways that balance between national interests, the scope for regional coordination and collaboration, the international governance around industrialization, and the commitments of the global community towards the UN 2030 Development Agenda and its associated Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors require this statement considering UNIDO's situation vis-a-vis its Member States and the need to dicharge the Organization of any responsibility regarding content in this publication.

Notes

  1. Emphasis in the source.

  2. Emphasis in the source.

  3. According to Constantinescu et al. (2019), should trade tensions intensify and affect investors’ confidence, up to 30.7 million people could slide into poverty at levels below $5.50 a day under a worst-case scenario, with serious long-term consequences in GVCs.

  4. See, for instance, Warwick (2013).

  5. See UNIDO (2023) for the complete analysis, and Annex I for the methodological details on how these indicators are constructed.

  6. Advanced digital production technologies combine hardware (advanced robots and 3D printers), software (big data analytics, cloud computing, and artificial intelligence), and connectivity (the Internet Things) (UNIDO 2019).

  7. According to IEA (2022), energy efficiency actions accelerated globally in 2022 after several years of slow progress. Global investments in energy efficiency—such as building renovations, public transport and electric car infrastructure—reached 560 billion USD in 2022.

  8. The manufacturing sample is from the FactSet Supply Chain Relationships dataset which includes information on companies and the geographic locations of their suppliers during various time periods (Falk et al. 2021).

  9. The UN 2023 Financing for Sustainable Development Report, for instance, advocates a “revolutionary financial and industrial development” to accelerate the progress on the achievement of the SDGs.

  10. For a discussion, see Santiago and Komendantova (2022).

  11. Santiago (2018a) and Santiago and Horst (2018) illustrate these multistakeholder policy making processes in context of the fourth industrial revolution.

  12. Regarding the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement), African Group (2023a, 5) compels the WTO “to ensure that trade rules provide a better balance between protection and incentives to promote research and innovations on the one hand and the unfolding needs of society on the other” and to further facilitate technology transfer from developed to developing countries.

  13. Emphasis in the original source.

  14. We kept only those official indicators for which it would be possible to cover at least half of the countries included in each region considered. See Annex Table 5 for the details.

  15. Available at https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/dataportal.

  16. This is based on the Note by the Secretariat PBC.39/11 of 14 March 2023, titled “Lists of States included in Annex I to the Constitution of UNIDO.” The lists are a classification established by the United Nations. UNIDO continued the classification when it became a specialized agency in 1985. Lists A, C ,and D can be associated with the industrializing world. List A includes economies from Africa and Asia-Pacific; List C, economies from LAC; and list D, economies from Eastern Europe.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nobuya Haraguchi.

Ethics declarations

Disclaimer

While the authors are professional staff at the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), the views expressed here are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of UNIDO or its Member States.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Annex

Annex

1.1 Methodology to Assess SDG 9 Progress: Indicators and Benchmarks

There are three analytical dimensions to assess SDG 9, namely industry, infrastructure, and innovation. Each of the three dimensions combines multiple indicators (see Annex Table 4). In the analysis, however, we could not include all the official indicators listed in the SDGs due to constraints in data availability.Footnote 14

Table 4 Official indicators included in each dimension of SDG 9

For each indicator, the data was extracted from the official SDG Global Database.Footnote 15 After filling in several gaps in data using standard statistical techniques, we defined specific targets and calculated the distance of each country to that target. Whenever possible, the target was defined using the ideal target implicit in the 2030 Agenda. This is the case, for instance, in indicator 9.C.1., “Proportion of population covered by a mobile network, by technology” where the target was set to 100%. For all the rest, the target was defined based on the best performance in all countries with available data between 2000 and 2021, after excluding outliers. Indicators were then normalized between zero and one (the latter representing optimal target achievement) and aggregated by dimension at the country level using arithmetic means. Finally, country-level indicators by dimensions were aggregated at the regional and sub-regional levels using population-weighted averages.

As there is no common definition of what constitutes the developing world, we focus on all low- and middle-income countries (following the most updated World Bank classification by income level) and selected high-income countries which are part of Lists A, C, and D included in Annex I to the Constitution of UNIDO.Footnote 16 Within this group, we distinguished four regions: Africa, Asia-Pacific, Eastern Europe, and Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC).

Table 5 Official SDG indicators, data availability by region, and relevance for the analysis

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santiago, F., Haraguchi, N. & Lavopa, A. Global Trends and World Order: Implications for New Industrial Policies in Developing Countries. J Ind Compet Trade 24, 5 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-024-00419-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-024-00419-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation