Skip to main content
Log in

Services and the Single Market

  • Published:
Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The single market programme of the EU covers services as one of the four fundamental freedoms. While the legislative effort has been impressive and positive results evident in areas such as mobile telephony and low cost air transport, the impact on many services has been weak as yet. This holds in particular true for a group of services that share specific characteristics such as the overriding importance of quality, the existence of asymmetric information and the need to produce in a tailor-made way. The combination of these characteristics and trends such as globalisation, the usage of ICT and enlargement, calls for a fresh view on the functioning of the single market. An effective future single market is based on a bottom up approach, integrating single market policies with other policies, starting from the functioning of national markets and being less uniform in nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. With the exception of certain basic provisions such as non-discrimination.

  2. For an overview of measurement issues relating to productivity in UK market services see Crespi et al (2006). A more detailed examination of these issues for the USA is provided by Triplett and Bosworth (2004).

  3. Labour productivity for non-market services can not be reliably established. For an extensive discussion of measurement of productivity for non-market services see the Atkinson Review: Final Report (2005).

  4. For the EU as a whole, intra-EU trade is part of domestic production. However, since the purpose here is to indicate the extent to which services can be traded cross-border, total trade (intra + extra EU) is used here to calculate the ratio.

  5. For a further examination of services divided into contact and intermediation categories, see Haskel (2007).

  6. Within the EU of course exports should equal imports apart from reporting errors.

  7. The OECD data would appear to overstate the growth of US firms relative to European ones since American start ups employ less people than those in Europe.

  8. For a recent overview of challenges to the single market see Delgado (2007).

  9. Haskel and Marrano (2007) in a similar exercise for the UK arrived at very comparable results.

References

  • Aghion, Cohen and Pisani-Ferry, Politique économique et croissance en Europe, La documentation française, 2006.

  • Ambler, T., and Boyfield, K., “Route map to reform: deregulation,” Adam Smith Institute, 2005.

  • Atkinson Review: Final Report, Measurement of Government Output and Productivity for the National Accounts. Macmillan: New York, 2005

  • Baily, M. N., Farrell, D., and Remes, J., McKinsey Global Institute, ‘Where US productivity is growing’, McKinsey Quarterly, Number 2, 2006.

  • Berger, H., and Danninger, S., “Labor and product market deregulation: partial, sequential, or simultaneous reform?” IMF Working Paper No. 05/277, 2005.

  • Corrado, C., Hulten, C., and Sichel, D., ‘Intangible capital and economic growth’, Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2006-24, Federal Reserve Board, 2006.

  • Crespi, C., Criscuolo, C., Haskel, J., and Hawkes, D., “Measuring and understanding productivity in UK market services”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 22, no. 4, 2006.

  • Delgado, J., “New challenges of the EU single market” Bruegel, ec.europa.eu/internal_market/strategy/docs/bruegel/jdelgado_en.pdf., 2007.

  • DIW, “Potential Migration from Central and Eastern Europe into the EU-15—An Update”, 2003.

  • Eurobarometer (2005) 64.1 on geographical and labour market mobility—September 2005.

  • European Commission (2005a) ‘Evaluation of the Performance of Network Industries Providing Services of General Economic Interest, 2005 Report’ Commission Staff Working Document

  • European Commission (2005b), The EU economy 2005 review ‘Rising International Economic Integration Opportunities and Challenges’

  • European Commission (2005c) ‘Second Implementation Report of the Internal Market Strategy 2003–2006’

  • European Commission (2006) ‘Report on the Functioning of the Transitional Arrangements set out in the 2003 Accession Treaty (period 1 May 2004–30 April 2006)’, COM(2006) 48 final of 8.2.2006

  • European Commission (2007) ‘Mergers & Acquisitions Note’, No. 4 April 2007

  • Farrell, D. ‘Improving European competitiveness’, McKinsey Global Institute: Washington, DC, 2003.

  • Farrell, D. ‘How Germany can win from offshoring’, McKinsey Global Institute: Washington, DC, 2004.

  • Haskel, J., “Measuring innovation and productivity in a knowledge-based service economy,” Economic and Labour Market Review, vol. 1, pp. 27–31, 2007

  • Haskel, J., and Marrano, M.G., “How much does the UK invest in intangible assets?”, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 6287, May 2007

  • Javorcik, B., and Spatareanu, M., “Do foreign investors care about labor market regulations”? CEPR Discussion Paper No. 4839, 2005.

  • Jensen, J.B., and Kletzer, L.G., “Tradable Services: understanding the scope and impact of services outsourcing,” Institute for International Economics Working Paper 05-9, 2006.

  • Kaufmann, D., and Kraay, A., “Governance matters III: Governance indicators for 1996–2002”. The World Bank, Working Paper 3106, 2003.

  • Kox, H., and Arjan, Lejour, “Regulatory heterogeneity as obstacle for international services trade’, CPB Discussion paper 2005.

  • McKinsey Global Institute, “Sweden’s Economic Performance-Recent Development, Current Priorities”, May 2006, “Portugal 2010”, 2003, “Reaching Higher Productivity Growth in France and Germany”, 2002, “Poland’s Economic Performance”, 2000, “Driving Productivity and Growth in the U.K. Economy”, 1998, “Boosting Dutch Economic Performance”, 1997.

  • OECD, ‘Regulatory reform in road freight and retail distribution’, Economics Department Working Papers No. 255 by Olivier Boylaud, 2000.

  • OECD, ‘Summary indicators of product market regulation with an extension to employment protection legislation’, Economics Department Working Papers No 226 by Giuseppe Nicoletti, Stefano Scarpetta and Olivier Boylaud, 2001a.

  • OECD, ‘Regulatory reform in retail distribution’ by Olivier Boylaud and Giuseppe Nicoletti OECD Economic Studies No. 32, 2001/I, 2001b.

  • OECD, Scarpetta, Hemmings, Tressel and Woo ‘The role of policy and institutions for productivity and firm dynamics: evidence from micro and industry data’, OECD Economics Department Working Papers No 329, 2002.

  • OECD, ‘The EU’s single market: At Your Service?’ by Line Vogt, Economics Department Working Paper 449, 2005a.

  • OECD, ‘Product market regulation in OECD countries: 1998 TO 2003’, Economics Department Working Papers No. 419 by Paul Conway, Véronique Janod, Giuseppe Nicoletti, 2005b.

  • OECD, ‘Regulation and Economic Performance: Product market reforms and productivity in the OECD’, Economics Department Working Papers No. 460 by Nicoletti and Stefano Scarpetta, 2005c.

  • OECD, ‘Economic Surveys: Germany-Volume 2006 Issue 8: Fostering product market competition would have large benefits’, OECD Economic Surveys, vol. 2006, no. 8, pp. 144–185.

  • Picker Institute, “Assessing the quality of information to support people in making decisions about their health and healthcare”, 2006.

  • Rubalcaba, L., ‘Services in European Policies’, College of Europe, BEEP briefing no. 16, 2007.

  • Sapir et al (2004), ‘An Agenda for a Growing Europe’ (Sapir report), OUP

  • Sverdrup, U., ‘How enlargement challenges the institutions—or the existence—of the European Economic Area, Arena, Centre for European Studies, Working Paper 05/02, 2005.

  • Triplet, J.E., and Bosworth, B.P., ‘Productivity in the U.S. Services Sector’, Brookings Institution Press: Washington, DC, 2004.

  • UK Home Office, ‘The economic and fiscal impact of immigration’, October 2007 and ‘Accession Monitoring Reports’ A8 Countries, 2007.

  • Van Ark, B., Inklaar, R., McGuckin, R.H., and Timmer, M.P., ‘The Employment Effects of the “New Economy” A Comparison of the European Union and the United States’, The Conference Board., 2003.

  • Van Ark Bart, ‘Europe’s productivity gap: catching up or getting stuck?’, Conference Board working papers, 2005.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Roger Liddle and to European Commission services for commenting on various drafts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter M. Smith.

Additional information

The views expressed in this article are the views of the authors and not necessarily those of the European Commission. At the time of writing, both authors were at the Bureau of European Policy Advisers, European Commission.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Canoy, M., Smith, P.M. Services and the Single Market. J Ind Compet Trade 8, 319–347 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-008-0041-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-008-0041-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation