Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Silvicultural practices, forest age, forest type, and large-scale regional factors influencing numbers of American burying beetles, Nicrophorus americanus (Coleoptera: Silphidae)

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The federally threatened American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus previously occurred throughout much of eastern North America but now is self-sustaining only on an eastern island and along the western edge of the historic range. The beetle occurred on landscapes managed by Weyerhaeuser Company for timber production, providing an opportunity to evaluate possible effects of silvicultural practices on the species. For 1997–2007, fluctuating densities were low on these lands in southeastern Oklahoma and southwestern Arkansas. We recaptured 23.0% of individuals (all within same year), 27.4% of those at different sites (1.40 km mean distance moved; longest 4.25 km). Comparable surveys at Fort Chaffee, Arkansas (185 km north) and Camp Gruber, Oklahoma (209 km north-northwest) during 1998–2004 demonstrated for Weyerhaeuser-Chaffee near-perfect correspondence in beetle densities expressed as percentage change from previous year but no relationship for Weyerhaeuser-Gruber. The species regionally may be bivoltine with Weyerhaeuser and Chaffee sampled in the second generation and Gruber in the first. The close Weyerhaeuser-Chaffee association indicates numbers were influenced substantially by non-local factors, although given the data in hand we were unable to demonstrate association of climatic factors with beetle relative densities or density changes. No clear-cutting effect on beetle densities was demonstrated. Increases occurred 2 years after a partial cut compared to the prior year. Beetles used pole (13–29 years old) and mature (30–50) sites less often than expected and sapling (5–12) and delayed-harvest (> 50) sites more frequently. For delayed-harvest sites, beetles frequented hardwood (≥ 75% hardwood) less than pine (≥ 75%) or mixed hardwood-pine sites. There were differences relative to stand age and type, but large-scale regional factors probably influenced numbers more than silvicultural practices. Low numbers in southeastern Oklahoma, coupled with substantial year-to-year fluctuations, elevated extirpation risk. Extirpation in the study area likely occurred in 2006 or shortly thereafter, possibly influenced by increases in red imported fire ants, Solenopsis invicta.

Implications for insect conservation

Our study highlights that multiple factors influence numbers of the American burying beetle. Our findings suggest it would be fruitful for investigators to devote further attention to broader regional factors that affect year-to-year variation in such numbers. Silvicultural practices can affect beetle numbers in positive or negative ways, influences that fluctuate through the various stages involved in managing forested landscapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Electronic supplementary tables are provided.

References

  • Allen CR, Lutz RS, Demarais S (1995) Red imported fire ant impacts on northern bobwhite populations. Ecol Appl 5:632–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RS (1982) On the decreasing abundance of Nicrophorus americanus Olivier (Coleoptera: Silphidae) in eastern North America. Coleopt Bull 36:362–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer KK (2010) Past, present and future status of the endangered American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus) in Texas. Thesis, University of Texas, Austin

  • Bedick JC, Ratcliffe BC, Hoback WW, Higley LG (1999) Distribution, ecology, and population dynamics of the American burying beetle [Nicrophorus americanus Olivier (Coleoptera, Silphidae)] in south-central Nebraska, USA. J Insect Conserv 3:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellanos AA, Medeiros MCI, Hamer GL, Morrow ME, Eubanks MD, Teel PD, Hamer SA, Light JE (2016) Decreased small mammal and on-host tick abundance in association with invasive red imported fire ants (Solenopsis invicta). Biol Lett 12:20160463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creighton JC, Schnell GD (1998) Short-term movement patterns of the endangered American burying beetle Nicrophorus americanus. Biol Conserv 86:281–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creighton JC, Vaughn CC, Chapman BR (1993) Habitat preference of the endangered American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus) in Oklahoma. Southwest Nat 38:275–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creighton JC, Bastarache R, Lomolino MV, Belk MC (2009) Effect of forest removal on the abundance of the endangered American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus (Coleoptera: Silphidae). J Insect Conserv 13:37–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurzenski J, Snethen DG, Brust ML, Hoback WW (2011) New records of carrion beetles in Nebraska reveal increased presence of the American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus Olivier (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Great Plains Res 21:131–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurzenski J, Jorgensen CF, Bishop A, Grosse R, Riens J, Hoback WW (2014) Identifying priority conservation areas for the American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus (Coleoptera: Silphidae), a habitat generalist. Syst Biodivers 12:149–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killion MJ, Grant WE, Vinson SB (1995) Response of Baiomys taylori to changes in density of imported fire ants. J Mammal 76:141–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozol AJ, Scott MP, Traniello JFA (1988) The American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus: studies on the natural history of a declining species. Psyche 95:167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaMotte Company (1994) Soil texture unit. LaMotte Company, Chestertown, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Leasure DR, Hoback WW (2017) Distribution and habitat of endangered American burying beetle in northern and southern regions. J Insect Conserv 21:75–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lechner KA, Ribble DO (1996) Behavioral interactions between red imported fire ants (Solenopsis invicta) and three rodent species of South Texas. Southwest Nat 41:123–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomolino MV, Creighton JC (1996) Habitat selection, breeding success and conservation of the endangered American burying beetle Nicrophorus americanus. Biol Conserv 77:235–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomolino MV, Creighton JC, Schnell GD, Certain DL (1995) Ecology and conservation of the endangered American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus). Conserv Biol 9:605–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masser MP, Grant WE (1986) Fire ant-induced trap mortality of small mammals in east-central Texas. Southwest Nat 31:540–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mckenna-Foster A, Perrotti L, Blyth J, LoPresti E (2016) Measuring success of a reintroduced population of the American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus Olivier) to Nantucket Island, MA. J Insect Conserv 20:895–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morehart MA, Gitzen RA, Terhune TM, Lepczyk CA, Sisson DC (2021) Changes in native small mammal populations with removal of invasive ant. J Mammal 102:1318–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mount RH (1981) The red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as a possible serious predator on some native southeastern vertebrates: direct observations and subjective impressions. J Alabama Acad Sci 52:71–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Peyton MM (2003) Range and population size of the American burying beetle (Coleoptera: Silphidae) in the dissected hills of south-central Nebraska. Great Plains Res 13:127–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Raithel CJ, Ginsberg HS, Prospero ML (2006) Population trends and flight behavior of the American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus (Coleoptera: Silphidae), on Block Island, RI. J Insect Conserv 10:317–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff BC (1995) Nebraska’s threatened and endangered species. American burying beetle. NEBRASKA land Mag and Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, Lincoln

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (2012) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 4th edn. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahlschmidt ZR, Walman RM, Mills AM (2018) Red imported fire ants (Solenopsis invicta) and seasonality influence community refuge use. Biol Invasions 20:2849–2859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschinkel WR (2006) The fire ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • US Fish and Wildlife Service (1989) Determination of endangered status for the American burying beetle. Fed Regist 54:29652–29655

    Google Scholar 

  • US Fish and Wildlife Service (2020) Reclassification of the American burying beetle from endangered to threatened with a Section 4(d) rule. Fed Regist 85:65241–65261

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieira Santos L (2020) The American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus) population at Camp Gruber OK breeding and overwintering survival. Thesis, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater

  • Vinson SB, Sorenson AA (1986) Imported fire ants: life history and impact. Texas Department of Agriculture, Austin

  • Walker TL Jr (2005) Eastern redcedar effects on Silphidae including American burying beetles (Nicrophorus americanus). Thesis, University of Nebraska at Kearney, Kearney

  • Walker TL Jr, Hoback WW (2007) Effects of invasive eastern redcedar on capture rates of Nicrophorus americanus and other Silphidae. Environ Entomol 36:297–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weyerhaeuser Company (1995) Habitat conservation plan for the American burying beetle on Weyerhaeuser Company Arkansas/Oklahoma timberlands, Little River County, Arkansas and McCurtain County, Oklahoma. Weyerhaeuser Company, De Queen, Arkansas

  • Woods AJ, Foti TL, Chapman SS, Omernik JM, Wise JA, Murray EO, Prior WL, Pagan JB Jr, Comstock JA, Radford M (2004) Ecoregions of Arkansas (map scale 1:1,000,000). US Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia

  • Woods AJ, Omernik JM, Butler DR, Ford JG, Henley JE, Hoagland BW, Arndt DS, Moran BC (2005) Ecoregions of Oklahoma (color poster with map, descriptive text summary tables, and photographs; map scale 1:1,250,000). US Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the numerous students who participated in annual surveys. Gary Arpin and Rich Heineman were very helpful in providing relevant data. Daniel Greene prepared Fig. 1. Helpful suggestions, comments, and assistance were provided by Darren Miller, Will McDearman, Daniel Greene, Curtis Creighton, and Bruce Hoagland. We also appreciate the comments and suggestions emanating from two anonymous reviewers.

Funding

Support of this research was provided by the Weyerhaeuser Company through numerous contracts with the University of Oklahoma.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary D. Schnell.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Appropriate federal and state Endangered Species permits were provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, and the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 271 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schnell, G.D., Hiott, A.E. & Smyth, V.L. Silvicultural practices, forest age, forest type, and large-scale regional factors influencing numbers of American burying beetles, Nicrophorus americanus (Coleoptera: Silphidae). J Insect Conserv 26, 593–618 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-022-00401-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-022-00401-7

Keywords

Navigation